Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Semi-presidentialism, hybrid regimes, and political transitions under armed conflicts and exogenous shocks: A comparative statistical analysis Cover

Semi-presidentialism, hybrid regimes, and political transitions under armed conflicts and exogenous shocks: A comparative statistical analysis

Open Access
|Apr 2026

References

  1. Åberg, Jenny. (2020). The Establishment of Semi-Presidential Regimes: A Mixed Methods Approach to Why and How. Örebro: Örebro University.
  2. Åberg, Jenny; Denk, Thomas. (2020). Diffusion and the Choice of Democratic Government System at the Time of Democratisation. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-020-00446-5.
  3. Åberg, Jenny; Denk, Thomas. (2024). Democracy as a Cause of Semi-Presidential Regimes: On Reverse Causality Between Democracy and Semi-Presidential Establishment. International Political Science Review. Vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121241281943.
  4. Åberg, Jenny; Sedelius, Thomas. (2020). A Structured Review of Semi-Presidential Studies: Debates, Results, and Missing Pieces. British Journal of Political Science. Vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1111–1136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000017.
  5. Acemoglu, Daron; Robinson, James A. (2005). Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510809.
  6. Albalate, Daniel, et al. (2012). Institutional Determinants of Military Spending. Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2011.12.006.
  7. Amorim Neto, Octavio; Accorsi, Pedro. (2022). Presidents and Generals: Systems of Government and the Selection of Defense Ministers. Armed Forces & Society. Vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 136–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X19900368.
  8. Balderacchi, Cecilia. (2022). Overlooked Forms of Non-Democracy? Insights from Hybrid Regimes. Third World Quarterly. Vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1441–1459. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2022.2059460.
  9. Balendra, Natasha. (2008). Defining Armed Conflict. Cardozo Law Review. Vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2461–2496.
  10. Berend, Ivan T.; Bugarič, Bojan. (2015). Unfinished Europe: Transition from Communism to Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Contemporary History. Vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 768–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009415596845.
  11. Bermeo, Nancy. (2016). On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012.
  12. Bogaards, Mathijs. (2009). How to Classify Hybrid Regimes? Defective Democracy and Electoral Authoritarianism. Democratization. Vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340902777800.
  13. Boin, Arjen; ’t Hart, Paul. (2012). Aligning Executive Action in Times of Adversity: The Politics of Crisis Co-Ordination. In Lodge, Martin; Wegrich, Kai (eds.). Executive Politics in Times of Crisis. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137010261_10.
  14. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, et al. (1999). An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace. American Political Science Review. Vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 791–807. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586113.
  15. Calleros-Alarcón, Juan Carlos. (2008). The Unfinished Transition to Democracy in Latin America. London: Routledge.
  16. Carothers, Christopher. (2018). The Surprising Instability of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0068.
  17. Cassani, Andrea (2024). The Great Convergence: Post–Cold War Transitions to Hybrid Regimes across Waves and Ebbs. Italian Political Science Review. Vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2024.15.
  18. Cheibub, José Antonio (2006). Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813344.
  19. Cheibub, José Antonio, et al. (2014). Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science. Vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 515–544. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341300032X.
  20. Choudhry, Sujit, et al. (2018). Semi-Presidentialism and Inclusive Government in Ukraine: Reflections for Constitutional Reform. Stockholm: International IDEA.
  21. Coricelli, Fabrizio. (2007). Democracy in the Post-Communist World: Unfinished Business. East European Politics & Societies. Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325406297127.
  22. Correlates of War Project. (n.d.). Cow War Data, 1816–2007 (v4.0) [online; accessed 2025-08-31]. Available from WWW: https://correlatesofwar.org/data-sets/cow-war/.
  23. Daly, Suzanne. (2003). The Ladder of Abstraction: A Framework for the Systematic Classification of Democratic Regime Types. Politics. Vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00185.
  24. D’Amore, Ciro. (2007). The Never-Ending Italian Transition. South European Society and Politics. Vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 247–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608740701306862.
  25. Devine, Daniel, et al. (2020). Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What are the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature. Political Studies Review. Vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920948684.
  26. Diamond, Larry. (2015). Facing Up to the Democratic Recession. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0009.
  27. Diamond, Larry. (2020). Democratic Regression in Comparative Perspective: Scope, Methods, and Causes. Democratization. Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1807517.
  28. Dixon, William. (1994). Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict. American Political Science Review. Vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 14–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944879.
  29. Duverger, Maurice. (1980). A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government. European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00569.x.
  30. Duverger, Maurice. (1983). La Nozione di Regime “Semi-Presidenziale” e L’esperienza Francese. Quaderni Costituzionali. Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 259–275.
  31. Duverger, Maurice. (1993). O Regime Semipresidencialista. São Paulo: Sumaré.
  32. Duverger, Maurice; Avril, Pierre. (1986). Les Régimes Semi-Présidentiels. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  33. Duverger, Maurice, et al. (1997). A New Political System. European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 31, no. 1–2, pp. 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1997.tb00769.x.
  34. Eaton, Kent. (2000). Parliamentarism versus Presidentialism in the Policy Arena. Comparative Politics. Vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 355–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/422371.
  35. Elgie, Robert. (1998). The Classification of Democratic Regime Types: Conceptual Ambiguity and Contestable Assumptions. European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00381.
  36. Elgie, Robert; ed. (1999). Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198293860.001.0001.
  37. Elgie, Robert. (2004). Semi-presidentialism: Concepts, Consequences and Contesting Explanations. Political Studies Review. Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 314–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9299.2004.00012.x.
  38. Elgie, Robert. (2005a). A Fresh Look at Semi-Presidentialism: Variations on a Theme. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2005.0045.
  39. Elgie, Robert. (2005b). From Linz to Tsebelis: Three Waves of Presidential/Parliamentary Studies? Democratization. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351034042000317989.
  40. Elgie, Robert. (2007). Varieties of Semi-Presidentialism and Their Impact on Nascent Democracies. Taiwan Journal of Democracy. Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 53–71.
  41. Elgie, Robert. (2010). Semi-Presidentialism, Cohabitation and the Collapse of Electoral Democracies, 1990–2008. Government and Opposition. Vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01303.x.
  42. Elgie, Robert; ed. (2011). Semi-Presidentialism: Sub-types and Democratic Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199585984.001.0001.
  43. Elgie, Robert; Mcmenamin, Iain. (2008). Semi-Presidentialism and Democratic Performance. Japanese Journal of Political Science. Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109908003162.
  44. Elgie, Robert; Mcmenamin, Iain. (2011). Explaining the Onset of Cohabitation under Semi-Presidentialism. Political Studies. Vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 616–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00870.x.
  45. Flores, Thomas Edward; Nooruddin, Irfan. (2009). Democracy under the Gun: Understanding Postconflict Economic Recovery. Journal of Conflict Resolution. Vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002708326745.
  46. Freedom House (n.d.a). Freedom in the World [online; accessed 2025-08-31]. Available from WWW: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world.
  47. Freedom House (n.d.b). Freedom in the World Research Methodology [online; accessed 2025-08-31]. Available from WWW: https://freedomhouse.org/reports/freedom-world/freedom-world-research-methodology.
  48. Frye, Timothy. (1997). A Politics of Institutional Choice: Post-Communist Presidencies. Comparative Political Studies. Vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 523–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414097030005001.
  49. Ganghof, Steffen. (2017). A New Political System Model: Semi-Parliamentary Government. European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12224.
  50. Gerring, John. (2012). Mere Description. British Journal of Political Science. Vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 721–746. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000130.
  51. Gherghina, Sergiu; Miscoiu, Sergiu. (2013). The Failure of Cohabitation: Explaining the 2007 and 2012 Institutional Crises in Romania. East European Politics and Societies. Vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 668–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325413485621.
  52. Gledsch, Kristian S.; Ruggeri, Andrea. (2010). Political Opportunity Structures, Democracy, And Civil War. Journal of Peace Research. Vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310362293.
  53. Gunitsky, Seva. (2014). From Shocks to Waves: Hegemonic Transitions and Democratization in the Twentieth Century. International Organization. Vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 561–597. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818314000113.
  54. Hale, Henry. (2015). Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139683524.
  55. Hale, Henry; Orttung, Robert W. (2016). Beyond the Euromaidan: Comparative Perspectives on Advancing Reforms in Ukraine. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
  56. Hegre, Håvard. (2014). Democracy and Armed Conflict. Journal of Peace Research. Vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 159–172. 10.1177/0022343313512852.
  57. Houle, Christian; Kayser, Mark A. (2019). The Two-Step Model of Clustered Democratization. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. Vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 2421–2437. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48597332.
  58. ICRC. (1949). The Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 [online; accessed 2025-08-31]. Available from WWW: https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/external/doc/en/assets/files/publications/icrc-002-0173.pdf.
  59. Jung, Jai Kwan; Deering, Christopher J. (2015). Constitutional Choices: Uncertainty and Institutional Design in Democratizing Nations. International Political Science Review. Vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512113503929.
  60. Kant, Immanuel. (2015). Perpetual Peace. In: Betts, Richard (ed.). Conflict After the Cold War: Arguments on Causes of War and Peace. London: Routledge, pp. 136–142.
  61. Kasapovic, Mirjana. (1996). Parliamentarism and Presidentialism in Eastern Europe. Politička Misao. Vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 120–135.
  62. Kassop, Nancy. (2003). The War Power and Its Limits. Presidential Studies Quarterly. Vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 509–529. 10.1111/1741-5705.00004.
  63. Kim, Young Hun. (2015). A Troubled Marriage? Divided Minority Government, Cohabitation, Presidential Powers, President-Parliamentarism and Semi-Presidentialism. Government and Opposition. Vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 652–681. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.23.
  64. Kroenig, Matthew; Schramm, Matthias. (2021). Pugnacious Presidents: Democratic Constitutional Systems and International Conflict. Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 249–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.13165.
  65. Krouwel, André. (2003). Measuring Presidentialism and Parliamentarism: An Application to Central and East European Countries. Acta Politica. Vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 333–364. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500041.
  66. Lake, David. (1992). Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War. American Political Science Review. Vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 24–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964013.
  67. Lazardeux, Sebastien G. (2015). Cohabitation and Conflicting Politics in French Policymaking. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137476906.
  68. Leblang, David; Chan, Steve. (2003). Explaining Wars Fought by Established Democracies: Do Institutional Constraints Matter? Political Research Quarterly. Vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600401.
  69. Levitsky, Steven; Way, Lucan A. (2002). Elections Without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0026.
  70. Levitsky, Steven; Way, Lucan A. (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781353.
  71. Levitsky, Steven; Ziblatt, Daniel. (2018). How Democracies Die. New York: Crown.
  72. Levy, Jack S. (1983). War in the Modern Great Power System: 1495–1975. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt130jjmm.
  73. Lieberman, Evan S. (2005). Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. American Political Science Review. Vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051762.
  74. Lijphart, Arend. (1997). Nomination: Trichotomy or Dichotomy. European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 31, no. 1–2, pp. 125–128.
  75. Linz, Juan J. (1990a). The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50–69.
  76. Linz, Juan J. (1990b). The Virtues of Parliamentarism. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 84–91.
  77. Linz, Juan J. (1994). Democracy, Presidential or Parliamentary: Does it Make a Difference? In Linz, Juan J.; Valenzuela, Arturo (eds.). The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The Case of Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 3–87.
  78. Lührmann, Anna; Lindberg, Staffan I. (2019). A Third Wave of Autocratization is Here: What is New About It? Democratization. Vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1095–1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029.
  79. Lytvyn, Vitaliy. (2020). Conditionality, Factors and Indicators of Heterogeneity and Typologization of Semi-Presidential System of Government. Studium Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej. Vol. 13, pp. 31–55. https://doi.org/10.59861/ansgk.2353-8392.2020.pp31-55.
  80. Lytvyn, Vitaliy. (2022). Newer-Ending Political Transition in Ukraine at the Background of the Experience of Central and Eastern European Countries: Dynamics and Correlation of Political Regimes and Systems of Government. Studium Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej. Vol. 18, pp. 29–47. https://doi.org/10.59861/ansgk.2353-8392.2022.2.pp29-47.
  81. Lytvyn, Vitaliy. (2023). Conflict, Stability and Efficiency of Various Types of Semi-Presidentialism: Theoretical Context, Empirical Implications and Generalisation at the Example of European Countries. Studium Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej. Vol. 20, pp. 117–132.
  82. Lytvyn, Vitaliy. (2025). Can Political Transition Be Never-Ending? The Context of Inter-Institutional and Political Relations in Ukraine. In New Research on Ukraine: Politics, Society, War: Petrach Program on Ukraine Conference Volume (The George Washington University: April 19th, 2024). Washington: The George Washington University, pp. 9–16.
  83. Lytvyn, Vitaliy; Romanyuk, Anatoliy. (2021). Types and Effects of European Semi-Presidentialism: Based on the Features of Dualism, Party Affiliation and Responsibility of the Executive and the Composition of Legislatures. The Annals of the University of Bucharest: Political Science Series. Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 87–116. https://doi.org/10.54885/JWZP6920.
  84. Mansfield, Edward D.; Snyder, Jack. (2002). Democratic Transitions, Institutional Strength, and War. International Organization. Vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 297–337. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802320005496.
  85. Markarov, Alexander. (2016). Semi-Presidentialism in Armenia. In Elgie, Robert; Moestrup, Sophia (eds.). Semi-Presidentialism in the Caucasus and Central Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 61–90. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-38781-3_3.
  86. Marshall, Monty G.; Gurr, Ted R. (2020). Polity5: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2018 (Dataset Users’ Manual). The Center for Systemic Peace [online; accessed 2025-08-31]. Available from WWW: https://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p5manualv2018.pdf.
  87. Mcmanus, Richard; Ozkan, F. Gulcin. (2018). Who Does Better for the Economy? Presidents Versus Parliamentary Democracies. Public Choice. Vol. 176, pp. 361–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-0552-2.
  88. Mendelson, Sarah E. (2001). Unfinished Business: Democracy Assistance and Political Transition in Eastern Europe and Eurasia. Problems of Post-Communism. Vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2001.11655930.
  89. Moestrup, Sophia. (2007). Semi-Presidentialism in Young Democracies: Help or Hindrance? In Elgie, Robert; Moestrup, Sophia (eds.). Semi-Presidentialism Outside Europe: A Comparative Study. London: Routledge, pp. 42–67. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203954294.
  90. Morlino, Leonardo. (2009). Are There Hybrid Regimes? Or Are They Just an Optical Illusion? European Political Science Review. Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909000198.
  91. Mufti, Mariam. (2018). What Do We Know About Hybrid Regimes after Two Decades? Politics and Governance. Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 112–119. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i2.1400.
  92. Munkh-Erdene, Lhamsuren. (2010). The Transformation of Mongolia’s Political System: From Semi-Parliamentary to Parliamentary? Asian Survey. Vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2010.50.2.311.
  93. O’connell, Mary Ellen. (2008). Defining Armed Conflict. Journal of Conflict & Security Law. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krp007.
  94. Pasquino, Gianfranco (2008). Italy: The Never-Ending Transition of a Democratic Regime. In Colomer, Josep M. (ed.), Comparative European Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 145–183.
  95. Perry, Valery. (2009). At Cross Purposes? Democratization and Peace Implementation Strategies in Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Frozen Conflict. Human Rights Review. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-008-0090-2.
  96. Persson, Torsten; Tabellini, Guido. (2002). Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  97. Polity5 Project. (2018). Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2018 [online; accessed 2025-08-31]. Available from WWW: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p5v2018d.xls.
  98. Protsyk, Oleh. (2005). Politics of Intraexecutive Conflict in Semipresidential Regimes in Eastern Europe. East European Politics and Societies. Vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325404270672.
  99. Protsyk, Oleh. (2006). Intra-Executive Competition Between President and Prime Minister: Patterns of Institutional Conflict and Cooperation Under Semi-Presidentialism. Political Studies. Vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00604.x.
  100. Przeworski, Adam. (2016). Democracy: A Never-Ending Quest. Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 19, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-021113-122919.
  101. Przeworski, Adam, et al. (2000). Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804946.
  102. Reiter, Dan; Tillman, Erik. (2002). Public, Legislative, and Executive Constraints on the Democratic Initiation of Conflict. Journal of Politics. Vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 810–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00147.
  103. Sartori, Giovanni. (1994a). Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. London: Macmillan.
  104. Sartori, Giovanni. (1994b). Neither Presidentialism nor Parliamentarism. In Linz, Juan J.; Valenzuela, Arturo (eds.). The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 106–118.
  105. Sartori, Giovanni. (1995). Elogio del Semi-Presidenzialismo. Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica. Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 3–20.
  106. Schleiter, Philip; Morgan-Jones, Edward. (2009). Party Government in Europe? Parliamentary and Semi-Presidential Democracies Compared. European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 665–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00847.x.
  107. Sedelius, Thomas. (2006). The Tug-of-War Between Presidents and Prime Ministers: Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe. Örebro: Örebro University.
  108. Sedelius, Thomas; Ekman, Joakim. (2010). Intra-Executive Conflict and Cabinet Instability: Effects of Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe. Government and Opposition. Vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 505–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2010.01325.x.
  109. Sedelius, Thomas; Linde, Jonas. (2017). Unravelling Semi-Presidentialism: Democracy and Government Performance in Four Distinct Regime Types. Democratization. Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 136-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2017.1334643.
  110. Sedelius, Thomas; Mashtaler, Olga. (2013). Two Decades of Semi-Presidentialism: Issues of Intra-Executive Conflict in Central and Eastern Europe 1991–2011. East European Politics. Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2012.748662.
  111. Sedelius, Thomas, et al. (2024). Semi-Presidentialism and War: Executive Leadership Models in Ukraine During Zelenskyi’s Presidency. East European Politics. Vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 658–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2024.2369978.
  112. Shugart, Matthew S.; Carey, John M. (1992). Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173988.
  113. Singer, J. David. (1970). From A Study of War to Peace Research: Some Criteria and Strategies. Journal of Conflict Resolution. Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277001400416.
  114. Skach, Cindy. (2007). The “Newest” Separation of Powers: Semipresidentialism. International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 5, no 1, pp. 93–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mol025.
  115. Stepan, Alfred; Suleiman, Ezra N. (2001). The French Fifth Republic: A Model for Import? In Stepan, Alfred (ed.). Arguing Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199242702.003.0014.
  116. The Center For Systemic Peace. (n.d.). Major Episodes of Political Violence 1946–2019 [online; accessed 2025-08-31]. Available from WWW: https://www.systemicpeace.org/warlist/warlist.htm.
  117. The Fraser Institute. (n.d.). Economic Freedom of the World: Dataset [online; accessed 2025-08-31]. Available from WWW: https://www.efotw.org/economic-freedom/dataset.
  118. Turk, Žiga. (2014). Central and Eastern Europe in Transition: An Unfinished Process? European View. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-014-0329-z.
  119. United Nations Development Programme (n.d.). Human Development Index (HDI) [online; accessed 2025-08-31]. Available from WWW: https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/human-development-index#/indicies/HDI.
  120. Vasquez, John A. (1993). The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  121. Vité, Sylvain. (2009). Typology of Armed Conflicts in International Humanitarian Law: Legal Concepts and Actual Situations. International Review of the Red Cross. Vol. 91, no. 873, pp. 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S181638310999021X.
  122. World Bank Group (n.d.). Worldwide Governance Indicators [online; accessed 2025-08-31]. Available from WWW: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators.
  123. Yan, Hsiu-Ting. (2023). Taiwan Can Help: The Political Impacts and Lessons of Taiwan’s Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic. In Lee, Wei-Chin (ed.). Protests, Pandemic, and Security Predicaments: Hong Kong, Taiwan, China, and the US in the 2020s. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 147–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33776-5_5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acpo-2026-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8220 | Journal ISSN: 1804-1302
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 25
Submitted on: Sep 4, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 19, 2026
Published on: Apr 21, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Vitaliy S. Lytvyn, Nazar O. Demchenko, Volodymyr V. Babenko, Ihor Yu. Osadchuk, published by Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.