Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Do Men Discuss Birth Control? A Social Network Analysis in Bangladesh Cover

Do Men Discuss Birth Control? A Social Network Analysis in Bangladesh

By: Bhanu Bhatia  
Open Access
|Mar 2019

References

  1. Agadjanian, V (2002). Men’s talk about “Women’s Matters” - Gender, communication, and contraception in urban Mozambique. Gender & Society, 16(2), 194-215.
  2. Ali, M, Rizwan, H, & Ushijima, H (2004). Men and reproductive health in rural Pakistan: The case for increased male participation. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 9(4), 260-266.
  3. Alvergne, A, Gibson, MA, Gurmu, E, & Mace, R (2011) Social transmission and the spread of modern contraception in rural Ethiopia. PLoS One, 6, 7, e22515.
  4. Ashfaq, S, & Sadiq, M (2015). Engaging the missing link: Evidence from FALAH for involving men in family planning in Pakistan. Washington DC: Population Council, The Evidence Project.
  5. Aziz, K.M.A. (1979). Kinship in Bangladesh, Monograph series, No.1. Dacca, Bangladesh: International Centre For Diarrhoeal Disease Research.
  6. Balk, D (1997). Defying gender norms in rural Bangladesh: A social demographic analysis. Population Studies, 51(2), 153-172.
  7. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (2015). Trends, patterns and determinants of marriage in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics.
  8. Barker, G, & Das, A (2004). Men and sexual and reproductive health: The social revolution. International Journal of Men’s Health, 3(3), 147-153.
  9. Barnett, I, Khanna, T, & Onnela, J-P (2016). Social and spatial clustering of people at humanity’s largest gathering. PLoS One, 11, 6, e0156794.
  10. Becker, S (1996). Couples and reproductive health: A review of couple studies. Studies in Family Planning, 27(6), 291-306.
  11. Behrman, JR, Kohler, H-P, & Watkins, SC (2002). Social networks and changes in contraceptive use over time: Evidence from a longitudnal study in rural Kenya. Demography, 39(4), 713-738.
  12. Bhatia, B, & Salignac, F (2018). Quantifying the Gender Patterning of Relationships: Insights from Reproductive Health Networks in Bangladesh. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 38(5-6), 360-377.
  13. Bhatia, S, Mosley, WH, Faraque, ASG, & Chakraborty, J (1980). The Matlab family planning-health services project. Studies in Family Planning, 11(6), 202-212.
  14. Borgatti, SP, Everett, MG, & Freeman, LC (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies. https://sites.google.com/site/ucinetsoftware/home
  15. Boulay, M, & Valente, TW (2005). The selection of family planning discussion partners in Nepal. Journal of Health Communication, 10(6), 519-36.
  16. Brown, E, Gul, X, Abbas, A, Nasar, A, & Balal, A (2017). Men’s perceptions of child-bearing and fertility control in Pakistan: Insights from a PEER project. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 19(11), 1225-1238.
  17. Chimbiri, AM (2007). The condom is an ‘intruder’in marriage: Evidence from rural Malawi. Social Science & Medicine, 64(5), 1102-1115.
  18. Cleland, J, Bernstein, S, Ezeh, A, Faundes, A, Glasier, A, & Innis, J (2006). Family planning: The unfinished agenda. The Lancet, 368(9549), 1810-1827.
  19. Cleland, J, Phillips, JF, Amin, S, & Kamal, GM (1994. The determinants of reproductive change in Bangladesh: Success in a challenging environment, Washington DC: World Bank.
  20. Cockcroft, A, Pearson, L, Hamel, C, & Andersson, N (2011). Reproductive and sexual health in the Maldives: Analysis of data from two cross-sectional surveys. BMC Health Services Research, 11, supplement 2, S6.
  21. Connell, RW (2012). Gender, health and theory: Conceptulizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Social Science and Medicine, 74(11), 1675-1683.
  22. Dorman, E, & Bishai, D (2012). Demand for male contraception. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 12(5), 605-613.
  23. Drennan, M (1998). New perspectives on men’s participation. Population Reports, 26(2), 1-2.
  24. Directorate General of Family Planning (DGFP) (2014). Annual Report of family planning, maternal, child and reproductive health, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare http://dgfp.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/dgfp.portal.gov.bd/annual_reports/bea0f39d_1ab9_4e08_b7ec_73f86b42dbe5/anual_rep2014.pdf
  25. El-Khoury, M, Thornton, R, Chatterji, M, Kamhawi, S, Sloane, P, & Halassa, M (2016). Counseling women and couples on family planning: A randomized study in Jordan. Studies in Family Planning, 47(3), 222-238.
  26. Freedman, R (1987). The contribution of social science research to population policy and family planning program effectiveness. Studies in Family Planning, 18(2), 57-82.
  27. Gayen, K, & Raeside, R (2010). Social networks and contraception practice of women in rural Bangladesh. Social Science & Medicine, 71(9), 1584-1592.
  28. Granovetter, MS (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Socioloogy, 78(6), 1360-1380.
  29. Granovetter, M (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233.
  30. Greene, ME, & Biddlecom, AE (2000). Absent and problematic men: Demographic accounts of male reproductive roles. Population and Development Review, 26(1), 81-115.
  31. Greene, ME, Mehta, M, Pulerwitz, J, Wulf, D, Bankole, A, & Singh, S (2006). Involving men in reproductive health: Contributions to development. Background paper prepared for the UN Millennium Project to contribute to the report Public Choices, Private Decisions: Sexual and Reproductive Health and the Millenium Development Goals. https://www.faithtoactionetwork.org/resources/pdf/Involving%20Men%20in%20Reproductive%20Health-Contributions%20to%20Development.pdf.
  32. Hanneman, RA, and Riddle, M (2005). Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside: University of California, Riverside.
  33. Hardee, K, Croce-Galis, M, & Gay, J (2017). Are men well served by family planning programs? Reproductive health, 14, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0278-5
  34. Hasan, MK, Aggleton, P, & Persson, A (2015). Rethinking gender, men and masculinity: Representations of men in the South Asian reproductive and sexual health literatures. International Journal of Men’s Health, 14(2), 146-162.
  35. Hawkes, S, & Collumbien, M (2007). What do men want? Understanding what men in South Asia want from sexual health services. International Journal of Sexual Health, 19(3), 53-64.
  36. Hossain, KJ (2003). Male Involvement in Family Planning in Bangladesh: Factors Constraining Low Use and the Potential for Augmenting the CPR. Paper 27. Centre for Policy Dialogue. United Nations Population Fund. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/25c0/8ca5465dc29e30c20e00df4e20c345ce0853.pdf
  37. Ishrat, J (2015). Development in Rural Bangladesh: A Critical Ethnography, Durham theses, Durham University. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11431/
  38. ICDDR,B (2016). Health and Demographic Surveillance System–Matlab, v, 49, Registration of health and demographic events 2014 Scientific Report No, 133. Dhaka: ICDDR,B.
  39. Jamieson, L, Milburn, KB, Simpson, R, & Wasoff, F (2010). Fertility and social change: The neglected contribution of men’s approaches to becoming partners and parents. The Sociological Review, 58(3), 463-485.
  40. Jejeebhoy, SJ, Prakash, R, Acharya, R, Singh, SK, & Daniel, E (2015). Meeting contraceptive needs: Long-term associations of the PRACHAR Project with married women’s awareness and behavior in Bihar. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41(3), 115-125.
  41. Kamal, N (2000). The influence of husbands on contraceptive use by Bangladeshi women. Health Policy and Planning, 15(1), 43-51.
  42. Karra, MV, Stark, NN, & Wolf, J (1997). Male involvement in family planning: A case study spanning five generations of a South Indian family. Studies in Family Planning, 28(1), 24-34.
  43. Kincaid, DL (2000). Social networks, ideation, and contraceptive behaviour in Bangladesh: A longitudinal analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 215-231.
  44. Kohler, H-P, Behrman, JR, & Watkins, SC (2001). The density of social networks and fertility decisions: Evidence from South Nyanza district, Kenya. Demography, 38(1), 43-58.
  45. Lasee, A, & Becker, S (1997). Husband-wife communication about family planning and contraceptive use in Kenya. International Family Planning Perspectives, 23(1), 15-20.
  46. Lundgren, R, Cachan, J, & Jennings, V (2012). Engaging men in family planning services delivery: Experiences introducing the Standard Days Method® in four countries. World Health & Population, 14(1), 44-51.
  47. Marsden, PV, & Campbell, KE (2012). Reflections on Conceptualizing and Measuring Tie Strength Social Forces, 91(1), Pages 17–23.
  48. McCarthy, AS, (2015). His and her fertility preferences: An experimental evaluation of asymmetric information in family planning, 10 April, http://thew.web.unc.edu/files/2013/08/mccarthy.pdf.
  49. McDonald, P (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition, Population and Development Review, 26(3), 427-439.
  50. McPherson, M, Smith-Lovin, L, & Cook, J, M (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks, Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
  51. Mizruchi, MS, 1994, Social network analysis: Recent achievements and current controversies. Acta Sociologica, 37(4), 327-343.
  52. Montgomery, MR, & Casterline, JB (1993). The diffusion of fertility control in Taiwan: Evidence from pooled cross-section time-series models, Population Studies, 47(3), 457-479.
  53. Munshi, K, & Myaux, J (2002) Development as a process of social change: An application to fertility transition, 11 September, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239506676_Development_as_a_Process_of_Social_Change_An_Application_to_the_Fertility_Transition.
  54. NIPORT (National Institute of Population Research and Training) and ICF International (2016). Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2014: Policy Briefs, Dhaka, Bangladesh and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NIPORT and ICF International.
  55. NIPORT (National Institute of Population Research and Training), Mitra and Associates & Macro International. (2016). Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2014, Dhaka: National Institute of Population Research and Training, Mitra and Associates, Macro International.
  56. Perkins, JM, Subramanian, S, & Christakis, NA (2015). Social networks and health: a systematic review of sociocentric network studies in low-and middle-income countries. Social Science & Medicine, 125, 60-78.
  57. Rutenberg, N, & Watkins, SC (1997). The buzz outside the clinics: Conversations and contraception in Nyanza province, Kenya, Studies in Family Planning, 28, 4, 290-307.
  58. Shahjahan, M, & Kabir, M (2006). Why males in Bangladesh do not participate in reproductive health: lessons learned from focus group discussions. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 26(1), 45-59.
  59. Shattuck, D, Kerner, B, Gilles, K, Hartmann, M, Ng’ombe, T, & Guest, G (2011). Encouraging contraceptive uptake by motivating men to communicate about family planning: The Malawi Male Motivator project. American Journal of Public Health, 101(6), 1089-1095.
  60. Sternberg, P, & Hubley, J (2004). Evaluating men’s involvement as a strategy in sexual and reproductive health promotion, Health Promotion International, 19 (3), 389-396.
  61. Stoebenau, K, & Valente, TW (2003). Using network analysis to understand community-based programs: A case study from highland Madagascar, International Family Planning Perspectives, 29(4), 167-173.
  62. United Nations, 1994, International Conference on Population and Development Cairo, 5–13 September 1994, New York: United Nations. https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/event-pdf/PoA_en.pdf
  63. Valente, TW, Watkins, SC, Jato, MN, Straten, AVD, & Tsitsol, L-PM (1997). Social network associations with contraceptive use among Cameroonian women in voluntary associations, Social Science Medicine, 45(5), 677-687.
  64. Wang, G-Z, & Pillai, VK (2001). Women’s reproductive health: A gender-sensitive human rights approach, Acta Sociologica, 44(3), 231-242.
  65. Wasserman, S, & Faust, K (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  66. Wemrell, M, Merlo, J, Mulinari, S, & Hornborg, AC (2016). Contemporary epidemiology: A review of critical discussions within the discipline and a call for further dialogue with social theory. Sociology Compass, 10(2), 153-171.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/joss-2019-002 | Journal eISSN: 1529-1227 | Journal ISSN: 2300-0422
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 19
Published on: Mar 27, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Bhanu Bhatia, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.

Volume 20 (2019): Issue 2 (January 2019)