Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A systems perspective on exploring the sustainability of leadership initiatives in a secondary school setting Cover

A systems perspective on exploring the sustainability of leadership initiatives in a secondary school setting

By: Kala. S. Retna and  John Davies  
Open Access
|Oct 2019

References

  1. Anderson, N. (2012). Design thinking: Employing an effective multidisciplinary pedagogical framework to foster creativity and innovation in rural and remote education. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 22(2), 43–52.
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
  3. Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership (4th Ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
  4. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
  5. Boni, A.A., Weingart, L. R., & Evenson, S. (2009). Innovation in an academic setting: Designing and leading a business through market-focussed, interdisciplinary teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(3), 407–417.
  6. Boyle, T. (2014). 21st century knowledge, skills, and abilities and entrepreneurial competencies: A model for undergraduate entrepreneurship education. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 15, 41–55.
  7. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, June, 86(6), 84–92.
  8. Burns. J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
  9. Constas, M. A. (1992). Qualitative analysis as a public event: The documentation of category development procedures. American Educational Research Journal, 2(2), 253–66.
  10. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Handbook of qualitative research. (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  11. DeRue, D. S., Nahrgand, J., Wellman, N., & Humphrey, S. (2011). Trait and behavioural theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 7–52.
  12. Dimmock, C., & Tan, C.Y. (2013). Educational leadership in Singapore. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(3), 320–340.
  13. Estrada, C., & Goldman, S. (2017). A Praxis model for design thinking – catalysing life readiness. In S. Goldman, & Z. Kabayadondo (Eds.), Taking design thinking to school: How the technology of design can transform teachers, learners and classrooms. New York, NY: Routledge. 37–49.
  14. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  15. Fullan, M. (2006). Turnaround leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  16. Gardner, H. (2006). Five minds for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  17. Goldman, S. (2018). Design thinking for kids? How teachers can bring this creative problem-solving process into the classroom. Stanford University, February 5, 2018.
  18. Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 78(2), 4–17.
  19. Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142.
  20. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2003). Sustaining leadership. In B. Davies and J. West-Burham (Eds.), Handbook of educational leadership and management. London, UK: Pearson Education.
  21. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions, and organisations across nation (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  22. Kelley, D., & Kelley, T. (2013). Creative conf idence: Unlocking the creative potential within us all. New York, NY: Crown.
  23. Kok, J.H.L., Chai, S.C., Wong, B., & Hong, H.Y. (2015). Design thinking for education: conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Singapore: Springer.
  24. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 59–67.
  25. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
  26. Lee, K. (2011). Beyond blueprints and basics: A service design conference report. Design Issues, 27(4), 95–100.
  27. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). Principal and teacher leadership effects: A replication. School Leadership and Management, 20(5), 415–434.
  28. Liedtka, J. (2011). Learning to use design thinking tools for successful innovation. Strategy and Leadership, 39(5), 13–19.
  29. Maani, K. E., & Cavana, R.Y. (2000) Systems thinking and modelling. Auckland, NZ: Pearson Publishing.
  30. Martin, R. L. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  31. McCullagh, K. (2010). Stepping up: Design thinking has uncovered real opportunities. Design Management Review, 3, 36–39.
  32. McDonagh, D., & Thomas, J. (2010). Rethinking design thinking: Empathy supporting innovation. Australasian Medical Journal, 3(8), 458–464.
  33. Oon-Seng, T. (2012). Singapore’s holistic approach to teacher development. Phi Delta Kappa, 94(3), 76–77.
  34. Peterson, S. J., Walumbwa, F. O., Byron, K., & Myrowitz, J. (2009). CEO positive psychological traits, transformational leadership, and firm performance in high-technology start-up and established firms. Journal of Management, 35, 348–368.
  35. Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Education Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.
  36. Rowe, P. G. (1987). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  37. Schwab, K. (2011). The Global Competitiveness Report 2011–2012. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
  38. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.
  39. Senge, P. M., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., Roth, G., & Smith, B. (1999). The dance of change: The challenges of sustaining momentum in learning organizations. London, UK: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
  40. Sergiovanni, T. J (2009). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  41. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. London, UK: Sage.
  42. Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modelling for a complex world. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  43. Tajasom, A., & Ahmad, Z. A. (2011). Principals’ leadership style and school climate: Teachers’ perspectives from Malaysia. The International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 7(4), 314–333.
  44. Tan, C., & Wong Y. (2012). Promoting spiritual ideals through design thinking in public schools. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 17(1), 25–37.
  45. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148.
  46. Todd, R. (1999). Design and technology yields a new paradigm for elementary schooling. Journal of Technology Studies, 25(2), 26–33.
  47. Wagner, T. (2008). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need – and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  48. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jelpp-2019-001 | Journal eISSN: 1178-8704 | Journal ISSN: 1178-8690
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 24
Published on: Oct 8, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Kala. S. Retna, John Davies, published by New Zealand Educational Administration and Leadership Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.