Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Modern Pig Breeding

Ewa Skrzypczak; Agnieszka Jędrzejczak; Karolina Szulc; Agnieszka Ludwiczak; Przemysław Racewicz; Piotr Ślósarz; Marek Babicz; Maria Kliks; Magdalena Szyndler-Nędza; Kinga Kropiwiec-Domańska

doi:10.2478/aoas-2026-0012

Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Modern Pig Breeding

By: Ewa Skrzypczak , Agnieszka Jędrzejczak , Karolina Szulc , Agnieszka Ludwiczak , Przemysław Racewicz , Piotr Ślósarz , Marek Babicz , Maria Kliks , Magdalena Szyndler-Nędza and Kinga Kropiwiec-Domańska

Open Access

|Oct 2026

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in pig farming significantly supports herd management, animal health monitoring and optimization of the rearing environment. The paper reviews key solutions such as radio-frequency identification (RFID) sensors, vision systems, sound analysis, deep learning algorithms and intelligent microclimate control systems that support production efficiency. Studies show that computer vision systems achieve more than 90% efficiency in detecting lameness, enabling faster intervention and reducing health losses. AI models for estrus detection achieve more than 95% accuracy, improving insemination planning and increasing reproductive rates. Monitoring feed intake with AI can increase feeding efficiency by 15–20%, improving daily gains and reducing feed wastage. Sound analysis systems enable early detection of respiratory diseases, reducing mortality and increasing pig welfare. The use of intelligent microclimate control systems can automatically regulate temperature, humidity and air quality, reducing environmental stress and preventing disease. The introduction of big data (BD) and Internet of things (IoT) technologies, meanwhile, enables real-time analysis of large data sets to support precision livestock management. Despite the many benefits, the full implementation of AI in pig breeding still requires work on algorithm optimization, component sustainability and implementation costs. The integration of these solutions into precision farming sets the stage for modern and sustainable livestock production.

References

Almalawi A., Alsolami F., Khan A.I., Alkhathlan A., Fahad A., Irshad K., Qaiyum S., Alfakeeh A.S. (2022 a). An IoT-based system for magnify air pollution monitoring and prognosis using hybrid artificial intelligence technique. Environ. Res., 206: 112576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112576
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Almalawi A., Khan A.I., Alsolami F., Alkhathlan A., Fahad A., Irshad K., Alfakeeh A.S., Qaiyum S. (2022 b). Arithmetic optimization algorithm with deep learning enabled airborne particle-bound metals size prediction model. Chemosphere, 303: 134960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134960
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Altmann M. (1941). Interrelations of the sex cycle and the behavior of the sow. J. Comp. Psychol., 31: 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060248
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Athira V., Geetha P., Vinayakumar R., Soman K.P. (2018). Deepairnet: Applying recurrent networks for air quality prediction. Procedia Comput. Sci., 132: 1394–1403. DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.068
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ayrle H., Mevissen M., Kaske M., Nathues H., Gruetzner N., Melzig M., Walkenhorst M. (2016). Medicinal plants – prophylactic and therapeutic options for gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases in calves and piglets? A systematic review. BMC Vet. Res., 12: 89. DOI 10.1186/s12917-016-0714-8
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Basioura A., Tsakmakidis I.A., Morrell J.M., Ntallaris T. (2025). Artificial insemination of boar semen doses prepared with a low-density colloid under field conditions. Front. Vet. Sci., 12: 1611751. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1611751
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Berckmans D. (2004). Automatic on-line monitoring of animals by precision livestock farming. Proc. ISAH Conference, 15–19.06.2004, Saint-Malo, France, pp. 27–31.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Berry R.J., Kennedy A.D., Scott S.L., Kyle B.L., Schaefer A.L. (2003). Daily variation in the udder surface temperature of dairy cows measured by infrared thermography: Potential for mastitis detection. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 83: 687–693. https://doi.org/10.4141/A03-012
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bonny S.P., Gardner G.E., Pethick D.W., Hocquette J.F. (2017). Artificial meat and the future of the meat industry. Anim. Prod. Sci., 57: 2216–2223. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17307
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bortolozzo F.P., Zanin G.P., Christ T.S., Rech R.D., da Rosa Ulguim R., Mellagi A.P.G. (2024). Artificial insemination and optimization of the use of seminal doses in swine. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 269: 107501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107501
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bressers H.P.M., Te Brake J.H.A., Engel B., Noordhuizen J.P.T.M. (1993). Feeding order of sows at an individual electronic feed station in a dynamic group-housing system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 36: 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(93)90004-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Broekhuijse M.L., Šoštarić E., Feitsma H., Gadella B.M. (2011). Additional value of computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) compared to conventional motility assessments in pig artificial insemination. Theriogenology, 76: 1473–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.05.040
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Broekhuijse M.L., Šoštarić E., Feitsma H., Gadella B.M. (2012). Application of computer-assisted semen analysis to explain variations in pig fertility. J. Anim. Sci., 90: 779–789. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4311
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bugge C.E., Burkhardt J., Dugstad K.S., Enger T.B., Kasprzycka M., Kleinauskas A., Myhre M., Scheffler K., Ström S., Vetlesen S. (2011). Biometric methods of animal identification. Course notes, Laboratory Animal Science at the Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Publisher Norecopa, pp. 1–6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cang Y., Luo S., Qiao Y. (2020). Classification of pig sounds based on deep neural network. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 36: 195–204. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.09.022.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chae H., Lee J., Kim J., Lee S., Lee J., Chung Y., Park D. (2024). Novel method for detecting coughing pigs with audio-visual multimodality for smart agriculture monitoring. Sensors, 24: 7232. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24227232.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chapa J.M., Peralta O.A., Abdelfattah E.M., Alvarez A., Müller H., Stock M., Bustamante H.A. (2020). Accelerometer systems as tools for health and welfare assessment in cattle and pigs – A review. Behav. Processes., 181: 104262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104262
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen Ch., Zhu W., Steibel J., Siegford J., Han J., Norton T. (2020 a). Classification of drinking and drinker-playing in pigs by a video-based deep learning method. Bio-systems Engineering, 196: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.05.010
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen Ch., Zhu W., Steibel J., Siegford J., Wurtz K., Han J., Norton T. (2020 b). Recognition of aggressive episodes of pigs based on convolutional neural network and long short-term memory. Comput. Electron. Agric., 169: 105166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105166
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen P., Tang W., Yin D., Yang B. (2021). Sow estrus diagnosis from sound samples based on improved deep learning. In: Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Security: 7th International Conference, ICAIS 2021, Dublin, Ireland, 19–23.07.2021, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78615-1_12
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Choi Y.K., Goyal S.M., Joo H.S. (2003). Retrospective analysis of etiologic agents associated with respiratory diseases in pigs. Can. Vet. J., 44: 735.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cloutier L., Pomar C., Létourneau Montminy M.P., Bernier J.F., Pomar J. (2015). Evaluation of a method estimating real-time individual lysine requirements in two lines of growing–finishing pigs. Animal, 9: 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114003073
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins L.M., Smith L.M. (2022). Smart agri-systems for the pig industry. Animal, 16: 100518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100518
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Conte S., Bergeron R., Gonyou H., Brown J., Rioja-Lang F.C., Connor L., Devillers N. (2014). Measure and characterization of lameness in gestating sows using force plate, kinematic, and accelerometer methods. J. Anim. Sci., 92: 5693–5703. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-7865
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cornou C. (2006). Automated oestrus detection methods in group housed sows: Review of the current methods and perspectives for development. Livest. Sci., 105: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.05.023
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Costa N., Marchi M., Boschi E., Tonon F., Costa L.N. (2007). The use of thermography on the slaughter-line for the assessment of pork and raw ham quality. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 6: 704–706. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.704
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dewulf J., Laevens H., Koenen F., Goddeeris B.M., de Kruif A. (2003). Infrared thermometry is not suitable for the detection of fever in pigs. Vet. J., 165: 373–379.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dong H., Liu Z., Ma H., Yan J. (2017). Application of speech enhancement in reducing noise originating from coughing pigs. J. Shanxi Agric. Univ., 37: 831–836.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Durand M., Largouët C., de Beaufort L.B., Dourmad J.Y., Gaillard C. (2023). Estimation of gestating sows’ welfare status based on machine learning methods and behavioral data. Sci. Rep., 13: 21042. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46925-z
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ermetin O. (2023). Evaluation of the application opportunities of precision livestock farming (PLF) for water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) breeding: SWOT analysis. Arch. Anim. Breed., 66: 41–50. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-66-41-2023
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fernández-Carrión E., Martínez-Avilés M., Ivorra B., Martínez-López B., Ramos Á.M., Sánchez-Vizcaíno J.M. (2017). Motion-based video monitoring for early detection of livestock diseases: The case of African swine fever. PloS One, 12(9): e0183793. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183793
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fernández-López P., Peña F.J., Salas-Huetos A., Johnston S.D., Gosálvez J., de Juan Romero C., Tamburrino L., Esteban O. (2022). Predicting fertility from sperm motility landscapes. Commun. Biol., 5(1), 1027. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7015571
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Finkenzeller K. (2010). RFID handbook: fundamentals and applications in contactless smart cards, radio frequency identification and near-field communication. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 478 pp.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fraser D., Weary D M., Pajor E.A., Milligan B.N. (1997). A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Anim. Welfare, 6: 187–205.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Freson L., Godrie S., Bos N., Jourquin J., Geers R. (1998). Validation of an infra-red sensor for oestrus detection of individually housed sows. Comput. Electron. Agric., 20: 21–29.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fu Y., Xu J., Tang Z., Wang L., Yin D., Fan Y., Zhang D., Deng F., Zhang Y., Zhang H., Wang H., Xing W., Yin L., Zhu S., Zhu M., Yu W., Li X., Liu X., Yuan X., Zhao S. (2020). A gene prioritization method based on a swine multi-omics knowledgebase and a deep learning model. Commun. Biol., 3: 502. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01233-4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gan H., Wang Z., Li S., Zhou Z., Liu G., Zhao R. (2021). Automated detection and analysis of social behaviors among preweaning piglets using key point-based spatial and temporal features. Comput. Electron. Agric., 188: 106357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106357
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gao Y., Chen B., Liao H., Lei M., Li X., Li J., Luo J. (2019). Deep learning – a method to identify aggressive behaviour in pig herds. Trans. Chinese Soc. Agric. Eng., 35: 192–200. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.23.024
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Geers R., Goedseels V., Puers R., Wouters P., Berckmans D., Decuypere E. (1995). Automated oestrus detection of sows with sensors for body temperature and physical activity. Proc. ARBIP Conference, Kobe, Japan, p. 7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hansen P.J. (2009). Effects of heat stress on mammalian reproduction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 364: 3341–3350. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0131
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
He Y., Maltecca C., Tiezzi F., Soto E.L., Flowers W.L. (2020). Transcriptome analysis identifies genes and co-expression networks underlying heat tolerance in pigs. BMC Genetics, 21: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-020-00852-4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Heinonen M., Oravainen J., Orro T., Seppä-Lassila L., Ala-Kurikka E., Virolainen J., Tast A., Peltoniemi O.A. (2006). Lameness and fertility of sows and gilts in randomly selected loose-housed herds in Finland. Vet. Rec., 159: 383–387. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.159.12.383
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jamroz D. (2022). Animal nutrition and feed science, Vol. 1. Physiological and biochemical bases of animal nutrition, new edition (in Polish). Warsaw, Poland, PWN Publishing, 448 pp.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jang J.C., Oh S.H. (2022). Management factors affecting gestating sows’ welfare in group housing systems – A review. Anim. Biosci., 35: 1817–1827. doi: 10.5713/ab.22.0289
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ji Y.P., Ying Y., Liu G. (2020). Recognition of pig eating and drinking behavior based on visible spectrum and YOLOv2. Spectrosc. Spectral Anal., 40: 1588–1594.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jirkof P., Rudeck J., Lewejohann L. (2019). Assessing affective state in laboratory rodents to promote animal welfare – what is the progress in applied refinement research? Animals, 9: 1026. DOI: 10.3390/ani9121026
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kashiha M., Bahr C., Haredasht S.A., Ott S., Moons C.P.H., Niewold T.A., Ödberg F.O., Berckmans D. (2013). The automatic monitoring of pigs water use by cameras. Comput. Electron. Agric., 90: 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2012.09.015
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kashiha M., Bahr C., Ott S., Moons C.P.H., Niewold T.A., Berckmans D. (2014). Weight estimation of pigs using top-view image processing. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Campilho A., Kamel M. (eds). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 496–503.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Keller A., Maus M., Keller E., Kerns K. (2025). Deep learning classification method for boar sperm morphology analysis. Andrology, 13: 1615–1625. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13758
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kemp B., Soede N.M., Langendijk P. (2005). Effects of boar contact and housing conditions on estrus expression in sows. Theriogenology, 63: 643–656. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.038
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Knox R.V. (2014). Impact of swine reproductive technologies on pig and global food production. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 752: 131–160. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8887-3_7
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Knox R.V. (2016). Artificial insemination in pigs today. Theriogenology, 85: 83–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.009
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kousenidis K., Kirtsanis G., Karageorgiou E., Tsiokos D. (2022). Evaluation of a numerical, real-time ultrasound imaging model for the prediction of litter size in pregnant sows, with machine learning. Animals, 12: 1948. DOI: 10.3390/ani12151948
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Laghouaouta H., Fraile L.J., Pena R.N. (2024). Selection for resilience in livestock production systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 25: 13109. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252313109
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lee W., Ham Y., Ban W., Jo O. (2019 a). Analysis of growth performance in swine based on machine learning. IEEE Access, 7: 161716–161724. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2951522
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lee J.H., Lee D.H., Yun W., Oh H.J., An J.S., Kim Y.G., Kim G.M., Cho J.H. (2019 b). Quantitative and feasible heat detection using an ultrasonic sensor array and digital infrared thermography. J. Anim. Sci. Technol., 61: 163–169. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2019.61.3.163
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lei K., Zong C., Du X., Teng G., Feng F. (2021). Oestrus analysis of sows based on bionic boars and machine vision technology. Animals, 11: 1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061485
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lewis B.M., Battye W.H., Aneja V.P., Kim H., Bell M.L. (2023). Modeling and analysis of air pollution and environmental justice: The case for North Carolina’s hog concentrated animal feeding operations. Environ. Health Perspect., 131: 87018. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11344
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Li D., Zhang K., Li Z., Chen Y. (2020). A spatio-temporal convolutional network for multi-behavior recognition of pigs. Sensors, 20(8): 2381. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082381
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Libo G., Zhang H., Wei W., Gao H., Zhang L. (2010). Trial effect of infrared thermometer in body temperature screening of pig slaughterhouse. China Anim. Husb. Vet. Med., 37: 235–237.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ma M., Wang H.H., Hua Y., Qin F., Yang J. (2021). African swine fever in China: Impacts, responses, and policy implications. Food Policy, 102: 102065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102065
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marchant J.N., Broom D.M., Corning S. (2001). The influence of sow behaviour on piglet mortality due to crushing in an open farrowing system. Anim. Sci., 72: 19–28. doi:10.1017/S135772980005551X
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martineau G.P., Badouard B. (2009). Tools of the trade. 9th London Swine Conference Proceedings, London, Ontario, Canada, 1–2. 04.2009, pp. 3–19.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maselyne J., Saeys W., Van Nuffel A. (2015). Review: Quantifying animal feeding behaviour with a focus on pigs. Physiol. Behav., 138: 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.09.012
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Matthews S.G., Miller A.L., Clapp J., Plötz T., Kyriazakis I. (2016). Early detection of health and welfare compromises through automated detection of behavioural changes in pigs. Vet. J., 217: 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.09.005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Meer Y.V.D., Gerrits W.J., Jansman A.J., Kemp B., Bolhuis J.E. (2017). A link between damaging behaviour in pigs, sanitary conditions, and dietary protein and amino acid supply. PloS One, 12(5): e0174688. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174688
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nasirahmadi A., Hensel O., Edwards S.A., Sturm B. (2016). Automatic detection of assembly behaviour in pigs using image analysis. Comput. Electron. Agric., 124: 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.04.022
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Navares R., Aznarte J.L. (2020). Predicting air quality with deep learning LSTM: Towards comprehensive models. Ecol. Informatics, 55: 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2019.101019
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
OECD (2023). Report on the implementation of the OECD Privacy Guidelines, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 361, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/cf87ae8f-en.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ohl F., van der Staay F.J. (2012). Animal welfare: at the interface between science and society. Vet. J., 192: 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.05.019
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ostersen T., Cornou C., Kristensen A.R. (2010). Detection of oestrus by monitoring sow visits to the boar. Comput. Electron. Agric., 74: 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2010.06.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Paula T.M.C.G., Sousa R.V., Sarmiento M.P., Kramer T., Souza Sardunha E.J., Sabei L., Machado J.S., Vilioti M., Zanella A.J. (2024). Deep learning pose detection model for sow locomotion. Sci. Rep., 14: 16401. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62151-7
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pawłowski K.P., Firlej P.K., Pietrzak K., Bartkowiak Z., Sołtysiak G. (2025). The maintenance system and profitability of pig production in Poland under conditions of ASF occurrence. Agriculture, 15: 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15010043
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peruffo E., Rodríguez R., Mandl I., Bisello M. (2020). Game-changing technologies: Transforming production and employment in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 54 pp.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pomar C., Remus A. (2023). Review: Fundamentals, limitations and pitfalls on the development and application of precision nutrition techniques for precision livestock farming. Animal, 17: 100763. doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100763
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Qin Y. (2015). Research on pig body temperature collection system based on infrared temperature measurement equipment. Information Technology Branch of China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Society. Proc. 10th Symposium of Information Technology Branch of China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Society, China.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Racewicz P., Ludwiczak A., Skrzypczak E., Składanowska-Baryza J., Biesiada H., Nowak T., Nowaczewski S., Zaborowicz M., Stanisz M., Ślósarz P. (2021). Welfare health and productivity in commercial pig herds. Animals, 11: 1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041176
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Radomil L., Pettitt M.J., Merkies K.M., Hickey K.D., Buhr M.M. (2011). Stress and dietary factors modify boar sperm for processing. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 46: 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01865.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Riaz U., Idris M., Ahmed M., Ali F., Yang L. (2023). Infrared thermography as a potential non-invasive tool for heat detection in cattle and buffaloes. Animals, 13: 1425. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081425
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rodríguez M., Toloza L., Salazar L., Muñoz J., Rojas H., Prieto C., Egea R. (2023). Feed intake patterns of modern genetics lactating sows: Characterization and effect of the reproductive parameters. Porc. Health Manag., 9: 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-022-00300-y
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Russell S., Norvig P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. London, UK, Pearson Press, 1136 pp.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sánchez-Giménez P., Martínez-Nicolas A., Madrid J.A., Fernández R., Martínez-Alarcón L., Murciano F., Muñoz A., Ramis G. (2024). Circadian temperature rhythm in breeding sows: differences between days in oestrus and anoestrus after weaning. Porc. Health Manag., 10: 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-024-00369-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sanket D., Shubhajyoti D., Nath M.S., Subhranil M., Santanu B. (2023). Ear image-based individual pig identification by using statistical parameters. Appl. Biol. Res., 25: 62–70. DOI: 10.5958/0974-4517.2023.00007.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schindler F., Steinhage V. (2021). Identification of animals and recognition of their actions in wildlife videos using deep learning techniques. Ecol. Informatics, 61: 101215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101215
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schmidt M., Ammon C., Schön P.C., Manteuffel C., Hoffmann G., Schön P.C. (2014). The suitability of infrared temperature measurements for continuous temperature monitoring in gilts. Arch. Anim. Breed., 57: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7482/0003-9438-57-021
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Seo H.J., Oh B.W., Seo I.H. (2025). Environmental monitoring and thermal data analysis related to mortality rates in a commercial pig house. Agriculture, 15: 635. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15060635
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Soerensen D.D., Pedersen L.J. (2015). Infrared skin temperature measurements for monitoring health in pigs: a review. Acta Vet. Scand. 57(1): 5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Špinka M., Illmann G., de Jonge F., Andersson M., Schuurman T., Jensen P. (2000). Dimensions of maternal behaviour characteristics in domestic and wild×domestic crossbred sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 70: 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00151-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Steverink D.W.B., Soede N.M., Groenland G.J.R., van Schie F.W., Noordhuizen J.P.T.M., Kemp B. (1999). Oestrus duration in relation to reproductive performance in pigs on commercial farms. J. Anim. Sci., 77: 801–809. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.774801x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tan H., Zhu W. (2018). Identification of drinking water behavior of pigs based on contour. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 46: 166–170.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thompson R.J., Matthews S., Plötz T., Kyriazakis I. (2019). Freedom to lie: How farrowing environment affects sow lying behaviour assessment using inertial sensors. Comput. Electron. Agric., 157: 549–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.01.035
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tsakmakidis I.A., Lymberopoulos A.G., Khalifa T.A.A. (2010). Relationship between sperm quality traits and field-fertility of porcine semen. J. Vet. Sci., 11: 151–154. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2010.11.2.151
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Verhoeven S., Chantziaras I., Bernaerdt E., Loicq M., Verhoeven L., Maes D. (2023). The evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for estrus detection in sows. Porc. Health Manag., 9: 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00303-3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vranken E., Berckmans D. (2017). Precision livestock farming for pigs. Anim. Front., 7: 32–37. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2017.0106
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang H., Liu J., Dong Z., Song J., Zhu Z. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based metabolic energy prediction model for animal feed proportioning optimization. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 22: 942–952. doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2023.2236132
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang S., Jiang H., Qiao Y., Jiang S., Lin H., Sun Q. (2022). The research progress of vision-based artificial intelligence in smart pig farming. Sensors, 22: 6541. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22176541
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang Z., Li Q., Yu Q., Qian W., Gao R., Wang R., Wu T., Li X.A. (2024). Review of visual estimation research on live pig weight. Sensors, 24: 7093. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24217093
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xu Z., Sullivan R., Zhou J., Bromfield C., Lim T.T., Safranski T.J., Yan Z. (2023). Detecting sow vulva size change around estrus using machine vision technology. Smart Agric. Technol., 3: 100090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100090
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xue H., Chen J., Ding Q., Sun Y., Shen M., Liu L., Chen X., Zhou J. (2022). Automatic detection of sow posture and estrus based on convolutional neural network. Front. Phys. 10: 1037129. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.1037129
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yan L., Shao Q., Wu X., Xie Q., Sun X., Wei C. (2016). Feature extraction and classification based on skewness clustering algorithm for lactating sow. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 47: 300–306.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yang Q.M., Xiao D.Q. (2020). A review of video-based porcine behaviour recognition. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 233: 105146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105146
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yang Q.M., Xiao D.Q., Zhang G. (2018). Automatic pig drinking behavior recognition with machine vision. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 49: 232–238.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yin M., Ma R., Luo H., Li J., Zhao Q., Zhang M. (2023). Non-contact sensing technology enables precision livestock farming in smart farms. Comput. Electron. Agric., 212: 108171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108171
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yin Y., Tu D., Shen W., Bao J. (2021). Recognition of cough sounds in sick pigs based on spline neural network in field situations. Inf. Process. Agric., 8: 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2020.11.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang C., Wu X., Xiao D., Zhang X., Lei X., Lin S. (2025). An automatic ear temperature monitoring method for group-housed pigs adopting infrared thermography. Animals, 15: 2279. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15152279
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang L., Guo W., Lv Ch., Guo M., Yang M., Fu Q., Liu X. (2024). Advancements in artificial intelligence technology for improving animal welfare: Current applications and research progress. Anim. Res. One Health., 2: 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/aro2.44
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang Z., Zhang H., Liu T. (2019). Study on body temperature detection of pig based on infrared technology: A review. Artif. Intell. Agric., 1: 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2019.02.002
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhao J., Li X., Liu W., Gao Y., Lei M., Tan H., Yang D. (2020). DNN-HMM based acoustic model for continuous pig cough sound recognition. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 13: 186–193.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhuang Y., Yu J., Teng G., Cao M. (2020). Recognition method of large white sow oestrus behavior based on a convolutional neural network. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 51: 364–370.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zin T.T., Phyo C.N., Tin P., Hama H., Kobayashi I. (2018). Image technology-based cow identification system using deep learning. Proc. International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong, China, 14–16.03.2018, pp. 236–247.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article