Table 1.
Nematicide application treatment rates and application methods.
| Treatment number | Product | Active ingredient | Total product rate (l/ha) | Active ingredient rate (kg a.i./ha) | Application method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nimitz | Fluensulfone | 2.92 | 1.40 | Boom-applied, chopper-incorporated to 15 cm |
| 2 | Nimitz | Fluensulfone | 4.11 | 1.96 | Boom-applied, chopper-incorporated to 15 cm |
| 3 | Nimitz | Fluensulfone | 5.87 | 2.80 | Boom-applied, chopper-incorporated to 15 cm |
| 4 | Nimitz | Fluensulfone | 8.20 | 3.92 | Boom-applied, chopper-incorporated to 15 cm |
| 5 | Telone II | 1,3-dichloropropene | 60.90 | – | Injected 25 cm deep, 1 shank per bed (102 cm wide) |
| 6 | Untreated control |
Table 2.
Schedule for data collection and trial maintenance from 2016 to 2018.
| Task | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-plant soil samples | January 25 | January 3 | January 10 |
| Nematicides applied | January 25 | January 3 to 4 | January 10 |
| Potatoes planted | February 15 | January 19 | February 6 |
| Harvest soil samples | May 31 | May 2 | May 7 |
| Potatoes harvested | May 31 | May 2 | May 23 to 24 |
Table 3.
Rainfall, soil, and air temperature at trial site before and after nematicide application in 2016, 2017, and 2018.
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (C) | Temperature (C) | Temperature (C) | |||||||
| Time perioda | Rainfallb | Soilc | Aird | Rainfall | Soil | Air | Rainfall | Soil | Air |
| 4 WBA | 2.29 | 21.1 | 19.9 | 0.00 | 18.3 | 15.6 | 0.00 | 15.7 | 15.1 |
| 3 WBA | 0.61 | 17.0 | 13.3 | 0.69 | 19.1 | 17.1 | 0.15 | 18.0 | 16.8 |
| 2 WBA | 2.46 | 15.5 | 11.3 | 0.08 | 18.2 | 16.6 | 0.18 | 14.9 | 9.6 |
| 1 WBA | 2.13 | 13.4 | 8.3 | 0.25 | 18.3 | 17.2 | 3.73 | 11.2 | 7.5 |
| Day nematicide applied | 0.00 | 12.0 | 8.9 | 0.00 | 19.6 | 19.0 | 1.65 | 15.9 | 18.5 |
| 1 WAA | 2.67 | 15.0 | 14.6 | 2.16 | 16.3 | 11.6 | 1.45 | 14.5 | 11.6 |
| 2 WAA | 7.24 | 15.9 | 14.6 | 0.08 | 17.8 | 18.2 | 0.53 | 13.1 | 11.6 |
| 3 WAA | 0.00 | 13.2 | 11.6 | 0.08 | 18.6 | 18.4 | 8.94 | 15.0 | 14.3 |
| 4 WAA | 2.51 | 15.9 | 15.5 | 0.00 | 16.8 | 12.4 | 0.30 | 15.0 | 15.1 |

Figure 1:
Sting nematode (Belonolaimus longicaudatus) abundance as affected by nematicide treatments. The abbreviations Fluen. and 1,3-D denote fluenosulfone (Nimitz EC) and 1,3-dichloropropene nematicide applications, respectively. Different letters indicate significantly different means based on Fisher’s protected LSD at α = 0.05. Bars represent means of six replicates.

Figure 2:
Stubby-root nematode (Paratrichodorus sp.) abundance as affected by nematicide treatments. The abbreviations Fluen. and 1,3-D denote fluenosulfone (Nimitz EC) and 1,3-dichloropropene nematicide applications, respectively. Different letters indicate significantly different means based on Fisher’s protected LSD at α = 0.05. Bars represent means of six replicates.

Figure 3:
Lesion nematode (Pratylenchus sp.) abundance as affected by nematicide treatments. The abbreviations Fluen. and 1,3-D denote fluenosulfone (Nimitz EC) and 1,3-dichloropropene nematicide applications, respectively. Different letters indicate significantly different means based on Fisher’s protected LSD at α = 0.05. Bars represent means of six replicates.

Figure 4:
Marketable potato yield (excluding culls) as affected by nematicide treatments in 2016, 2017, and 2018. The abbreviations Fluen. and 1,3-D denote fluensulfone (Nimitz EC) and 1,3-dichloropropene nematicide applications, respectively. Different letters indicate significantly different means based on Fisher’s protected LSD at α = 0.05. Bars represent means of six replicates.
Table 4.
Marketable potato tuber yield (kg/ha) by grade as affected by nematicide treatments.a
| Grade | Cb | B | A1 | A2 | A3 | A123 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nematicide treatment | 2016 | |||||
| Fluensulfone 3 l/ha | 547 | 1,095 | 7,174 ab | 441 b | 220 | 7,835 ab |
| Fluensulfone 4 l/ha | 547 | 1,166 | 6,563 ab | 1,223 ab | 192 | 7,977 ab |
| Fluensulfone 6 l/ha | 576 | 1,180 | 7,551 a | 1,849 a | 0 | 9,399 a |
| Fluensulfone 8 l/ha | 704 | 1,315 | 7,985 a | 1,130 ab | 50 | 9,165 a |
| 1,3-dichloropropene 61 l/ha | 597 | 1,230 | 8,418 a | 1,969 a | 43 | 10,430 a |
| Untreated control | 661 | 939 | 4,721 b | 242 b | 0 | 4,963 b |
| Nematicide treatment | 2017 | |||||
| Fluensulfone 3 l/ha | 594 | 1,299 | 8,774 ab | 2,167 ab | 1,275 ab | 12,216 ab |
| Fluensulfone 4 l/ha | 679 | 1,505 | 9,665 a | 2,842 a | 1,851 a | 14,357 a |
| Fluensulfone 6 l/ha | 771 | 1,244 | 9,503 a | 1,353 bc | 1,706 a | 12,562 ab |
| Fluensulfone 8 l/ha | 540 | 997 | 7,648 abc | 1,079 c | 1,285 ab | 10,011 bc |
| 1,3-dichloropropene 61 l/ha | 712 | 1,313 | 6,029 c | 1,613 bc | 634 bc | 8,276 c |
| Untreated control | 492 | 1,239 | 6,611 bc | 1,359 bc | 467 c | 8,437 c |
| Nematicide treatment | 2018 | |||||
| Fluensulfone 3 l/ha | 3,235 | 6,143 a | 7,160 a | 533 | 313 | 8,006 a |
| Fluensulfone 4 l/ha | 3,427 | 5,567 ab | 7,430 a | 675 | 284 | 8,383 a |
| Fluensulfone 6 l/ha | 3,263 | 5,610 ab | 6,051 ab | 633 | 114 | 6,797 ab |
| Fluensulfone 8 l/ha | 3,214 | 5,524 ab | 6,079 ab | 398 | 114 | 6,591 ab |
| 1,3-dichloropropene 61 l/ha | 3,647 | 5,809 ab | 8,006 a | 626 | 277 | 8,909 a |
| Untreated control | 3,512 | 4,494 b | 3,868 b | 100 | 43 | 4,010 b |
1 Note: aDifferent letters in the same column indicate significantly different means based on Fisher’s protected LSD at α = 0.05; btuber grades of C, B, A1, A2, and A3 include harvest potatoes with diameters of 1.3 to 3.7, 3.8 to 4.7, 4.8 to 6.3, 6.4 to 8.3, and 8.4 to 10.2 cm respectively. A123 is total yield for grades A1, A2, and A3 combined.
Table 5.
Cull potato tuber weight (kg/ha) by category as affected by nematicide treatments.a
| Total | Rotted | Green | Growth crack | Misshapen | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nematicide treatment | 2016 | ||||
| Fluensulfone 3 l/ha | 6,100 | 6,100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fluensulfone 4 l/ha | 6,157 | 6,157 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fluensulfone 6 l/ha | 6,719 | 6,719 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fluensulfone 8 l/ha | 6,385 | 6,385 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1,3-dichloropropene 61 l/ha | 7,266 | 7,266 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Untreated control | 5,091 | 5,091 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nematicide treatment | 2017 | ||||
| Fluensulfone 3 l/ha | 4,639 | 1,779 | 1,024 | 930 | 907 |
| Fluensulfone 4 l/ha | 4,001 | 1,642 | 1,246 | 759 | 352 |
| Fluensulfone 6 l/ha | 3,504 | 1,397 | 855 | 444 | 807 |
| Fluensulfone 8 l/ha | 2,945 | 851 | 821 | 675 | 597 |
| 1,3-dichloropropene 61 l/ha | 3,271 | 1,679 | 542 | 430 | 619 |
| Untreated control | 2,601 | 880 | 787 | 553 | 382 |
| Nematicide treatment | 2018 | ||||
| Fluensulfone 3 l/ha | 1,522 | 1,159 ab | 64 | 78 | 228 c |
| Fluensulfone 4 l/ha | 1,237 | 761 b | 206 | 107 | 164 c |
| Fluensulfone 6 l/ha | 2,190 | 1,379 ab | 220 | 78 | 519 ab |
| Fluensulfone 8 l/ha | 1,586 | 946 ab | 263 | 85 | 313 bc |
| 1,3-dichloropropene 61 l/ha | 2,481 | 1,529 a | 185 | 107 | 654 a |
| Untreated control | 1,436 | 825 b | 199 | 36 | 377 bc |