Rhizosphere Bacteriobiome of the Husk Tomato Grown in the Open Field in West Siberia

Naumova, Natalia B.; Savenkov, Oleg A.; Alikina, Tatiana Y.; Kabilov, Marsel R.

doi:10.2478/agri-2019-0015

Abstract

The composition and structure of rhizosphere bacteriobiome of the husk tomato (Physalis philadelphica Lam.) plants grown on Phaeozem in the open field in West Siberia, Russia (55°15’ NL, 83°31’ EL) were studied using Illumina MiSeq sequencing of the V3-V4 hypervariable region of 16S rRNA genes. In total 5898 OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units) were found in the study, representing 20 phyla and 53 identified and 15 non-identified (below the phylum level) classes. The most OTU-rich phyla were Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria, their relative abundance in the total number of sequence reads being 26, 22 and 19%, respectively. Bacteroidetes, Gemmatimonadetes and Verrucomicrobia phyla each accounted for 2 ‒ 4%. The rest 14 of the identified phyla were quite negligible, contributing less than 0.5% each. At the OTUs level, the structure was very even and equitable, as only 7 OTUs had relative abundance ranging from 0.5 to 1.1%. The main dominant OTU represented Bradyrhizobiaceae family, implying the importance of nitrogen-fixing bacteria for plant growth and development without any mineral fertilisation. The dominance biodiversity index was very low (0.001), while Shannon index was rather high (7.5). We believe the presented husk tomato rhizosphere bacteriobiome, as the first study using new generation sequencing platform for this species, will help get a better picture of Solanaceae microbiomes in different environments, thus contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of shaping microbial communities by plant roots.

References

AHKAMI, A.H. – WHITE, R.A. – HANDAKUMBURA, P.P. – JANSSON, C. 2017. Rhizosphere engineering: Enhancing sustainable plant ecosystem productivity. In Rhizosphere, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 233 – 243. DOI: 10.1016/j.rhi-sph.2017.04.01210.1016/j.rhi-sph.2017.04.012
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ALLARD, S.M. – WALSH, C.S. – WALLIS, A.E. – OT-TESEN, A.R. – BROWN, E.W. – MICALLEF, S.A. 2016. Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) hosts robust phyllosphere and rhizosphere bacterial communities when grown in soil amended with various organic and synthetic fertilizers. In Science of the Total Environment, vol. 573, pp. 555 – 563. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.15710.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.157
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BERENDSEN, R.L. – PIETERSE, C.M.J. – BAKKER, P.A.H.M. 2012. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. In Trends in Plant Science, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 478 – 486. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.00110.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
CAI, F. – PANG, G. – MIAO, Y. – LI, R. – LI, R. – SHEN, Q. – CHEN, W. 2017. The nutrient preference of plants influences their rhizosphere microbiome. In Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 110, pp. 146 – 150. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.11.00610.1016/j.apsoil.2016.11.006
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
CORDERO-RAMÍREZ, J.D. – LÓPEZ-RIVERA, R. – CALDERÓN-VÁZQUEZ, C.L. – FIGUEROA-LÓPEZ, A.MI. – MARTÍNEZ-ÁLVAREZ, J.C. – LEYVA-MADRIGAL, K.Y. – CERVANTES-GÁMEZ, R.G. – MALDONA-DO-MENDOZA, I.E. 2012. Microorganismos asociados a la rizosfera de jitomate en un agroecosistema del valle de Guasave, Sinaloa, México. In Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 712 – 730. DOI: 10.7550/rmb.1789710.7550/rmb.17897
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EDGAR, R.C. 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. In Nature Methods, vol. 10, pp. 996 – 998. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.260410.1038/nmeth.2604
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EDGAR, R.C. 2016. SINTAX, a Simple Non-Bayesian Taxonomy Classifier for 16S and ITS Sequences. bioRxiv., DOI: 10.1101/07416110.1101/074161
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
FADROSH, D.W. – MA, B. – GAJER, P. – GAJER, P. – SENGAMALAY, N. – OTT, S. – BROTMAN, R.M. – RAVEL, J. 2014. An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform. In Microbiome, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 6. DOI: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-610.1186/2049-2618-2-6
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
FAUTH, E. – BERNARDO, J. – CAMARA, M. – RESETARITS, W.J. – VAN BUSKIRK, J. – MCCOLLUM, S.A. 1996. Simplifying the Jargon of community ecology: A conceptual approach. In The American Naturalist, vol. 147, pp. 282 – 286.10.1086/285850
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
HAMMER, Ø. – HARPER, D.A.T. – RYAN, P.D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. In Palaeontologia Electronica, vol. 4, pp. 1 – 9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
HUGHES, J.B. – HELLMANN, J.J. 2005. The application of rarefaction techniques to molecular inventories of microbial diversity. In Methods in Enzymology, vol. 397, pp. 292 – 308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(05)97017-110.1016/S0076-6879(05)97017-1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
IGOLKINA, А.А. – GREKHOV, G.A. – PERSHINA, E.V. – SAMOSOROVA, G.G. – LEUNOVA, V.M. – SEMENOVA, A.N. – BATURINA, O.A. – KABILOV, M.R. – ANDRONOV, E.E. 2018. Identifying components of mixed and contaminated soil samples by detecting specific signatures of control 16S rRNA libraries. In Ecoogical Indicators, vol. 94, no.1, pp. 446 – 453. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.06010.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.060
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
IUSS WORKING GROUP. 2014. WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. Rome: FAO.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
KHAN, W. – BAKHT, J. – NAIR, M.G. – UDDIN, M.N. – SHAFI, M. 2018. Extraction and isolation of important bioactive compounds from the fruit of Physalis ixocarpa. In Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 2463 – 2469.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
KHAN, W. – BAKHT, J. – SHAFI, M. 2016. Antimicrobial potentials of different solvent extracted samples from Physalis ixocarpa. In Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 467 – 475.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LEE, S.A. – PARK, J. – CHU, B. – KIM, J.M. – JOA, J.H. – SANG, M.K. – SONG, J. – WEON, H.Y. 2016. Comparative analysis of bacterial diversity in the rhizosphere of tomato by culture-dependent and -independent approaches. In Journal of Microbioogy, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 823 – 831. DOI: 10.1007/s12275-016-6410-310.1007/s12275-016-6410-327888459
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LI, B. – CAO, Y. – GUAN, X. – LI, Y. – HAO, ZH. – HU, W. – CHEN, L. 2019. Microbial assessments of soil with a 40-year history of reclaimed wastewater irrigation. In Science of the Total Environment, vol. 651, no. 1, pp. 696 – 705. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.19310.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.19330245425
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MARQUEZ-SANTACRUZ, H.A. – HERNANDEZ-LEON, R. – OROZCO-MOSQUEDA, M.C. – VELAZQUEZ-SEPULVEDA, I. – SANTOYO, G. 2010. Diversity of bacterial endophytes in roots of Mexican husk tomato plants (Physalis ixocarpa) and their detection in the rhizosphere. In Genetic and Molecular Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 2372 – 2380. DOI: 10.4238/vol9-4gmr92110.4238/vol9-4gmr92121157706
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MARTINES, M. – VARGAS-PONCE, O. – RODRIGUEZ, A. – CHIANG, F. – OCEGUEDA, S. 2017. Solanaceae family in Mexico. In Botanical Sciences, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.17129/botsci.65810.17129/botsci.658
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MORALES-CONTRERAS, B.E. – CONTRERAS-ESQUIVEL, J.C. – WICKER, L. – OCHOA-MARTÍNEZ, L.A. – MORALES-CASTRO, J. 2017. Husk Tomato (Physalis ixocarpa Brot.) Waste as a Promising Source of Pectin: Extraction and Physicochemical Characterization. In Journal of Food Science, vol. 82, no. 7, pp. 1594 – 1601. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.1376810.1111/1750-3841.1376828585703
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
NAUMOVA, N.B. – SAVENKOV, O.A. – NECHAEVA, T.V. – FOTEV, Y.V. 2019. Yield and fruit properties of husk tomato (Physalis phyladelphica) cultivars grown in the open field in the South of West Siberia. In Horticulturae, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19. DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae501001910.3390/horticulturae5010019
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
RAMÍREZ-GODINA, F. – ROBLEDO-TORRES, V. – FOROUGHBAKHCH-POURNABAV, R. – BENAVIDES-MENDOZA, A. – HERNÁNDEZ-PIÑERO, J.L. – REYES-VALDES, M.H. – ALVARADO-VÁZQUEZ, M.A. 2013. Yield and fruit quality evaluation in husk tomato autotetraploids (Physalis ixocarpa) and diploids. In Australian Journal of Crop Science, vol. 933, pp. 933 – 940.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SALEEM, M. – LAW, A.D. – SAHIB, M.R. – PERVAIZ, Z.H. – ZHANG, Q. 2018. Impact of root system architecture on rhizosphere and root microbiome. In Rhizosphere, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 47 – 51. DOI: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2018.02.00310.1016/j.rhisph.2018.02.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SMITH, R. – JIMENEZ, M.– CANTWELL, M. 1999. Tomatillo production in California. Available at http://anrcatalog.ucanr.edu/pdf/7246.pdf (accessed July 23, 2019)10.3733/ucanr.7246
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
VALDIVIA-MARES, L.E. – RODRÍGUEZ ZARAGOZA, F.A. – SÁNCHEZ GONZÁLEZ, J.J. – VARGAS-PONCE, O. 2016. Phenology, agronomic and nutritional potential of three wild husk tomato species (Physalis, Solanaceae) from Mexico. In Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 200, pp. 83 – 94. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.01.00510.1016/j.scienta.2016.01.005
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
WALLENSTEIN, M.D. 2017. Managing and manipulating the rhizosphere microbiome for plant health: A systems approach. In Rhizosphere, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 230 – 232. DOI: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2017.04.00410.1016/j.rhisph.2017.04.004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
WANG, Q. – GARRITY, G.M. – TIEDJE, J.M. – COLE, J.R. 2007. Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. In Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 73, pp. 5261 – 5267. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00062-0710.1128/AEM.00062-07195098217586664
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
WANG, M. – CHEN, L. – LI, Y. – CHEN, L. – LIU, ZH. – WANG, X. – YAN, P. – QIN, S. 2018. Responses of soil microbial communities to a short-term application of seaweed fertilizer revealed by deep amplicon sequencing. In Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 125, pp. 288 – 296. DOI: 10.1016/j.ap-soil.2018.02.01310.1016/j.ap-soil.2018.02.013
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
XUE, D. – CHRISTENSON, R. – GENGER, R. – GEVENS, A. – LANKAU, R.A. 2018. Soil microbial communities reflect both inherent soil properties and management practices in Wisconsin potato fields. In American Journal of Potato Research, vol. 95, pp. 696. DOI: 10.1007/s12230-018-9677-610.1007/s12230-018-9677-6
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ZAMORA-TAVARES, P. – VARGAS-PONCE, O. – SANCHEZ-MARTINEZ, J. – CABRERA-TOLEDO, D. 2015. Diversity and genetic structure of the husk tomato (Physalis philadelphica Lam.) in Western Mexico. In Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, vol. 62, pp. 141 – 153. DOI: 10.1007/s10722-014-0163-910.1007/s10722-014-0163-9
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ZHAO, Q. – ZENG, D.H. – FAN, Z.-P. 2010. Nitrogen and phosphorus transformations in the rhizospheres of three tree species in a nutrient-poor sandy soil. In Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 46, pp. 341 – 346. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.10.00710.1016/j.apsoil.2010.10.007
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ZHENG, M. – GUO, J. – XU, J. – YANG, K. – TANG, R. – GU, X. – LI, H. – CHEN, L. 2019. Ixocarpalactone A from dietary tomatillo inhibits pancreatic cancer growth by targeting PHGDH. In Food & Function, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 3386 – 3395. DOI: 10.1039/c9fo00394k10.1039/C9FO00394K
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Rhizosphere Bacteriobiome of the Husk Tomato Grown in the Open Field in West Siberia

Abstract

Paradigm

My account