Technostress and perceived disadvantages of flexible work arrangements as predictors of turnover intention: Testing the mediating role of work engagement among Generation Z in Indonesia’s hybrid workforce
References
- Akram, Z., Li, Y., & Akram, U. (2019). When employees are emotionally exhausted due to abusive supervision: A conservation-of-resources perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(18), 3300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183300
- Albion, M. J. (2004). A measure of attitudes towards flexible work options. Australian Journal of Management, 29(2), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289620402900207
- Alkhayyal, S., & Bajaba, S. (2024). Countering technostress in virtual work environments: The role of work-based learning and digital leadership in enhancing employee well-being. Acta Psychologica, 248, 104377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104377
- Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Hasil Sensus Penduduk (SP2020) pada September 2020 mencatat jumlah penduduk sebesar 270,20 juta jiwa [The results of the Population Census (SP2020) in September 2020 recorded a population of 270.20 million people]. https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2021/01/21/1854/hasil-sensus-penduduk-2020.html
- Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024, July 30). Gen Z phenomenon is difficult to find a job. https://bandungkab.bps.go.id/en/news/2024/07/30/75/gen-z-phenomenon-is-difficult-to-find-a-job-.html
- Bai, Y., Zhou, J., & He, W. (2023). How employee job burnout, work engagement, and turnover intention relate to career plateau during the epidemic. Social Sciences, 12(7), 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12070394
- Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
- Baş, M., & Çınar, O. (2021). The mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between perceived organizational support and turnover intention – with an application to healthcare employees in Erzincan province of Turkey. Ekonomski Vjesnik, 34(2), 291-306. https://doi.org/10.51680/ev.34.2.4
- Bielefeld, L., Fuchs, O., Pfeiffer, H., Lorenz, E., & Poslawski, K. (2025). The importance of flexibility at work for Generation Z in Germany. Journal of Economics, Management, and Trade, 31(9), 102-119. https://doi.org/10.9734/jemt/2025/v31i91352
- Bloom, N., Han, R., & Liang, J. (2024). Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance. Nature, 630, 920-925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2
- Bourlakis, M., Nisar, T. M., & Prabhakar, G. (2023). How technostress may affect employee performance in educational work environments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193, 122674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122674
- Califf, C. B., & Brooks, S. (2024). How did COVID-19 impact techno stressors, literacy facilitation, burnout, and turnover intention? An exact replication. AIS Transactions on Replication Research, 10(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.17705/1atrr.00084
- Califf, C. B., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2020). The bright and dark sides of technostress: A mixed-methods study involving healthcare IT. MIS Quarterly, 44(2), 809-856. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14818
- Cao, X., & Chen, L. (2021). The impact of resilience on turnover intention in dialysis nurses: The mediating effects of work engagement and compassion fatigue. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 18(3), e12414. https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12414
- Chang, J. P.-C., Cheng, S.-W., Chang, S. M.-J., & Su, K.-P. (2025). Navigating the digital maze: A review of AI bias, social media, and mental health in Generation Z. AI, 6(6), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6060118
- Chillakuri, B. (2020). Understanding Generation Z expectations for effective onboarding. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1277-1296. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2020-0058
- Çivilidağ, A., & Durmaz, Ş. (2024). Examining the relationship between flexible working arrangements and employee performance: A mini review. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1398309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1398309
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
- Gašić, D., & Berber, N. (2023). The mediating role of employee engagement in the relationship between flexible work arrangements and turnover intentions among highly educated employees in the Republic of Serbia. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020131
- Gupta, M., & Shaheen, M. (2017). Impact of work engagement on turnover intention: Moderation by psychological capital in India. Business: Theory and Practice, 18, 136-143. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2017.014
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Pearson. https://eli.johogo.com/Class/CCU/SEM/_Multivariate%20Data%20Analysis_Hair.pdf
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage. https://eli.johogo.com/Class/CCU/SEM/_A%20Primer%20on%20Partial%20Least%20Squares%20Structural%20Equation%20Modeling_Hair.pdf
- Harris, K. J., Harris, R. B., Valle, M., Carlson, J., Carlson, D. S., Zivnuska, S., & Wiley, B. (2022). Technostress and the entitled employee: Impacts on work and family. Information Technology & People, 35(3), 1073-1095. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2019-0348
- Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
- Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
- Hou, H. (C.), & Sing, M. (C. P.) (2025). Transformative response in office workplace: A systematic review of post-pandemic changes. Buildings, 15(9), 1519. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15091519
- Jiejing, Y., Anuar Bin Arshad, M., & Mengjiao, Z. (2024). Flexible work arrangements and employee turnover intentions: A comprehensive review of theory, empirical evidence, and future directions. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(12), 3557-3569. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i12/24030
- Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
- Katsaros, K. K. (2024). Gen Z employee adaptive performance: The role of inclusive leadership and workplace happiness. Administrative Sciences, 14(8), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14080163
- Kemp, S. (2024, February 21). Digital 2024: Indonesia. DataReportal. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-indonesia
- Kim, K. T., & Sohn, Y. W. (2024). The impact of quiet quitting on turnover intentions in the era of digital transformation: The mediating roles of job satisfaction and affective commitment, and the moderating role of psychological safety. Systems, 12(11), 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12110460
- Li, Q., Mohamed, R., Mahomed, A., & Khan, H. (2022). The effect of perceived organizational support and employee care on turnover intention and work engagement: A mediated moderation model using age in the post pandemic period. Sustainability, 14(15), 9125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159125
- May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety, and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11-37. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892
- Memon, M. A., Salleh, R., Mirza, M. Z., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Ahmad, M. S., & Tariq, A. (2021). Satisfaction matters: The relationships between HRM practices, work engagement, and turnover intention. International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 21-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-04-2018-0127
- Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O., & Hollingsworth, A. T. (1978). An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 408-414. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.408
- Molino, M., Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Manuti, A., Giancaspro, M. L., Russo, V., Zito, M., & Cortese, C. G. (2020). Wellbeing costs of technology use during COVID-19 remote working: An investigation using the Italian translation of the technostress creators scale. Sustainability, 12(15), 5911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155911
- Pansini, M., Buonomo, I., De Vincenzi, C., Ferrara, B., & Benevene, P. (2023). Positioning technostress in the JD-R model perspective: A systematic literature review. Healthcare, 11(3), 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030446
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
- Popovac, R., Vukmirović, D., Čomić, T., & Pavlović, Z. G. (2025). Evaluating the impact of remote work on employee health and sustainable lifestyles in the IT sector. Sustainability, 17(19), 8677. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198677
- Pothuganti, S. K. (2024). Technostress: A comprehensive literature review on dimensions, impacts, and management strategies. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 16, 100475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100475
- Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417-433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165
- Rani, S., & Suneja, A. (2025). Attracting talent: Understanding Generation Z’s expectations of technology-driven workplaces. Vilakshan – XIMB Journal of Management, 23(1), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/XJM-08-2024-0129
- Rick, V. B., Stebner, M., Dräger, L., Franken, A., Mertens, A., & Nitsch, V. (2024). Effects of AI-based technologies on employees’ work engagement: Implications for the human-centered design of digital work. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 78, 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-024-00438-1
- Saleem, F., & Malik, M. I. (2023). Technostress, quality of work life, and job performance: A moderated mediation model. Behavioral Sciences, 13(12), 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13121014
- Salem, M. R. M. (2025). Designing future-ready workplaces: How Gen Z’s preferred work type influence retention intention; mediating role of perceived autonomy in Malaysian SMEs. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00643-2
- Saraiva, M., & Nogueiro, T. (2025). Perspectives and realities of disengagement among younger Generation Y and Z workers in contemporary work dynamics. Administrative Sciences, 15(4), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15040133
- Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
- Scholze, A., & Hecker, A. (2023). Digital job demands and resources: Digitization in the context of the Job Demands-Resources model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(16), 6581. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20166581
- Schroth, H. (2019). Are you ready for Gen Z in the workplace? California Management Review, 61(3), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619841006
- Shinde, O., & Surve, M. (2025). Understanding Generation Z in the workplace: Adapting organizational strategies for a new era of work. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 14(3), 790-797. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR25316115930
- Siddiqi, K. O. (2024). Impact of technostress and work-family conflict on turnover intention among nurses in Bangladesh: A moderation effect of perceived supervisor support. Journal of Computational Social Science, 7, 2005-2028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-024-00296-1
- Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2010). Impact of technostress on end-user satisfaction and performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(3), 303-334. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270311
- La Torre, G., Esposito, A., Sciarra, I., & Chiappetta, M. (2019). Definition, symptoms, and risk of techno-stress: A systematic review. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 92, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1352-1
- Upadhyaya, P., & Vrinda (2021). Impact of technostress on academic productivity of university students. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1647-1664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10319-9
- Xu, G., Zheng, Z., Zhang, J., Sun, T., & Liu, G. (2025). Does digitalization benefit employees? A systematic meta-analysis of the digital technology–employee nexus in the workplace. Systems, 13(6), 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13060409
- Zambrano-Chumo, L., & Guevara, R. (2024). Psychological capital and turnover intention: The mediating role of burnout among healthcare professionals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21020185
- Zhang, Q., Dai, W., Chen, J., Gu, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2025). The ‘side effects’ of digitalization: A study on role overload and job burnout of employees. PLOS One, 20(4), e0322112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322112
Language: English
Page range: 149 - 180
Submitted on: Apr 7, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 19, 2026
Published on: Apr 29, 2026
Published by: University of Economics in Katowice
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Diva Aldira Wijaya, Alvania Artamevia, Cathrine Nathania Cahyadi, Anita Maharani, published by University of Economics in Katowice
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.