Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Screening of Cucurbita maxima and Cucurbita moschata Genotypes for Resistance Against Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, M. javanica, and M. luci Cover

Screening of Cucurbita maxima and Cucurbita moschata Genotypes for Resistance Against Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, M. javanica, and M. luci

Open Access
|Sep 2019

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Origin of winter squash (Cucurbita maxima) and pumpkin (C. moschata) genotypes used in this study.

GenotypeOriginSource
C. maxima
57SI21-IP157SI21 Kurtar and Balkaya (2010)
57SI21-IP2 Kurtar and Balkaya (2010)
57SI21-A3 Kurtar et al. (2016)
57SI21-A6 Kurtar et al. (2016)
57SI21-O7 Kurtar et al. (2018)
57SI21-O11 Kurtar et al. (2018)
57SI06-IP157SI06 Kurtar and Balkaya (2010)
57SI06-IP3 Kurtar and Balkaya (2010)
55CA06-A155CA06 Kurtar et al. (2016)
55CA06-A4 Kurtar et al. (2016)
55BA03-A155BA03 Kurtar et al. (2016)
55CA15-A255CA15 Kurtar et al. (2016)
55CA15-A3 Kurtar et al. (2016)
55CA15-O9 Kurtar et al. (2018)
G14-IP1G14 Kurtar and Balkaya (2010)
C. moschata
14BO01-O114BO01 Kurtar et al. (2018)
14BO01-O2 Kurtar et al. (2018)
G9-A4G9 Kurtar et al. (2016)
G9-A5 Kurtar et al. (2016)
G9-O12 Kurtar et al. (2018)
Table 2.

Root weight, gall index (GI) and eggs per gram root of Meloidogyne arenaria on genotypes of Cucurbita maxima and C. moschata in pot experiments.

GenotypeRoot weight (g)GIa Eggs/g rootResistance designationb
C. maxima
57SI21-IP13.90 ± 0.20 defg7.88 ± 0.30 abc16734 ± 1471 deS
57SI21-IP22.80 ± 0.16 g6.25 ± 0.16 e18450 ± 2443 bcdeS
57SI21-A33.48 ± 0.38 efg7.25 ± 0.16 cd36042 ± 2827 aS
57SI21-A63.46 ± 0.28 efg8.75 ± 0.16 a39911 ± 4924 aS
57SI21-O74.44 ± 0.27 cdef7.63 ± 0.32 bc24815 ± 1376 abcdS
57SI21-O114.80 ± 0.11 cd6.50 ± 0.19 de11768 ± 875 efMR
57SI06-IP14.63 ± 0.37 cde7.75 ± 0.25 abc29306 ± 4407 abcS
57SI06-IP33.30 ± 0.32 fg8.50 ± 0.19 ab17156 ± 1408 cdeS
55CA06-A12.78 ± 0.18 g6.13 ± 0.13 e28110 ± 1632 abcS
55CA06-A44.49 ± 0.25 cdef7.50 ± 0.19 bc16847 ± 1528 deS
55BA03-A17.11 ± 0.15 a7.63 ± 0.18 bc33326 ± 3760 aS
55CA15-A26.14 ± 0.43 ab8.00 ± 0.00 abc30655 ± 3574 abS
55CA15-A35.60 ± 0.27 bc7.75 ± 0.16 abc9430 ± 1265 fMR
55CA15-O93.07 ± 0.21 g6.13 ± 0.13 e12384 ± 741 efMR
G14-IP13.09 ± 0.08 g5.88 ± 0.23 e2644 ± 190 gHR
C. moschata
14BO01-O12.99 ± 0.16 b6.88 ± 0.30 b27423 ± 2677 bMR
14BO01-O25.91 ± 0.38 a7.25 ± 0.16 b6134 ± 790 cHR
G9-A42.83 ± 0.22 b4.75 ± 0.16 c5474 ± 597 cHR
G9-A52.68 ± 0.10 b8.25 ± 0.16 a62155 ± 5801 aS
G9-O122.77 ± 0.19 b7.00 ± 0.27 b38177 ± 5127 bS

1 Notes: Data are the mean ± standard error of two experiments (four replicates for each experiment). Statistical analyses of data were based on log10 (x + 1) transformed data. Means within a column followed by the same letters for each plant species are not significantly different according to Tukey's HSD test at P<0.05. aGI was based on a scale from 0 (no galls) to 10 (100% of roots galled) (Bridge and Page, 1980). bResistance is based on reproduction relative to the most susceptible genotype (55BA03-A1 and 55CA15-A2 for C. maxima and G9-A5 for C. moschata). Reproduction <10% that of the susceptible genotype is considered highly resistant (HR), £50% is considered moderately resistant (MR), and >50% is considered susceptible (S).

Table 3.

Root weight, gall index (GI) and eggs per gram root of Meloidogyne incognita on genotypes of Cucurbita maxima and C. moschata in pot experiments.

GenotypeRoot weight (g)GIa Eggs/g rootResistance designationb
C. maxima
57SI21-IP15.68 ± 0.17 a7.50 ± 0.27 bcde12227 ± 746 fgMR
57SI21-IP23.27 ± 0.26 cdef7.50 ± 0.33 bcde20687 ± 1219 cdS
57SI21-A32.66 ± 0.15 ef8.00 ± 0.27 abcd23554 ± 1700 cdS
57SI21-A62.91 ± 0.09 def8.25 ± 0.25 abc17028 ± 1154 deS
57SI21-O75.71 ± 0.34 a7.25 ± 0.25 cde12047 ± 1478 fgMR
57SI21-O114.25 ± 0.29 bc7.13 ± 0.23 cde9308 ± 514 gMR
57SI06-IP13.40 ± 0.10 cdef8.50 ± 0.19 ab22673 ± 1636 cdS
57SI06-IP33.61 ± 0.21 bcde7.88 ± 0.13 abcd39499 ± 1917 aS
55CA06-A12.78 ± 0.17 ef6.63 ± 0.18 e16987 ± 1678 deS
55CA06-A44.50 ± 0.29 ab7.38 ± 0.26 bcde25059 ± 446 bcS
55BA03-A13.96 ± 0.28 bcd7.88 ± 0.23 abcd33905 ± 1255 abS
55CA15-A23.51 ± 0.22 bcde8.00 ± 0.19 abcd39663 ± 3164 aS
55CA15-A33.30 ± 0.25 cdef8.63 ± 0.18 a14508 ± 928 fgMR
55CA15-O92.68 ± 0.18 ef7.00 ± 0.27 de10282 ± 791 gMR
G14-IP12.62 ± 0.17 f8.50 ± 0.19 ab18994 ± 1133 cdS
C. moschata
14BO01-O13.74 ± 0.54 b8.25 ± 0.16 a56002 ± 8086 abS
14BO01-O26.21 ± 0.20 a8.00 ± 0.00 a50951 ± 2998 abS
G9-A46.12 ± 0.38 a8.13 ± 0.13 a47032 ± 3124 bS
G9-A55.82 ± 0.48 a8.13 ± 0.13 a45326 ± 3968 bS
G9-O123.08 ± 0.20 b8.13 ± 0.13 a70915 ± 3829 aS

1 Notes: Data are the mean ± standard error of two experiments (four replicates for each experiment). Statistical analyses of data were based on log10 (x + 1) transformed data. Means within a column followed by the same letters for each plant species are not significantly different according to Tukey's HSD test at P<0.05. aGI was based on a scale from 0 (no galls) to 10 (100% of roots galled) (Bridge and Page, 1980). bResistance is based on reproduction relative to the most susceptible genotype (55BA03-A1 and 55CA15-A2 for C. maxima and G9-A5 for C. moschata). Reproduction <10% that of the susceptible genotype is considered highly resistant (HR), £50% is considered moderately resistant (MR), and >50% is considered susceptible (S).

Table 4.

Root weight, gall index (GI) and eggs per gram root of Meloidogyne javanica on genotypes of Cucurbita maxima and C. moschata in pot experiments.

GenotypeRoot weight (g)GIa Eggs/g rootResistance designationb
C. maxima
57SI21-IP15.55 ± 0.32 ab6.13 ± 0.13 cd6244 ± 426 efMR
57SI21-IP23.66 ± 0.23 cdef5.50 ± 0.57 de21206 ± 2011 abS
57SI21-A33.55 ± 0.48 def7.25 ± 0.16 abc13853 ± 1405 cS
57SI21-A62.73 ± 0.12 f7.50 ± 0.27 ab8830 ± 678 deMR
57SI21-O73.74 ± 0.28 cdef3.63 ± 0.18 f4359 ± 589 fgMR
57SI21-O114.35 ± 0.18 bcde4.88 ± 0.13 e3119 ± 347 gMR
57SI06-IP13.11 ± 0.16 ef8.50 ± 0.19 a5621 ± 357 fMR
57SI06-IP35.31 ± 0.41 ab7.38 ± 0.18 ab14219 ± 562 bcS
55CA06-A14.73 ± 0.37 abcd6.88 ± 0.13 bc16197 ± 1360 abcS
55CA06-A45.96 ± 0.23 a7.00 ± 0.00 bc18338 ± 1490 abcS
55BA03-A15.11 ± 0.36 abc7.50 ± 0.19 ab18348 ± 753 abcS
55CA15-A24.17 ± 0.23 bcde7.25 ± 0.16 abc21806 ± 933 aS
55CA15-A33.58 ± 0.20 def7.50 ± 0.19 ab17962 ± 1074 abcS
55CA15-O93.28 ± 0.26 ef6.63 ± 0.18 bc13072 ± 1244 cS
G14-IP12.87 ± 0.17 f7.13 ± 0.13 abc5729 ± 298 fMR
C. moschata
14BO01-O14.03 ± 0.42 b7.25 ± 0.16 b28924 ± 3039 dMR
14BO01-O27.06 ± 0.22 a8.00 ± 0.00 a53259 ± 2769 bS
G9-A47.30 ± 0.16 a8.00 ± 0.00 a51721 ± 5434 bS
G9-A56.31 ± 0.32 a7.75 ± 0.16 ab71450 ± 4601 aS
G9-O123.09 ± 0.09 b6.25 ± 0.16 c40865 ± 3240 bcS

1 Notes: Data are the mean ± standard error of two experiments (four replicates for each experiment). Statistical analyses of data were based on log10 (x + 1) transformed data. Means within a column followed by the same letters for each plant species are not significantly different according to Tukey's HSD test at P<0.05. aGI was based on a scale from 0 (no galls) to 10 (100% of roots galled) (Bridge and Page, 1980). bResistance is based on reproduction relative to the most susceptible genotype (55BA03-A1 and 55CA15-A2 for C. maxima and G9-A5 for C. moschata). Reproduction <10% that of the susceptible genotype is considered highly resistant (HR), £50% is considered moderately resistant (MR), and >50% is considered susceptible (S).

Table 5.

Root weight, gall index (GI) and eggs per gram root of Meloidogyne luci on genotypes of Cucurbita maxima and C. moschata in pot experiments.

GenotypeRoot weight (g)GIa Eggs/g rootResistance designationb
C. maxima
57SI21-IP17.48 ± 0.34 a7.75 ± 0.31 abcd19071 ± 2846 dMR
57SI21-IP25.38 ± 0.36 bcde7.88 ± 0.13 abcd21923 ± 809 cdMR
57SI21-A36.45 ± 0.42 abc8.50 ± 0.19 ab35623 ± 3365 bcS
57SI21-A66.33 ± 0.49 abc8.75 ± 0.16 a29438 ± 5060 bcdS
57SI21-O75.73 ± 0.34 abcd8.13 ± 0.13 abc36444 ± 4583 bcS
57SI21-O114.28 ± 0.29 cde5.63 ± 0.18 e4856 ± 416 eMR
57SI06-IP16.26 ± 0.53 abcd7.75 ± 0.16 abcd26005 ± 3796 cdS
57SI06-IP37.18 ± 0.71 ab7.63 ± 0.26 bcd31562 ± 4911 bcdS
55CA06-A13.51 ± 0.28 ef7.13 ± 0.13 d20797 ± 1271 cdMR
55CA06-A45.88 ± 0.46 abcd8.00 ± 0.19 abcd32246 ± 5771 bcdS
55BA03-A17.30 ± 0.28 ab8.38 ± 0.18 ab53064 ± 3789 aS
55CA15-A27.59 ± 0.43 a8.50 ± 0.19 ab47280 ± 2876 abS
55CA15-A34.96 ± 0.25 cde5.50 ± 0.19 e2671 ± 310 fHR
55CA15-O92.90 ± 0.19 f5.75 ± 0.16 e6089 ± 312 eMR
G14-IP15.09 ± 0.37 cde7.25 ± 0.25 cd7871 ± 1099 eMR
C. moschata
14BO01-O15.53 ± 0.48 ab7.63 ± 0.18 a16800 ± 2570 bMR
14BO01-O27.31 ± 0.50 a7.50 ± 0.19 a15548 ± 2290 bMR
G9-A46.02 ± 0.53 ab7.50 ± 0.19 a22700 ± 1262 abS
G9-A54.45 ± 0.52 bc7.75 ± 0.16 a34525 ± 3971 aS
G9-O123.42 ± 0.14 c6.50 ± 0.19 b27980 ± 1912 abS

1 Notes: Data are the mean ± standard error of two experiments (four replicates for each experiment). Statistical analyses of data were based on log10 (x + 1) transformed data. Means within a column followed by the same letters for each plant species are not significantly different according to Tukey's HSD test at P<0.05. aGI was based on a scale from 0 (no galls) to 10 (100% of roots galled) (Bridge and Page, 1980). bResistance is based on reproduction relative to the most susceptible genotype (55BA03-A1 and 55CA15-A2 for C. maxima and G9-A5 for C. moschata). Reproduction <10% that of the susceptible genotype is considered highly resistant (HR), £50% is considered moderately resistant (MR), and >50% is considered susceptible (S).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2019-057 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 10
Submitted on: Jan 25, 2019
Published online: Sep 17, 2019
Published in print: Jan 1, 2019
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Gökhan Aydınlı, Ertan Sait Kurtar, Sevilhan Mennan, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.