Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Automatic milking systems as a tool for mastitis control in dairy cow herds – a review Cover

Automatic milking systems as a tool for mastitis control in dairy cow herds – a review

Open Access
|Oct 2026

References

  1. Abdul Ghafoor, N., & Sitkowska, B. (2021). MasPA: A machine learning application to predict risk of mastitis in cattle from AMS sensor data. AgriEngineering, 3(3): 575–583. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering3030037
  2. Adriaens, I., Van Den Brulle, I., Geerinckx, K., D’Anvers, L., De Vliegher, S., & Aernouts, B. (2021). Milk losses linked to mastitis treatments at dairy farms with automatic milking systems. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 194, 105420. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105420
  3. Alnakip, M.E., Quintela-Baluja, M., Böhme, K., Fernández-No, I., Caamaño-Antelo, S., Calo-Mata, P., & Barros-Velázquez, J. (2014). The immunology of mammary gland of dairy ruminants between healthy and inflammatory conditions. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 2014, 1–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/659801
  4. Amran, R., Alhimaidi, A., & Ammari, A. (2025). Evaluation of the California mastitis test, pH and milk colour as indicators for subclinical mastitis detection in local dairy cows. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 24(1), 15–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v24i1.3
  5. Atroshi, F., Parantainen, J., Sankari, S., Järvinen, M., Lindberg, L.A., & Saloniemi, H. (1996). Changes in inflammation-related blood constituents of mastitic cows. Veterinary Research, 27(2), 125–132. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8721292
  6. Bach, A., & Cabrera, V. (2017). Robotic milking: Feeding strategies and economic returns. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(9), 7720–7728. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11694
  7. Bangar, Y. C., Singh, B., Dohare, A. K., & Verma, M. R. (2015). A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows in India. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 47(2), 291–297. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-014-0718-y
  8. Bausewein, M., Mansfeld, R., Doherr, M. G., Harms, J., & Sorge, U. S. (2022). Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of clinical mastitis by automatic milking systems in Bavarian dairy herds. Animals, 12(16), 2131. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162131
  9. Boerman, J. P., Brito, L. F., Montes, M. E., Maskal, J. M., Doucette, J., & Kalbaugh, K. (2025). Data processing techniques to improve data integration from dairy farms. JDS Communications, 6(3), 339–344. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2024-0723
  10. Bortacki, P. (2017). Impact of milking frequency on yield, chemical composition and quality of milk in high producing dairy herd. Mljekarstvo, 67(3), 226–230. doi: https://doi.org/10.15567/mljekarstvo.2017.0307
  11. Brasier, J. E., Schwanke, A. J., Bergeron, R., Haley, D. B., & DeVries, T. J. (2025). Effect of training method and dairy cow personality traits on adaptation to an automated milking system. Journal of Dairy Science, 108(1), 885–899. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25420
  12. Bruinjé, T. C., Ambrose, D. J., & LeBlanc, S. J. (2025). In-line milk progesterone monitoring as a tool for precision reproductive management. JDS Communications, 6(2), 267–271. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2024-0649
  13. Busanello, M. (2024). Cow traffic designs in barns with automatic milking systems: Advantages, disadvantages and differences. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, 57(2), 40–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.36547/sjas.887
  14. Busanello, M., Rossi, R. S., Cassoli, L. D., Pantoja, J. C. F., & Machado, P. F. (2017). Estimation of prevalence and incidence of subclinical mastitis in a large population of Brazilian dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(8), 6545–6553. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12042
  15. Carvalho-Sombra, T. C. F., Fernandes, D. D., Bezerra, B. M. O., & Nunes-Pinheiro, D. C. S. (2021). Systemic inflammatory biomarkers and somatic cell count in dairy cows with subclinical mastitis. Veterinary and Animal Science, 11, 100165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2021.100165
  16. Cerqueira, J. L., Araújo, J.P., Cantalapiedra, J., & Blanco-Penedo, I. (2018). How is the association of teat-end severe hyperkeratosis on udder health and dairy cow behavior? Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire, 169(1–3), 30–37. https://research.slu.se/ws/portalfiles/portal/19173953/fulltext.pdf
  17. Chen, X., Chen, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, S., Wen, X., Ran, X., Wang, H., Zhao, J., Qi, Y., & Xue, N. (2022). Prevalence of subclinical mastitis among dairy cattle and associated risks factors in China during 2012–2021: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Research in Veterinary Science, 148, 65–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.04.007
  18. Chiumenti, A., Da Borso, F., Chiumenti, R., & Kic, P. (2020). Applying a mathematical model to compare, choose, and optimize the management and economics of milking parlors in dairy farms. Agriculture, 10(10), 472. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10100472
  19. Clay, N., Garnett, T., & Lorimer, J. (2020). Dairy intensification: Drivers, impacts and alternatives. Ambio, 49(1), 35–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01177-y
  20. Cobirka, M., Tancin, V., & Slama, P. (2020). Epidemiology and classification of mastitis. Animals, 10(12), 2212. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122212
  21. Costa, H. N., Lage, C. F. A., Malacco, V. M. R., Belli, A. L., Carvalho, A. U., Facury, E. J., & Molina, L. R. (2019). Frequency of microorganisms isolated at different stages of lactation and milk production loss associated with somatic cell count and to mastitis-causing pathogens. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 71(2), 393–403. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-10185
  22. Dalen, G., Rachah, A., Nørstebø, H., Schukken, Y. H., & Reksen, O. (2019). The detection of intramammary infections using online somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Science, 102(6), 5419–5429. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15295
  23. Deng, Z., Hogeveen, H., Lam, T. J. G. M., Van Der Tol, R., & Koop, G. (2020a). Performance of online somatic cell count estimation in automatic milking systems. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 221. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00221
  24. Deng, Z., Lam, T. J. G. M., Hogeveen, H., Spaninks, M., Heij, N., Postema, M., Van Werven, T., & Koop, G. (2020b). Antimicrobial use and farmers’ attitude toward mastitis treatment on dairy farms with automatic or conventional milking systems. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(8), 7302–7314. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17960
  25. Dharejo, M. N., Minogue, L., Kabelitz, T., Amon, T., Kashongwe, O., & Doherr, M. G. (2025). Time series data analysis to predict the status of mastitis in dairy cows by applying machine learning models to automated milking systems data. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 242, 106575. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106575
  26. Egyedy, A. F., & Ametaj, B. N. (2022). Mastitis: Impact of dry period, pathogens, and immune responses on etiopathogenesis of disease and its association with periparturient diseases. Dairy, 3(4), 881–906. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy3040061
  27. Ekman, L., Anglart, D., Gillsjö, I., Lind, N., Fall, N., & Antillón, G. O. (2025). What information counts when detecting mastitis in automatic milking systems? A mixed methods approach from a Swedish perspective. Journal of Dairy Science, 108(9), 9861–9875. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-26455
  28. Facciuolo, A., Aubrey, L., Barron-Castillo, U., Berube, N., Norleen, C., McCreary, S., Huang, Y., Pessoa, N., Jacome, L. M., Mubareka, S., McGeer, A., Berhane, Y., Gerdts, V., Van Kessel, A., Warner, B., & Zhou, Y. (2025). Dairy cows develop protective immunity against reinfection with bovine H5N1 influenza virus. Nature Microbiology, 10(6), 1366–1377. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-025-01998-6
  29. Ferneborg, S., Thulin, M., Agenäs, S., Svennersten-Sjaunja, K., Krawczel, P., & Ternman, E. (2019). Increased take-off level in automatic milking systems – effects on milk flow, milk yield and milking efficiency at the quarter level. Journal of Dairy Research, 86(1), 85–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002202991800078X
  30. Gomes, F., & Henriques, M. (2016). Control of bovine mastitis: Old and recent therapeutic approaches. Current Microbiology, 72(4), 377–382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-015-0958-8
  31. Govignon-Gion, A., Dassonneville, R., Baloche, G., & Ducrocq, V. (2016). Multiple trait genetic evaluation of clinical mastitis in three dairy cattle breeds. Animal, 10(4), 558–565. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115002529
  32. Guarín, J. F., Baumberger, C., & Ruegg, P. L. (2017). Anatomical characteristics of teats and premilking bacterial counts of teat skin swabs of primiparous cows exposed to different types of bedding. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(2), 1436–1444. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11514
  33. Hiitiö, H., Vakkamäki, J., Simojoki, H., Autio, T., Junnila, J., Pelkonen, S., & Pyörälä, S. (2017). Prevalence of subclinical mastitis in Finnish dairy cows: Changes during recent decades and impact of cow and herd factors. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 59(1), 22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-017-0288-x
  34. Hooker, J., De Medeiros, B. B., Saha, C., Abdulrahman, T., & Alves, A. A. C. (2025). Evaluating the contribution of behavioral, milking system, and environmental data to short-term milk yield prediction in commercial dairy cows using machine learning. Journal of Dairy Science, 108(10), 11133–11150. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-26724
  35. Hovinen, M., Aisla, A.-M., & Pyörälä, S. (2005). Visual detection of technical success and effectiveness of teat cleaning in two automatic milking systems. Journal of Dairy Science, 88(9), 3354–3362. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73019-8
  36. Inzaghi, V., Zucali, M., Thompson, P. D., Penry, J. F., & Reinemann, D. J. (2021). Changes in electrical conductivity, milk production rate and milk flow rate prior to clinical mastitis confirmation. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 20(1), 1554–1561. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2021.1984852
  37. Jiang, H., Wang, W., Li, C., & Wang, W. (2017). Innovation, practical benefits and prospects for the future development of automatic milking systems. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 4(1), 37. doi: https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2016117
  38. Jin, C., Upton, J., Bazargani, M. H. Z., & Mac Namee, B. (2024). Using milk flow profiles for subclinical mastitis detection. Smart Agricultural Technology, 9, 100537. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100537
  39. Johansen, F. P., Buijs, S., & Arnott, G. (2025a). Providing concentrate feed outside of the milking robot increases feed intake in dairy cows without reducing motivation to visit the robot. Animal, 19(4), 101459. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2025.101459
  40. Johansen, F. P., Buijs, S., & Arnott, G. (2025b). Social rank and personality are associated with visit frequency in dairy cows learning to use an automatic milking system. Animal, 19(3), 101446. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2025.101446
  41. Johansen, F. P., Donnelly, P., Arnott, G., & Buijs, S. (2025c). Use of a priority lane to increase voluntary visits to a milking robot in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 108(7), 7387–7400. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-26081
  42. Kamphuis, C., Pietersma, D., Van Der Tol, R., Wiedemann, M., & Hogeveen, H. (2008). Using sensor data patterns from an automatic milking system to develop predictive variables for classifying clinical mastitis and abnormal milk. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 62(2), 169–181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2007.12.009
  43. Kaskous, S. (2021). Physiological aspects of milk somatic cell count in dairy cattle. International Journal of Livestock Research, 11(10), 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20210518075402
  44. Kalińska, A., Puppel, K., Grodkowski, G., Mendelowski, W., Niemiec, D., Jagodziński, K., & Gołębiewski, M. (2025). Intelligent analysis of microbiological quality of milk (mqa) – an innovative tool to improve the quality of animal products. 89th Scientific Congress of the Polish Society of Animal Production, Bydgoszcz, Poland, 16–19.09.2025, p. 45.
  45. Khatun, M., Thomson, P. C., García, S. C., & Bruckmaier, R. M. (2022). Suitability of milk lactate dehydrogenase and serum albumin for pathogen-specific mastitis detection in automatic milking systems. Journal of Dairy Science, 105(3), 2558–2571. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-20475
  46. Koeck, A., Loker, S., Miglior, F., Kelton, D. F., Jamrozik, J., & Schenkel, F. S. (2014). Genetic relationships of clinical mastitis, cystic ovaries, and lameness with milk yield and somatic cell score in first-lactation Canadian Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 97(9), 5806–5813. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7785
  47. Krömker, V., & Leimbach, S. (2017). Mastitis treatment – Reduction in antibiotic usage in dairy cows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 52(S3), 21–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13032
  48. Krömker, V., Falkenberg, U., Wente, N., Zhang, Y., Leimbach, S., Nitz, J., Gisbert, P., & Nankemann, F. (2025). Ketoprofen as the sole initial treatment for nonsevere bovine mastitis: Efficacy and antibiotic reduction. Journal of Dairy Science, 108(6), 6273–6283. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25850
  49. Krukowski, H., Lassa, H., Zastempowska, E., Smulski, S., & Bis-Wencel, H. (2020). Etiological agents of bovine mastitis in Poland. Medycyna Weterynaryjna, 76(01), 6339–2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.21521/mw.6339
  50. Kunes, R., Bartos, P., Iwasaka, G. K., Lang, A., Hankovec, T., Smutny, L., Cerny, P., Poborska, A., Smetana, P., Kriz, P., & Kernerova, N. (2021). In-line technologies for the analysis of important milk parameters during the milking process: A review. Agriculture, 11(3), 239. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11030239
  51. Kurjogi, M. M., & Kaliwal, B. B. (2014). Epidemiology of bovine mastitis in cows of Dharwad district. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2014, 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/968076
  52. Lacy-Hulbert, S.J., Dalley, D.E., Clark, D.A. (2005). The effects of once a day milking on mastitis and somatic cell count. 65th New Zealand Society of Animal Production Conference, Lincoln University, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 21–24.
  53. Lambrecht-Szambelan, V., Busanello, M., Lindorfer, M. S., Rodrigues, R. B., & Sarubbi, J. (2025). Temporal distribution of milking events in a dairy herd with an automatic milking system. Animals, 15(15), 2293. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15152293
  54. Larsen, B., Jensen, N. E., Madsen, P., Nielsen, S. M., Klastrup, O., & Madsen, P. S. (1985). Association of the M blood group system with bovine mastitis. Animal Blood Groups and Biochemical Genetics, 16(3), 165–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.1985.tb01467.x
  55. Leelahapongsathon, K., Schukken, Y. H., Srithanasuwan, A., & Suriyasathaporn, W. (2020). Molecular epidemiology of Streptococcus uberis intramammary infections: Persistent and transient patterns of infection in a dairy herd. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(4), 3565–3576. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17281
  56. Li, N., Richoux, R., Boutinaud, M., Martin, P., & Gagnaire, V. (2014). Role of somatic cells on dairy processes and products: A review. Dairy Science and Technology, 94(6), 517–538. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13594-014-0176-3
  57. Lien, C.-C., Wan, Y.-N., & Ting, C.-H. (2016). Online detection of dairy cow subclinical mastitis using electrical conductivity indices of milk. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food, 9(3), 201–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2015.12.002
  58. Marques, T. C., Lage, C. F. A., Bruno, D. R., Fausak, E. D., Endres, M. I., Ferreira, F. C., & Lima, F. S. (2023). Geographical trends for automatic milking systems research in non-pasture-based dairy farms: A scoping review. Journal of Dairy Science, 106(11), 7725–7736. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-23313
  59. Meijering, A., Hogeveen, H., & de Koning, C. J. A. M. (2004) Automatic milking: a better understanding. Wageningen, The Netherlands, Wageningen Academic Publishers, pp. 27–28.
  60. Mpatswenumugabo, J. P., Bebora, L. C., Gitao, G. C., Mobegi, V. A., Iraguha, B., Kamana, O., & Shumbusho, B. (2017). Prevalence of subclinical mastitis and distribution of pathogens in dairy farms of Rubavu and Nyabihu districts, Rwanda. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 2017, 1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8456713
  61. Nakov, D., Hristov, S., Andonov, S., & Trajchev, M. (2014). Udder-related risk factors for clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Veterinary Archives, 84(2), 111–127. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/175847
  62. Naranjo-Lucena, A., Becker, P., Madigan, G., Cupial, R., Byrne, B., & Johnson, A. (2025). Longitudinal patterns in the isolation and antimicrobial resistance of bovine mastitis-causing bacteria in Ireland. Antibiotics, 14(3), 243. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14030243
  63. Nogara, K. F., Busanello, M., & Zopollatto, M. (2025). Relationship between subclinical mastitis occurrence and pathogen prevalence in two different automatic milking systems. Animals, 15(6), 776. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15060776
  64. Norberg, E., Hogeveen, H., Korsgaard, I. R., Friggens, N. C., Sloth, K. H. M. N., & Løvendahl, P. (2004). Electrical conductivity of milk: Ability to predict mastitis status. Journal of Dairy Science, 87(4), 1099–1107. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73256-7
  65. O’Driscoll, K., Olmos, G., Llamas Moya, S., Mee, J. F., Earley, B., Gleeson, D., O’Brien, B., & Boyle, L. (2012). A reduction in milking frequency and feed allowance improves dairy cow immune status. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(3), 1177–1187. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4408
  66. Ozella, L., Brotto Rebuli, K., Forte, C., & Giacobini, M. (2023). A literature review of modeling approaches applied to data collected in automatic milking systems. Animals, 13(12), 1916. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13121916
  67. Pan, L., Chen, X., Han, D., Li, N., Chen, D., Wang, J., Chen, J., & Huo, X. (2025). Machine learning-based clinical mastitis detection in dairy cows using milk electrical conductivity and somatic cell count. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 12, 1671186. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1671186
  68. Pantoja, J. C. F., Correia, L. B. N., Rossi, R. S., & Latosinski, G. S. (2020). Association between teat-end hyperkeratosis and mastitis in dairy cows: A systematic review. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(2), 1843–1855. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16811
  69. Patel, K., Godden, S. M., Royster, E., Crooker, B. A., Timmerman, J., & Fox, L. (2019). Relationships among bedding materials, bedding bacteria counts, udder hygiene, milk quality, and udder health in US dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science, 102(11), 10213–10234. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16692
  70. Piwczyński, D., Siatka, K., Sitkowska, B., Kolenda, M., Özkaya, S., & Gondek, J. (2023). Comparison of selected parameters of automated milking in dairy cattle barns equipped with a concentrate feeding system. Animal, 17(12), 101011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.101011
  71. Poli, S. F., Freu, G., Lohana Dos Santos, L., Piccinini, R., Bronzo, V., Gioia, G., Moroni, P., Addis, M. F., & Veiga Dos Santos, M. (2025). Efficacy of lime-based conditioner against environmental udder pathogens in different bedding materials. Veterinary and Animal Science, 28, 100459. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2025.100459
  72. Pokorska, J., Sawicki, S., Gabryś, J., Kułaj, D., Bauer, E. A., Lenart-Boroń, A., Bulanda, K., Kuchta-Gładysz, M., Grzesiakowska, A., Kemilew, J., Barton, P. M., Lasek, O., & Bugno-Poniewierska, M. (2024). The use of stem cells in the treatment of mastitis in dairy cows. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 10349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61051-0
  73. Pszczola, M., Szalanski, M., Rzewuska, K., & Strabel, T. (2018). Short communication: Improving repeatability of cows’ body weight recorded by an automated milking system. Livestock Science, 214, 149–152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.04.016
  74. Pytlewski, J., Antkowiak, I. R., & Stanisławski, D. (2022). Associations between udder and skin cleanliness and somatic cell counts, yield and composition of milk of Polish Holstein-Friesian Black-and-White cows in the autumn-winter season. Animal Science and Genetics, 18(2), 23–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.8825
  75. Raisatulhaq, R., Anggaeni, T., & Tasripin, D. (2025). Prevalence and risk factors of mastitis in Guranteng dairy farms, Tasikmalaya, Indonesia. Open Veterinary Journal, 15(2), 785–794. doi: https://doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2025.v15.i2.27
  76. Rasmussen, M. D., Yde Blom, J., Arne Hjort Nielsen, L., & Justesen, P. (2001). Udder health of cows milked automatically. Livestock Production Science, 72(1–2), 147–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00275-5
  77. Rodriguez, Z., Lopez-Benavides, M., Gentilini, M. B., & Ruegg, P. L. (2025). Impact of training dairy farm personnel on milking routine compliance, udder health, and milk quality. Journal of Dairy Science, 108(2), 1615–1624. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25609
  78. Rowe, S. M., Godden, S. M., Royster, E., Timmerman, J., Crooker, B. A., & Boyle, M. (2019). Cross-sectional study of the relationships among bedding materials, bedding bacteria counts, and intramammary infection in late-lactation dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 102(12), 11384–11400. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17074
  79. Salfer, J. A., Siewert, J. M., & Endres, M. I. (2018). Housing, management characteristics, and factors associated with lameness, hock lesion, and hygiene of lactating dairy cattle on Upper Midwest United States dairy farms using automatic milking systems. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(9), 8586–8594. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13925
  80. Sarma, O., & Hussain, J. (2021). Bovine mastitis: an overview. Vigyan Varta, 2, 54–59. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Olympica-Sarma-2/publication/393185590_Bovine_Mastitis_An_Overview/links/68637266e4632b045dc8cef3/Bovine-Mastitis-An-Overview.pdf
  81. Schmenger, A., & Krömker, V. (2020). Characterization, cure rates and associated risks of clinical mastitis in northern Germany. Veterinary Sciences, 7(4), 170. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7040170
  82. Shahedani, M., Ahmadi, F., & Tosun, H. (2024). The impact of bedding materials and disinfectants on udder health and mastitis control in dairy cows. Journal of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society, 75(3), 8083–8098. doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.37052
  83. Simões Filho, L. M., Lopes, M. A., Brito, S. C., Rossi, G., Conti, L., & Barbari, M. (2020). Robotic milking of dairy cows: A review. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 41(6), 2833–2850. doi: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n6p2833
  84. Sinha, R., Sinha, B., Kumari, R., M.R., V., Verma, A., & Gupta, I. D. (2021). Effect of season, stage of lactation, parity and level of milk production on incidence of clinical mastitis in Karan Fries and Sahiwal cows. Biological Rhythm Research, 52(4), 593–602. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2019.1621064
  85. Sitkowska, B., Siatka, K., Ghiasi, H., Piwczyński, D., & Ptak, E. (2025). Estimation of genetic parameters for udder quarters milk yield and milking traits in Holstein cattle. Animal, 19(11), 101667. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2025.101667
  86. Steeneveld, W., Vernooij, J. C. M., & Hogeveen, H. (2015). Effect of sensor systems for cow management on milk production, somatic cell count, and reproduction. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(6), 3896–3905. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-9101
  87. Strapák, P., Strapáková, E., Rušinová, M., & Szencziová, I. (2017). The influence of milking on the teat canal of dairy cows determined by ultrasonographic measurements. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 62(2), 75–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.17221/68/2015-CJAS
  88. Sumon, S. M. M. R., Parvin, Mst. S., Ehsan, Md. A., & Islam, Md. T. (2020). Relationship between somatic cell counts and subclinical mastitis in lactating dairy cows. Veterinary World, 13(8), 1709–1713. doi: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.1709-1713
  89. Sztachańska, M., Barański, W., Janowski, T., Pogorzelska, J., & Zduńczyk, S. (2016). Prevalence and etiological agents of subclinical mastitis at the end of lactation in nine dairy herds in North-East Poland. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 19(1), 119–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/pjvs-2016-0015
  90. Teki̇n, K., Yurdakök Di̇Kmen, B., Kanca, H., & Guatteo, R. (2021). Precision livestock farming technologies: Novel direction of information flow. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 68(2), 193–212. doi: https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.837485
  91. Tomanić, D., Samardžija, M., & Kovačević, Z. (2023). Alternatives to antimicrobial treatment in bovine mastitis therapy: A review. Antibiotics, 12(4), 683. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12040683
  92. Tremblay, M., Hess, J. P., Christenson, B. M., McIntyre, K. K., Smink, B., Van Der Kamp, A. J., De Jong, L. G., & Döpfer, D. (2016). Factors associated with increased milk production for automatic milking systems. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(5), 3824–3837. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10152
  93. Uí Chearbhaill, A., Boloña, P. S., Ryan, E. G., McAloon, C. I., Burrell, A., McAloon, C. G., & Upton, J. (2024). Survey of farm, parlour and milking management, parlour technologies, SCC control strategies and farmer demographics on Irish dairy farms. Irish Veterinary Journal, 77(1), 8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13620-024-00267-y
  94. Unal, H., Kuraloglu, H., Koyuncu, M., & Alibas, K. (2017). Effect of cow traffic type on automatic milking system performance in dairy farms. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 27(5), 1454–1463. https://web.archive.org/web/20180422130815id_/http://www.thejaps.org.pk/docs/v-27-05/08.pdf
  95. Vargas Jurado, N., Aamand, G. P., Nielsen, U. S., Pösö, J., Fikse, W. F., Kudinov, A. A., Ikonen, T., & Lidauer, M. H. (2026). Genetic parameters for clinical mastitis and somatic cell count for the Nordic dairy cattle populations. Journal of Dairy Science, 109(6), 6387–6400. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-27952
  96. Veysset, P., Wallet, P., & Prugnard, E. (2001). Le robot de traite: Pour qui? pourquoi? Caractérisation des exploitations équipées, simulations économiques et éléments de réflexion avant investissement. INRAE Productions Animales, 14(1), 51–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.20870/productions-animales.2001.14.1.3725
  97. Yesil, M. I., & Goncu, S. (2024). The determination of mastitis severity at 4-level using Milk physical properties: A deep learning approach via MLP and evaluation at different SCC thresholds. Research in Veterinary Science, 174, 105310. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105310
  98. Zecconi, A., Zaghen, F., Meroni, G., Sommariva, F., Ferrari, S., & Sora, V. (2025). Machine learning approach for early lactation mastitis diagnosis using total and differential somatic cell counts. Animals, 15(8), 1125. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15081125
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2027-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8733 (formerly 1642-3402) | Journal ISSN: 1642-3402
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 10, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 16, 2026
Published on: Oct 28, 2026
Published by: National Research Institute of Animal Production
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2026 Sandra Kunda, Kamil Siatka, Roland Kozdrowski, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.