Comparing the Affective Outcomes of CLIL Modules and Streams on Secondary School Students
References
- Abendroth-Timmer, D. (2007). Akzeptanz und Motivation: Empirische Ansätze zur Erforschung des unterrichtlichen Einsatzes von bilingualen und mehrsprachigen Modulen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
- Admiraal, W., Westhoff, G. & de Bot, K. (2006). Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in the Netherlands: Students’ language proficiency in English. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 75–93.10.1080/13803610500392160
- Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
- Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, Vol. 4 (pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.
- Bonnet, A. (2012). CLIL im Fach Chemie – Wachsende Orchidee und Motor der Integration. In B. Diehr, & L. Schmelter (Ed.), Bilingualen Unterricht weiterdenken. Programme, Positionen, Perspektiven (pp. 201-215). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
- Bruton, A. (2011). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 39, 523-532.10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002
- Bruton, A. (2013). CLIL: Some of the reasons why and why not. System, 41(3), 587-597.10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001
- Bruton, A. (2015). CLIL: Detail matters in the whole picture. More than a reply to J. Hüttner and U. Smit (2014). System, 53, 119-128.
- Çikrıkci, Ö. (2017). The Effect of Self-efficacy on Student Achievement. In Karadağ, E. (Ed.), The Factors Effecting Student Achievement. Meta-Analysis of Empirical Studies (pp. 95-116). Springer e-book.10.1007/978-3-319-56083-0_6
- Costa, F., & D’Angelo, L. (2011). CLIL: A Suit for All Seasons. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 4(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2011.4.1.110.5294/laclil.2011.4.1.1
- Coyle, D. (1999). Supporting students in content and language integrated contexts: planning for effective classrooms. In J. Masih (Ed.), Learning through a foreign language. Models, methods and outcomes (pp. 46-62). London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
- Dallinger, S., Jonkmann, K., Hollm, J., & Fiege, C. (2016). The Effect of Content and Language Integrated Learning on Students’ English and History Competences – Killing Two Birds with One Stone? Learning and Instruction, 41, S. 23-31.
- Dalton-Puffer, C., & Nikula, T. (2006). Pragmatics of content-based instruction: Teacher and student directives in Finnish and Austrian classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 241-267. doi:10.1093/applin/aml00710.1093/applin/aml007
- Daniels, Z. (2008). Entwicklung schulischer Interessen im Jugendalter. Münster: Waxmann.
- Darn, S. 2006. CLIL: a European overview. INGED News Online Issue 2. http://www.stevedarn.com/?Writings::CLIL%3A_A_European_Overview
- Dewaele, J.-M. (2007). The effect of multilingualism, sociobiographical, and situational factors on communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety of mature language learners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(4), 391-409.10.1177/13670069070110040301
- Diehr, B. & Frisch, S. (2018). Das Zusammenspiel von zwei Sprachen im bilingualen Unterricht. Theoretische Überlegungen, empirische Erkenntnisse und praktische Implikationen. In C. Caruso, J. Hofmann, A. Rohde & K. Schick (Ed.), Sprache im Unterricht. Ansätze, Konzepte, Methoden (pp. 245-259). Trier: WVT.
- Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2014). CLIL and motivation: the effect of individual and contextual variables. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 209-224.10.1080/09571736.2014.889508
- Donat, M., Radant, M., & Dalbert, C. (2008). Psychologie der Schülerpersönlichkeit. In M. K. W. Schweer (Ed.), Lehrer-Schüler-Interaktion (pp. 127-154). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
- Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2009). Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847691293
- Elsner, D., & Keßler, J.-U. (2013). Bilingual Education in Primary School – Aspects of Immersion, CLIL and Bilingual Modules. Tübingen: Narr.
- Fehling, S. (2005). Language Awareness und bilingualer Unterricht. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
- Feng, X., Wang, J.-L., & Rost, D. H. (2018). Akademische Selbstkonzepte und akademische Selbstwirksamkeiten: Interdependenzen und Beziehungen zu schulischen Leistungen. Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie, 32(1-2), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a00021810.1024/1010-0652/a000218
- Fernández Fontecha, A., & Canga Alonso, A. (2014). A preliminary study on motivation and gender in CLIL and non-CLIL types of instruction. International Journal of English Studies, 14(1), 21-36.10.6018/ijes/14/1/156681
- Huang, J. (2012). Overcoming foreign language classroom anxiety. New York, NY: Nova Science Publ.
- Hüttner, J., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013). The power of beliefs: lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 267-284. DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2013.77738510.1080/13670050.2013.777385
- Jaekel, N. (2018). Language learning strategy use in context: the effects of self-efficacy and CLIL on language proficiency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Advance online publication, available at https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-010210.1515/iral-2016-0102
- Jansen, M., Scherer, R., & Schroeders, U. (2015). Students‘ self-concept and self-efficacy in the sciences: Differential relations to antecedents and educational outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 13-24.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.002
- Jerusalem, M., & Satow, L. (1999). Schulbezogene Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung. In R. Schwarzer, & M. Jerusalem (Ed.), Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen. Berlin.
- Juan-Garau, M., & Jacob, K. (2015). Developing English learners’ transcultural skills through content- and task-based lessons. System, 54(SI), 55-68. doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.04.01710.1016/j.system.2015.04.017
- KMK (2013). Bericht „Konzepte für den bilingualen Unterricht – Erfahrungsbericht und Vorschläge zur Weiterentwicklung“. http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2006/2006_04_10-Konzepte-bilingualer-Unterricht.pdf
- Krapp, A. (1998). Entwicklung und Förderung von Interessen im Unterricht. Psychologie, Erziehung, Unterricht, 44, 185-201.
- Krechel, H.-L. (2003). Bilingual Modules: Flexible Formen bilingualen Lehrens und Lernens. In M. Wildhage (Ed.), Praxis des bilingualen Unterrichts (pp. 194-216). Berlin: Cornelsen Scriptor.
- Küppers, A., & Trautmann, M. (2013). It’s not CLIL that is a success – CLIL students are! Some critical remarks on the current CLIL boom. In S. Breidbach & B. Viebrock (Ed.), Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in Europe. Research perspectives on policy and practice (pp. 285-296). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
- Lancaster, N. K. (2018). Extramural Exposure and Language Attainment: The Examination of Input-Related Variables in CLIL Programmes. Porta Linguarum, 29, 91-114.10.30827/Digibug.54024
- Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1(1), 31-42. doi: 10.2174/187491350080101003010.2174/1874913500801010030
- Lasagabaster, D. & Lopez Beloqui, R. (2015). The Impact of Type of Approach (CLIL Versus EFL) and Methodology (Book-Based Versus Project Work) on Motivation. Porta Linguarum, 23, 41–57.10.30827/Digibug.53737
- Löwe, B. (1992). Biologieunterricht und Schülerinteresse an Biologie. In Schriftenreihe der Pädagogischen Hochschule Heidelberg, Band 9.
- MacIntyre, P. D. (2017). An Overview of Language Anxiety Research and Trends in its Development. In C. Gkonou, M. Daubney, & J.-M. Dewaele (Ed.), New Insights into Language Anxiety. Theory, Research and Educational Implications (pp. 11-30). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
- Madrid, D., & Barrios, E. (2018). A Comparison of Students’ Educational Achievement across Programmes and School Types with and without CLIL Provision. Porta Linguarum, 29, 29-50.
- Marsh, D., Marsland, B., & Nikula, T. (1999). CLIL: a review of current thinking. In D. Marsh & B. Marsland (Ed.), CLIL initiatives for the millenium (pp. 34-45). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä Continuing Education Centre.
- Mehisto, P. (2008). CLIL counterweights: Recognising and decreasing disjuncture in CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(1), 93-119.
- Meyerhöffer, N. & Dreesmann, D. C. (2019). English-bilingual biology for standard classes development, implementation and evaluation of an English-bilingual teaching unit in standard German high school classes. International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1366-1386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.160762010.1080/09500693.2019.1607620
- Möller, J., Hohenstein, F., Fleckenstein, J., & Baumert, J. (2017). Formen und Effekte des Fremdsprachenerwerbs und der bilingualen Beschulung. In J. Möller, F. Hohenstein, J. Fleckenstein, O. Köller, & J. Baumert (Ed.), Erfolgreich integrieren - die Staatliche Europa-Schule Berlin (pp. 25-48). Münster: Waxmann.
- MSW NRW (2011). Bilingualer Unterricht in Nordrhein-Westfalen. https://www.schulministerium.nrw.de/docs/Schulsystem/Unterricht/Lernbereiche-und-Faecher/Fremdsprachen/Bilingualer-Unterricht/Kontext/Broschuere_Bilinguale-Unterricht-in-NRW.pdf
- MSW NRW (2014). Kernlehrplan für die Sekundarstufe II Gymnasium/Gesamtschule in Nordrhein-Westfalen: Englisch. Retrieved from http://www.schulentwicklung.nrw.de/lehrplaene/upload/klp_SII/e/KLP_GOSt_Englisch.pdf
- Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why Are You Learning a Second Language? Motivational Orientations and Self-Determination Theory. Language Learning, 50, 57-85. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.0011110.1111/0023-8333.00111
- Nold, G., Hartig, J., Hinz, S. & Rossa, H. (2008). Klassen mit bilingualem Sachfachunterricht: Englisch als Arbeitssprache. In DESI-Konsortium (Ed.), Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch und Englisch (pp. 451–457). Weinheim: Beltz.
- Ohlberger, S., & Wegner, C. (2017). Motivational Changes due to the Implementation of a Bilingual Module in Biology. Journal of Innovation in Psychology, Education and Didactics, 21(2), 149-176.
- Ohlberger, S., & Wegner, C. (2018). Bilingualer Sachfachunterricht in Deutschland und Europa – Darstel-lung des Forschungsstands. HLZ – Herausforderung Lehrer_innenbildung, 1(1), 45-89.
- Ohlberger, S., & Wegner, C. (2019). CLIL modules and their affective impact on students with high English anxiety and low self-efficacy. Apples: Applied Language Studies, 13(3), 1-15.10.17011/apples/urn.201906253409
- Osterhage, S. (2009). Sachfachkönnen (scientific literacy) bilingual und monolingual unterrichteter Biologieschüler: ein Kompetenzvergleich. In D. Caspari, W. Hallet, A. Wegner, & W. Zydatiß (Hg), Bilingualer Unterricht macht Schule: Beiträge aus der Praxisforschung (pp. 41-50). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
- Pajares, F. (2005). Self-Efficacy during Childhood and Adolescence – Implications for Teachers and Parents. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan, Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (pp. 339-367). Information Age Publishing.
- Piesche, N., Jonkmann, K., Fiege, C., & Keßler, J.-U. (2016). CLIL for all? A randomised controlled field experiment with sixth-grade students on the effects of content and language integrated science learning. Learning and Instruction, 44, S. 108–116. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.04.001.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.04.001
- Pietsch, J., Walker, R., & Chapman, E. (2003). The relationship among self-concept, self-efficacy, and performance in mathematics during secondary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 589–603.10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.589
- Pihko, M. K. (2007). Foreign language anxiety in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) and in traditional foreign language classes. In S. Tella (Ed.), From brawn to brain: Strong signals in foreign language education (pp. 129–142). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
- Preisfeld, A. (2016). Die Bedeutung bilingualen Experimentalunterrichts in Biologie für die fachliche und sprachliche Kompetenz. In B. Diehr, A. Preisfeld, & L. Schmelter (Ed.), Bilingualen Unterricht weiterentwickeln und erforschen (pp. 103-123). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
- Richter, R. (2004). And now – in English, please. Unterricht Biologie, 297/298, 4-12.
- Rodenhauser, A., & Preisfeld, A. (2015). Bilingual (German-English) Molecular Biology Courses in an Outof-School Lab on a University Campus: Cognitive and Affective Evaluation. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(1), 99-110.
- Rumlich, D. (2014). Prospective CLIL and non-CLIL students’ interest in English (classes): A quasi-experimental study on German sixth-graders. In R. Breeze, C. Llamas Saiz, & C. Martinez Pasamar (Ed.), Utrecht Studies in Language and Communication. Integration of theory and practice in CLIL (pp. 75-95). Rodopi.
- Rumlich, D. (2015). Zur affektiv-motivationalen Entwicklung von Lernenden im CLIL Unterricht. In B. Rüschoff, J. Sudhoff, & D. Wolff (Ed.), CLIL Revisited: Eine kritische Analyse des gegenwärtigen Standes des bilingualen Sachfachunterrichts (pp. 309-330). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
- Rumlich, D. (2016). Evaluating bilingual education in Germany: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-653-06460-5
- Schiefele, U. (2009). Motivation. In E. Wild & J. Möller (Ed.), Pädagogische Psychologie (pp.151-177). Heidelberg: Springer Medizin Verlag. DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-88573-3_710.1007/978-3-540-88573-3_7
- Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (2002). Das Konzept der Selbstwirksamkeit. In M. Jerusalem & D. Hopf (Ed.), Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Beiheft: Vol. 44. Selbstwirksamkeit und Motivationsprozesse in Bildungsinstitutionen (pp. 28-53). Weinheim: Beltz.
- Seikkula-Leino, J. (2007). CLIL Learning. Achievement Levels and Affective Factors. Language and Education, 21(4), S. 328–341. doi: 10.2167/le635.0.10.2167/le635.0
- Sylven, L. K., & Thompson, A. S. (2015). Language learning motivation and CLIL Is there a connection? Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 3(1), S. 28–50. doi: 10.1075/jicb.3.1.02syl10.1075/jicb.3.1.02syl
- Thompson, A. S., & Sylvén, L. K. (2015). “Does English make you nervous?” Anxiety profiles of CLIL and non-CLIL students in Sweden. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies, 9(2), 1–23.10.17011/apples/urn.201512093950
- Tóth, Z. (2010). Foreign Language Anxiety and the Advanced Language Learner: A Study of Hungarian Students of English as a Foreign Language. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- van Mensel, L., Hiligsmann, P., Mettewie, L., & Galand, B. (2019). CLIL, an elitist language learning approach? A background analysis of English and Dutch CLIL pupils in French-speaking Belgium. LANGUAGE CULTURE AND CURRICULUM, 1(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2019.157107810.1080/07908318.2019.1571078
- Verriere, K. (2014). Bilinguale Module im Mathematikunterricht und ihr Einfluss auf die Lernbereitschaft der Schüler/innen für das Sachfach. Trier: WVT Wiss. Verl.
- Wegner, C. (2009). Entwicklung und Evaluation des Projektes “Kolumbus-Kids” zur Förderung begabter SchülerInnen in den Naturwissenschaften (Dissertation). Bielefeld University, Bielefeld.
- Wolff, D. (2013). CLIL als europäisches Konzept. In W. Hallet & F. G. Königs (Ed.), Handbuch Bilingualer Unterricht – Content and Language Integrated Learning (pp. 18-25). Seelze: Friedrich Verlag.
- Zarobe, Y. R. (2008). CLIL and foreign language learning: A longitudinal study in the Basque Country. International CLIL Research Journal, 1 (1), 60-73.
- Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202–231). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
- Zydatiß, W. (2007). Deutsch-Englische Züge in Berlin (DEZIBEL). Eine Evaluation des bilingualen Sachfachunterrichts an Gymnasien. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23770/rt1825 | Journal eISSN: 2616-7697
Language: English
Page range: 61 - 84
Published on: Jun 14, 2022
Published by: Gesellschaft für Fachdidaktik (GfD e.V.)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2022 Stephanie Ohlberger, Vivienne Litzke, Claas Wegener, published by Gesellschaft für Fachdidaktik (GfD e.V.)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.