Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Towards Sustainable Aquaculture: Innovative Strategies for Reducing Environmental Carbon Footprints Across Different Aquaculture Systems – A Review Cover

Towards Sustainable Aquaculture: Innovative Strategies for Reducing Environmental Carbon Footprints Across Different Aquaculture Systems – A Review

Open Access
|Apr 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Emission status of various GHGs in India (1980 and 2018)

Greenhouse gases1980 value2018 valueUnitMain sourceReferences
Carbon dioxide (CO2)1.8216.39Quad BTUElectricity sector (75.31%) which mainly relies on coalAhmed et al. (2023)
Methane (CH4)444,528666,510kt CO2eGeneral emissionsAhmed et al. (2023)
Nitrous oxide (N2O)114,802253,790Thousand metric tonnes CO2eAgriculture (wheat, paddy)Lu et al. (2022); Ahmed et al. (2023)

[i] Note: Quad BTU – Quadrillion British Thermal Units; ktCO2e – kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Figure 1.

Greenhouse gas emissions from a pond aquaculture system. Modified from Zhang et al. (2022)

Figure 2.

Greenhouse gas emissions from a cage culture system. Modified from da Silva et al. (2021)

Table 2.

Different amounts of GHGs emitted from various aquaculture systems

Aquaculture systemTypesQuantity of greenhouse gases emittedUnitReferences
Pond cultureVietnamese striped catfish1.37tCO2e/t of live weightMungkung et al. (2014)
Bangladeshi Nile tilapia system1.58tCO2e/t of live weight
Indian major carp system1.84tCO2e/t of live weight
Cage cultureO. mykiss cage farming1.13kgCO2e/kg of live fishDiken et al. (2022)
Larimichthys polyactis7.553 × 104kgCO2e/tonneLiu et al. (2023)
Sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicus)5148.7kgCO2e/tonneYang et al. (2024)
Dicentrarchus labrax2.34 to 2.85kgCO2e/kgBahida et al. (2022)
Bivalve aquacultureMussels raised on floating platforms500kgCO2e/tonneTamburini et al. (2019)
Long lines of cultivated oysters1500kgCO2e/tonne
Shrimp farming (Penaeus vannamei)Taiwanese farm6.9389kgCO2e/kgChang et al. (2017)
Mexican farm7.6kgCO2e/kgCortés et al. (2021)
High-place ponds (HPP)4,424.2kgCO2eSun et al. (2023)
Biofloc technology (BFT)4,657.2kgCO2e
RASNorthern Chinese indoor RAS (Salmo salar)16.7tCO2e/tonneSong et al. (2019)
P. vannamei13769.32 to 14860.87kgCO2e/tonneRong et al. (2025)
O. niloticus2.03kgCO2e/kgde Melo Júnior et al. (2025)
P. vannamei4,965.6kgCO2eSun et al. (2023)

[i] Note: tCO2e/t – tonnes of CO2/tonne; kgCO2e/kg – kilograms of CO2e/kilogram; kgCO2e/tonne – kilograms of CO2e/tonne.

Figure 3.

Greenhouse gas emissions from a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS). Source: Author

Figure 4.

Integrated mangrove aquaculture system. Modified from Su et al. (2025)

Figure 5.

Integrated agri-aquaculture system (IAAS). Modified from Ibrahim et al. (2023)

Table 3.

GHG emissions intensity of various integrated farming systems (Fatima et al., 2023)

Different integrated systemsGHG intensity (kg CO2e/kg food production)
Crop + dairy + fishery0.189±0.019
Crop + dairy + fishery + poultry0.183±0.021
Crop + dairy + fishery + poultry + duckery0.176±0.023
Agriculture crops + dairy + fisheries + poultry + duck farming + apiaries0.172±0.024
Agriculture crops + dairy + fisheries + poultry + duck farming + apiaries + boundary plantation0.170±0.025
Agriculture crops + dairy + fisheries + poultry + duck farming + apiaries + boundary plantation + biogas unit0.169±0.025
Agriculture crops + dairy + fisheries + poultry + duck farming + apiaries + vermicompost + biogas unit + boundary plantation0.164±0.027
Table 4.

Greenhouse gas emissions from sustainable aquaculture systems

Type of aquaculture systemGHG emissionReference
Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA)Abalone farmingDecreased by 290 to 350 tCO2e/yearNobre et al. (2010)
Biofloc systemShrimp farming5945 kgCO2e/tonneHuang et al. (2024)
Aquaponics systemPilot scale systemFish tank – 52.8 to 131.3 kg CO2e; clarifier – 9.8 to 16.2 kg CO2e; plant growth system – 0.3 to 1.0 kg CO2e.Kalvakaalva et al. (2022)
Figure 6.

Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) system. Source: Author

Figure 7.

Biofloc technology. Modified from Castilla-Gavilán et al. (2024)

Figure 8.

Aquaponics system. Modified from Verma et al. (2023)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2025-0066 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8733 (formerly 1642-3402) | Journal ISSN: 1642-3402
Language: English
Page range: 655 - 676
Submitted on: Mar 11, 2025
Accepted on: Jun 3, 2025
Published on: Apr 30, 2026
Published by: National Research Institute of Animal Production
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2026 Ajit Kumar Verma, Panneerselvam Dheeran, Kishore Kumar Krishnani, Kavitha Murugesan, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.