Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Orbit Determination of Chinese Rocket Bodies from the Picosecond Full-Rate Laser Measurements Cover

Orbit Determination of Chinese Rocket Bodies from the Picosecond Full-Rate Laser Measurements

By: Paweł Lejba  
Open Access
|Jan 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Number of successful passes in years 2016–2021 registered by BORL sensor. The black line and labels represent all registered passes, including satellite and space debris. The gray line and labels show the number of successful passes specifically for space debris.
Number of successful passes in years 2016–2021 registered by BORL sensor. The black line and labels represent all registered passes, including satellite and space debris. The gray line and labels show the number of successful passes specifically for space debris.

Figure 2.

Pass of CZ-2C R/B (NORAD 31114) registered by Polish laser sensor on August 3, 2018, 22:10 UTC, showing slant ranges (top) and fit residuals (bottom) with 1900 valid returns. TCA means the time of closest approach. The min. and max. distances to the target were 1083 and 1750 km, respectively.
Pass of CZ-2C R/B (NORAD 31114) registered by Polish laser sensor on August 3, 2018, 22:10 UTC, showing slant ranges (top) and fit residuals (bottom) with 1900 valid returns. TCA means the time of closest approach. The min. and max. distances to the target were 1083 and 1750 km, respectively.

Figure 3.

Pass of CZ-2C R/B (NORAD 28480) registered by Polish laser sensor on April 21, 2018, 20:04 UTC, showing slant ranges (top) and fit residuals (bottom) with 869 valid returns. TCA means the time of closest approach (TCA). The min. and max. distances to the target were 1176 and 1621 km, respectively.
Pass of CZ-2C R/B (NORAD 28480) registered by Polish laser sensor on April 21, 2018, 20:04 UTC, showing slant ranges (top) and fit residuals (bottom) with 869 valid returns. TCA means the time of closest approach (TCA). The min. and max. distances to the target were 1176 and 1621 km, respectively.

Figure 4.

RMPOS determined for object 28480. The dotted line separates observational slots for object 28480. Slots are described in Table 5. The results obtained for scenarios 1, 2, and 3 are shown by the colors green, orange, and red, respectively.
RMPOS determined for object 28480. The dotted line separates observational slots for object 28480. Slots are described in Table 5. The results obtained for scenarios 1, 2, and 3 are shown by the colors green, orange, and red, respectively.

Figure 5.

RMPOS determined for object 31114. The dotted line separates observational slots for object 31114. Slots are described in Table 5. The results obtained for scenarios 1, 2, and 3 are shown by the colors green, orange, and red, respectively.
RMPOS determined for object 31114. The dotted line separates observational slots for object 31114. Slots are described in Table 5. The results obtained for scenarios 1, 2, and 3 are shown by the colors green, orange, and red, respectively.

Figure 6.

The sample results show the range errors in the RSW system for Scenario sc1-1 (object 28480). The red broken line indicates the determined alert time.
The sample results show the range errors in the RSW system for Scenario sc1-1 (object 28480). The red broken line indicates the determined alert time.

Figure 7.

The alert times for objects 28480 and 31114
The alert times for objects 28480 and 31114

Figure 8.

The results of comparing the semi-major axis determined using TLE ephemeris and laser measurements
The results of comparing the semi-major axis determined using TLE ephemeris and laser measurements

Figure 9.

The results of comparing the eccentricity axis determined using TLE ephemeris and laser measurements
The results of comparing the eccentricity axis determined using TLE ephemeris and laser measurements

The observational statistics for objects 28480 and 31114 from the years 2016 to 2022

2848031114
Lasernspsnsps
Passes259033230
Avg. returns597321860548
Avg. pass RMS [cm]24.982.1622.972.60
Avg. RB [m]30.8824.95−30.95−24.79
Avg. TB [ms]−117.65−120.016.783.34

RMSPOS, RMSVEL, and arc RMS determined for object 31114_ Results for scenario No_ 2 are highlighted with a gray background color_

NRSCERMSPOS [m]RMSVEL [m/s]Full-rate meas.Arc RMS [cm]
1sc1-1519.721.25121373.99
2sc1-2519.500.937110664.85
3sc1-3517.370.951513625.03
4sc1-4486.990.9245140211.50
5sc1-5495.130.965889712.85
6sc1-6523.720.95713132.49
7sc1-7648.470.564019005.53
8sc2-1519.721.25131373.93
9sc2-2251.680.869110665.02
10sc2-3356.220.791113625.01
11sc2-4335.000.8601140215.33
12sc2-5495.100.965789711.95
13sc2-6341.950.73073132.46
14sc2-7453.610.369119005.53
15sc3-1519.721.25121373.99
16sc3-215.700.113212036.19
17sc3-31.390.01122565110.55
18sc3-40.560.00413967374.04
19sc3-5495.130.965889712.85
20sc3-641.840.1580121014.45
21sc3-72.020.00733110131.05

The list of observations of objects 28480 and 31114 taken into orbital computations

Slot No.Date [mm.dd.yyyy]UTC timeDuration of meas. [mm:ss]No. of Full-rate meas.TB [ms]RB [m]Pass RMS [cm]
Object 28480
104.18.201821:1900:3856−116.9439.422.93
04.19.201820:5302:49459−129.48−14.102.86
04.20.201820:2804:41755−110.38−32.804.64
04.21.201820:0404:27869−104.9311.282.61
04.21.201821:4401:39146−106.7628.701.80
210.10.201820:2602:54592−137.14102.962.24
10.11.201820:0205:18305−130.5121.831.89
10.12.201819:3803:38184−121.5410.152.62
Object 31114
305.29.201820:5102:02137−18.5741.763.37
05.29.201822:2805:3910660.77−89.602.23
05.30.201822:0905:111362−19.37−42.733.60
05.31.201821:5007:3514028.09−3.523.43
408.01.201821:0506:3889741.16−15.753.53
08.02.201822:2903:5231323.33−17.541.98
08.03.201822:1005:121900−23.51−10.134.62

The basic parameters of the lasers used by the BORL sensor

LaserEKSPLA PL-2250Continuum Surelite III
StandOptical tableOptical table
Pulse width60 ps3–5 ns
Repetition rate10 Hz10 Hz
Pulse energy0.05 J0.45 J
Average power0.5 W4.5 W

Basic physical and orbital parameters of CZ-2C’s 28480 and 31114

ObjectCZ-2C R/BCZ-2C R/B
NORAD2848031114
COSPAR2004-046B2007-010B
Semi-major axis [km]71877207
Eccentricity0.014470290.0058965
Inclination [deg]98.0598.37
Height [m]8.4
Mass [kg]3800
Avg. cross section [m2]26.51

Observational statistics for CZ-2C's 28480 and 31114 from 2017 to 2018

NORAD2848031114
YearPassesReturnsNormal pointsMean pass RMS [cm]PassesReturnsNormal pointsMean pass RMS [cm]
20173617,8302598.675649,3355029.37
20183912,4242272.4511674,2879593.89

The list of models and parameters used in orbital calculations

Force and measurement models
  • Earth gravity field: EGM2008 120 × 120

  • Earth tides: IERS conventions 2003

  • Ocean tide model: GOT99.2

  • Third-body gravity: Moon, Sun, and planets: DE403

  • Solar radiation pressure coefficient: CR = 1.00 (default value)

  • Drag coefficient: CD = 2.3 (default value, one coefficient per 24 h)

  • Tidal constants k2, k3, and phase k2: 0.300, 0.000, 0.093

  • Earth albedo

  • Dynamic polar motion

  • Relativistic corrections

  • Atmospheric density model: MSIS-86

  • Tropospheric refraction: Mendes–Pavlis model

  • Measurements: full-rate format from BORL7811 station

  • Laser pulse wavelength: 532 nm

  • Center of mass correction: not used

Reference frame
  • Inertial reference frame: J2000.0

  • Coordinate reference system: true of date defined at 0.0 h of the reference epoch for each satellite

  • Station coordinates: SLRF2014 for epoch 2010.0

  • Precession and nutation: IAU 2000

  • Polar motion: C04 IERS

  • Tidal uplift: Love model H2 = 0.609, L2 = 0.0852

  • Pole tide

Estimated parameters
Input state vector (six components + their deviations) determined at the beginning of the orbital arc-both Cartesian and Keplerian elements
Numerical integration
  • Integration: Cowell’s method

  • Orbit integration step size: 1 s

  • Arc length: from 1 to 4 days (depending on the scenario)

The alert time and the 3-sigma range error of RSW components for object 28480_ Results for scenario No_ 2 are highlighted with a gray background color_

Alerttime [s]SCE3-sigma range error R [m]3-sigma range error S [m]3-sigma range error W [m]
77,160sc1-13105.6756,194.05210.34
75,540sc1-2472.3818,206.11138.15
76,080sc1-3459.2625,574.61753.82
76,020sc1-4305.544150.101016.30
77,160sc1-52366.6642,412.72414.71
69,000sc1-6927.5120,229.23287.22
86,400sc1-7184.056558.61676.77
69,180sc1-8647.7916,555.541231.71
77,160sc2-13100.3256,100.60210.12
76,080sc2-21833.2481,233.783107.26
76,440sc2-31304.1039,701.687863.85
76,320sc2-41270.3537,543.632969.35
77,400sc2-52717.9740,404.66605.94
69,000sc2-6927.5120,229.23287.22
75,600sc2-72356.37102,477.055203.18
75,660sc2-81376.6764,128.168125.32
77,100sc3-13095.0656,285.17214.53
148,200sc3-2418.6915,744.07685.10
69,960sc3-3222.227889.42652.46
68,940sc3-4336.707815.63853.14
63,480sc3-5347.787830.871106.28
69,000sc3-6929.0420,281.01292.12
68,100sc3-7757.9210,287.96943.96
63,600sc3-81175.7710,441.241052.57

The alert time and the 3-sigma range error of RSW components for object 31114_ Results for scenario No_ 2 are highlighted with a gray background color_

Alert time [s]SCE3-sigma range error R [m]3-sigma range error S [m]3-sigma range error W [m]
78,180sc1-1112.614386.70164.48
75,780sc1-2293.6635,828.80782.60
79,500sc1-3157.701525.23610.29
75,660sc1-415960.54431,936.2217,428.61
76,260sc1-54164.90171,254.882219.53
75,240sc1-6158.077147.91492.29
62,880sc1-7198.071214.40955.42
83,700sc2-1207.153329.70181.66
78,240sc2-2202.013894.75913.07
78,360sc2-3132.434515.85780.22
75,720sc2-46517.98266,437.8413,800.13
76,200sc2-56280.38231,564.703208.94
76,440sc2-6542.6920,509.421561.46
57,180sc2-7200.461144.53983.61
78,180sc3-1112.624385.22164.49
75,120sc3-2400.5921,401.257262.87
74,940sc3-3254.2211,002.82585.79
57,180sc3-42621.0712,134.63586.38
76,260sc3-54164.94171,255.842219.54
77,760sc3-6803.4014,323.839480.79
70,860sc3-7706.1313,450.79805.29

RMSPOS, RMSVEL, and arc RMS determined for object 28480_ Results for scenario No_ 2 are highlighted with a gray background color_

NRSCERMSPOS [m]RMSVEL [m/s]Full-rate meas.Arc RMS [cm]
1sc1-1528.981.3812562.69
2sc1-2503.001.01794592.67
3sc1-3512.910.96877555.88
4sc1-4528.110.93788694.04
5sc1-5547.041.27991462.40
6sc1-6506.831.02495922.28
7sc1-7507.840.98303056.29
8sc1-8527.770.95951843.31
9sc2-1528.981.3812562.69
10sc2-2186.481.00864592.66
11sc2-3242.630.55207555.90
12sc2-4328.320.72998694.08
13sc2-5360.281.18221463.12
14sc2-6506.831.02495922.28
15sc2-7371.210.80893055.41
16sc2-8238.790.61211843.34
17sc3-1528.981.3812562.69
18sc3-289.780.57655152.98
19sc3-35.040.03871270176.99
20sc3-41.180.0066213954.52
21sc3-50.620.0026228594.33
22sc3-6506.831.02495922.28
23sc3-723.860.09438975.75
24sc3-88.080.0256108127.30
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/arsa-2023-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2083-6104 | Journal ISSN: 1509-3859
Language: English
Page range: 256 - 277
Submitted on: Oct 27, 2023
Accepted on: Nov 24, 2023
Published on: Jan 19, 2024
Published by: Polish Academy of Sciences, Space Research Centre
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Paweł Lejba, published by Polish Academy of Sciences, Space Research Centre
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.