Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessment of sperm quality parameters of native Polish Crested chickens in relation to short-term storage* Cover

Assessment of sperm quality parameters of native Polish Crested chickens in relation to short-term storage*

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Agarwal A., Sharma R.K., Nelson D.R. (2003). New semen quality scores developed by principal component analysis of semen characteristics. J. Androl., 24: 343–352. https://doi:10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb02681.x
  2. Amin A.M.S., Salem M.M.I., Ashour A.F., El Nagar A.G. (2024). Principal component analysis of phenotypic and breeding value data for semen traits in Egyptian buffalo bulls. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 56: 135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-024-03975-3
  3. Blanco J.M., Wildt D.E., Höfle U., Voelker W., Donoghue A.M. (2009). Implementing artificial insemination as an effective tool for ex situ conservation of endangered avian species. Theriogenology, 71: 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.019
  4. Blank M.H., Ruivo L.P., Novaes G.A., Lemos E.C., Losano J.D., Siqueira A.F., Pereira R.J. (2021). Assessing different liquid-storage temperatures for rooster spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 233: 106845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2021.106845
  5. Bond A., Mills K.M., Ferreira C.R., Harford I., Flack B., Long J.A., Diehl K. (2024). Broiler breeder putative lipid biomarkers associated with sperm mobility. Front Physiol., 15: 1504557. https://doi:10.3389/fphys.2024.1504557
  6. Burrows W.H., Quinn J.P. (1937). The collection of spermatozoa from the domestic fowl and turkey. Poult. Sci., 16: 19–24. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0160019
  7. Czech K., Gumułka M. (2021). Quality of semen from Polish Crested Chickens compared to Hy-Line Brown. In: LXXXV Scientific Congress of the Polish Society of Animal Production, Olsztyn, Biel W., Chabuz W., Gugołek A., Karpiński M., Lis M., Polak G., Rant W., Rekiel A., Witkowska D., Wójcik A. (eds). University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, pp. 27.
  8. Di Iorio M., Marelli S.P., Antenucci E., Madeddu M., Zaniboni L., Belcredito S., Rusco G., Schiavone A., Soglia D., Penasa M., Castellini C., Buccioni A., Marzoni M., Maiuro L., Iaffaldano N., Cerolini S. (2024). A comparative study on semen quality and cryopreservation ability in Italian native chicken breeds. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 23: 1704–1718. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2024.2424518
  9. Dorado J., Molina I., Muñoz-Serrano A., Hidalgo M. (2010). Identification of sperm subpopulations with defined motility characteristics in ejaculates from Florida goats Theriogenology, 74: 795–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.04.004
  10. European Union (1999). Council Directive 1999/74/EC laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens in the EU. Off. J. Eur. Comm., L203: 53–57.
  11. Feyisa S.G., Park Y.H., Kim Y.M., Lee B.R., Jung K.M., Choi S.B., Cho C.Y., Han J.Y. (2018). Morphological defects of sperm and their association with motility, fertility, and hatchability in four Korean native chicken breeds. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 31: 1160–1165. https://doi:10.5713/ajas.17.0626
  12. Gogol P., Trzcińska M. (2022). Relationship between quality parameters and fertilizing ability of cryopreserved sexed bull sperm. Ann. Anim. Sci., 22: 1257–1263. https://doi:10.2478/aoas-2022-0046
  13. Gumułka M., Kapkowska E. (2005). Age effect of broiler breeders on fertility and sperm penetration of the perivitelline layer of the ovum. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 90: 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.01.018
  14. Gumułka M., Rozenboim I. (2015). Breeding period-associated changes in semen quality, concentrations of LH, PRL, gonadal steroid and thyroid hormones in domestic goose ganders (Anser anser f. domesticus). Anim. Reprod. Sci., 154: 166–175. https://doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.11.021
  15. Gumułka M., Hrabia A., Avital-Cohen N., Andres K., Rozenboim I. (2020). The effect of parachlorophenylalanine treatment on the activity of gonadal and lactotrophic axes in native Polish crested chickens stimulated to broodiness. Poult. Sci., 99: 2708–2717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.015
  16. Gumułka M., Andres K., Krawczyk J., Calik J. (2022). Research note: The nutritional value of eggs from native Polish Crested chickens and commercial hybrids that have been stored in various conditions. Poult. Sci., 101: 101579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101579
  17. Kheawkanha T., Chankitisakul V., Thananurak P., Pimprasert M., Boonkum W., Vongpralub T. (2023). Solid storage supplemented with serine of rooster semen enhances higher sperm quality and fertility potential during storage at 5°C for up to 120 h. Poult. Sci., 102: 102648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102648
  18. Khodaei-Motlagh M., Masoudi R., Karimi-Sabet M.J., Hatefi A. (2022). Supplementation of sperm cooling medium with zinc and zinc oxide nanoparticles preserves rooster sperm quality and fertility potential. Theriogenology, 183: 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.02.015
  19. Koedkanmark T., Ratchamak R., Authaida S., Boonkum W., Semaming Y., Chankitisakul V. (2024). Supplementation of sperm cooling medium with Eurycoma longifolia extract enhances native Thai chicken sperm quality and fertility potential. Front. Vet. Sci., 11: 1474386. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1474386
  20. Kopec T., Máchal L., Rečková Z., Filipčík R., Večeřa M., Pešan V., Tůmová E. (2025). Analysis of ejaculate parameters and sperm morphology in roosters of initial laying strains. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 70: 72–81. https://doi.org/10.17221/203/2024-CJAS
  21. Lewko L., Gumułka M., Andres K., Krawczyk J. (2024). Physical quality parameters and activity of albumen lysozyme of eggs from traditional hens bred in Poland compared with commercial hybrids. Ann. Anim. Sci., 24: 965–977. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2024-0032
  22. Łukaszewicz E., Jerysz A., Kowalczyk A. (2020). Effect of semen extenders on viability of ISA Brown and Hubbard Flex roosters' sperm stored for 24 h. Poult. Sci., 99: 2766–2774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.055
  23. Łukaszewicz E., Jerysz A., Kowalczyk A. (2023). Effect of freeze-dried quail egg white and yolk addition to semen extender on viability of rooster sperm stored for 6 h at 4°C. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 58: 450–458. https://doi:10.1111/rda.14307
  24. Masoudi R., Esmaeilkhanian S., Sharafi M., Abdollahi Z., Jafari V., Hatefi A., Zarei F., Asadzadeh N., Sadeghipanah A., Barfourooshi H.J., Banabazi M.H. (2022). Cysteamine enhances quality and fertility potential of rooster semen in cooled storage. Theriogenology, 177: 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.09.023
  25. Mavi G.K., Dubey P.P., Cheema R.S., Dash S.K., Bansal B.K. (2019). Comparative analysis of semen quality parameters and their relationship with fertility in different genetic groups of layer chicken. Indian J. Anim. Res., 53: 1269–1274. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.B-3646
  26. Mavi G.K., Dubey P.P., Cheema R.S. (2020 a). Identification of sperm-specific proteins associated with high fertility of Punjab Red and RIR × local cross roosters with SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 55: 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13628
  27. Mavi G.K., Dubey P.P., Cheema R.S. (2020 b). Association of antioxidant defense system with semen attributes vis a vis fertility in exotic and indigenous chicken breeds. Theriogenology, 144: 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.01.003
  28. Mussa N.J., Ratchamak R., Ratsiri T., Vongpralub T., Boonkum W., Semaming Y., Chankitisakul V. (2021). Lipid profile of sperm cells in Thai native and commercial roosters and its impact on cryopreserved semen quality. Trop Anim Health Prod., 53: 321. https://doi:10.1007/s11250-021-02664-9
  29. Nallella K.P., Sharma R.K., Allamaneni S.S.R., Agarwal A. (2005). Identification of male factor infertility using a novel semen quality score and reactive oxygen species levels. Clinics., 60: 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322005000400010
  30. National Research Institute of Animal Production (2023). Directive No. 12/23 of February 13, 2023 regarding the implementation of the Program for the Protection of the Laying Hen Population Resources. http://www.bioroznorodnosc.izoo.krakow.pl/drob/dokumenty [accessed: 29.06.2025]
  31. Nonnis S., Maffioli E., Grana J., Madeddu M., Zaniboni L., Marelli S.P., Perricone V., Iaffaldano N., Tedeschi G., Cerolini S. (2025). Relation between proteome characterization and semen quality in Italian chicken breeds. PLoS One., 20(10):e0333802. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0333802
  32. Partyka A., Niżański W. (2022). Advances in storage of poultry semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 246: 106921. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2021.106921
  33. Peña F.J., Johannisson A., Wallgren M., Rodriguez Martinez H. (2004). Antioxidant supplementation of boar spermatozoa from different fractions of the ejaculate improves cryopreservation: changes in sperm membrane lipid architecture. Zygote., 12: 117–124. https://doi:10.1017/s096719940400262x
  34. Pimpa J., Authaida S., Boonkum W., Rerkyusuke S., Janta C., Chankitisakul V. (2024). Unveiling the potential of Aloe vera gel supplementation in a cooling extender: a breakthrough in enhancing rooster sperm quality and fertility ability. Animals, 14: 2290. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162290
  35. Ratchamak R., Authaida S., Koedkanmark T., Saiyamanon H., Boonkum W., Chankitisakul V. (2025). Optimization of rooster semen preservation: a comparative study of extender types and antioxidant supplementation strategies during cold storage. Poult. Sci., 104: 105137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105137
  36. Sangani A.K., Masoudi A.A., Torshizi R.V. (2017). Association of mitochondrial function and sperm progressivity in slow- and fast-growing roosters. Poult. Sci., 96: 211–219. https://doi.org/doi:10.3382/ps/pew273
  37. Sithole S.M., Nephawe K.A., Mphaphathi M.L., Ngcobo J.N. (2025). Understanding the role of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid and antioxidants in enhancing rooster semen quality: a comprehensive review. Front. Anim. Sci., 6: 1669519. https://doi:10.3389/fanim.2025.1669519
  38. Sun Y., Li Y., Zong Y., Gamal M.K., Chen J. (2022). Poultry genetic heritage cryopreservation and reconstruction: advancement and future challenges. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 13: 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00768-2
  39. Tamargo C., Garriga F., Yeste M., Pinart E., Muiño R., Carbajo M.T., Hidalgo C.O. (2024). Predictive indicators of cryotolerance and fertility in bovine sperm: Evaluating fresh semen quality to improve outcomes with frozen–thawed sperm. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 59: e14742. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.14742
  40. Tesfay H.H., Sun Y., Li Y., Shi L., Fan J., Wang P., Zong A., Ni H., Ma A.I., Mani J., Chen, J. (2020). Comparative studies of semen quality traits and sperm kinematic parameters in relation to fertility rate between 2 genetic groups of breed lines. Poult. Sci., 99: 6139–6146. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.088
  41. Vasicek J., Kuzelova L., Kulikova B., Chrenek P. (2015). Effect of diluent and storage time on sperm characteristics of rooster insemination doses. Avian Biol. Res., 8: 41–46. https://doi.org/10.3184/175815515X14232453836759
  42. Węglarz A., Andres K., Wojtysiak D. (2020). Slaughter value and meat quality in two strains of Polish Crested cockerels. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 19: 813–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1772132
  43. Yánez-Ortiz I., García W., Tabarez A., Palomo M.J. (2024). The contribution of different sperm parameters to better explain ram semen cryoresistance. Vet. J., 306: 106194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106194
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2026-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8733 (formerly 1642-3402) | Journal ISSN: 1642-3402
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 22, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 2, 2026
Published on: Jun 4, 2026
Published by: National Research Institute of Animal Production
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2026 Małgorzata Gumułka, Monika Trzcińska, Magdalena Bryła, Krzysztof Andres, Lechosław Gajda, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.