Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Modern Pig Breeding Cover

References

  1. Almalawi A., Alsolami F., Khan A.I., Alkhathlan A., Fahad A., Irshad K., Qaiyum S., Alfakeeh A.S. (2022 a). An IoT-based system for magnify air pollution monitoring and prognosis using hybrid artificial intelligence technique. Environ. Res., 206: 112576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112576
  2. Almalawi A., Khan A.I., Alsolami F., Alkhathlan A., Fahad A., Irshad K., Alfakeeh A.S., Qaiyum S. (2022 b). Arithmetic optimization algorithm with deep learning enabled airborne particle-bound metals size prediction model. Chemosphere, 303: 134960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134960
  3. Altmann M. (1941). Interrelations of the sex cycle and the behavior of the sow. J. Comp. Psychol., 31: 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060248
  4. Athira V., Geetha P., Vinayakumar R., Soman K.P. (2018). Deepairnet: Applying recurrent networks for air quality prediction. Procedia Comput. Sci., 132: 1394–1403. DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.068
  5. Ayrle H., Mevissen M., Kaske M., Nathues H., Gruetzner N., Melzig M., Walkenhorst M. (2016). Medicinal plants – prophylactic and therapeutic options for gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases in calves and piglets? A systematic review. BMC Vet. Res., 12: 89. DOI 10.1186/s12917-016-0714-8
  6. Basioura A., Tsakmakidis I.A., Morrell J.M., Ntallaris T. (2025). Artificial insemination of boar semen doses prepared with a low-density colloid under field conditions. Front. Vet. Sci., 12: 1611751. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1611751
  7. Berckmans D. (2004). Automatic on-line monitoring of animals by precision livestock farming. Proc. ISAH Conference, 15–19.06.2004, Saint-Malo, France, pp. 27–31.
  8. Berry R.J., Kennedy A.D., Scott S.L., Kyle B.L., Schaefer A.L. (2003). Daily variation in the udder surface temperature of dairy cows measured by infrared thermography: Potential for mastitis detection. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 83: 687–693. https://doi.org/10.4141/A03-012
  9. Bonny S.P., Gardner G.E., Pethick D.W., Hocquette J.F. (2017). Artificial meat and the future of the meat industry. Anim. Prod. Sci., 57: 2216–2223. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17307
  10. Bortolozzo F.P., Zanin G.P., Christ T.S., Rech R.D., da Rosa Ulguim R., Mellagi A.P.G. (2024). Artificial insemination and optimization of the use of seminal doses in swine. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 269: 107501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107501
  11. Bressers H.P.M., Te Brake J.H.A., Engel B., Noordhuizen J.P.T.M. (1993). Feeding order of sows at an individual electronic feed station in a dynamic group-housing system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 36: 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(93)90004-9
  12. Broekhuijse M.L., Šoštarić E., Feitsma H., Gadella B.M. (2011). Additional value of computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) compared to conventional motility assessments in pig artificial insemination. Theriogenology, 76: 1473–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.05.040
  13. Broekhuijse M.L., Šoštarić E., Feitsma H., Gadella B.M. (2012). Application of computer-assisted semen analysis to explain variations in pig fertility. J. Anim. Sci., 90: 779–789. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4311
  14. Bugge C.E., Burkhardt J., Dugstad K.S., Enger T.B., Kasprzycka M., Kleinauskas A., Myhre M., Scheffler K., Ström S., Vetlesen S. (2011). Biometric methods of animal identification. Course notes, Laboratory Animal Science at the Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Publisher Norecopa, pp. 1–6.
  15. Cang Y., Luo S., Qiao Y. (2020). Classification of pig sounds based on deep neural network. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 36: 195–204. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.09.022.
  16. Chae H., Lee J., Kim J., Lee S., Lee J., Chung Y., Park D. (2024). Novel method for detecting coughing pigs with audio-visual multimodality for smart agriculture monitoring. Sensors, 24: 7232. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24227232.
  17. Chapa J.M., Peralta O.A., Abdelfattah E.M., Alvarez A., Müller H., Stock M., Bustamante H.A. (2020). Accelerometer systems as tools for health and welfare assessment in cattle and pigs – A review. Behav. Processes., 181: 104262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104262
  18. Chen Ch., Zhu W., Steibel J., Siegford J., Han J., Norton T. (2020 a). Classification of drinking and drinker-playing in pigs by a video-based deep learning method. Bio-systems Engineering, 196: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.05.010
  19. Chen Ch., Zhu W., Steibel J., Siegford J., Wurtz K., Han J., Norton T. (2020 b). Recognition of aggressive episodes of pigs based on convolutional neural network and long short-term memory. Comput. Electron. Agric., 169: 105166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105166
  20. Chen P., Tang W., Yin D., Yang B. (2021). Sow estrus diagnosis from sound samples based on improved deep learning. In: Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Security: 7th International Conference, ICAIS 2021, Dublin, Ireland, 19–23.07.2021, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78615-1_12
  21. Choi Y.K., Goyal S.M., Joo H.S. (2003). Retrospective analysis of etiologic agents associated with respiratory diseases in pigs. Can. Vet. J., 44: 735.
  22. Cloutier L., Pomar C., Létourneau Montminy M.P., Bernier J.F., Pomar J. (2015). Evaluation of a method estimating real-time individual lysine requirements in two lines of growing–finishing pigs. Animal, 9: 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114003073
  23. Collins L.M., Smith L.M. (2022). Smart agri-systems for the pig industry. Animal, 16: 100518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100518
  24. Conte S., Bergeron R., Gonyou H., Brown J., Rioja-Lang F.C., Connor L., Devillers N. (2014). Measure and characterization of lameness in gestating sows using force plate, kinematic, and accelerometer methods. J. Anim. Sci., 92: 5693–5703. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-7865
  25. Cornou C. (2006). Automated oestrus detection methods in group housed sows: Review of the current methods and perspectives for development. Livest. Sci., 105: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.05.023
  26. Costa N., Marchi M., Boschi E., Tonon F., Costa L.N. (2007). The use of thermography on the slaughter-line for the assessment of pork and raw ham quality. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 6: 704–706. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.704
  27. Dewulf J., Laevens H., Koenen F., Goddeeris B.M., de Kruif A. (2003). Infrared thermometry is not suitable for the detection of fever in pigs. Vet. J., 165: 373–379.
  28. Dong H., Liu Z., Ma H., Yan J. (2017). Application of speech enhancement in reducing noise originating from coughing pigs. J. Shanxi Agric. Univ., 37: 831–836.
  29. Durand M., Largouët C., de Beaufort L.B., Dourmad J.Y., Gaillard C. (2023). Estimation of gestating sows’ welfare status based on machine learning methods and behavioral data. Sci. Rep., 13: 21042. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46925-z
  30. Ermetin O. (2023). Evaluation of the application opportunities of precision livestock farming (PLF) for water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) breeding: SWOT analysis. Arch. Anim. Breed., 66: 41–50. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-66-41-2023
  31. Fernández-Carrión E., Martínez-Avilés M., Ivorra B., Martínez-López B., Ramos Á.M., Sánchez-Vizcaíno J.M. (2017). Motion-based video monitoring for early detection of livestock diseases: The case of African swine fever. PloS One, 12(9): e0183793. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183793
  32. Fernández-López P., Peña F.J., Salas-Huetos A., Johnston S.D., Gosálvez J., de Juan Romero C., Tamburrino L., Esteban O. (2022). Predicting fertility from sperm motility landscapes. Commun. Biol., 5(1), 1027. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7015571
  33. Finkenzeller K. (2010). RFID handbook: fundamentals and applications in contactless smart cards, radio frequency identification and near-field communication. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 478 pp.
  34. Fraser D., Weary D M., Pajor E.A., Milligan B.N. (1997). A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Anim. Welfare, 6: 187–205.
  35. Freson L., Godrie S., Bos N., Jourquin J., Geers R. (1998). Validation of an infra-red sensor for oestrus detection of individually housed sows. Comput. Electron. Agric., 20: 21–29.
  36. Fu Y., Xu J., Tang Z., Wang L., Yin D., Fan Y., Zhang D., Deng F., Zhang Y., Zhang H., Wang H., Xing W., Yin L., Zhu S., Zhu M., Yu W., Li X., Liu X., Yuan X., Zhao S. (2020). A gene prioritization method based on a swine multi-omics knowledgebase and a deep learning model. Commun. Biol., 3: 502. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01233-4
  37. Gan H., Wang Z., Li S., Zhou Z., Liu G., Zhao R. (2021). Automated detection and analysis of social behaviors among preweaning piglets using key point-based spatial and temporal features. Comput. Electron. Agric., 188: 106357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106357
  38. Gao Y., Chen B., Liao H., Lei M., Li X., Li J., Luo J. (2019). Deep learning – a method to identify aggressive behaviour in pig herds. Trans. Chinese Soc. Agric. Eng., 35: 192–200. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.23.024
  39. Geers R., Goedseels V., Puers R., Wouters P., Berckmans D., Decuypere E. (1995). Automated oestrus detection of sows with sensors for body temperature and physical activity. Proc. ARBIP Conference, Kobe, Japan, p. 7.
  40. Hansen P.J. (2009). Effects of heat stress on mammalian reproduction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 364: 3341–3350. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0131
  41. He Y., Maltecca C., Tiezzi F., Soto E.L., Flowers W.L. (2020). Transcriptome analysis identifies genes and co-expression networks underlying heat tolerance in pigs. BMC Genetics, 21: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-020-00852-4
  42. Heinonen M., Oravainen J., Orro T., Seppä-Lassila L., Ala-Kurikka E., Virolainen J., Tast A., Peltoniemi O.A. (2006). Lameness and fertility of sows and gilts in randomly selected loose-housed herds in Finland. Vet. Rec., 159: 383–387. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.159.12.383
  43. Jamroz D. (2022). Animal nutrition and feed science, Vol. 1. Physiological and biochemical bases of animal nutrition, new edition (in Polish). Warsaw, Poland, PWN Publishing, 448 pp.
  44. Jang J.C., Oh S.H. (2022). Management factors affecting gestating sows’ welfare in group housing systems – A review. Anim. Biosci., 35: 1817–1827. doi: 10.5713/ab.22.0289
  45. Ji Y.P., Ying Y., Liu G. (2020). Recognition of pig eating and drinking behavior based on visible spectrum and YOLOv2. Spectrosc. Spectral Anal., 40: 1588–1594.
  46. Jirkof P., Rudeck J., Lewejohann L. (2019). Assessing affective state in laboratory rodents to promote animal welfare – what is the progress in applied refinement research? Animals, 9: 1026. DOI: 10.3390/ani9121026
  47. Kashiha M., Bahr C., Haredasht S.A., Ott S., Moons C.P.H., Niewold T.A., Ödberg F.O., Berckmans D. (2013). The automatic monitoring of pigs water use by cameras. Comput. Electron. Agric., 90: 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2012.09.015
  48. Kashiha M., Bahr C., Ott S., Moons C.P.H., Niewold T.A., Berckmans D. (2014). Weight estimation of pigs using top-view image processing. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Campilho A., Kamel M. (eds). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 496–503.
  49. Keller A., Maus M., Keller E., Kerns K. (2025). Deep learning classification method for boar sperm morphology analysis. Andrology, 13: 1615–1625. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13758
  50. Kemp B., Soede N.M., Langendijk P. (2005). Effects of boar contact and housing conditions on estrus expression in sows. Theriogenology, 63: 643–656. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.038
  51. Knox R.V. (2014). Impact of swine reproductive technologies on pig and global food production. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 752: 131–160. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8887-3_7
  52. Knox R.V. (2016). Artificial insemination in pigs today. Theriogenology, 85: 83–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.009
  53. Kousenidis K., Kirtsanis G., Karageorgiou E., Tsiokos D. (2022). Evaluation of a numerical, real-time ultrasound imaging model for the prediction of litter size in pregnant sows, with machine learning. Animals, 12: 1948. DOI: 10.3390/ani12151948
  54. Laghouaouta H., Fraile L.J., Pena R.N. (2024). Selection for resilience in livestock production systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 25: 13109. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252313109
  55. Lee W., Ham Y., Ban W., Jo O. (2019 a). Analysis of growth performance in swine based on machine learning. IEEE Access, 7: 161716–161724. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2951522
  56. Lee J.H., Lee D.H., Yun W., Oh H.J., An J.S., Kim Y.G., Kim G.M., Cho J.H. (2019 b). Quantitative and feasible heat detection using an ultrasonic sensor array and digital infrared thermography. J. Anim. Sci. Technol., 61: 163–169. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2019.61.3.163
  57. Lei K., Zong C., Du X., Teng G., Feng F. (2021). Oestrus analysis of sows based on bionic boars and machine vision technology. Animals, 11: 1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061485
  58. Lewis B.M., Battye W.H., Aneja V.P., Kim H., Bell M.L. (2023). Modeling and analysis of air pollution and environmental justice: The case for North Carolina’s hog concentrated animal feeding operations. Environ. Health Perspect., 131: 87018. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11344
  59. Li D., Zhang K., Li Z., Chen Y. (2020). A spatio-temporal convolutional network for multi-behavior recognition of pigs. Sensors, 20(8): 2381. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082381
  60. Libo G., Zhang H., Wei W., Gao H., Zhang L. (2010). Trial effect of infrared thermometer in body temperature screening of pig slaughterhouse. China Anim. Husb. Vet. Med., 37: 235–237.
  61. Ma M., Wang H.H., Hua Y., Qin F., Yang J. (2021). African swine fever in China: Impacts, responses, and policy implications. Food Policy, 102: 102065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102065
  62. Marchant J.N., Broom D.M., Corning S. (2001). The influence of sow behaviour on piglet mortality due to crushing in an open farrowing system. Anim. Sci., 72: 19–28. doi:10.1017/S135772980005551X
  63. Martineau G.P., Badouard B. (2009). Tools of the trade. 9th London Swine Conference Proceedings, London, Ontario, Canada, 1–2. 04.2009, pp. 3–19.
  64. Maselyne J., Saeys W., Van Nuffel A. (2015). Review: Quantifying animal feeding behaviour with a focus on pigs. Physiol. Behav., 138: 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.09.012
  65. Matthews S.G., Miller A.L., Clapp J., Plötz T., Kyriazakis I. (2016). Early detection of health and welfare compromises through automated detection of behavioural changes in pigs. Vet. J., 217: 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.09.005
  66. Meer Y.V.D., Gerrits W.J., Jansman A.J., Kemp B., Bolhuis J.E. (2017). A link between damaging behaviour in pigs, sanitary conditions, and dietary protein and amino acid supply. PloS One, 12(5): e0174688. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174688
  67. Nasirahmadi A., Hensel O., Edwards S.A., Sturm B. (2016). Automatic detection of assembly behaviour in pigs using image analysis. Comput. Electron. Agric., 124: 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.04.022
  68. Navares R., Aznarte J.L. (2020). Predicting air quality with deep learning LSTM: Towards comprehensive models. Ecol. Informatics, 55: 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2019.101019
  69. OECD (2023). Report on the implementation of the OECD Privacy Guidelines, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 361, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/cf87ae8f-en.
  70. Ohl F., van der Staay F.J. (2012). Animal welfare: at the interface between science and society. Vet. J., 192: 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.05.019
  71. Ostersen T., Cornou C., Kristensen A.R. (2010). Detection of oestrus by monitoring sow visits to the boar. Comput. Electron. Agric., 74: 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2010.06.003
  72. Paula T.M.C.G., Sousa R.V., Sarmiento M.P., Kramer T., Souza Sardunha E.J., Sabei L., Machado J.S., Vilioti M., Zanella A.J. (2024). Deep learning pose detection model for sow locomotion. Sci. Rep., 14: 16401. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62151-7
  73. Pawłowski K.P., Firlej P.K., Pietrzak K., Bartkowiak Z., Sołtysiak G. (2025). The maintenance system and profitability of pig production in Poland under conditions of ASF occurrence. Agriculture, 15: 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15010043
  74. Peruffo E., Rodríguez R., Mandl I., Bisello M. (2020). Game-changing technologies: Transforming production and employment in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 54 pp.
  75. Pomar C., Remus A. (2023). Review: Fundamentals, limitations and pitfalls on the development and application of precision nutrition techniques for precision livestock farming. Animal, 17: 100763. doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100763
  76. Qin Y. (2015). Research on pig body temperature collection system based on infrared temperature measurement equipment. Information Technology Branch of China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Society. Proc. 10th Symposium of Information Technology Branch of China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Society, China.
  77. Racewicz P., Ludwiczak A., Skrzypczak E., Składanowska-Baryza J., Biesiada H., Nowak T., Nowaczewski S., Zaborowicz M., Stanisz M., Ślósarz P. (2021). Welfare health and productivity in commercial pig herds. Animals, 11: 1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041176
  78. Radomil L., Pettitt M.J., Merkies K.M., Hickey K.D., Buhr M.M. (2011). Stress and dietary factors modify boar sperm for processing. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 46: 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01865.x
  79. Riaz U., Idris M., Ahmed M., Ali F., Yang L. (2023). Infrared thermography as a potential non-invasive tool for heat detection in cattle and buffaloes. Animals, 13: 1425. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081425
  80. Rodríguez M., Toloza L., Salazar L., Muñoz J., Rojas H., Prieto C., Egea R. (2023). Feed intake patterns of modern genetics lactating sows: Characterization and effect of the reproductive parameters. Porc. Health Manag., 9: 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-022-00300-y
  81. Russell S., Norvig P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. London, UK, Pearson Press, 1136 pp.
  82. Sánchez-Giménez P., Martínez-Nicolas A., Madrid J.A., Fernández R., Martínez-Alarcón L., Murciano F., Muñoz A., Ramis G. (2024). Circadian temperature rhythm in breeding sows: differences between days in oestrus and anoestrus after weaning. Porc. Health Manag., 10: 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-024-00369-7
  83. Sanket D., Shubhajyoti D., Nath M.S., Subhranil M., Santanu B. (2023). Ear image-based individual pig identification by using statistical parameters. Appl. Biol. Res., 25: 62–70. DOI: 10.5958/0974-4517.2023.00007.1
  84. Schindler F., Steinhage V. (2021). Identification of animals and recognition of their actions in wildlife videos using deep learning techniques. Ecol. Informatics, 61: 101215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101215
  85. Schmidt M., Ammon C., Schön P.C., Manteuffel C., Hoffmann G., Schön P.C. (2014). The suitability of infrared temperature measurements for continuous temperature monitoring in gilts. Arch. Anim. Breed., 57: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7482/0003-9438-57-021
  86. Seo H.J., Oh B.W., Seo I.H. (2025). Environmental monitoring and thermal data analysis related to mortality rates in a commercial pig house. Agriculture, 15: 635. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15060635
  87. Soerensen D.D., Pedersen L.J. (2015). Infrared skin temperature measurements for monitoring health in pigs: a review. Acta Vet. Scand. 57(1): 5.
  88. Špinka M., Illmann G., de Jonge F., Andersson M., Schuurman T., Jensen P. (2000). Dimensions of maternal behaviour characteristics in domestic and wild×domestic crossbred sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 70: 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00151-9
  89. Steverink D.W.B., Soede N.M., Groenland G.J.R., van Schie F.W., Noordhuizen J.P.T.M., Kemp B. (1999). Oestrus duration in relation to reproductive performance in pigs on commercial farms. J. Anim. Sci., 77: 801–809. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.774801x
  90. Tan H., Zhu W. (2018). Identification of drinking water behavior of pigs based on contour. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 46: 166–170.
  91. Thompson R.J., Matthews S., Plötz T., Kyriazakis I. (2019). Freedom to lie: How farrowing environment affects sow lying behaviour assessment using inertial sensors. Comput. Electron. Agric., 157: 549–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.01.035
  92. Tsakmakidis I.A., Lymberopoulos A.G., Khalifa T.A.A. (2010). Relationship between sperm quality traits and field-fertility of porcine semen. J. Vet. Sci., 11: 151–154. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2010.11.2.151
  93. Verhoeven S., Chantziaras I., Bernaerdt E., Loicq M., Verhoeven L., Maes D. (2023). The evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for estrus detection in sows. Porc. Health Manag., 9: 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00303-3
  94. Vranken E., Berckmans D. (2017). Precision livestock farming for pigs. Anim. Front., 7: 32–37. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2017.0106
  95. Wang H., Liu J., Dong Z., Song J., Zhu Z. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based metabolic energy prediction model for animal feed proportioning optimization. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 22: 942–952. doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2023.2236132
  96. Wang S., Jiang H., Qiao Y., Jiang S., Lin H., Sun Q. (2022). The research progress of vision-based artificial intelligence in smart pig farming. Sensors, 22: 6541. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22176541
  97. Wang Z., Li Q., Yu Q., Qian W., Gao R., Wang R., Wu T., Li X.A. (2024). Review of visual estimation research on live pig weight. Sensors, 24: 7093. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24217093
  98. Xu Z., Sullivan R., Zhou J., Bromfield C., Lim T.T., Safranski T.J., Yan Z. (2023). Detecting sow vulva size change around estrus using machine vision technology. Smart Agric. Technol., 3: 100090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100090
  99. Xue H., Chen J., Ding Q., Sun Y., Shen M., Liu L., Chen X., Zhou J. (2022). Automatic detection of sow posture and estrus based on convolutional neural network. Front. Phys. 10: 1037129. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.1037129
  100. Yan L., Shao Q., Wu X., Xie Q., Sun X., Wei C. (2016). Feature extraction and classification based on skewness clustering algorithm for lactating sow. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 47: 300–306.
  101. Yang Q.M., Xiao D.Q. (2020). A review of video-based porcine behaviour recognition. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 233: 105146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105146
  102. Yang Q.M., Xiao D.Q., Zhang G. (2018). Automatic pig drinking behavior recognition with machine vision. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 49: 232–238.
  103. Yin M., Ma R., Luo H., Li J., Zhao Q., Zhang M. (2023). Non-contact sensing technology enables precision livestock farming in smart farms. Comput. Electron. Agric., 212: 108171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108171
  104. Yin Y., Tu D., Shen W., Bao J. (2021). Recognition of cough sounds in sick pigs based on spline neural network in field situations. Inf. Process. Agric., 8: 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2020.11.001
  105. Zhang C., Wu X., Xiao D., Zhang X., Lei X., Lin S. (2025). An automatic ear temperature monitoring method for group-housed pigs adopting infrared thermography. Animals, 15: 2279. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15152279
  106. Zhang L., Guo W., Lv Ch., Guo M., Yang M., Fu Q., Liu X. (2024). Advancements in artificial intelligence technology for improving animal welfare: Current applications and research progress. Anim. Res. One Health., 2: 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/aro2.44
  107. Zhang Z., Zhang H., Liu T. (2019). Study on body temperature detection of pig based on infrared technology: A review. Artif. Intell. Agric., 1: 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2019.02.002
  108. Zhao J., Li X., Liu W., Gao Y., Lei M., Tan H., Yang D. (2020). DNN-HMM based acoustic model for continuous pig cough sound recognition. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 13: 186–193.
  109. Zhuang Y., Yu J., Teng G., Cao M. (2020). Recognition method of large white sow oestrus behavior based on a convolutional neural network. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 51: 364–370.
  110. Zin T.T., Phyo C.N., Tin P., Hama H., Kobayashi I. (2018). Image technology-based cow identification system using deep learning. Proc. International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong, China, 14–16.03.2018, pp. 236–247.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2026-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8733 (formerly 1642-3402) | Journal ISSN: 1642-3402
Language: English
Submitted on: May 7, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 19, 2026
Published on: Oct 6, 2026
Published by: National Research Institute of Animal Production
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2026 Ewa Skrzypczak, Agnieszka Jędrzejczak, Karolina Szulc, Agnieszka Ludwiczak, Przemysław Racewicz, Piotr Ślósarz, Marek Babicz, Maria Kliks, Magdalena Szyndler-Nędza, Kinga Kropiwiec-Domańska, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.