Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Polarized trust and democratic decline. Rethinking resilience in the V4 countries Cover

Polarized trust and democratic decline. Rethinking resilience in the V4 countries

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Aassve, Arnstein, et al. (2024). Social and Political Trust Diverge During a Crisis. Scientific Reports. Vol. 14, no. 1, p. 331. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50898-4.
  2. Ágh, Attila. (2016). The Decline of Democracy in East-Central Europe: Hungary as the Worst-Case Scenario. Problems of Post-Communism. Vol. 63, no. 5–6, pp. 277–287. doi: 10.1080/10758216.2015.1113383.
  3. Albertson, Bethany; Gadarian, Shana Kushner. (2015). Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139963107.
  4. Almond, Gabriel Abraham; Verba, Sidney. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi: 10.1515/9781400874569.
  5. Bajomi-Lázár, Péter. (2017). Manipulál-e a média? Médiakutató: Médiaelméleti Folyóirat. Vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 61–79. https://mediakutato.hu/cikk/2017_04_tel/04_manipulale_a_media.pdf.
  6. Balík, Stanislav, et al. (2017). Czech Politics: From West to East and Back Again. Leverkusen: Verlag Barbara Budrich. doi: 10.2307/j.ctvdf03qs.
  7. Bátorfy, Attila; Urbán, Ágnes. (2020). State Advertising as an Instrument of Transformation of the Media Market in Hungary. East European Politics. Vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 44–65. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2019.1662398.
  8. Bayer, Judit; Bárd, Petra. (2020). Hate Speech and Hate Crime in the EU and the Evaluation of Online Content Regulation Approaches. European Union. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_STU(2020)655135.
  9. Bermeo, Nancy. (2016). On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 5–19. doi: 10.1353/jod.2016.0012.
  10. Bozóki, András; Hegedűs, Dániel. (2018). An Externally Constrained Hybrid Regime: Hungary in the European Union. Democratization. Vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1173–1189. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2018.1455664.
  11. Buštíková, Lenka; Guasti, Petra. (2019). The State as a Firm: Understanding the Autocratic Roots of Technocratic Populism. East European Politics and Societies. Vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 302–330. doi: 10.1177/0888325418791723.
  12. Butzlaff, Felix; Messinger-Zimmer, Sören. (2020). Undermining or Defending Democracy? The Consequences of Distrust for Democratic Attitudes and Participation. Critical Policy Studies. Vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 249–266. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2019.1584120.
  13. Citrin, Jack; Stoker, Laura. (2018). Political Trust in a Cynical Age. Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 21, pp. 49–70. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-050316-092550.
  14. Cleary, Matthew R.; Stokes, Susan. (2006). Democracy and the Culture of Skepticism: The Politics of Trust in Argentina and Mexico. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610441285.
  15. Croke, Kevin, et al. (2016). Deliberate Disengagement: How Education Can Decrease Political Participation in Electoral Authoritarian Regimes. American Political Science Review. Vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 579–600. doi: 10.1017/S0003055416000253.
  16. Dalton, Russell J. (2017). Political trust in North America. In Zmerli, Sonja; van der Meer, Tom W. G. (eds.). Handbook on Political Trust. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 375–394. doi: 10.4337/9781782545118.00035.
  17. Dimitrova, Antoaneta L. (2018). The Uncertain Road to Sustainable Democracy: Elite Coalitions, Citizen Protests and the Prospects of Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics. Vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 257–275. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2018.1491840.
  18. Enyedi, Zsolt. (2016). Paternalist Populism and Illiberal Elitism in Central Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies. Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 9–25. doi: 10.1080/13569317.2016.1105402.
  19. Esaiasson, Peter, et al. (2021). How the Coronavirus Crisis Affects Citizen Trust in Institutions and in Unknown Others: Evidence from ‘the Swedish Experiment.’ European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 748–760. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12419.
  20. Falcone, Rino, et al. (2020). All We Need Is Trust: How the COVID-19 Outbreak Reconfigured Trust in Italian Public Institutions. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 11, pp. 1–17. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561747.
  21. Fomina, Joanna. (2017). The Unlikely Eurosceptics: The Undercurrent Anti-European Attitudes among the Young Poles and the Role of the Domestic Context. Polish Sociological Review. Vol. 198, pp. 141–165. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26383054.
  22. Geissel, Brigitte. (2008). Reflections and Findings on the Critical Citizen: Civic Education – What for? European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 34–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00714.x.
  23. Graham, Matthew H.; Svolik, Milan W. (2020). Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review. Vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 392–409. doi: 10.1017/S0003055420000052.
  24. Grillo, Edoardo; Prato, Carlo. (2023). Reference Points and Democratic Backsliding. American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 71–88. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12672.
  25. Hanley, Seán; Vachudova, Milada Anna. (2018). Understanding the Illiberal Turn: Democratic Backsliding in the Czech Republic. East European Politics. Vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 276–296. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2018.1493457.
  26. Hetherington, Marc J. (2005). Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi: 10.2307/j.ctv301fkq.
  27. Hetherington, Marc J.; Rudolph, Thomas J. (2015). Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/W/bo21516007.html.
  28. Hibbing, John R.; Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. (2002). Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511613722.
  29. Huddy, Leonie; Mason, Lilliana; Aarøe, Lene. (2015). Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity. American Political Science Review. Vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 1–17. doi: 10.1017/S0003055414000604.
  30. Iyengar, Shanto, et al. (2019). The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 22, pp. 129–146. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034.
  31. Iyengar, Shanto; Westwood, Sean J. (2015). Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization. American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 690–707. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12152.
  32. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall; Cappella, Joseph N. (2008). Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/echo-chamber-9780195398601.
  33. Jezierska, Katarzyna. (2018). Performing Independence. The Apolitical Image of Polish Think Tanks. Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 345–364. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26594054.
  34. Keele, Luke. (2007). Social Capital and the Dynamics of Trust in Government. American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 241–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00248.x.
  35. Kestilä-Kekkonen, Elina; Koivula, Aki; Tiihonen, Aino. (2022). When Trust is Not Enough. A Longitudinal Analysis of Political Trust and Political Competence During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Finland. European Political Science Review. Vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 424–440. doi: 10.1017/S1755773922000224.
  36. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter; Fuchs, Dieter; Zielonka, Jan. (2006). Democracy and Political Culture in Eastern Europe. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203085974.
  37. Koncewicz, Tomasz Tadeusz. (2018). The Capture of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal and Beyond: Of Institution(s), Fidelities and the Rule of Law in Flux. Review of Central and East European Law. Vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 116–173. doi: 10.1163/15730352-04302002.
  38. Kornai, János. (2015). Hungary’s U-Turn. Society and Economy. Vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 279–329. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43774219.
  39. Körösényi, András. (2018). Manipuláció és demokrácia—Politikaelméleti tanulmányok. Budapest: Gondolat Kiadói Kör. doi: 10.1556/2065.185.2024.6.12.
  40. Krastev, Ivan. (2016). What’s Wrong with East-Central Europe? Liberalism’s Failure to Deliver. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 35–38. doi: 10.1353/jod.2016.0001.
  41. Laux, Johann. (2024). Institutionalised Distrust and Human Oversight of Artificial Intelligence: Toward a Democratic Design of AI Governance under the European Union AI Act. AI & Soc. Vol. 39, pp. 2853–2866. doi: 10.1007/s00146-023-01777-z.
  42. Lendvai-Bainton, Noemi; Szelewa, Dorota. (2021). Governing New Authoritarianism: Populism, Nationalism and Radical Welfare Reforms in Hungary and Poland. Social Policy & Administration. Vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 559–572. doi: 10.1111/spol.12642.
  43. Levi, Margaret; Stoker, Laura. (2000). Political Trust and Trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 3, pp. 475–507. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475.
  44. Levitsky, Steven; Ziblatt, Daniel. (2018). How Democracies Die. New York: Crown.
  45. Linek, Lukáš. (2016). Legitimacy, Political Disaffection and Discontent with (Democratic) Politics in the Czech Republic. Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 51–73. https://acpo.vedeckecasopisy.cz/publicFiles/001208.pdf.
  46. Lührmann, Anna; Lindberg, Staffan Ingemar. (2019). A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it? Democratization. Vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1095–1113. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029.
  47. Marien, Sofie; Hooghe, Marc. (2011). Does Political Trust Matter? An Empirical Investigation into the Relation between Political Trust and Support for Law Compliance. European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 267–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01930.x.
  48. Markowski, Radoslaw. (2020). The Future of Liberal Democracies, Pandemic Trade-Offs, and the Role of Social Sciences. Global Perspectives. Vol. 1, no. 1, p. 17637. doi: 10.1525/gp.2020.17637.
  49. Mason, Lilliana. (2018a). Ideologues without Issues: The Polarizing Consequences of Ideological Identities. Public Opinion Quarterly. Vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 866–887. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfy005.
  50. Mason, Lilliana. (2018b). Losing Common Ground: Social Sorting and Polarization. The Forum. Vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 47–66. doi: 10.1515/for-2018-0004.
  51. McCoy, Jennifer, Rahman, Tahmina; Somer, Murat. (2018). Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities. American Behavioral Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 16–42. doi: 10.1177/0002764218759576.
  52. McCoy, Jennifer; Somer, Murat. (2019). Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Vol. 681, no. 1, pp. 234–271. doi: 10.1177/0002716218818782.
  53. Mesežnikov, Grigorij; Gyárfášová, Ol’ga. (2018). Explaining Eastern Europe: Slovakia’s Conflicting Camps. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 78–90. doi: 10.1353/jod.2018.0046.
  54. Miller, Arthur H.; Listhaug, Ola. (1990). Political Parties and Confidence in Government: A Comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. British Journal of Political Science. Vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 357–386. https://www.jstor.org/stable/193915.
  55. Mishler, William; Rose, Richard. (2001). What Are the Origins of Political Trust?: Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-communist Societies. Comparative Political Studies. Vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 30–62. doi: 10.1177/0010414001034001002.
  56. Newton, Kenneth. (2001). Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy. International Political Science Review. Vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 201–214. doi: 10.1177/0192512101222004.
  57. Norris, Pippa. (1999). Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/0198295685.001.0001.
  58. Norris, Pippa. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511973383.
  59. Norris, Pippa. (2017). Is Western Democracy Backsliding? Diagnosing the Risks [Faculty Research Working Paper Series]. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/western-democracy-backsliding-diagnosing-risks.
  60. Novakova, Zuzana Reptova. (2020). The Curious Case of Slovakia. Regime Preferences Thirty Years after the Velvet Revolution. The International Journal of Social Quality. Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–19. doi: 10.3167/IJSQ.2020.100203.
  61. Ouattara, Ebe; Van der Meer, Tom. (2023). Distrusting Democrats: A Panel Study into the Effects of Structurally Low and Declining Political Trust on Citizens’ Support for Democratic Reform. European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1101–1121. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12561.
  62. Pappas, Takis S. (2019). Populism and Liberal Democracy: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198837886.001.0001.
  63. Pech, Laurent; Scheppele, Kim Lane. (2017). Illiberalism Within: Rule of Law Backsliding in the EU (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 3009280). Social Science Research Network. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3009280.
  64. Putnam, Robert D.; Leonardi, Robert; Nanetti, Raffaella Y. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi: 10.2307/j.ctt7s8r7.
  65. Roberts, Andrew. (2014). How Stable and Reasonable is Postcommunist Public Opinion? The Case of the Czech Republic. Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 925–944. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2014.900973.
  66. Rothstein, Bo; Stolle, Dietlind. (2008). The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust. Comparative Politics. Vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 441–459. doi: 10.5129/001041508X12911362383354.
  67. Sunstein, Cass R. (2018). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi: 10.2307/j.ctv8xnhtd.
  68. Wojciech, Sadurski. (2019). Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198840503.001.0001.
  69. Wunsch, Natasha; Gessler, Theresa. (2023). Who Tolerates Democratic Backsliding? A Mosaic Approach to Voters’ Responses to Authoritarian Leadership in Hungary. Democratization. Vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 914–937. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2023.2203918.
  70. Zakaria, Fareed. (1997). The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs. Vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 22–43. doi: 10.2307/20048274.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acpo-2025-0007 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8220 | Journal ISSN: 1804-1302
Language: English
Page range: 16 - 35
Submitted on: Nov 24, 2024
|
Accepted on: Sep 1, 2025
|
Published on: Oct 3, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Hadászi Szabolcs, published by Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.