Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Limited evidence examining visual feedback in rehabilitation for generalised knee pain: a scoping review and call for further research Cover

Limited evidence examining visual feedback in rehabilitation for generalised knee pain: a scoping review and call for further research

Open Access
|Mar 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

PRISMA flow diagram

Joint and muscle forces and moments

Lead authorInterventionOutcome measureBaselineFinalChangep-value
Kernozek [50]Squatting with 3D motion capture analysis VF (post-training)PFJ force (BW)4.64 ± 1.053.97 ± 0.81−0.67 BW<0.001a
Knee extension moment (Nm/BW)0.11 ± 0.020.10 ± 0.02−0.01 Nm/BW0.01a
Hip extension moment (Nm/BW)0.06 ± 0.040.04 ± 0.03−0.02 Nm/BW0.001a
Quadriceps forces (BW)4.67 ± 0.984.06 ± 0.87−0.61 BW<0.001

j_advrehab-2026-0003_tab_007

Search termAlternate terms includedSearch details
#1: Knee painKnee ache, PFP(((‘knee’[MeSH Terms] OR ‘knee’[All Fields] OR ‘knee joint’[MeSH Terms] OR (‘knee’[All Fields] AND ‘joint’[All Fields]) OR ‘knee joint’[All Fields]) AND (‘pain’[MeSH Terms] OR ‘pain’[All Fields])) OR ((‘knee’[MeSH Terms] OR ‘knee’[All Fields] OR ‘knee joint’[MeSH Terms] OR (‘knee’[All Fields] AND ‘joint’[All Fields]) OR ‘knee joint’[All Fields]) AND (‘ache protein human’[Supplementary Concept] OR ‘ache protein human’[All Fields] OR ‘ache’[All Fields] OR ‘pain’[MeSH Terms] OR ‘pain’[All Fields])) OR (‘patellofemoral pain syndrome’[MeSH Terms] OR (‘patellofemoral’[All Fields] AND ‘pain’[All Fields] AND ‘syndrome’[All Fields]) OR ‘patellofemoral pain syndrome’[All Fields] OR (‘patellofemoral’[All Fields] AND ‘pain’[All Fields]) OR ‘patellofemoral pain’[All Fields]))
#2: VFFeedback, biofeedback, mirror therapy, virtual reality, gamification, CAREN, Computer assisted rehabilitation environment, external focus(‘feedback, sensory’[MeSH Terms] OR (‘feedback’[All Fields] AND ‘sensory’[All Fields]) OR ‘sensory feedback’[All Fields] OR (‘visual’[All Fields] AND ‘feedback’[All Fields]) OR ‘visual feedback’[All Fields] OR (‘feedback’[MeSH Terms] OR ‘feedback’[All Fields] OR ‘feedbacks’[All Fields] OR ‘feedback s’[All Fields]) OR (‘biofeedback, psychology’[MeSH Terms] OR (‘biofeedback’[All Fields] AND ‘psychology’[All Fields]) OR ‘psychology biofeedback’[All Fields] OR ‘biofeedback’[All Fields]) OR (‘mirror movement therapy’[MeSH Terms] OR (‘mirror’[All Fields] AND ‘movement’[All Fields] AND ‘therapy’[All Fields]) OR ‘mirror movement therapy’[All Fields] OR (‘mirror’[All Fields] AND ‘therapy’[All Fields]) OR ‘mirror therapy’[All Fields]) OR (‘virtual reality’[MeSH Terms] OR (‘virtual’[All Fields] AND ‘reality’[All Fields]) OR ‘virtual reality’[All Fields]) OR (‘gamification’[MeSH Terms] OR ‘gamification’[All Fields]) OR ‘CAREN’[All Fields] OR ((‘computability’[All Fields] OR ‘computable’[All Fields] OR ‘computating’[All Fields] OR ‘computation’[All Fields] OR ‘computational’[All Fields] OR ‘computations’[All Fields] OR ‘compute’[All Fields] OR ‘computed’[All Fields] OR ‘computer s’[All Fields] OR ‘computers’[MeSH Terms] OR ‘computers’[All Fields] OR ‘computer’[All Fields] OR ‘computes’[All Fields] OR ‘computing’[All Fields] OR ‘computional’[All Fields]) AND (‘assistances’[All Fields] OR ‘assistant s’[All Fields] OR ‘assistants’[All Fields] OR ‘assisted’[All Fields] OR ‘assisting’[All Fields] OR ‘assistive’[All Fields] OR ‘dental assistants’[MeSH Terms] OR (‘dental’[All Fields] AND ‘assistants’[All Fields]) OR ‘dental assistants’[All Fields] OR ‘assistant’[All Fields] OR ‘helping behavior’[MeSH Terms] OR (‘helping’[All Fields] AND ‘behavior’[All Fields]) OR ‘helping behavior’[All Fields] OR ‘assist’[All Fields] OR ‘assistance’[All Fields] OR ‘assists’[All Fields]) AND (‘rehabilitant’[All Fields] OR ‘rehabilitants’[All Fields] OR ‘rehabilitate’[All Fields] OR ‘rehabilitated’[All Fields] OR ‘rehabilitates’[All Fields] OR ‘rehabilitating’[All Fields] OR ‘rehabilitation’[MeSH Terms] OR ‘rehabilitation’[All Fields] OR ‘rehabilitations’[All Fields] OR ‘rehabilitative’[All Fields] OR ‘rehabilitation’[MeSH Subheading] OR ‘rehabilitation s’[All Fields] OR ‘rehabilitational’[All Fields] OR ‘rehabilitator’[All Fields] OR ‘rehabilitators’[All Fields]) AND (‘environ’[All Fields] OR ‘environment’[MeSH Terms] OR ‘environment’[All Fields] OR ‘environments’[All Fields] OR ‘environment s’[All Fields] OR ‘environs’[All Fields])) OR ((‘external’[All Fields] OR ‘externally’[All Fields] OR ‘externals’[All Fields]) AND (‘wood des focus’[Journal] OR ‘focus’[Journal] OR ‘focus ohio dent’[Journal] OR ‘focus madison’[Journal] OR ‘focus am psychiatr publ’[Journal] OR ‘focus’[All Fields])))
#3: CKCSquat, biomechana, functional movement(((‘close’[All Fields] OR ‘closed’[All Fields] OR ‘closely’[All Fields] OR ‘closeness’[All Fields] OR ‘closes’[All Fields] OR ‘closing’[All Fields] OR ‘closings’[All Fields]) AND (‘kinetical’[All Fields] OR ‘kinetically’[All Fields] OR ‘kinetics’[MeSH Terms] OR ‘kinetics’[All Fields] OR ‘kinetic’[All Fields]) AND (‘chain’[All Fields] OR ‘chain s’[All Fields] OR ‘chains’[All Fields])) OR ‘squat*’[All Fields] OR ‘biomechan*’[All Fields] OR ((‘functional’[All Fields] OR ‘functional s’[All Fields] OR ‘functionalities’[All Fields] OR ‘functionality’[All Fields] OR ‘functionalization’[All Fields] OR ‘functionalizations’[All Fields] OR ‘functionalize’[All Fields] OR ‘functionalized’[All Fields] OR ‘functionalizes’[All Fields] OR ‘functionalizing’[All Fields] OR ‘functionally’[All Fields] OR ‘functionals’[All Fields] OR ‘functioned’[All Fields] OR ‘functioning’[All Fields] OR ‘functionings’[All Fields] OR ‘functions’[All Fields] OR ‘physiology’[MeSH Subheading] OR ‘physiology’[All Fields] OR ‘function’[All Fields] OR ‘physiology’[MeSH Terms]) AND (‘movement’[MeSH Terms] OR ‘movement’[All Fields] OR ‘movements’[All Fields] OR ‘movement s’[All Fields])))
#4: #1 AND #2 AND #3
#5: #4 with filters of randomized controlled trial, clinical trial, english language, and publication date of 2009–2024

Muscle activity (EMG)

Lead authorInterventionMuscleBaselineFinalChange
Hwangbo [48]Visual EMG feedbackaVM46.94 ± 5.3650.51 ± 4.78+3.57 ± 2.28
No feedbackVM43.40 ± 4.9845.85 ± 6.95+2.45 ± 3.26
Visual EMG feedbackaVL60.84 ± 6.5461.75 ± 7.72+0.91 ± 3.40
No feedbackaVL58.37 ± 5.7262.43 ± 7.18+4.06 ± 3.66

Summary of study interventions, outcomes and key findings

Lead authorInterventionComparatorOutcomesTotal follow-up periodKey findingsRisk of bias
Hwangbo [48]Squat exercises with EMG VFSquat exercises without VFMuscle Activity (EMG): VM, VL6 weeks
  • ↑ VM activity in both groups;

  • VL: mixed results, significantly greater ↑ in No-VF group

High
Rabelo [49]MC&S with mirror VFStrengthening onlyPain: NPRS Function: AKPS Kinematics: Trunk lean4 weeks (kinematics) 6 months (NPRS, AKPS)
  • NPRS: both groups improved; no significant between-group difference

  • AKPS: greater improvement in MC&S group

  • Trunk lean reduced more in MC&S group

Some concerns
Kernozek [50]Post-training squatting with 3D motion capture analysis VFPre-training squatting without VFJoint Forces/Moments: PFJ force, knee & hip ext. moment, quad force Joint Angles: hip, knee, ankleImmediate
  • ↓ PFJ and quad force with VF

  • ↓ hip/knee flexion angles with VF

  • Ankle DF: No significant change with VF

Moderate

j_advrehab-2026-0003_tab_008

Lead authorRisk of bias toolStudy designKey domainsOverall risk of bias
Rabelo [49]RoB 2RCT
  • Randomisation: Low

  • Deviations: Some concerns

  • Missing data: Low

  • Measurement: Some concerns

  • Reporting: Some concerns

Some concerns
Hwangbo [48]RoB 2RCT
  • Randomisation: Some concerns

  • Deviations: Some concerns

  • Missing data: Some concerns

  • Measurement: Low

  • Reporting: Some concerns

High
Kernozek [50]ROBINS-INRSI
  • Confounding: Moderate

  • Selection: Low

  • Intervention: Low

  • Deviations: Low

  • Missing data: Low

  • Measurement: Low

  • Reporting: Moderate

Moderate

Study and participant characteristics

Hwangbo [48]Rabelo [49]Kernozek [50]
PopulationN: 20N: 34N: 20
Age: 22–23 yearsAge: 18–30 yearsAge: 18–25 years
Sex: not reportedSex: All femaleSex: 17 females, 3 males

Inclusion criteriaIncreased quadriceps (Q) anglesClinical diagnosis of PFP; symptoms ≥3 months; pain with squatting/stairsClinical criteria for PFP; NPRS ≥3 during activity

Study designRCTRCTNRSI

Experimental groupSquat exercises with EMG VFMotor control and strengthening with mirror VFSquatting with 3D motion capture analysis VF (post-training)

Comparator groupSquat exercises with no VFStrengthening onlySquatting with no VF (pre-training)

OutcomesVL and VM EMGFunction, pain intensity, strength, trunk and lower limb kinematicsJoint and muscle forces, joint angles

Pain and functional outcomes

Lead authorInterventionOutcome measureBaselineFinalBetween-group difference (95% CI)p-value
Rabelo [49]MC&SNPRS6.1 ± 1.41.3 ± 1.8−0.3 (−1.7 to 1.0)>0.05
Strengthening onlyNPRS6.6 ± 1.02.2 ± 1.6
MC&SAKPS (0–100)67.1 ± 7.689.0 ± 8.2−8.5 (−16.8 to −0.3)0.04a
Strengthening onlyAKPS (0–100)67.5 ± 11.384.8 ± 9.8

Joint angles (degrees)

Lead authorInterventionJoint angleBaselineFinalChangep-value
Kernozek [50]Squatting with 3D motion capture analysis VF (post-training)Hip flexion91.99 ± 14.6086.20 ± 15.05−5.790.001a
Knee flexion102.96 ± 16.5597.26 ± 17.11−5.700.001a
Ankle dorsiflexion35.63 ± 6.9534.77 ± 7.28−0.860.07
Rabelo [49]MC&S with mirror VFTrunk ipsilateral lean5.0 ± 3.73.9 ± 2.3−1.10.02b
Strengthening onlyTrunk ipsilateral lean4.4 ± 1.73.2 ± 1.6−1.2
Language: English
Page range: 36 - 53
Submitted on: May 30, 2025
Accepted on: Nov 4, 2025
Published on: Mar 31, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Margaret R. Klausing et al., published by Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.