Figure 1.
The Ω and Θ volumes adopted to determine the gETA component
Table 1.
The coefficients of model (Eq. 14) used in the calculations
| Coefficient | Value |
|---|---|
| a0 | 1.22499986 |
| a1 | −1.17606554 × 10−4 |
| a2 | 4.32023892 × 10−9 |
| a3 | −7.34343434 × 10−14 |
| a4 | 5.18648018 × 10−19 |
Figure 2.
The δgSA values for points with Hp = 2,500 m (red line) and Hp = 8,500 m (black line). The symbols in both charts indicate the dh values for which the calculations were performed.
Figure 3.
Relief maps of the study areas for a) the whole areas of elaboration and b) the Tatra mountains
Table 2.
The statistics of the determined components of atmospheric gravity correction (mGal)
| min | max | mean | st dev | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gTA | 0.012 | 0.108 | 0.033 | 0.019 | |
| gSA | 0.000 | 0.233 | 0.042 | 0.040 | |
| gETA | −0.012 | 0.125 | 0.009 | 0.021 | |
Figure 4.
The correlation between the height of computation points and the values of gTA – navy blue, gSA – green and gETA – red
Figure 5.
The gETA component: a) for the whole area of elaboration and b) for the Tatra mountains
Table 3.
The statistics of the δgatm and corrections as well as the differences, Δδgatm (mGal)
| min | max | max − min | mean | st dev | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δgatm | 0.643 | 0.875 | 0.232 | 0.833 | 0.039 |
| 0.748 | 0.886 | 0.138 | 0.865 | 0.021 | |
| Δδgatm | −0.105 | −0.011 | 0.094 | −0.032 | 0.018 |
Figure 6.
The correlations between the height of computation points and the corrections: – black and δgatm– orange
Figure 7.
The corrections a) for the whole area of elaboration and b) for the Tatra mountains
Figure 8.
The differences Δδgatm a) for the whole area of elaboration and b) for the Tatra mountains