Cyst-forming nematodes are the economical pests of cultivated crops and known to be reported from all the continents (Jones et al., 2013). The genus Heterodera was erected by Schmidt (1871) and currently contains about 80 species (Subbotin et al., 2010). Literature studies have indicated the presence of 14 Heterodera species from China mainland, including H. avenae (Chen et al., 1991), H. glycines (Liu et al., 1994), H. sinensis (Chen and Zheng, 1994), H. filipjevi (Li et al., 2010), H. koreana (Wang et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012b), H. elachista (Ding et al., 2012), H. ripae (Wang et al., 2012a; Wang et al., 2012b), H. hainanensis (Zhuo et al., 2013), H. fengi (Wang et al., 2013), H. guangdongensis (Zhuo et al., 2014), H. zeae (Wu et al., 2017), H. sojae (Zhen et al., 2018), H. schachtii, and H. vallicola (Peng et al., 2020).
Due to overlapping morphological characters and phenotypic plasticity, it is difficult to distinguish closely related Heterodera species; therefore, sequence-based diagnosis is gaining more reliability for precise and accurate identification of cyst-forming nematodes (Peng et al., 2003). The internal transcribed spacer region of the ribosomal DNA (ITS-rDNA), the D2 and D3 expansion fragments of the 28S ribosomal DNA genes (D2-D3 of 28S-rDNA), and mitochondrial DNA (COI gene) units are good candidate genes for molecular taxonomic and phylogenetic studies (Subbotin et al., 2001; Subbotin et al., 2006; Madani et al., 2004; Vovlas et al., 2017). Based on morphomolecular characterizations, Handoo and Subbotin (2018) divided Heterodera into nine distinct groups such as Afenestrata, Avenae, Bifenestra, Cardiolata, Cyperi, Goettingiana, Humuli, Sacchari, and Schachtii group. Sequence analysis of these groups is significant to study the phylogenetic relationship and identifying the Heterodera species.
During 2018 and 2019, a population of cyst nematode was collected from the rhizosphere of Microula sikkimensis in Tianzhu county of Gansu Province, China. Considering the economic value of the cyst nematode, morphomolecular studies were performed; the preliminary studies indicated that the population belongs to Goettingiana group of Heterodera. The species characters were then compared with all the related species and concluded that this population possess unique characters and it is described herein as Heterodera microulae sp. n.
Materials and methods
Isolation and morphological observation of nematodes
The nematodes were extracted from root and soil samples of Microula sikkimensis in Tianzhu county, Gansu Province, China. Cysts and white females were collected using sieving-decanting method, while second-stage juveniles (J2s) were recovered from hatched eggs and kept in water suspension until further use (Hooper, 1970; Golden, 1990). Males were not found. For morphometric studies, second-stage juveniles were killed by gentle heating, fixed in TAF solution (formalin: triethanolamine: water = 7:2:91), and processed to ethanol-glycerin dehydration according to Seinhorst (1959) as modified by De Grisse (1969) and mounted on permanent slides. Vulval cones were mostly mounted in glycerin jelly. Measurements were made on mounted specimens using a Nikon Eclipse E100 Microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Light micrographs and illustrations were produced using a Zeiss Axio Scope A1 microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) equipped with an AxioCam 105 color camera and Nikon YS 100 with a drawing tube (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), respectively.
Molecular analyses
DNA samples were prepared according to Maria et al. (2018). Three sets of primers (synthesized by Tsingke Biotech Co. Ltd., Xi’an, China) were used in the PCR analyses to amplify sequences of the ITS, D2-D3 expansion segments of 28S, and COI gene. The ITS region was amplified with TW81 (5′-GTTTCCGTAGGTGAACCTGC-3′) and AB28 (5′-ATATGCTTAAGTTCAGCGGGT-3′) (Maafi et al., 2003). The 28S D2-D3 region was amplified with the D2A (5′-ACAAGTACCGTGAGGGAAAGTTG-3′) and D3B (5′-TCGGAAGGAACCAGCTACTA-3′) (De Ley et al., 2005; Ye et al., 2007). Finally, the partial COI gene was amplified using primers Het-coxiF (5′-TAGTTGATCGTAATTTTAATGG-3′) and Het-coxiR (5′-CCTAAAACATAATGAAAATGWGC-3′) (Subbotin, 2015). PCR conditions were as described by Ye et al. (2007), De Ley et al. (2005), and Subbotin (2015). PCR products were separated on 1% agarose gels and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide. PCR products of sufficiently high quality were purified for cloning and sequencing by Tsingke Biotech Co. Ltd., Xi’an, China. The PCR products were purified by the Tiangen Gel Extraction Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co. Ltd., Beijing, China), cloned into pMD18-T vectors and transformed into DH5α-competent cells, and then sequenced by Tsingke Biotech Co. Ltd (Xi’an, China).
Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis
The newly obtained sequences for each gene (ITS-rDNA, D2-D3 region of 28S-rDNA, and COI gene) were compared with known sequences of Heterodera using BLASTn homology search program. Outgroup taxa for phylogenetic analyses were selected based on the previously published studies (Subbotin et al., 2001; Maafi et al., 2003; Mundo-Ocampo et al., 2008; Kang et al., 2016; Madani et al., 2018; Vovlas et al., 2017). The selected sequences were aligned by MAFFT (Kazutaka and Standley, 2013) with default parameters and edited using Gblock (Castresana, 2000). Phylogenetic analyses were based on Bayesian inference (BI) using MrBayes 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001). The GTR + I + G model was selected as the best-fit model of DNA evolution for both 28S D2-D3, ITS, and COI regions using MrModeltest version 2.3 (Nylander, 2004), according to the Akaike information criterion (AIC). BI analysis for each gene was initiated with a random starting tree and run with four Markov chains for 1,000,000 generations. The Markov chains were sampled at intervals of 100 generations and the burn-in value was 25%. Two runs were performed for each analysis. After discarding burn-in samples, the remaining samples were used to generate a 50% majority-rule consensus tree. Posterior probabilities (PP) were given on appropriate clades. The phylogenetic consensus trees were visualized using FigTree v.1.4.3 software (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/) (Rambaut, 2016). The species in Goettingiana group and their localities, hosts, and GenBank accession numbers used in this study were presented in Table S1.
Table S1.
Goettingiana group species, locality, host plants, and GenBank accession number used in this study.
| Species | Locality | Host-plant | Marker | Accession number | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H. goettingiana | Germany | Pisum sp. | ITS | AF274414 | ||||
| H. goettingiana | Lorestan, Doroud, Akbar Abad, Iran | Trifolium repens | ITS | AF498374 | ||||
| H. goettingiana | Monopoly, Bari province, Italy | Pisum sativum | ITS | KY129827 | ||||
| H. sp | Yuekou village, Tianmen county, Hubei province, China | – | ITS | HM560794 | ||||
| H. sp | Morroco | – | ITS | AY347918 | ||||
| H. carotae | Creances, France | Daucus sp. | ITS | AF274413 | ||||
| H. carotae | South Africa | Daucus carota | ITS | MG976790 | ||||
| H. cruciferae | Brielle, The Netherlands | Brassica sp. | ITS | AF274411 | ||||
| H. urticae | Diksmuide, Belgium | Urtica sp. | ITS | AF274412 | ||||
| H. cruciferae | Moscow, Russia | Brassica oleracea | ITS | GU126668 | ||||
| H. sp | Xinzhuang village, Huangzhong county, Qinghai province, China | – | ITS | EU623623 | ||||
| H. microulae sp. n. | Tianzhu county, Gansu province, China | Microula sikkimensis | ITS | MT573437 | ||||
| H. microulae sp. n. | Haiyan county, Qinghai province, China | – | ITS | HM560791 | ||||
| H. microulae sp. n. | Haibei city, Qinghai province, China | – | ITS | HM370425 | ||||
| H. microulae sp. n. | Xining city, Qinghai province, China | – | ITS | HM370423 | ||||
| H. persica | Tehran, Dizin, Iran | Heracleum persicum | ITS | AF498377 | ||||
| H. scutellariae | Bremen, Germany | Circaea lutetiana | ITS | AY368994 | ||||
| H. circeae | Muenster, Germany | Scutellaria galericulata | ITS | AY368995 | ||||
| H. carotae | Ontario province, Canada | Daucus carota | 28S | KX463292 | ||||
| H. carotae | Ontario province, Canada | Daucus carota | 28S | KX463293 | ||||
| H. sp | Yuekou village, Tianmen county, Hubei province, China | – | 28S | HM560857 | ||||
| H. sp | Iran | – | 28S | GU456692 | ||||
| H. cruciferae | Iran | – | 28S | KP114546 | ||||
| H. urticae | Belgium | – | 28S | DQ328696 | ||||
| H. goettingiana | Iran | – | 28S | DQ328697 | ||||
| H. microulae sp. n. | Haiyan county, Qinghai province, China | – | 28S | HM560855 | ||||
| H. microulae sp. n. | Haomen village, Menyuan county, Qinghai province, China | – | 28S | HM560856 | ||||
| H. microulae sp. n. | Tianzhu county, Gansu province, China | Microula sikkimensis | 28S | MT573436 | ||||
| H. carotae | South Africa | Daucus carota | COI | MN820659 | ||||
| H. carotae | Mesola, Forli-Cesena province, Italy | Daucus carota | COI | KX463299 | ||||
| H. carotae | Mesola, Forli-Cesena province, Italy | Daucus carota | COI | KX463300 | ||||
| H. carotae | Margherita, di Savoia, Italy | Daucus carota | COI | KX463301 | ||||
| H. carotae | Margherita, di Savoia, Italy | Daucus carota | COI | KX463302 | ||||
| H. carotae | Ontario province, Canada | Daucus carota | COI | KX463303 | ||||
| H. carotae | Ontario province, Canada | Daucus carota | COI | KX463304 | ||||
| H. carotae | Ontario province, Canada | Daucus carota | COI | KX463305 | ||||
| H. carotae | Ontario province, Canada | Daucus carota | COI | KX463306 | ||||
| H. carotae | Mexico | Daucus carota | COI | MG563227 | ||||
| H. carotae | Mexico | Daucus carota | COI | MG563229 | ||||
| H. carotae | Switzerland | – | COI | MG563231 | ||||
| H. carotae | Switzerland | – | COI | MG563232 | ||||
| H. carotae | France | – | COI | MG563233 | ||||
| H. carotae | Belgium | – | COI | KC172916 | ||||
| H. urticae | Faulkner county, Arkansas, USA | Stellaria media | COI | MK093155 | ||||
| H. urticae | Faulkner county, Arkansas, USA | Stellaria media | COI | MK093156 | ||||
| H. cruciferae | California, USA | – | COI | MG563230 | ||||
| H. cruciferae | Moscow region, Russia | – | COI | MG563234 | ||||
| H. goettingiana | Monopoly, Bari province, Italy | Vicia faba | COI | KY129829 | ||||
| H. goettingiana | Monopoly, Bari province, Italy | Pisum sativum | COI | KY129830 | ||||
| H. goettingiana | Monopoly, Bari province, Italy | Medicago lupulina | COI | KY129831 | ||||
| H. microulae sp. n. | Tianzhu county, Gansu province, China | Microula sikkimensis | COI | MT576084 | ||||
| Stage | Character | Holotype | Paratype | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyst | ||||||||
| n | 20 | |||||||
| L (excluding length) | 521.79 | 495.50 ± 41.01 (413.93-543.23) | ||||||
| Diam. | 419.33 | 384.29 ± 43.30 (304.96-455.51) | ||||||
| L/Diam | 1.27 | 1.30 ± 0.09 (1.12-1.45) | ||||||
| Fenestral length | 30.72 | 31.14 ± 1.36 (28.33-32.78) | ||||||
| Fenestral width | 36.16 | 37.75 ± 1.61 (35.46-40.07) | ||||||
| Vulval slit length | 35.53 | 39.00 ± 2.78 (35.16-44.38) | ||||||
| Female | ||||||||
| n | 20 | |||||||
| Length | 454.21 ± 28.32 (381.62-496.48) | |||||||
| Width | 326.47 ± 31.42 (256.32-421.63) | |||||||
| Length/width | 1.40 ± 0.12 (1.28-1.56) | |||||||
| Second-stage juveniles | ||||||||
| n | 20 | |||||||
| Body length | 567.73 ± 43.24 (505.62-627.92) | |||||||
| Body width at mid-body | 23.19 ± 1.31 (20.39-25.43) | |||||||
| a | 24.54 ± 1.34 (21.97-27.67) | |||||||
| b | 4.37 ± 0.33 (3.91-5.00) | |||||||
| c | 10.07 ± 1.18 (8.56-12.52) | |||||||
| c′ | 4.26 ± 0.33 (3.63-4.90) | |||||||
| Lip-region height | 4.63 ± 0.44 (3.90-5.50) | |||||||
| Lip-region diam. | 11.07 ± 0.82 (9.65-12.75) | |||||||
| Stylet length | 25.73 ± 1.21 (24.07-28.92) | |||||||
| Stylet base height | 2.53 ± 0.33 (2.04-3.19) | |||||||
| Stylet base width | 5.30 ± 0.54 (4.39-6.09) | |||||||
| Median bulb from the anterior end (MB) | 85.57 ± 5.02 (76.37-95.26) | |||||||
| Opening of dorsal pharyngeal gland from the stylet base (DGO) | 5.13 ± 0.72 (4.03-6.41) | |||||||
| Excretory pore from the anterior end (EP) | 114.40 ± 6.89 (102.46-130.79) | |||||||
| Median bulb width (MBW) | 12.33 ± 1.49 (10.51-15.82) | |||||||
| Diam. at the anus | 13.23 ± 1.00 (11.24-15.26) | |||||||
| Tail length | 56.67 ± 3.75 (48.90-60.80) | |||||||
| Hyaline portion tail | 28.63 ± 1.91 (24.29-30.60) | |||||||
| L/MB | 6.65 ± 0.37 (5.76-7.53) | |||||||
| TL/H | 1.98 ± 0.10 (1.64-2.08) | |||||||
| Egg | ||||||||
| n | 20 | |||||||
| Length | 111.61 ± 8.02 (100.21-124.65) | |||||||
| Width | 50.34 ± 6.71 (35.64-71.51) | |||||||
| Length/width | 2.26 ± 0.38 (1.43-3.26) | |||||||
| Species | H. goettingiana a | H. carotae b | H. cruciferae c | H. persica d | H. urticae e | H. circeae f | H. scutellariae g | H. microulae sp. n. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Host | Pisum sativum L. | Daucus carota var.sativa | Brassica oleracea L.V.capitata | Heracleum persicum Desf.ex | Urtica dioica L. | Circaea lutetiana | Scutellaria galericulata | Microula sikkimensis |
| Locality | Germany | England | England | Iran | Northern Ireland | Germany | Germany | China |
| Cyst | ||||||||
| Size | 521 × 372 | 408 × 309 | 429 × 333 | 533 × 380 | 492 × 435 | 555 × 397 | 560 × 424 | 495×384 |
| Fenestral length | 35 | 31 | 34 | 47 | 38 | 43 | 35 | 31 |
| Underbridge length | 117 | 90 | 85 | 104 | Weak | 83 | 86 | Weak |
| Bullae | Few | Absent | Absent | Present | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent |
| Vulval slit length | 39 | 47 | 45 | 49 | 46 | 48 | 43 | 39 |
| Second-stage juvenile | ||||||||
| Body length | 486 | 422 | 431 | 440 | 541 | 434 | 408 | 568 |
| a | 25 | 21 | – | 23 | 23 | 22 | 21 | 25 |
| Stylet knobs | Smoothly rounded to slightly hooked shaped with recurved anterior surface | Concave anterior face | Anterior face flat to concave | Rounded or projecting slightly anterior, convex posteriorly | Slightly concave anteriorly | Rounded and slightly sloping posteriorly | Slightly convave anteriorly | Rounded and flat or slightly concave anteriorly |
| Stylet length | 25 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 27 | 25 | 24 | 26 |
| Lateral line | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| DGO | 5 | 5-6 | – | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| MB | 70 | 66 | 68 | 70 | – | 70 | 62 | 86 |
| Excretory pore from anterior end | 158 | 99 | 101 | 103 | 130 | 101 | 89 | 114 |
| Tail | 60 | 52 | 50 | 47 | 58 | 52 | 47 | 57 |
| Hyaline portion of tail length | 37 | 28 | 25 | 24 | 29 | 26 | 25 | 29 |






