
Figure 1.
Neighbourhood relations between urban places within a public space unit
Table 1.
Classification of neighbourhood relations between urban places
| Marking of the Relationships | Description of the Relationships |
|---|---|
| [-/-] | mutually antagonistic |
| [-/+] | parasitic |
| [0/0] | neutral (non-antagonistic) |
| [+/+] | symbiotic |
| [++/++] | hypersymbiotic |
Table 2.
Weights of neighbourhood relations between urban places
| Types of the Relationship | Marking of Relationships | Weights of Relationship |
|---|---|---|
| mutually antagonistic | [-/-] | -2 |
| parasitic | [-/+] | -1 |
| neutral (non-antagonistic) | [0/0] | 0 |
| symbiotic | [+/+] | 1 |
| hypersymbiotic | [++/++] | 2 |

Figure 2.
Neighbourhood relations between urban places with assigned relationships weights

Figure 3.
Measures of the level of symbiosis and synergy occurring in the analysed area in terms of the intensity of symbiosis and synergy

Figure 4.
Measures of the intensity of symbiosis and synergy occurring in the analysed area

Figure 5.
Measures of the level of symbiosis and synergy occurring in the analysed area after the introduction of change 1

Figure 6.
Measures of intensity of symbiosis and synergy occurring in the analysed area after the introduction of change 1

Figure 7.
A comparison of measures of the level and intensity of symbiosis and synergy occurring in the analysed area before and after the introduction of change 1.
Table 3.
Table of types of use and use of urban areas in the analysed area
| Urban Place | Use Types |
|---|---|
| A1 | h |
| A2 | h |
| B1 | u |
| B2 | m |
| B3 | s |
Table 4.
A table of types of relations of the neighbourhood of urban places occurring in the analysed area
| Urban Places Relationships | Uses neighbourhoods |
|---|---|
| A1-A2 | h-h |
| A1-B1 | h-u |
| A1-B2 | h-m |
| A1-B3 | h-s |
| A2-B1 | h-u |
| A2-B2 | h-m |
| A2-B3 | h-s |
| B1-B2 | u-m |
| B2-B3 | m-s |
| B1-B3 | u-s |
Table 5.
A table of weights of types of relations between the neighbourhood of urban places occurring in the analysed area.
| Use of place – neighbourhoods | Weights of the type of neighbourhood relationship |
|---|---|
| h-h | 0 |
| h-u | 1 |
| h-m | 2 |
| h-s | -1 |
| u-m | 2 |
| u-s | -1 |
| m-s | -2 |
Table 6.
A table of weights of the neighbourhood of urban places occurring in the area of the analysed segment of the main street
| Urban Places Relationships | Weights of the type of Neighbourhood |
|---|---|
| A1-A2 | 0 |
| A1-B1 | 1 |
| A1-B2 | 2 |
| A1-B3 | -1 |
| A2-B1 | 1 |
| A2-B2 | 2 |
| A2-B3 | -1 |
| B1-B2 | 2 |
| B2-B3 | -2 |
| B1-B3 | -1 |
Table 7.
Weights of neighbourhood relations between urban places in the analysed segment of the main street
| Types of the Relationship | Relationship markings | Weights of the Relationship | Number of relationships |
|---|---|---|---|
| mutually antagonistic | [-/-] | -2 | 1 |
| parasitic | [-/+] | -1 | 3 |
| indifferent | [0/0] | 0 | 1 |
| symbiotic | [+/+] | 1 | 2 |
| hypersymbiotic | [++/++] | 2 | 3 |
Table 8.
A table of types of use of urban places in the analysed area after the introduction of change 1
| Urban Places | Uses |
|---|---|
| A1 | h |
| A2 | h |
| B1 | u |
| B2 | m |
| B3 | u |
Table 9.
A table of types of relations of the neighbourhood of urban places occurring in the analysed area after the introduction of change 1
| Urban Places Relationships | Uses Neighbourhoods |
|---|---|
| A1-A2 | h-h |
| A1-B1 | h-u |
| A1-B2 | h-m |
| A1-B3 | h-u |
| A2-B1 | h-u |
| A2-B2 | h-m |
| A2-B3 | h-u |
| B1-B2 | u-m |
| B2-B3 | m-u |
| B1-B3 | u-u |
Table 10.
A table of types of use of urban places in the analysed area after the introduction of change 1
| Uses Neighbourhoods | Weights of Neighbourhood Relations |
|---|---|
| h-h | 0 |
| h-u | 1 |
| h-m | 2 |
| h-s | -1 |
| u-m | 2 |
| u-s | -1 |
| m-s | -2 |
| u-u | 0 |
Table 11.
A table of weights of the neighbourhood of urban places occurring in the analysed area after the introduction of change 1
| Urban Places Relationships | Weights of Neighbourhood Relations |
|---|---|
| A1-A2 | 0 |
| A1-B1 | 1 |
| A1-B2 | 2 |
| A1-B3 | 1 |
| A2-B1 | 1 |
| A2-B2 | 2 |
| A2-B3 | 1 |
| B1-B2 | 2 |
| B2-B3 | 2 |
| B1-B3 | 1 |
Table 12.
Weights of the neighbourhood relationship between urban places in the analysed area after the introduction of change 1
| Types of Relationship | Relationship Markings | Weights of Relationships | Number of Relationships |
|---|---|---|---|
| mutually antagonistic | [-/-] | -2 | 0 |
| parasitic | [-/+] | -1 | 1 |
| indifferent | [0/0] | 0 | 1 |
| symbiotic | [+/+] | 1 | 4 |
| hypersymbiotic | [++/++] | 2 | 4 |

Figure 8.
A plan of an abstarctional main city street divided into segments

Figure 9.
A diagram of assessments of sections of public street space – state before change 1

Figure 10.
A diagram of assessments of sections of public street space – state after change 1

Figure 11.
A map of the distribution of assessments of sections of the public space of the street – existing state – before the change 1

Figure 12.
A map of the distribution of assessments of sections of the public space of the street – state after the change 1.
