Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The association between patellar height and anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis patellar height Cover

The association between patellar height and anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis patellar height

Open Access
|Jun 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

PRISMA flow diagram. PRISMA, preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis

StudyCountryStudy designSample size (ACL/Control)Age(years) Mean ± SDSex (% Male)Sport/activityISI measurement methodMeasurement timingISI Mean ± SD (ACL/control)Followup duration
Degnan et al.23USACase-control70 (34/36)ACL: 12.4 ± 1.4
Control: 12.8 ± 2.1
ACL: 73.5%
Control: 80.6%
Youth athletesTraditional ISI (MRI sagittal PD)After ACL tearACL: 1.16 ± 0.16
Control: 0.99 ± 0.14
N/A
Kwak et al. 24South KoreaProspective cohort231 (116/115)ACL: 14 ± 3.7
Control: 14.2 ± 3.6
100%SoccerTraditional ISI (MRI sagittal PD)Before ACL tearACL: 0.90 ± 0.20
Control: 1.00 ± 0.20
N/A
Güven et al.25TurkeyProspective cohort210 (120/90)ACL: 29.1. ± 8.2
Control: 31.8 ± 9.8
100%Not specifiedTraditional ISI (MRI sagittal PD)Before ACL tearACL: 1.01 ± 0.15
Control: 0.96 ± 0.14
2014–2020
Lin et al. 26ChinaProspective380 (190/190)ACL: 27.72 ± 7.55
Control: 30.30 ± 6.62
ACL: 75.3%
Control: 63.2%
Not specifiedModified ISI (MRI sagittal PD/T2)Before ACL tearACL: 1.74 ± 0.23
Control: 1.64 ± 0.15
2019–2023

1 ACL - anterior cruciate ligament, ISI -Insall-Salvati Index, MIS -modified Insall-Salvati Index, MRI -magnetic resonance imaging, N/A -not applicable, PD -proton density, SD -standard deviation

Table 2.

Quality assessment of included studies

StudySelection (max 4✶)Comparability (max 2✶)Outcome (max 3✶)Total scoreQuality
Degnan et al.23✶ ✶✶☆✶✶✶✶✶8/9High
Kwak et al.24✶ ✶✶☆✶ ☆✶✶✶7/9High
Güven et al.25✶✶✶✶✶✶✶✶✶9/9High
Lin et al.26✶✶✶✶✶✶✶✶✶9/9High
Figure 2.

Forest plot of the ISI in ACL - injured patients and controls. ACL - anterior cruciate ligament, CI - confidence intervals, ISI - Insall-Salvati index, PI - prediction interval, SD - standard deviation, SMD - standardised mean differences

Figure 3.

Subgroup analysis by age group. CI - confidence intervals, SD - standard deviation, SMD - standardised mean differences

Figure 4.

Subgroup analysis by measurement method. CI - confidence intervals, SD - standard deviation, SMD - standardised mean differences

Figure 5.

Subgroup analysis by measurement timing. CI - confidence intervals, SD - standard deviation, SMD - standardised mean differences

Figure 6.

Forest plot of the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. CI - confidence intervals, SMD - standardised mean differences

Table 3.

GRADE Summary of findings for the association between patellar height (ISI) and ACL injury

Certainty assessmentNo of patientsEffectCertaintyImportance
No. of studiesStudy designRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationsACL injuryNon--ACL injuryRelative (95% CI)Absolute (95% CI)
Outcome 1: ISI difference (overall) (assessed with: [ISI]; Scale from: 0 to 3)
4Non-ran-domised studiesNot seriousVery seriousanot seriousseriousbnone460431-SMD 0.35 SD higher (0.291 lower to 0.991 higher)ⴲⵔⵔⵔ Very lowa,bCRITICAL
Outcome 2: ISI difference (age > 16 years) (assessed with: [ISI]; Scale from: 0 to 3)
2Non-ran-domised studiesNot seriousNot seriousnot seriousnot seriousnone310280-SMD 0.453 SD higher (0.289 higher to 0.617 higher)ⴲⴲⵔⵔ LowCRITICAL
Outcome 3: ISI difference (age ≤ 16 years) (assessed with: [ISI]; Scale from: 0 to 3)
2Non-ran-domised studiesNot seriousVery seriouscnot seriousvery seriousdnone150151-0.296 higher (1.29 higher to 1.882 higher)ⴲⵔⵔⵔ Very lowc,dIMPORTANT
Outcome 4: ISI difference (measurement timing – before tear) (assessed with: [ISI] – prospective measurement)
3Non-ran-domised studiesNot seriousVery seriousenot seriousseriousfnone426395-SMD 0.122 SD higher (0.491 lower to 0.735 higher)ⴲⵔⵔⵔ Very lowee,fIMPORTANT
Outcome 6: ISI difference (traditional measurement method) (assessed with: Traditional ISI [patellar tendon/patella length ratio])
3Non-ran-domised studiesNot seriousVery seriousgnot seriousserioushnone270241-SMD 0.301 SD higher (0.605 lower to 1.208 higher)ⴲⵔⵔⵔ Very lowgg,hIMPOR-TANTlea

1 CI - confidence interval, ISI - Insall-Salvati Index, SMD - standardised mean difference

1a Very high heterogeneity (I2 = 93.9%, p < 0.0001) with unexplained variation in effect sizes across studies

1b Wide confidence interval crossing null (95% CI: −0.291 to 0.991) in random effects model

1c Very high heterogeneity (I2 = 96.8%, p < 0.0001) with large variation in effect estimates between two studies

1d Very wide confidence interval (95% CI: −1.290 to 1.882) with small sample size (n = 301)

1e Very high heterogeneity (I2 = 94.6%, p < 0.0001) with the opposite direction of effect in one study (Kwak 2021: SMD −0.498)

1f Wide confidence interval crossing null (95% CI: −0.491 to 0.735) despite adequate sample size

1g Very high heterogeneity (I2 = 94.8%, p < 0.0001) with one study showing the opposite direction despite the same measurement method

1h Very wide confidence interval (95% CI: −0.605 to 1.208) including both negative and positive effects

Language: English
Page range: 24 - 39
Submitted on: Jan 13, 2026
Accepted on: Apr 12, 2026
Published on: Jun 30, 2026
Published by: University of Physical Education in Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Min Bong Kang et al.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.