Understanding Abnormal Behaviour in Dairy Calves – A Narrative Review
References
- Abdelfattah E.M., Aly S.S., Lehenbauer T.W., Karle B.M. (2024). Effects of simplified group housing on behaviour, welfare, growth performance, and health of preweaned dairy calves on a California dairy. J. Dairy Sci., 107: 3927–3940.
- Adamczyk K. (2018). Dairy cattle welfare as a result of human-animal relationship – a review. Ann. Anim. Sci., 18: 601–622.
- Adamczyk K., Górecka-Bruzda A., Nowicki J., Gumułka M., Molik E., Schwarz T., Earley B., Klocek C. (2015). Perception of environment in farm animals – a review. Ann. Anim. Sci., 15: 565–589.
- Babu L.K., Pandey H.N., Sahoo A. (2004). Effect of individual versus group rearing on ethological and physiological responses of crossbred calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 87: 177–191.
- Bailly-Caumette E., Bertelsen M.B., Jensen M.B. (2023). Social and locomotor play behaviour of dairy calves kept with the dam either full time or half time in straw-bedded pens. JDS Communications, 4: 278–283.
- Barrows E.M. (2001). Animal behaviour desk reference: A dictionary of animal behaviour, ecology, and evolution (2nd ed). CRC Press, Cambridge, USA.
- Barry J., Bokkers E.A.M., De Boer I.J.M., Kennedy E. (2020). Pre-weaning management of calves on commercial dairy farms and its influence on calf welfare and mortality. Animal, 14: 2580–2587.
- Beaver A., Meagher R.K., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. (2019). Invited review: A systematic review of the effects of early separation on dairy cow and calf health. J. Dairy Sci., 102: 5784–5810.
- Bertelsen M., Jensen M.B. (2023). Comparing weaning methods in dairy calves with different dam contact levels. J. Dairy Sci., 106: 9598–9612.
- Binev R. (2023). Investigations on some indicators in the blood of cattle with orosthenic activity tongue rolling. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res., 10: 336.
- Bøe K.E., Færevik G. (2003). Grouping and social preferences in calves, heifers and cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 80: 175–190.
- Bouissou M.F., Boissy A., Le Neindre P., Veissier I. (2001). The social behaviour of cattle. In: Social behaviour in farm animals, Keeling L.J., Gonyou H.W. (eds). CAB International, Cambridge, USA, pp. 113–145.
- Broucek J., Uhrincat M., Kisac P., Hanus A. (2020). Effect of different rearing during the milk-feeding period on growth of dairy calves. Agriculture, 10: 346.
- Camiloti T.V., Fregonesi J.A., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. (2012). Short communication: Effects of bedding quality on the lying behaviour of dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 95: 3380–3383.
- Carslake C., Occhiuto F., Vázquez-Diosdado J.A., Kaler J. (2022). Indication of a personality trait in dairy calves and its link to weight gain through automatically collected feeding behaviours. Sci. Rep., 12: 19425.
- Carulla P., Villagrá A., Estellés F., Blanco-Penedo I. (2023). Welfare implications on management strategies for rearing dairy calves: A systematic review. Part 2 – Social management. Front. Vet. Sci., 10: 1154555.
- Castells L., Bach A., Aris A., Terré M. (2013). Effects of forage provision to young calves on rumen fermentation and development of the gastrointestinal tract. J. Dairy Sci., 96: 5226–5236.
- Charlolf E.H., Marck B.T., Matsumoto A.M., Dorsa D.M., Palmiter R.D. (2001). Induction of stereotypy in dopamine-deficient mice requires striatal D1 receptor activation. Neurobiology, 98: 10451–10456.
- Coetzee J.F., Gehring R., Bettenhausen A.C., Lubbers B.V., Toerber S.E., Thomson D.U., Kukanich B., Apley M.D. (2007). Attenuation of acute plasma cortisol response in calves following intravenous sodium salicylate administration prior to castration. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap., 30: 305–313.
- Costa J.H.C., Daros R.R., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. (2014). Complex social housing reduces food neophobia in dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 97: 7804–7810.
- Costa J.H.C., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. (2016). Invited review: Effects of group housing of dairy calves on behaviour, cognition, performance, and health. J. Dairy Sci., 99: 2453–2467.
- Daigle C.L., Ridge E.E., Caddiell R.M., Jennings J.S. (2023). Effect of dietary corn stalk inclusion on the performance of non-nutritive oral behaviours of drylot-housed beef steers. J. Appl. Anim. Welfare Sci., 27: 694–701.
- Dantzer R. (1991). Stress, stereotypies and welfare. Behav. Processes, 25: 95–102.
- de Passillé A.M., Rushen J. (2012). Adjusting the weaning age of calves fed by automated feeders according to individual intakes of solid feed. J. Dairy Sci., 95: 5292–5298.
- De Passillé A.M., Sweeney B., Rushen J. (2010). Cross-sucking and gradual weaning of dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 124: 11–15.
- de Passillé A.M., Borderas F., Rushen J. (2011). Cross-sucking by dairy calves may become a habit or reflect characteristics of individual calves more than milk allowance or weaning. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 133: 137–143.
- de Paula Vieira A., Guesdon V., de Passillé A.M., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. (2008). Behavioural indicators of hunger in dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 109: 180–189.
- de Paula Vieira A., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. (2010). Effects of pair versus single housing on performance and behaviour of dairy calves before and after weaning from milk. J. Dairy Sci., 93: 3079–3085.
- Downey B.C., Tucker C.B. (2023 a). Breed differences in oral behaviours in feed-restricted dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci., 106: 9440–9450.
- Downey B.C., Tucker C.B. (2023 b). Providing long hay in a novel pipe feeder or a bucket reduces abnormal oral behaviours in milk-fed dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 106: 1968–1985.
- Downey B.C., Gfeller J.S., Tucker C.B. (2021). Validation of 1–0 and instantaneous sampling for quantifying oral behaviours in milk-fed dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 104: 9185–9194.
- Downey B.C., Jensen M.B., Tucker C.B. (2022). Hay provision affects 24-h performance of normal and abnormal oral behaviours in individually housed dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 105: 4434–4448.
- Doyle S.B., Miller-Cushon E.K. (2023). Influences of human contact following milk-feeding on nonnutritive oral behaviour and rest of individual and pair-housed dairy calves during weaning. JDS Commun., 4: 46–50.
- Doyle S.B., Wickens C.L., Van Os J.M.C., Miller-Cushon E.K. (2024). Producer perceptions of dairy calf management, behaviour, and welfare. J. Dairy Sci., 107: 6131–6147.
- Duve L.R., Jensen M.B. (2011). The level of social contact affects social behaviour in pre-weaned dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 135: 34–43.
- Duve L.R., Jensen M.B. (2012). Social behaviour of young dairy calves housed with limited or full social contact with a peer. J. Dairy Sci., 95: 5936–5945.
- Eckert E., Brown H.E., Leslie K.E., DeVries T.J., Steele M.A. (2015). Weaning age affects growth, feed intake, gastrointestinal development, and behaviour in Holstein calves fed an elevated plane of nutrition during the preweaning stage. J. Dairy Sci., 98: 6315–6326.
- EFSA AHAW Panel (EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Animal Welfare), Nielsen S.S., Alvarez J., Bicout D.J., Calistri P., Canali E., Drewe J.A., Garin-Bastuji B., Gonzales Rojas J.L., Schmidt C.G., Herskin M., Michel V., Miranda Chueca M.A., Padalino B., Pasquali P., Roberts H.C., Spoolder H., Stahl K., Velarde A., Viltrop A., Jensen M.B., Waiblinger S., Candiani D., Lima E., Mosbach-Schulz O., Van der Stede Y., Vitali M., Winckler C. (2023). Scientific opinion on the welfare of calves. EFSA J., 21: 7896.
- Fericean M.L., Palicica R., Rada O. (2010). The behaviour of calves. Res. J. Agric. Sci., 42: 248–254.
- Gaillard C., Meagher R.K., von Keyserlingk M.A., Weary D.M. (2014). Social housing improves dairy calves’ performance in two cognitive tests. PLoS ONE 9, e90205.
- García-Muñoz A., Vidal G., Singh N., Silva-del-Río N. (2016). Evaluation of two methodologies for lameness detection in dairy cows based on postural and gait abnormalities observed during milking and while restrained at headlock stanchions. Prev. Vet. Med., 128: 33–40.
- Garner J.P. (2005). Perseveration and stereotypy – Systems-level insights from clinical psychology. In: Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare (2nd ed.), Rushen J., Mason G. (eds). CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
- Giannetto C., Cerutti R.D., Scaglione M.C., Arfuso F., Pennisi M., Giudice E., Piccione G., Zumbo A. (2023). Real-time measurement of the daily total locomotor behaviour in calves reared in an intensive management system for the possible application in precision livestock farming. Vet. Sci., 10: 64.
- Gleerup K.B., Andersen P.H., Munksgaard L., Forkman B. (2015). Pain evaluation in dairy cattle. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 171: 25–32.
- Graf B., Senn M. (1999). Behavioural and physiological responses of calves to dehorning by heat cauterization with or without local anaesthesia. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 62: 153–171.
- Größbacher V., Bučková K., Lawrence A.B., Špinka M., Winckler C. (2020). Discriminating spontaneous locomotor play of dairy calves using accelerometers. J. Dairy Sci., 103: 1866–1873.
- Guevara-Mann D., Renaud D.L., Cantor M.C. (2023). Activity behaviours and relative changes in activity patterns recorded by precision technology were associated with diarrhea status in individually housed calves. J. Dairy Sci., 106: 9366–9376.
- Gygax L., Neisen G., Wechsler B. (2010). Socio-spatial relationships in dairy cows. Ethology, 116: 10–23.
- Harré R., Lamb R. (1986). Editors. The Dictionary of ethology and animal learning (1st MIT Press ed). MIT Press.
- Harris A.D., Singer H.S., Horska A., Kline T., Ryan M., Edden R.A., Mahone E.M. (2016). GABA and glutamate in children with primary complex motor stereotypies: an 1H-MRS study at 7T. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., 37: 552–557.
- Heinrich A., Duffield T.F., Lissemore K.D., Squires E.J., Millman S.T. (2010). The impact of meloxicam on postsurgical stress associated with cautery dehorning. J. Dairy Sci., 93: 245–255.
- Hemmings A., Parker M.O., Hale C., McBride S.D. (2018). Causal and functional interpretation of mu- and delta-opioid receptor profiles in mesoaccumbens and nigrostriatal pathways of an oral stereotypy phenotype. Behav. Brain Res., 353: 108–113.
- Hessle A.K. (2009). Effects of social learning on foraging behaviour and live weight gain in first-season grazing calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 116: 150–155.
- Hillmann E., Johns J., Wagner K., Waiblinger S., Barth K. (2011). Saugverhalten und Festfutteraufnahme muttergebunden aufgezogener Kälber. Anim. Nutr., 34: 115–117.
- Horvath K.C., Miller-Cushon E.K. (2017). The effect of milk-feeding method and hay provision on the development of feeding behaviour and non-nutritive oral behaviour of dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 100: 3949–3957.
- Horvath K.C., Miller-Cushon E.K. (2019 a). Characterizing grooming behaviour patterns and the influence of brush access on the behaviour of group-housed dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 102: 3421–3430.
- Horvath K.C., Miller-Cushon E.K. (2019 b). Evaluating effects of providing hay on behavioural development and performance of group-housed dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 102: 10411–10422.
- Horvath K.C., Allen A.N., Miller-Cushon E.K. (2020). Effects of access to stationary brushes and chopped hay on behaviour and performance of individually housed dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 103: 8421–8432.
- Hurnik J.F., Webster A.B., Siegel P.B. (1995). Dictionary of Farm Animal Behaviour (2nd Ed). Iowa State Univ. Press.
- Hut P.R., Hostens M.M., Beijaard M.J., van Eerdenburg F.J.C.M., Hulsen J.H.J.L., Hooijer G.A., Stassen E.N., Nielen M. (2021). Associations between body condition score, locomotion score, and sensor-based time budgets of dairy cattle during the dry period and early lactation. J. Dairy Sci., 104: 4746–4763.
- Jensen E.H., Neave H.W., Bateson M., Jensen M.B. (2024). Maternal behavior of dairy cows and suckling behavior of dairy calves in different cow-calf contact conditions. J. Dairy Sci., 107: 6090–6103.
- Jensen M.B. (1999). Effects of confinement on rebounds of locomotor behaviour of calves and heifers, and the spatial preferences of calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 62: 43–56.
- Jensen M.B. (2003). The effects of feeding method, milk allowance and social factors on milk feeding behaviour and cross-sucking in group housed dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 80: 191–206.
- Jensen M.B., Holm L. (2003). The effect of milk flow rate and milk allowance on feeding related behaviour in dairy calves fed by computer controlled milk feeders. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 82: 87–100.
- Johanssen J.R.E., Adler S., Johnsen J.F., Sørheim K., Bøe K.E. (2024). Performance in dairy cows and calves with or without cow-calf contact on pasture. Livest. Sci., 285: 105502.
- Juge A.E., Cooke R.F., Ceja G., Matt M., Daigle C.L. (2024). Comparison of physiological markers, behaviour monitoring, and clinical illness scoring as indicators of an inflammatory response in beef cattle. Plos One, 19(4), e0302172.
- Jung J., Lidfors L. (2001). Effects of amount of milk, milk flow, and access to a rubber teat on cross-sucking and non-nutritive sucking in dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 72: 201–213.
- Jurkovich V., Hejel P., Kovács L. (2024). A review of the effects of stress on dairy cattle behaviour. Animals, 14: 2038.
- Kälber T., Barth K. (2014). Practical implications of suckling systems for dairy calves in organic production systems – a review. Landbauforschung, 64: 45–58.
- Kerr S.C., Wood-Gush D.G. (1987). The development of behaviour patterns and temperament in dairy heifers. Behav. Processes, 15: 1–16.
- Khan M.A., Burggraaf V.T., Thomson B., Muir P., Lowe K., Koolaard J., Heiser A., Leath S., McCoard S. (2020). Feeding forage or concentrates early in life influences rumen fermentation, metabolic response, immune function and growth of Wagyu × Friesian calves. Anim. Prod. Sci., 60: 1418–1428.
- Lensink B.J., Boivin X., Pradel P., Le Neindre P., Veissier I. (2000). Reducing veal calves’ reactivity to people by providing additional human contact. J. Anim. Sci., 78: 1213–1218.
- Leruste H., Brscic M., Cozzi G., Kemp B., Wolthuis-Fillerup M., Lensink B.J., Bokkers E.A., van Reenen C.G. (2014). Prevalence and potential influencing factors of non-nutritive oral behaviours of veal calves on commercial farms. J. Dairy Sci., 97: 7021–7030.
- Levitis D.A., Lidicker W.Z., Freund G. (2009). Behavioural biologists do not agree on what constitutes behaviour. Anim. Behav., 78: 103–110.
- Li C., Chen X., Fang T., Gu X. (2024 a). Do cows with stereotypic tongue-rolling behaviour cope better with their environment? Front. Vet. Sci., 11: 1404539.
- Li C., Gu X. (2024 b). Oral stereotypic behaviours in farm animals and their causes. Anim. Res. One Health, 2: 337–351.
- Low M. (2003). Stereotypies and behavioural medicine: confusions in current thinking. Australian Vet. J., 81: 192–198.
- Lv J., Zhao X.-W., Su H., Wang Z.-P., Wang C., Li J.-H., Li X., Zhang R.-X., Bao J. (2021). Effects of group size on the behaviour, heart rate, immunity, and growth of Holstein dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 241: 105378.
- Lyu J., Wang C., Zhao X., Miao E., Wang Z., Xu Y., Bai X., Bao J. (2023). Effect of group size and regrouping on physiological stress and behaviour of dairy calves. J. Integr. Agricult., 22: 844–852.
- Mahendran S.A., Wathes D.C., Booth R.E., Blackie N. (2023). Effects of the individual and pair housing of calves on long-term heifer production on a UK commercial dairy farm. Animals, 14: 125.
- Mahmoud M.E., Mahmoud F.A., Ahmed A.E. (2016). Impacts of self- and cross-sucking on cattle health and performance. Vet. World, 9: 922–928.
- Mandel R., Whay H.R., Klement E., Nicol C.J. (2016). Invited review: Environmental enrichment of dairy cows and calves in indoor housing. J. Dairy Sci., 99: 1695–1715.
- Manning A., Dawkins M.S. (2012). An introduction to animal behaviour (6th ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK,
- Margerison J.K., Preston T.R., Berry N., Phillips C.J.C. (2003). Cross-sucking and other oral behaviours in calves, and their relation to cow suckling and food provision. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 80: 277–286.
- Marin M.B.U., Gingerich K.N., Wang J., Yu H., Miller-Cushon E.K. (2024). Effects of space allowance on patterns of activity in group-housed dairy calves. JDS Commun., 5: 468–473.
- Mason G.J. (1991). Stereotypies: A critical review. Anim. Behav., 41: 1015–1037.
- Mason G., Rushen J. (2006). Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Implications for Animal Welfare (2nd ed.). CABI, Wallingford Oxford.
- McBride S.D., Cuddeford D. (2001). The putative welfare-reducing effects of preventing equine stereotypic behaviour. Anim. Welfare, 10: 173–189.
- McKay C., Ellis K., Haskell M.J., Gladden N. (2025). Impact of early social housing on the play behaviour of neonatal and post-weaning dairy calves. Front. Vet. Sci., 12: 1683861.
- Meagher R.K., Weary D.M., von Keyserlingk M.A.G. (2017). Some like it varied: Individual differences in preference for feed variety in dairy heifers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 195: 8–14.
- Meale S.J., Leal L.N., Martín-Tereso J., Steele M.A. (2015). Delayed weaning of Holstein bull calves fed an elevated plane of nutrition impacts feed intake, growth and potential markers of gastrointestinal development. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 209: 268–273.
- Mearns D.S., Donovan J.C., Fernandes A.M., Semmelhack J.L., Baier H. (2020). Deconstructing hunting behavior reveals a tightly coupled stimulus-response loop. Curr. Biol., 30: 54–69.e9.
- Mery F., Burns J.G. (2010). Behavioural plasticity: an interaction between evolution and experience. Evolut. Ecol., 24: 571–583.
- Miller-Cushon E.K., DeVries T.J. (2015). Development and expression of dairy calf feeding behaviour. Canadian J. Anim. Sci., 95: 341–350.
- Miller-Cushon E.K., Bergeron R., Leslie K.E., DeVries T.J. (2013). Effect of milk feeding level on development of feeding behaviour in dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 96: 551–564.
- Mirra A., Spadavecchia C., Bruckmaier R. Gutzwiller A., Casoni D. (2018). Acute pain and peripheral sensitization following cautery disbudding in 1- and 4-week-old calves. Physiol. Behav., 184: 248–260.
- Morrow C.R., Downey B.C., Tucker C.B. (2023). Response to novel feed in dairy calves is affected by prior hay provision and presentation method. PLOS One 18(5), e0284889.
- Nakamura T., Uramura K., Nambu T., Yada T., Goto K., Yanagisawa M., Sakurai T. (2000). Orexin-induced hyperlocomotion and stereotypy are mediated by the dopaminergic system. Brain Res., 873: 181–187.
- Neave H.W., Weary D.M., Von Keyserlingk M.A.G. (2018). Individual variability in feeding behaviour of domesticated ruminants. Animal, 12: 419–430.
- Neja W., Jankowska M., Bogucki M., Krężel-Czopek S., Zielińska S., Ozkaya S. (2017). Behaviour of calves. Folia Pomeranae Universitatis Technologiae Stetinensis, Agriculture, Aliment, Pisciculture, Zootechnica, 336: 103–110.
- Nickles K.R., Relling A.E., Moraes L.E., Parker A.J. (2021). The effect of a social facilitator cow on the distance walked and time spent walking by abruptly weaned beef calves. Anim. Prod. Sci., 61: 596–601.
- Nielsen P.P., Jensen M.B., Lidfors L. (2008). Milk allowance and weaning method affect the use of a computer-controlled milk feeder and the development of cross-sucking in dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 109: 223–237.
- O’Leary N.W., Byrne D.T., Garcia P., Werner J., Cabedoche M., Shalloo L. (2020). Grazing cow behaviour’s association with mild and moderate lameness. Animals, 10: 661.
- Occhiuto F., Vázquez-Diosdado J.A., Thomas M., Gayner E.R., King A.J., Kaler J. (2025). Dairy calves provided with environmental enrichment are more active, playful and have fewer feeding interruptions. Sci. Rep., 15: 4241.
- Orihuela A., Mota-Rojas D., Strappini A., Serrapica F., Braghieri A., Mora-Medina P., Napolitano F. (2021). Neurophysiological mechanisms of mother-young bonding in buffalo and other farm animals. Animals (Basel), 11: 1968.
- Pempek J.A., Eastridge M.L., Botheras N.A., Croney C.C., Bowen Yoho W.S. (2013). Effects of alternative housing and feeding systems on the behaviour and performance of dairy heifer calves. Profes. Anim. Sci., 29: 278–287.
- Pempek J.A., Eastridge M.L., Swartzwelder S.S., Daniels K.M., Yohe T.T. (2016). Housing system may affect behaviour and growth performance of Jersey heifer calves. J. Dairy Sci., 99: 569–578.
- Pempek J.A., Eastridge M.L., Proudfoot K.L. (2017). The effect of a furnished individual hutch pre-weaning on calf behaviour, response to novelty, and growth. J. Dairy Sci., 100: 4807–4817.
- Peng R., Xiao J., Chen T., Alugongo G.M., Yang H., Zhang S., Cao Z. (2023). Validation of a methodology for characterization of rumination, lying, standing, and performing non-nutritive oral behaviours and behavioural patterns in Holstein dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 106: 6402–6415.
- Perry G.A. (2016). Effects of peri-AI nutritional management on embryo development and pregnancy success. Appl. Reprod. Strateg. Beef Cattle, 158: 158–168.
- Phillips C. (2002). Cattle Behaviour and Welfare. Blackwell Science Ltd, Iowa State Press, a Blackwell Publishing Company, Second Edition.
- Phillips C.J.C. (2004). The effects of forage provision and group size on the behaviour of calves. J. Dairy Sci., 87: 1380–1388.
- Phillips C. (2008). Cattle Behaviour and Welfare. John Wiley Sons, pp. 272.
- Plaugher G.D., Cantor M.C. (2025). A scoping review on pair housing dairy calves: health and performance outcomes and tactics to reduce cross-sucking behavior. Front. Vet. Sci., 12: 1568164.
- Pullin A.N., Pairis-Garcia M.D., Campbell B.J., Campler M.R., Proudfoot K.L., Fluharty F.L. (2017). The effect of social dynamics and environment at time of early weaning on short- and long-term lamb behaviour in a pasture and feedlot setting. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 197: 32–39.
- Qi J., Fang J., Huang F., Li Z., Kumbhar M.A., Guo H., Ren Z., Geng Y., Deng J., Zuo Z. (2024). Effects of meloxicam on the welfare of Holstein calves from 6 weeks to 6 months old undergoing amputation dehorning. J. Dairy Sci., 107: 6065–6078.
- Quigley J.D. (2024). Invited review: An evaluation of EFSA opinion on calf welfare from a nutritional and management perspective. J. Dairy Sci., 107: 7483–7503.
- Raboisson D., Delor F., Cahuzac E., Gendre C., Sans P., Allaire G. (2013). Perinatal, neonatal, and rearing period mortality of dairy calves and replacement heifers in France. J. Dairy Sci., 96: 2913–2924.
- Rademann A., Schneider M.L., Waiblinger S. (2025). Welfare of calves and heifers on dairy farms with cow-calf contact rearing or early separation. Front. Vet. Sci., 12: 1610084.
- Radkowska I., Godyń D., Fic K. (2020). Stereotypic behaviour in cattle, pigs, and horses – a review. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., 38: 303–319.
- Raussi S., Niskanen S., Siivonen J., Hänninen L., Hepola H., Jauhiainen L., Veissier I. (2010). The formation of preferential relationships at early age in cattle. Behav. Processes, 84: 726–731.
- Relić R., Hristov S., Joksimović-Todorović M., Davidović V., Bojkovski J. (2012). Behaviour of cattle as an indicator of their health and welfare. Bull. Univ. Agricult. Sci. Vet. Med. Cluj-Napoca, Vet. Med., 69: 1–8.
- Ridge E.E., Foster M.J., Daigle C.L. (2020). Effect of diet on non-nutritive oral behaviour performance in cattle: A systematic review. Livest. Sci., 238: 104063.
- Riley B.B., Duthie C.A., Corbishley A., Mason C., Bowen J.M., Bell D.J., Haskell M.J. (2023). Intrinsic calf factors associated with the behaviour of healthy pre-weaned group-housed dairy-bred calves. Front. Vet. Sci., 10: 1204580.
- Roche J.R., Friggens N.C., Kay J.K., Fisher M.W., Stafford K.J., Berry D.P. (2009). Invited review: Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. J. Dairy Sci., 92: 5769–5801.
- Roth B.A., Keil N.M., Gygax L., Hillmann E. (2009 a). Temporal distribution of sucking behaviour in dairy calves and influence of energy balance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 119: 137–142.
- Roth B.A., Barth K., Gygax L., Hillmann E. (2009 b). Influence of artificial vs. mother-bonded rearing on sucking behaviour, health, and weight gain in calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 119: 143–150.
- Rushen J., de Passillé A.M., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. (2008). The welfare of cattle. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp. 1–150.
- Sadiq M.B., Ramanoon S.Z., Shaik Mossadeq W.M., Mansor R., Syed-Hussain S.S. (2017). Association between lameness and indicators of dairy cow welfare based on locomotion scoring, body and hock condition, leg hygiene and lying behaviour. Animals, 7: 79.
- Salter R.S., Reuscher K.J., Van Os J.M.C. (2021). Milk- and starter-feeding strategies to reduce cross sucking in pair-housed calves in outdoor hutches. J. Dairy Sci., 104: 6096–6112.
- Schnaider M.A., Heidemann M.S., Silva A.H.P., Taconeli C.A., Molento C.F.M. (2022). Vocalization and other behaviours indicating pain in beef calves during the ear tagging procedure. J. Vet. Behav., 47: 93–98.
- Schneider L., Kemper N., Spindler B. (2019). Stereotypic behaviour in fattening bulls. Animals, 10: 40.
- Silva F.G., Conceição C., Pereira A.M., Cerqueira J.L., Silva S.R. (2023). Literature review on technological applications to monitor and evaluate calves’ health and welfare. Animals, 13: 1148.
- Špinka M. (2006). How important is natural behaviour in animal farming systems? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 100: 117–128.
- Steagall P.V., Bustamante H., Johnson C.B., Turner P.V. (2021). Pain management in farm animals: Focus on cattle, sheep and pigs. Animals (Basel), 11: 1483.
- Stewart M., Stafford K.J., Dowling S.K. (2008). Eye temperature and heart rate variability of calves disbudded with or without local anaesthetic. Physiol. Behav., 93: 789–797.
- Sun F., Zhao Q., Chen X., Zhao G., Gu X. (2022). Physiological indicators and production performance of dairy cows with tongue rolling stereotyped behaviour. Front. Vet. Sci., 9: 840726.
- Sutherland M.A., Worth G.M., Schütz K.E., Stewart M. (2014). Rearing substrate and space allowance influences locomotor play behaviour of dairy calves in an arena test. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 154: 8–14.
- Tatemoto P., Broom D.M., Zanella A.J. (2022). Changes in stereotypies: Effects over time and over generations. Animals (Basel), 12: 2504.
- Tinbergen N. (1969). The Study of Instinct. Oxford University Press, New York, 228 pp. 6.
- Tschoner T. (2021). Methods for pain assessment in calves and their use for the evaluation of pain during different procedures – A review. Animals (Basel), 11: 1235.
- Ugwu N., Love E., Murrell J., Whay H.R., Knowles T., Hockenhull J. (2021). Development of an ethogram for hutch-housed dairy calves and determination of factors influencing their behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 234: 105165.
- Ursin H., Eriksen H.R. (2004). The cognitive activation theory of stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29: 567–592.
- Van der Saag D., Lomax S., Windsor P.A., Taylor C., White P.J. (2018). Evaluating treatments with topical anaesthetic and buccal meloxicam for pain and inflammation caused by amputation dehorning of calves. PLoS ONE, 13(6), e0198808.
- Vanhonacker F., Verbeke W. (2014). Public and consumer policies for higher welfare food products: Challenges and opportunities. J. Agricult. Environ. Ethics, 27: 153–171.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-013-9479-2 - Vaughan A., Miguel-Pacheco G.G., de Passillé A.M., Rushen J. (2016). Reciprocated cross sucking between dairy calves after weaning off milk does not appear to negatively affect udder health or production. J. Dairy Sci., 99: 5596–5603.
- Vázquez-Diosdado J.A., Doidge C., Bushby E.V. (2024). Quantification of play behaviour in calves using automated ultra-wideband location data and its association with age, weaning and health status. Sci. Rep., 14: 8872.
- Veissier I., Ramirez de la Fe A.R., Pradel P. (1998). Nonnutritive oral activities and feeding and housing conditions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 57: 35–49.
- Veissier I., De Passillé A.M., Després G., Rushen J., Charpentier I., Ramirez De La Fe A.R., Pradel P. (2002). Does nutritive and non-nutritive sucking reduce other oral behaviours and stimulate rest in calves?. J. Anim. Sci., 80: 2574–2587.
- Veissier I., Care S., Pomies D. (2013). Suckling, weaning, and the development of oral behaviours in dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 147: 11–18.
- Visha P., Sejian V. (2023). Physiology of Animal Behaviour. In: Textbook of Veterinary Physiology, Singapore: Springer Nature, pp. 695–720.
- Wagner N., Mialon M.M., Sloth K.H., Lardy R., Ledoux D., Silberberg M., de Boyer des Roches A., Veissier I. (2021). Detection of changes in the circadian rhythm of cattle in relation to disease, stress, and reproductive events. Methods, 186: 14–21.
- Wang H., Yu Z., Gao Z., Li Q., Qiu X., Wu F., Guan T., Cao B., Su H. (2022 a). Effects of compound probiotics on growth performance, rumen fermentation, blood parameters, and health status of neonatal Holstein calves. J. Dairy Sci., 105: 2190–2200.
- Wang S., Diao Q.Y., Hu F.M., Bi Y.L., Piao M.Y., Jiang L.S., Sun F., Li H., Tu Y. (2022 b). Development of ruminating behaviour in Holstein calves between birth and 30 days of age. J. Dairy Sci., 105: 572–584.
- Webb L.E., Bokkers E.A.M., Engel B., Gerrits W.J.J., Berends H., van Reenen C.G. (2012). Behaviour and welfare of veal calves fed different amounts of solid feed supplemented to a milk replacer ration adjusted for similar growth. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 136: 108–116.
- Webb L.E., Engel B., Berends H., van Reenen C.G., Gerrits W.J.J., De Boer I.J.M., Bokkers E.A.M. (2014). What do calves choose to eat and how do preferences affect behaviour? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 161: 17–19.
- Webb L., van Reenen C.G., Engel B., Berends H., Gerrits W.J., Bokkers E.M. (2017). Understanding oral stereotypies in calves: alternative strategies, hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (re)activity and gene by environment interactions. Animal, 11: 1054–1062.
- Webb L.E., Verwer C., Bokkers E.A.M. (2023). The future of surplus dairy calves – An animal welfare perspective. Front. Anim. Sci., 4: 1228770.
- Wechsler B., Lea S.E. (2007). Adaptation by learning: Its significance for farm animal husbandry. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 108: 197–214.
- Welk A., Neave H.W., Spitzer H.B., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. (2022). Effects of intake-based weaning and forage type on feeding behaviour and growth of dairy calves fed by automated feeders. J. Dairy Sci., 105: 9119–9136.
- Welk A., Otten N.D., Jensen M.B. (2023). Invited review: The effect of milk feeding practices on dairy calf behaviour, health, and performance – A systematic review. J. Dairy Sci., 106: 5853–5879.
- Whalin L., Weary D.M., von Keyserlingk M.A.G. (2021). Understanding behavioural development of calves in natural settings to inform calf management. Animals, 11: 2446.
- Whalin L., Weary D.M., von Keyserlingk M.A. (2022). Preweaning dairy calves’ preferences for outdoor access. J. Dairy Sci., 105: 2521–2530.
- Xiao J., Chen T., Peng R., Alugongo G.M., Yang H., Khan M.Z., Liu S., Ma Y., Wang J., Wang W., Wang Y., Li S., Cao Z. (2023). The age at first consumption of forage in calves and its effect on growth and rumination in the short- and long-term. J. Anim. Sci., Biotechnol., 14: 107.
- Zanella A.J., Broom D.M., Hunter J.C., Mendl M.T. (1996). Brain opioid receptors in relation to stereotypies, inactivity, and housing in sows. Physiol. Behav., 59: 769–775.
- Zhang C., Juniper D.T., Meagher R.K. (2021). Effects of physical enrichment items and social housing on calves’ growth, behaviour, and response to novelty. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 237: 105295.
- Zhang J., Zhang C., Yang X., Li L., Cao Y., Zhang X., Zhou S., Ma J., Li M., Hou X., Zhang Z., Yao J. (2024). Short- and long-term effects of different forage types supplemented in pre-weaning dairy calves on performance and milk production into first lactation. J. Dairy Sci., 107: 7405–7422.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2026-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8733 (formerly 1642-3402) | Journal ISSN: 1642-3402
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 25, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 14, 2026
Published on: Oct 4, 2026
Published by: National Research Institute of Animal Production
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Robert Kupczyński, Katarzyna Pacyga, Krzysztof Adamczyk, Anna Budny-Walczak, Wojciech Pisula, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.