Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Annual and Perennial Alleyway Cover Crops Vary in Their Effects on Pratylenchus penetrans in Pacific Northwest Red Raspberry (Rubus idaeus) Cover

Annual and Perennial Alleyway Cover Crops Vary in Their Effects on Pratylenchus penetrans in Pacific Northwest Red Raspberry (Rubus idaeus)

Open Access
|Sep 2018

Figures & Tables

TABLE 1.

Crop type, species name, and cultivar for alleyway cover crops included in the Washington raspberry (Rubus idaeus) field study and Pratylenchus penetrans greenhouse host assays.

CropCultivar
Hard, red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) a Norwest 553
Soft, white winter wheat (T. aestivum) a Rosalyn
Winter-hardy oat (Avena sativa) b Nora
Winter-hardy oat (A. sativa) b TAM 606
Intermediate and tetraploid perennial ryegrass mix (Lolium hybridum, Lolium perenne) c 51.25% Tetralite, 48.24% Kentaur
Perennial ryegrass mix (L. perenne) c 43.93% Esquire, 31.44% TopHat 2, 22.49% Tetragreen
Triticale (Triticosecale sp.) d Trical 103BB
Triticale (Triticosecale sp.) d TriMark 099
Cereal rye (Secale cereale) c Common

1a Sourced from WSU Northwest Research and Extension Center Plant Breeding Program, Mount Vernon, WA.

2b Sourced from Justin Seed Co., Justin, TX.

3c Sourced from Bailey Seed Co., Salem, OR.

4d Sourced from ProGene Plant Research, Othello, OR.

TABLE 2.

Pratylenchus penetrans population densities over a 2-yr period from cover crops roots in alleyways adjacent to raised beds of raspberry (Rubus idaeus) in Lynden, WA.

P. penetrans/g of cover crop root
Treatment a Spring 2015Fall 2015Spring 2016Fall 2016
Till (industry standard)----
Mow----
Cereal rye292 ± 280 b 325 ± 286220 ± 383830 ± 554
Oat ‘Nora’31 ± 31253 ± 202325 ± 251378 ± 246
Oat ‘TAM 606’187 ± 187503 ± 49884 ± 131439 ± 263
Triticale ‘Trical 103BB’68 ± 49447 ± 44312 ± 20340 ± 335
Triticale ‘TriMark 099’39 ± 3939 ± 22352 ± 63277 ± 53
Wheat ‘Norwest 553’297 ± 256336 ± 329371 ± 434282 ± 195
Wheat ‘Rosalyn’14 ± 14B c 81 ± 38A94 ± 54228 ± 90
Grass mix 1 (perennial)0B5 ± 3B44 ± 43A8 ± 5B
Grass mix 2 (annual)88 ± 811 ± 1341 ± 66652 ± 50
Overall mean d 108221205293

1a Treatment abbreviations: Till = control bare cultivated soil, Mow = control weedy mow, Grass mix 1 = intermediate and tetraploid perennial ryegrass mix, Grass mix 2 = perennial ryegrass mix.

2b Values are the mean of 4 replications ± SE.

3c Values followed by the same uppercase letter in the same row are not significantly different from one another at P ≤ 0.05. Annual treatment means were compared within year; perennial treatment means were compared across all four sampling dates.

4d The overall mean is an average of all the P penetrans population densities in all cover crops in each season.

TABLE 3.

Pratylenchus penetrans population densities over a 2-yr period from raspberry (Rubus idaeus) roots adjacent to alleyways with annual and perennial cover crops in Lynden, WA.

P. penetrans/g of raspberry root
Treatment a Spring 2015Fall 2015Spring 2016Fall 2016
Till (industry standard)4,847 ± 1,639 b  5,536 ± 1,185 3,286 ± 424 2,391 ± 566 
Mow2,319 ± 1,254B c 6,120 ± 986A2,277 ± 397B1,861 ± 178B
Cereal rye3,915 ± 1,257AB5,616 ± 744A1,799 ± 431B1,976 ± 432B
Oat ‘Nora’2,372 ± 571 3,255 ± 1,850 2,211 ± 701 2,931 ± 689 
Oat ‘Tam 606’3,020 ± 863B5,750 ± 870A2,546 ± 521B4,462 ± 603AB
Triticale ‘Trical 103BB’2,294 ± 780AB4,175 ± 862A4,037 ± 742A1,331 ± 568B
Triticale ‘TriMark 099’5,005 ± 765 4,309 ± 1,137 2,703 ± 1,004 3,084 ± 595 
Wheat ‘Norwest 553’2,884 ± 555 4,879 ± 1,796 1,677 ± 580 2,516 ± 817 
Wheat ‘Rosalyn’2,596 ± 354AB4,320 ± 703A1,081 ± 217B2,919 ± 1,009AB
Grass mix 1 (perennial)5,112 ± 853A5,205 ± 1,126A2,192 ± 334B3,857 ± 846AB
Grass mix 2 (annual)3,176 ± 1,180 5,192 ± 1,796 4,298 ± 384 3,166 ± 1,658 
Overall mean d 3,432B4,941A2,555C2,796BC

1a Treatment abbreviations: Till = control bare cultivated soil, Mow = control weedy mow, Grass mix 1 = intermediate and tetraploid perennial ryegrass mix, Grass mix 2 = perennial ryegrass mix.

2b Values are the mean of 4 replications ± SE.

3c Values followed by the same uppercase letter in the same row are not significantly different from one another at P ≤ 0.05.

4d Overall mean is the average of all the P. penetrans population densities in cover crop roots within each season.

TABLE 4.

Host status of cover crops for Pratylenchus penetrans in greenhouse host assays conducted in Mount Vernon, WA.

Host assay 1Host assay 2
Treatment P. penetrans/g of rootRoot weight (g)RF a P. penetrans/g of rootRoot weight (g)RF
Cereal rye743 ± 196bc b 1.26 ± 0.09ab2.04ab1,070 ± 359ab2.00 ± 0.11a2.59a
Oat ‘Nora’1,936 ± 678ab0.51 ± 0.12cd1.99ab2,392 ± 184ab0.75 ± 0.06efg2.30ab
Oat ‘TAM 606’3,226 ± 1,093ab0.36 ± 0.10d1.37bc3,393 ± 991a0.75 ± 0.12def2.39a
Triticale ‘Trical 103BB’1,424 ± 702bc1.27 ± 0.36ab1.70ab718 ± 168b0.95 ± 0.08cde0.79c
Triticale ‘TriMark 099’276 ± 50c1.47 ± 0.07a0.66b1,113 ± 339ab1.86 ± 0.21ab2.07ab
Wheat ‘Norwest 553’656 ± 231bc0.78 ± 0.17bcd0.70b417 ± 236b1.29 ± 0.25bcde0.46c
Wheat ‘Rosalyn’1,338 ± 491bc0.62 ± 0.12bcd1.10ab874 ± 340b1.37 ± 0.23abcd1.02c
Mustard ‘Pacific Gold’5,212 ± 768a0.20 ± 0.01d2.84a1,705 ± 841ab0.30 ± 0.04gf1.03c
Mustard ‘Ida Gold’2,832 ± 884ab0.18 ± 0.02d1.78ab2,060 ± 771ab0.20 ± 0.04 g 1.09c
Raspberry ‘Meeker’627 ± 150bc1.17 ± 0.05abc1.53ab744 ± 189b1.44 ± 0.06abc1.33bc

1a RF = Reproductive factor (final population density/initial inoculum). In host assay, 1, 656 ml pots were inoculated with 626 P. penetrans/pot. In host assay 2, 656 ml pots were inoculated with 918 P. penetrans/pot.

2b Values are the mean of 6 replications ± SE. Values followed by the same lowercase letter in the same column are not significantly different from one another at P ≤ 0.05.

TABLE 5.

Host status of cover crops for Pratylenchus penetrans in greenhouse host assays conducted in Mount Vernon, WA.

Treatment a Host assay 3Host assay 4
P. penetrans/g of rootRoot weight (g)RF b P. penetrans/g of rootRoot weight (g)RF
Grass mix 1108 ± 17b c 8.19 ± 0.35a0.57b263 ± 50b10.60 ± 0.92a1.10b
Grass mix 262 ± 10c8.39 ± 0.33a0.50b123 ± 28c10.95 ± 0.43a0.50c
Raspberry ‘Meeker’910 ± 165a2.08 ± 0.19b1.51a1,402 ± 309a2.31 ± 0.30b1.97a

1a Treatment abbreviations: Grass mix 1 = 51.25% ‘Tetralite’, 48.24% ‘Kentaur’, an intermediate and tetraploid perennial ryegrass mix (Lolium hybridum, Lolium perenne); Grass mix 2 = 3.93% ‘Esquire’, 31.44% ‘TopHat 2’, 22.49% ‘Tetragreen’, a perennial ryegrass mix (L. perenne).

2b RF = reproductive factor (final population density/initial inoculum). In hostassay3,2.6 liter pots were inoculated with 1,969 P. penetrans/pot. In host assay 4, 2.6 liter pots were inoculated with 3,231 P. penetrans/pot.

3c Values are the mean of six replications ± SE. Values followed by the same lowercase letter in the same column are not significantly different from one another at P ≤ 0.05.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2017-094 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Page range: 446 - 456
Submitted on: Apr 24, 2017
Published online: Sep 26, 2018
Published in print: Jan 1, 2017
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 RACHEL E. RUDOLPH, INGA A. ZASADA, LISA W. DEVETTER, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.