Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Scientists, Their Work, and how Others Perceive Them: Self-Perceptions of Scientists and Students’ Stereotypes

Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. Aikenhead, G. (1987). High school graduates’ beliefs about sciencetechnologysociety. III. Characteristics and limitations of science knowledge. Science Education, 71(4), 459-87.
  2. Dierks, P. O., Höffler, T., & Parchmann, I. (2014). Profiling interest of students in science: Learning in school and beyond. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(2), 97-114. doi:10.1080./02635143.2014.89571210.1080/02635143.2014.895712
  3. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young People’s Images of Science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  4. Hannover, B., & Kessels, U. (2002). Challenge the science-stereotype. Der Einfluss von Technik-Freizeitkursen auf das Naturwissenschaften-Stereotyp von Schülerinnen und Schülern. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 45, 341-358.
  5. Henson, D. (2012). Television Archaeology: Education or Entertainment? History in British Education. University of London – Institute of Historical Research.
  6. Holland, J. L. (1959). A theory of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6, 35-45.10.1037/h0040767
  7. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Edessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  8. Hollander M. A., & Parker H. J. (1972). Occupational Stereotypes and Self-Descriptions: Their Relationship to Vocational Choice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2, 57-65.10.1016/0001-8791(72)90007-3
  9. Höttecke, D. (2004). “Student Ideas Regarding Nature of Science“ [In German: Schülervorstellungen über die “Natur der Naturwissenschaften”]. In C. Hößle, D. Höttecke & E. Kircher (Eds.), „Teaching and Learning about the Nature of Science“ [In German: Lehren und Lernen über die Natur der Naturwissenschaften] (pp. 264-277). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
  10. Höttecke, D., & Hopf, M. (2018). “Students´ perceptions about Nature of Science“ [In German: Schülervorstellungen zur Natur der Naturwissenschaften]. In H. Schecker, T. Wilhelm, M. Hopf & R. Duit (Eds.), “Students´perceptions and physics lessons“ [In German: Schülervorstellungen und Physikunterricht] (pp. 271-287). Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland.
  11. Jung, W. (1997). “Essays About Physics Education and Philosophy of Science“ [In German: Aufsätze zur Didaktik der Physik und Wissenschaftstheorie]. Frankfurt: Diesterweg.
  12. Kessels, U., Rau, M., & Hannover,B. (2006). What goes well with physics? Measuring and altering the image of science. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 761-80.10.1348/000709905X59961
  13. Kircher, E. (1995). “Studies on Physics Education“ [In German: Studien zur Physikdidaktik]. Kiel: IPN.
  14. Kircher, E., & Dittmer, A. (2004). „Teaching and Learning about the Nature of Science – an overview“ [In German: Lehren und Lernen über die Natur der Naturwissenschaften - ein Überblick]. In C. Hößle, D. Höttecke & E. Kircher (Eds.), “Teaching and Learning about the Nature of Science“ [In German: Lehren und Lernen über die Natur der Naturwissenschaften] (pp. 2-22). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
  15. Kuhn, W. (1991). “Philosophy of Science Dimension of Physics Lessons” [In German: Die wissenschaftstheoretische Dimension des Physikunterrichts]. In H. Wiesner (Ed.), “Essays About Physics Education” [In German: Aufsätze zur Didaktik der Physik] (pp. 125-144). II. Phys. Did. Sonderausgabe: Franzbecker.
  16. Laherto, A., Tirre, F., Kampschulte, L., Parchmann, I., & Schwarzer, S. (2018). Scientists‘ perceptions on the Nature of Nanoscience and its public communication. Problems of Education in the 21.st Century, 76(1), 2538-7111.10.33225/pec/18.76.43
  17. Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of Science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831-879). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  18. Neumann, I. (2011). Beyond Physics Content Knowledge. Modeling Competence Regarding Nature of Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Scientific Knowledge. Studien zum Physik- und Chemielernen 117, Logos Verlag Berlin.
  19. Neumann, I., & Kremer, K. (2013). “Nature of Science and Epistemological Beliefs – Similarities and Differences” [In German: Nature of Science und epistemologische Überzeugungen]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 19, 209-232
  20. Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Lederman J. S. (2008). An Instrument to Assess Views Of Scientific Inquiry: The VOSI Questionnaire. Paper presented at Annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD.
  21. Sharkawy, A. (2012). Exploring the potential of using stories about diverse scientists and reflective activities to enrich primary students’ images of scientists and scientific work. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 307-340. DOI 10.1007/s11422-012-9386-210.1007/s11422-012-9386-2
  22. Solomon, J., Scott, L., & Duveen, J. (1994). Pupils’ images of scientific epistemology. International Journal of Science Education, 16(3), 361-373.10.1080/0950069940160309
  23. Stamer, I., Pönicke, H., Laherto, A., Tirre, F., Höffler, T. N., Schwarzer, S., & Parchmann, I. (2019). Development & validation of scientific video vignettes to promote perception of authentic science in student laboratories. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1470-1138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.160049110.1080/02635143.2019.1600491
  24. Thomas, G. P., & Durant, J. R. (1987). Why should we promote the public understanding of science? In: Shortland M (Ed.), Scientific Literacy Papers. Rewley House. Oxford. 1-14.
  25. Tintori, A., & Palomba, R. (2017). The most common stereotypes about science and scientists: what scholars know. In A. Tintori & R. Palomba (Eds.), Turn on the light on science. London: Ubiquity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bba.b10.5334/bba.b
  26. Wentorf, W., Höffler, T. N., & Parchmann, I. (2015). “Concepts of students about the activities of scientists: Perception, corresponding interests and self-efficacy expectations.” [In German: Schülerkonzepte über das Tätigkeitsspektrum von Naturwissenschaftlerinnen und Naturwissenschaftlern: Vorstellungen, korrespondierende Interessen und Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 21, 207-222.
  27. Werner, M., & Kremer, K. (2010). „An experiment is, what the teacher makes: Students’ perception about the nature of science.“ [In German: “Ein Experiment ist das, was der Lehrer macht.” – Schülervorstellungen über die Natur der Naturwissenschaften.] Erkenntnisweg Biologiedidaktik, 9, 135-150.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23770/rt1826 | Journal eISSN: 2616-7697
Language: English
Page range: 85 - 101
Published on: Jun 14, 2022
Published by: Gesellschaft für Fachdidaktik (GfD e.V.)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Insa Stamer, Marcus Kubsch, Mara Thiele, Tim Höffler, Stefan Schwarzer, Ilka Parchmann, published by Gesellschaft für Fachdidaktik (GfD e.V.)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.