Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effect of the trap crop, Solanum sisymbriifolium, on Globodera pallida, Globodera tabacum, and Globodera ellingtonae Cover

Effect of the trap crop, Solanum sisymbriifolium, on Globodera pallida, Globodera tabacum, and Globodera ellingtonae

Open Access
|May 2019

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Effect of Solanum sisymbriifolium on Globodera pallida egg density and viability and on subsequent reproduction on potato in 2015.

Remaining eggs/cystsEgg viability (%)Progeny cyst (no./kg soil)Encysted eggs (eggs/g soil) Pf a (eggs/g soil) Pf/Pi b (eggs/g soil)
TreatmentAfter 10 wkc Reproduction on potatod
Fallow299e 57.0361966.92.8
S. sisymbriifolium 23058.14100.020.01
P-valuef 0.100.920.00010.00010.00010.0001

1 Note: a Pf=final egg population density; b Pf/Pi=final egg population density/initial egg population density (Pi ); ceggs remaining in cysts initially used for soil infestation were measured 10 wk after infesting into bare soil or S. sisymbriifolium. Soil was infested with a Pi of 2.5 encysted eggs/g soil; dreproduction was assessed after a second 16-wk cycle where all treatments were planted to potato; evalues are the mean of six replicates; f P-value was determined by analysis of variance.

Table 2.

Effect of Solanum sisymbriifolium on Globodera pallida egg density and viability and on subsequent reproduction on potato in 2016.

Remaining eggs/cystsEgg viability (%)Progeny cyst (no./kg soil)Encysted eggs (eggs/g soil) Pf a (eggs/g soil) Pf/Pi b (eggs/g soil)
TreatmentAfter 12 wkc Reproduction on potatod
Fallow162e 71.4201873.51.4
S. sisymbriifolium 8166.40000
P-valuef 0.0020.190.00060.00010.00010.0001

1 Note: a Pf = final egg population density; b Pf/Pi = final egg population density/initial egg population density (Pi); ceggs remaining in cysts initially used for soil infestation were measured 12 wk after infesting into bare soil or S. sisymbriifolium. Soil was infested with a Pi of 2.5 encysted eggs/g soil; dreproduction was assessed after a second 16-wk cycle where all treatments were planted to potato; evalues are the mean of six replicates; f P-value was determined by analysis of variance.

Table 3.

Effect of treatment (bare ground or Solanum sisymbriifolium) and termination date after treatment establishment on Globodera ellingtonae egg densities in soil at Powell Butte, Oregon in 2014 and 2015.

Termination date (weeks after S. sisymbriifolium planting)a
Treatment36912
G. ellingtonae eggs/cystb
2014
S. sisymbriifolium 196 ac 98 b69 bntd
 Fallow209 a195 a173 ant
2015
S. sisymbriifolium nt218 b108 c58 d
 Fallownt271 a261 a179 b

1 Note: aTreatments were established on May 19, 2014 and June 8, 2015; binitial density in 2014 was 30 ± 734 eggs/cyst with approximately 50 cysts, and in 2015 was 31126 with approximately 75 cysts; cvalues are the means of six observations. All values in the same year followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Dunnett’s adjustment for multiplicity (P ≤ 0.05); dnt = not tested.

Table 4.

Influence of nematode-susceptible or resistant tobacco, Solanum ptychanthum, S. sisymbriifolium, fallow on Globodera tabacum population change over one season in field microplots.

20152016
Treatment Pi a Pf a Pf/Pi a Pi Pf Pf/Pi
Susceptible tobacco90.6b 193.62.9 ac 64.0173.82.8 a
Resistant tobacco103.836.40.4 b82.629.70.3 b
S. ptychanthum ntd ntnt77.3335.16.6 a
S. sisymbriifolium 91.110.60.1 c75.69.30.2 c
Fallowntntnt86.443.40.56 b
P-value0.890.00010.00010.860.00010.0001

1 Note: aPf/Pi = final egg population density (Pf)/initial egg population density (Pi). Data were log transformed and differences between final and initial populations analyzed by analysis of variance. Means were separated by Fishers LSD multiple comparison test; bvalues are the means of 20 replicate plots in 2015 and 12 or 13 replicates in 2016. Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Fisher’s LSD multiple comparison tests (P ≤ 0.05); cnumbers within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different; dnt = not tested.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2019-030 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 11
Submitted on: May 1, 2018
Published on: May 27, 2019
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 L. M. Dandurand, I. A. Zasada, J. A. LaMondia, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.