FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 10.

FIGURE 11.

FIGURE 12.

FIGURE 13.

Physical properties of the sandy granite saprolite
| Water contenta [%] | Bulk densityb [kg·m−3] | Solid particle densityc [kg·m−3] | Sand equivalentd [%] | Proctor teste | VBSf [-] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ρ [g·cm−3] | Wopt [%] | |||||
| 11.11 | 1 460.66 | 2 427.18 | 80.93 | 1.75 | 11.6 | 0.24 |
Physical properties of marble waste
| Bulk density [g·cm−3] | Absolute density [g·cm−3] | Grain size distribution [%] | Fineness modulus | Sand equivalent [%] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 0.08 mm | 0.08‒1.25 mm | 1.25‒5.0 mm | ||||
| 1.665 | 2.665 | 2.3 | 84.7 | 12.3 | 2.48 | 89.6 |
Properties of the cement
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Chemical analysis [%] | |
| Loss on ignition | 2.6‒3.7 |
| Sulfate content (SO3) | 2.2‒2.8 |
| Magnesium oxide (MgO) | 1.7‒2.8 |
| Chloride content (Cl) | 0.03‒0.07 |
| Potential clinker composition [%] | |
| Tricalcium silicate (C3S) | 56‒66 |
| Tricalcium aluminate (C3A) | 5.1‒7.2 |
| Compressive strength [MPa] | |
| For the 2-day-aged sample | 20‒29 |
| For the 28-day-aged sample | 42.5‒52.5 |
