References
- Mandava P, Singaraju GS, Obili S, Nettam V, Vatturu S, Erugu S. Impact of self-esteem on the relationship between orthodontic treatment and the oral health-related quality of life in patients after orthodontic treatment - a systematic review. Med. Pharm. reports 2021;94:158–69.
- American Association of Orthodontists. Adult orthodontics. American Association of Orthodontists; 2023, https://www3. aaoinfo.org/_/adult-orthodontics/.
- Namvar F, Shahrebabak MZ, Arab S, Tabrizi MA, Ghasemi A, Safari F. Shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets to zirconium crowns treated by sandblasting compared to enamel using a universal adhesive: An in vitro study. Int. Orthod. 2022;20(2):⊠.
- Bae EJ, Jeong I Do, Kim WC, Kim JH. A comparative study of additive and subtractive manufacturing for dental restorations. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2017;118:187–93.
- Favero CS, English JD, Cozad BE, Wirthlin JO, Short MM, Kasper FK. Effect of print layer height and printer type on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed orthodontic models. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2017;152:557–65.
- Duarte S, Phark JH. Advances in Dental Restorations: A Comprehensive Review of Machinable and 3D-Printed Ceramic-Reinforced Composites. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2024;37:257–76.
- Wang S, Dai J, Xu S, et al. Surface characteristics, cytotoxicity, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed hybrid resin-ceramic materials for definitive restoration. J. Dent. 2025;152:105436.
- Küçükekenci AS, Dönmez MB, Dede DÖ, Çakmak G, Yilmaz B. Bond strength of recently introduced computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing resin-based crown materials to polyetheretherketone and titanium. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2024;132:1066.e1–1066.e8.
- Reynolds IR. A Review of Direct Orthodontic Bonding. Br. J. Orthod. 1975;2:171–8.
- Hanson MS, Ontiveros JC, English JD, et al. Effect of Material and Pad Abrasion on Shear Bond Strength of 3D-Printed Orthodontic Brackets. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 2023;26(S1):171–9.
- Zhao Z, Wang Q, Zhao J, Zhao B, Ma Z, Zhang C. Adhesion of Teeth. Front. Mater. 2021;7:615225. Available at: www.frontiersin. org. Accessed February 16, 2025.
- Zhang S, Wang X, Yang J, Chen H, Jiang X. Micromechanical interlocking structure at the filler/resin interface for dental composites: a review. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2023 151 2023;15:1–13.
- Fotovat F, Shishehian A, Alijani S, Alafchi B, Parchami P. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic stainless-steel brackets on temporary crowns fabricated by three different methods: An in vitro study. Int. Orthod. 2022;20:100641.
- Biadsee A, Rosner O, Khalil C, et al. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to three-dimensionally-printed and milled materials after surface treatment and artificial aging. J Orthod 2021;53(1):⊠.
- Kim M, Lee J, Park C, et al. Evaluation of Shear Bond Strengths of 3D Printed Materials for Permanent Restorations with Different Surface Treatments. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16(13):▄.
- Piedra-Cascón W, Krishnamurthy V, Dentistry WA-J. of, 2021 undefined. 3D printing parameters, supporting structures, slicing, and post-processing procedures of vat-polymerization additive manufacturing technologies: A narrative. Elsevier ▄;▄:▄.
- Fathima F, Shantaraj R, Pradeep S, Rajashekar DM, Kumar IG. A comparison of the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded after enamel conditioning with sodium hypochlorite and papain gel: An in vitro study. JMS - J. Med. Soc. 2022;36:101–5.
- Biadsee A, Rosner O, Khalil C, Atanasova V, Blushtein J, Levartovsky S. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to three-dimensionally-printed and milled materials after surface treatment and artificial aging. Korean J. Orthod. 2023;53:45–53.
- Eser I, Cicek O, Ozkalayci N, Yetmez M, Erener H. Effect of Different Types of Adhesive Agents on Orthodontic Bracket Shear Bond Strength: A Cyclic Loading Study. Mater. 2023, Vol. 16, Page 724 2023;16:724.
- Tahmasbi S, Badiee M, Modarresi M. Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets to Composite Restorations Using Universal Adhesive. J. Dent. 2019;20:75–82.
- Alijani S, Fotovat F, Rezaei Soufi L, Alafchi B, Mohammadkhani MH. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to specimens fabricated from temporary restorative materials by 3D-printing, CAD/CAM technology, and the conventional technique after surface treatment by sandblasting and laser. Int. Orthod. 2023;21:100790.
- Farhadifard H, Rezaei-Soufi L, Farhadian M, Shokouhi P. Effect of different surface treatments on shear bond strength of ceramic brackets to old composite. Biomater. Res. 2020;24:1–7.
- Isber H, Ambrosio AR, Carvalho PEG, do Valle-Corotti KM, Siqueira DF. Comparative in vitro study of the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with restorative and orthodontic resins. Braz. Oral Res. 2011;25:49–55.
- Sha HN, Choi SH, Yu HS, Hwang CJ, Cha JY, Kim KM. Debonding force and shear bond strength of an array of CAD/CAM-based customized orthodontic brackets, placed by indirect bonding-An In Vitro study. PLoS One 2018;13:e0202952.
- Murray SD, Hobson RS. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro shear bond strength. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2003;123:2–9.
- Hajrassie MKA, Khier SE. In-vivo and in-vitro comparison of bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel and debonded at various times. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:384–90.
- Proffit WR, Fields HW, Nixon WL. Occlusal forces in normal- and long-face adults. J. Dent. Res. 1983;62:566–70.
- Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J. Dent. 1999;27:89–99.
- Özden Y, Altinok Uygun L. Effects of postcuring times on the trueness of 3D -printed dental inlays made with permanent resins. Clin. Oral Investig. 2025;29:1–12.
- Di Fiore A, Stellini E, Alageel O, Alhotan A. Comparison of mechanical and surface properties of two 3D printed composite resins for definitive restoration. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2024;132:839.el–839.e7.
- Yu H, Özcan M, Yoshida K, Cheng H, Sawase T. Bonding to industrial indirect composite blocks: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent. Mater. 2020;36:119–34.
- Mandurino M, Cortili S, Coccoluto L, et al. Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed vs. Subtractively Manufactured Composite Resins for Permanent Restorations: A Systematic Review. Materials (Basel). 2025;18:985.
- Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am. J. Orthod. 1984;85:333–40.
- Bishara SE, Fehr DE. Ceramic brackets: something old, something new, a review. Semin. Orthod. 1997;3:178–88.
- Proffit, WR, Fields, HW, Larson, B and Sarver DM. contemporary orthodontic (proffit, 2018). Elsevier Heal. Sci. 2018;⊠:5–24.
- Lankes V, Reymus M, Liebermann A, Stawarczyk B. Bond strength between temporary 3D printable resin and conventional resin composite: influence of cleaning methods and air-abrasion parameters. Clin. Oral Investig. 2023;27:31–43.
- Albahri R, Yoon HI, Lee JD, Yoon S, Lee SJ. Shear bond strength of provisional repair materials bonded to 3D printed resin. J. Dent. Sci. 2020;16:261.
- Sismanoglu S, Yildirim-Bilmez Z, Erten-Taysi A, Ercal P. Influence of different surface treatments and universal adhesives on the repair of CAD-CAM composite resins: An in vitro study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020;124:238.e1–238.e9.
- Fathy H, Hamama HH, El-Wassefy N, Mahmoud SH. Clinical performance of resin-matrix ceramic partial coverage restorations: a systematic review. Clin. Oral Investig. 2022;26:3807–22.
- Kabetani T, Ban S, Mine A, et al. Four-year clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM indirect resin composite premolar crowns using 3D digital data: Discovering the causes of debonding. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2022;66:402–8.