Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Influences of nitrogen inputs on nematode populations under highbush blueberry

Open Access
|Jul 2020

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Changes through time in the percentage of samples with Pratylenchus crenatus, Rotylenchus robustus, and Paratrichodorus renifer in the experimental area. At each sample date, a single 100 cm3 sample from each of 24 plots (six replicates of four N fertilization treatments) in the experimental area was analyzed. Blueberry bushes were planted in fall of 2008.
Changes through time in the percentage of samples with Pratylenchus crenatus, Rotylenchus robustus, and Paratrichodorus renifer in the experimental area. At each sample date, a single 100 cm3 sample from each of 24 plots (six replicates of four N fertilization treatments) in the experimental area was analyzed. Blueberry bushes were planted in fall of 2008.

Figure 2:

Effects of fertilizer nitrogen application rates on population densities of Rotylenchus robustus, from September, 2009 through June, 2019. Error bars are one standard error projecting above the 0N control (pooled standard error from overall ANOVA of non-transformed data). Within a date, points labeled with the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05) based on Diff procedure in mixed model repeated measures analysis of log-transformed data. NS, no significant differences.
Effects of fertilizer nitrogen application rates on population densities of Rotylenchus robustus, from September, 2009 through June, 2019. Error bars are one standard error projecting above the 0N control (pooled standard error from overall ANOVA of non-transformed data). Within a date, points labeled with the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05) based on Diff procedure in mixed model repeated measures analysis of log-transformed data. NS, no significant differences.

Figure 3:

Effects of fertilizer nitrogen application rates on population densities of Pratylenchus crenatus, from September, 2009 through June, 2019. Error bars are one standard error projecting above the 0N control (pooled standard error from overall ANOVA of non-transformed data). Within a date, points labeled with the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05) based on Diff procedure in mixed model repeated measures analysis of log-transformed data. NS, no significant differences.
Effects of fertilizer nitrogen application rates on population densities of Pratylenchus crenatus, from September, 2009 through June, 2019. Error bars are one standard error projecting above the 0N control (pooled standard error from overall ANOVA of non-transformed data). Within a date, points labeled with the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05) based on Diff procedure in mixed model repeated measures analysis of log-transformed data. NS, no significant differences.

Figure 4:

Effects of fertilizer nitrogen rates on the abundance of root fragments extracted from soil cores (g roots per kg dry soil), from April, 2016 through June, 2019. Error bars are one standard error projecting above the 0N control. Within a date, points labeled with the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05) based on Diff procedure in mixed model repeated measures analysis of log-transformed data. NS, no significant differences.
Effects of fertilizer nitrogen rates on the abundance of root fragments extracted from soil cores (g roots per kg dry soil), from April, 2016 through June, 2019. Error bars are one standard error projecting above the 0N control. Within a date, points labeled with the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05) based on Diff procedure in mixed model repeated measures analysis of log-transformed data. NS, no significant differences.

Figure 5:

Relationships between Rotylenchus robustus population densities and root biomass. Nematode population data and root biomass data for each plot were averages of six sample dates in 2016 and 2017.
Relationships between Rotylenchus robustus population densities and root biomass. Nematode population data and root biomass data for each plot were averages of six sample dates in 2016 and 2017.

Actual nitrogen application rates by year for the three fertilizer treatments sampled in this study, in relation to rates recommended for blueberry production in British Columbia (BCMAL, 2020)_

Nitrogen application rates (kg N ha–1)
2009201020112012201320142015-2019
1N11142539100111144
1.5N22295079151167215
2N324375118201222287
Recommended22295079100111144

Mean (n=6 replicate plots) population densities (nematodes/100 cm3 soil) of free-living nematodes across dates and N fertilization treatments in 2017_

DateApril 2017June 2017September 2017
Treatment0N1N1.5N2N0N1N1.5N2N0N1N1.5N2N
Ditylenchus91 (48)154 (58)109 (33)135 (61)50 (37)147 (240)81 (51)150 (225)96 (38)124 (73)65 (25)73 (37)
Acrobeloides43 (43)104 (77)69 (31)98 (80)41 (28)166 (286)117 (54)109 (97)31 (10)77 (51)81 (24)68 (68)
Rhabditidae23 (18)62 (78)52 (52)39 (42)46 (23)62 (100)26 (23)26 (20)35 (39)16 (13)17 (11)17 (21)
Aphelenchoides59 (37)66 (68)51 (21)42 (8)22 (16)26 (25)14 (14)19 (21)34 (23)25 (12)15 (13)10 (7)
Filenchus26 (11)43 (35)22 (17)15 (21)22 (24)8 (5)5 (4)3 (3)27 (26)51 (34)12 (13)4 (6)
Cervidellus23 (23)51 (47)28 (39)14 (17)13 (25)42 (72)5 (8)4 (7)16 (13)23 (16)8 (4)5 (6)
Alaimus9 (10)7 (7)3 (6)1 (2)21 (18)7 (7)13 (10)5 (6)24 (16)15 (19)5 (5)4 (7)
Plectus14 (11)17 (20)19 (13)7 (12)4 (7)1 (2)3 (7)09 (9)2 (3)02 (5)
Clarkus4 (10)7 (12)2 (3)05 (6)9 (14)1 (3)010 (8)12 (24)1 (2)1 (2)
Prismatolaimus11 (6)9 (12)1 (3)03 (5)0 (1)04 (8)9 (13))1 (3)1 (2)1 (1)
Aphelenchus3 (10)01 (3)1 (2)1 (1)6 (15)001 (2)1 (2)2 (3)1 (2)
Teratocephalus6 (9)1 (2)1 (3)3 (5)0 (1)1 (2)000 (1)000
Seinura1 (1)03 (4)00 (1)1 (2)1 (3)3 (8)0 (1)2 (4)1 (2)0
Panagrolaimidae1 (2)5 (13)2 (3)2 (5)00000001 (2)
Thonus3 (5)0001 (1)03 (8)01 (3)2 (4)00
Heterocephalobus1 (3)0001 (3)1 (2)1 (2)01 (2)01 (1)0
Tylencholaimus1 (2)0001 (2)0004 (6)000
Achromadora3 (8)01 (3)00 (1)1 (1)000000
Cephalobus0000 (1)1 (3)0001 (3)2 (4)01 (1)
Monhysteridae2 (3)0001 (2)0001 (3)0 (1)00
Diphtherophora0000000004 (10)00
Diplogasteridae1 (2)1 (3)01 (2)0 (1)0000000
Tylenchus001 (3)02 (3)0000 (1)000
Pungentus0 (1)0001 (2)02 (5)00000
Nygolaimus000000000 (1)2 (5)00
Acrobeles02 (4)001 (2)0000000
Rhabdolaimus001 (3)000000 (1)000
Aporcelaimellus0000000001 (2)00
Cylindrolaimus0 (1)00000000000
Leptonchidae0 (1)00000000000
Eucephalobus0 (1)00000000000
Chiloplacus0 (1)00000000000
Ecumenicus000000000 (1)000
Anguinidae000000000 (1)000
Trophic groups (nematodes/100cm 3 soil) and community structure indices
Bacterivorous138 (98)259 (214)179 (45)165 (123)133 (78)282 (452)165 (56)148 (94)128 (72)137 (69)112 (29)98 (47)
Fungivorous180 (60)262 (106)185 (43)193 (68)96 (61)186 (276)99 (48)171 (242)162 (66)204 (96)94 (37)89 (44)
Omni+Predsa 8 (11)7 (12)5 (4)06 (6)10 (15)8 (9)3 (8)12 (8)17 (28)2 (2)1 (2)
Enrichment Index51 (9)51 (10)55 (12)53 (10)67 (12)52 (11)46 (15)53 (8)56 (10)46 (4)45 (12)46 (11)
Structure Index41 (10)25 (15)23 (12)12 (11)54 (19)32 (14)29 (11)17 (13)52 (13)46 (10)21 (14)13 (13)
Channel Index66 (19)61 (27)50 (21)60 (24)30 (17)50 (21)54 (21)51 (31)56 (19)70 (18)58 (12)64 (25)
Shannon Diversity7.30 (1.11)5.66 (1.65)5.97 (0.88)4.66 (1.15)6.79 (1.15)6.46 (1.22)4.94 (1.25)3.99 (0.80)7.51 (1.92)7.33 (2.48)5.37 (1.09)4.67 (1.01)
Simpson Diversity5.51 (1.04)4.60 (1.58)4.72 (0.70)3.82 (0.98)5.42 (1.00)5.12 (1.10)3.91 (1.07)3.17 (0.73)5.78 (1.79)4.69 (1.80)4.24 (1.02)3.69 (0.84)

Effects of nitrogen fertilizer treatments on the Shannon–Weiner (S–W) and Simpson (Simpson) indices of genus-level diversity, the nematode Structure Index (SI) and Enrichment Index (EI), and population densities (nematodes/100 cm3) of omnivorous+predacious (O + P), bacterivorous (Bact) and fungivorous (Fung) trophic groups_

TreatmentS–WSimpsonSIEICIO + PBactFung
0N7.02aa 5.57a49a58a519ab133146
1N6.48a4.90ab35b49b6011a226218
1.5N5.43b4.36b24c49b545bc152126
2N4.44c3.51c14d50b581c137151
ANOVA summary (p-values) b
Treatment< 0.001< 0.001< 0.0010.0040.390.0040.180.09
Date0.210.570.050.070.0020.470.190.04
T × D0.570.800.290.050.180.670.910.70
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2020-056 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 14
Submitted on: Sep 27, 2019
Published on: Jul 6, 2020
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Thomas Forge, David Ehret, Aime Messiga, Martine Dorais, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.