Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Weights of neighbourhood relations between urban places in the analysed segment of the main street
| Types of the Relationship | Relationship markings | Weights of the Relationship | Number of relationships |
|---|---|---|---|
| mutually antagonistic | [-/-] | -2 | 1 |
| parasitic | [-/+] | -1 | 3 |
| indifferent | [0/0] | 0 | 1 |
| symbiotic | [+/+] | 1 | 2 |
| hypersymbiotic | [++/++] | 2 | 3 |
A table of types of relations of the neighbourhood of urban places occurring in the analysed area after the introduction of change 1
| Urban Places Relationships | Uses Neighbourhoods |
|---|---|
| A1-A2 | h-h |
| A1-B1 | h-u |
| A1-B2 | h-m |
| A1-B3 | h-u |
| A2-B1 | h-u |
| A2-B2 | h-m |
| A2-B3 | h-u |
| B1-B2 | u-m |
| B2-B3 | m-u |
| B1-B3 | u-u |
A table of types of use of urban places in the analysed area after the introduction of change 1
| Uses Neighbourhoods | Weights of Neighbourhood Relations |
|---|---|
| h-h | 0 |
| h-u | 1 |
| h-m | 2 |
| h-s | -1 |
| u-m | 2 |
| u-s | -1 |
| m-s | -2 |
| u-u | 0 |
Table of types of use and use of urban areas in the analysed area
| Urban Place | Use Types |
|---|---|
| A1 | h |
| A2 | h |
| B1 | u |
| B2 | m |
| B3 | s |
A table of weights of the neighbourhood of urban places occurring in the area of the analysed segment of the main street
| Urban Places Relationships | Weights of the type of Neighbourhood |
|---|---|
| A1-A2 | 0 |
| A1-B1 | 1 |
| A1-B2 | 2 |
| A1-B3 | -1 |
| A2-B1 | 1 |
| A2-B2 | 2 |
| A2-B3 | -1 |
| B1-B2 | 2 |
| B2-B3 | -2 |
| B1-B3 | -1 |
Weights of the neighbourhood relationship between urban places in the analysed area after the introduction of change 1
| Types of Relationship | Relationship Markings | Weights of Relationships | Number of Relationships |
|---|---|---|---|
| mutually antagonistic | [-/-] | -2 | 0 |
| parasitic | [-/+] | -1 | 1 |
| indifferent | [0/0] | 0 | 1 |
| symbiotic | [+/+] | 1 | 4 |
| hypersymbiotic | [++/++] | 2 | 4 |
Classification of neighbourhood relations between urban places
| Marking of the Relationships | Description of the Relationships |
|---|---|
| [-/-] | mutually antagonistic |
| [-/+] | parasitic |
| [0/0] | neutral (non-antagonistic) |
| [+/+] | symbiotic |
| [++/++] | hypersymbiotic |
Weights of neighbourhood relations between urban places
| Types of the Relationship | Marking of Relationships | Weights of Relationship |
|---|---|---|
| mutually antagonistic | [-/-] | -2 |
| parasitic | [-/+] | -1 |
| neutral (non-antagonistic) | [0/0] | 0 |
| symbiotic | [+/+] | 1 |
| hypersymbiotic | [++/++] | 2 |
A table of types of relations of the neighbourhood of urban places occurring in the analysed area
| Urban Places Relationships | Uses neighbourhoods |
|---|---|
| A1-A2 | h-h |
| A1-B1 | h-u |
| A1-B2 | h-m |
| A1-B3 | h-s |
| A2-B1 | h-u |
| A2-B2 | h-m |
| A2-B3 | h-s |
| B1-B2 | u-m |
| B2-B3 | m-s |
| B1-B3 | u-s |
A table of weights of the neighbourhood of urban places occurring in the analysed area after the introduction of change 1
| Urban Places Relationships | Weights of Neighbourhood Relations |
|---|---|
| A1-A2 | 0 |
| A1-B1 | 1 |
| A1-B2 | 2 |
| A1-B3 | 1 |
| A2-B1 | 1 |
| A2-B2 | 2 |
| A2-B3 | 1 |
| B1-B2 | 2 |
| B2-B3 | 2 |
| B1-B3 | 1 |
A table of weights of types of relations between the neighbourhood of urban places occurring in the analysed area_
| Use of place – neighbourhoods | Weights of the type of neighbourhood relationship |
|---|---|
| h-h | 0 |
| h-u | 1 |
| h-m | 2 |
| h-s | -1 |
| u-m | 2 |
| u-s | -1 |
| m-s | -2 |