Reviewing “Interlocking Directorates”: Clarifying the construct to understand the effect discrepancies across interlock studies
References
- Afuah, A. (2013). Are network effects really all about size? The role of structure and conduct. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2013
- Algthami, N. M. J., & Hussin, N. (2021). Research on interlocking directorates in family business: Evidence from scopus bibliometric data. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.4.1012
- Andres, C., Van Den Bongard, I., & Lehmann, M. (2013). Is busy really busy? Board governance revisited. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 40(9–10), 1221–1246. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12051
- Baysinger, B. D., & Butler, H. N. (1985). Corporate governance and the board of directors: performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 1(1), 101–124.
- Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. Macmillan
- Bilgili, H., Johnson, J. L., Bilgili, T. V., & Ellstrand, A. E. (2022). Research on social relationships and processes governing the behaviors of members of the corporate elite: A review and bibliometric analysis. Review of Managerial Science, 16(8), 2285–2339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00505-5
- Breiger, R. L. (1974). The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces, 53(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2576011
- Burris, V. (2001). The two faces of capital: corporations and individual capitalists as political actors. American Sociological Review, 66(3), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088884
- Burris, V. (2005). Interlocking directorates and political cohesion among corporate elites. American Journal of Sociology, 111(1), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1086/428817
- Burt, R. S. (1978). A structural theory of interlocking corporate directorates. Social Networks, 1(4), 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90006-0
- Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kbhnhh-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3300361.
- Byrd, D. T., & Mizruchi, M. S. (2005). Bankers on the board and the debt ratio of firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1–2), 129–173.
- Caiazza, R., Cannella Jr, A. A., Phan, P. H., & Simoni, M. (2019). An institutional contingency perspective of interlocking directorates. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12182
- Caiazza, R., & Simoni, M. (2019). Directorate ties: A bibliometric analysis. Management Decision, 57(10), 2837–2851. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2018-0085
- Caiazza, R., Phan, P. H., & Simoni, M. (2023). Theoretical and empirical differences between the interlocked boards of family and non-family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 14(2), 100518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2022.100518
- Cao, S., Fang, Z., Pu, W., & Ruan, Y.-Y. (2022). Vertical interlock and firm value: The role of corporate innovation. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(4), 1061–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2021.1927699
- Cárdenas, J. (2012). Varieties of corporate networks: Network analysis and fsQCA. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 53(4), 298–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715212460257
- Carney, R. W., Child, T. B., & Li, X. (2020). Board connections and crisis performance: Family, state, and political networks. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101630
- Carpenter, M. A., Li, M., & Jiang, H. (2012). Social network research in organizational contexts: A systematic review of methodological issues and choices. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1328–1361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312440119
- Carrington, P. D. (1981). Horizontal co-optation through corporate interlocks. [PhD Thesis]. Department of Sociology, University of Toronto.
- Carroll, W. K. (2010). The Making of a Transnational Capitalist Class: Corporate Power in the 21st Century. Bloomsbury Academic & Professional. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kbhnhh-ebooks/detail.action?docID=688553.
- Carroll, W. K., & Fennema, M. (2002). Is there a transnational business community? International Sociology, 17(3), 393–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580902017003003
- Chen, V. Z., Hobdari, B., & Shen, C. (2023). Board social ties, institutional change asynchronicity, and performance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 32(3), 774–794. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtac046
- Chen, X., & Yang, C. (2021). Vertical interlock and the value of cash holdings. Accounting & Finance, 61(1), 561–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12587
- Connelly, B. L., & Van Slyke, E. J. (2012). The power and peril of board interlocks. Business Horizons, 55(5), 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2012.03.006
- Córdova, M. (2019). “That is OK, he is a good fellow”: Introducing the outcomes dichotomy for corporate networks of interlocking directorates. Revista Academia & Negocios, 5(1), 123–134.
- Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290.
- David, T., & Westerhuis, G. (2014a). 1 comparing corporate networks in a long-term perspective. In The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective. T. David & G. Westerhuis (Eds.), Routledge.
- David, T., & Westerhuis, G. (2014b). Comparing corporate networks in a long-term perspective. In The Power of Corporate Networks. Routledge.
- David, T., & Westerhuis, G. (2014c). The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective. Routledge. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kbhnhh-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1775324
- Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without Principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 583–613. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393275
- Davis, G. F., & Mizruchi, M. S. (1999). The Money Center Cannot Hold: Commercial Banks in the U.S. System of Corporate Governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666995
- Dhingra, D., & Dwivedi, N. (2024). Unearthing the intellectual structure of board interlocks research: A bibliometric analysis. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 24(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-11-2022-0446
- Dieleman, M., & Boddewyn, J. J. (2011). Using organization structure to buffer political ties in emerging markets: A case study. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611430595
- Dixon, F. H. (1914). The economic significance of interlocking directorates in railway finance. Journal of Political Economy, 22(10), 937–954. https://doi.org/10.1086/252552
- Domhoff, G. W. (1967). Who Rules America? Prentice-Hall.
- Durand, E. D. (1914). The trust legislation of 1914. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 29(1), 72–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885298
- Edling, C., Hobdari, B., Randøy, T., Stafsudd, A., & Thomsen, S. (2012). Testing the “Old Boys’ Network”: diversity and board interlocks in scandinavia. In The Small Worlds of Corporate Governance (pp. 183–201), B. Kogut (Ed.), MIT Press.
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/258191
- Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411–1454. https://doi.org/10.1086/230450
- Faizabad, A., Refakar, M., & Champagne, C. (2021). Corporate, social, political connections and corporate governance: A review. Corporate Ownership and Control, 18(4), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv18i4art13
- Fennema, M., & Heemskerk, E. M. (2018). When theory meets methods: The naissance of computer assisted corporate interlock research: Global Networks. Global Networks, 18(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12178
- Ferris, S. P., Jagannathan, M., & Pritchard, A. C. (2003). Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1087–1111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00559
- Fligstein, N., & Brantley, P. (1992). Bank control, owner control, or organizational dynamics: Who controls the large modern corporation? American Journal of Sociology, 98(2), 280–307. https://doi.org/10.1086/230009
- Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
- Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
- Granovetter, M. S., & Swedberg, R. (2011). The Sociology of Economic Life. Routledge.
- Grønmo, S., Løyning, T., & Makt- OG demokratiutredningen 1998–2003. (2003). Sosiale nettverk og økonomisk makt: Overlappende styremedlemskap mellom norske bedrifter 197–-2000. In Norbok. Fagbokforl. https://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-nb_digibok_2018102305050.
- Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press.
- Heemskerk, E. M., Fennema, M., & Carroll, W. K. (2016). The global corporate elite after the financial crisis: Evidence from the transnational network of interlocking directorates: Global Networks. Global Networks, 16(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12098
- Heemskerk, E., Young, K., Takes, F. W., Cronin, B., Garcia‐Bernardo, J., Henriksen, L. F., Winecoff, W. K., Popov, V., & Laurin‐Lamothe, A. (2018). The promise and perils of using big data in the study of corporate networks: Problems, diagnostics and fixes. Global Networks, 18(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12183
- Hiebl, M. R. W. (2023). Sample selection in systematic literature reviews of management research. Organizational Research Methods, 26(2), 229–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120986851
- Hillman, A. J. (2005). Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? Journal of Management, 31(3), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272187
- Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Schuler, D. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research Agenda. Journal of Management, 30(6), 837–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.003
- Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469
- Huijzer, M. J., & Heemskerk, E. M. (2021). Delineating the corporate elite: Inquiring the boundaries and composition of interlocking directorate networks. Global Networks, 21(4), 791–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12316
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
- Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3), 409–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(96)90031-8
- Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312463938
- Kaplan, S. N., & Minton, B. A. (1994). Appointments of outsiders to Japanese boards: Determinants and implications for managers. Journal of Financial Economics, 36(2), 225–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)90025-6
- Keister, L. A. (1998). Engineering Growth: Business group structure and firm performance in China’s transition economy. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 404–440. https://doi.org/10.1086/210043
- Koenig, T., & Gogel, R. (1981). Interlocking corporate directorships as a social network. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 40(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1981.tb01370.x
- Koenig, T., Gogel, R., & Sonquist, J. (1979). Models of the Significance of interlocking corporate directorates. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 38(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1979.tb02877.x
- Koskinen, J., & Edling, C. (2012). Modelling the evolution of a bipartite network—Peer referral in interlocking directorates. Social Networks, 34(3), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.001
- Krause, R., Roh, J., & Whitler, K. A. (2022). The top management team: conceptualization, operationalization, and a roadmap for scholarship. Journal of Management, 48(6), 1548–1601. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211072459
- Lamb, N. H., & Roundy, P. (2016). The “ties that bind” board interlocks research: A systematic review. Management Research Review, 39(11), 1516–1542. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2015-0027
- Larsen, A. G., & Ellersgaard, C. H. (2018). The inner circle revisited: The case of an egalitarian society. Socio-Economic Review, 16(2), 251–275. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwx052
- Laumann, E., Marsden, P. V., & Prensky, D. (1983). The boundary specification problem in network analysis. In Applied Network Analysis. R. Burt & M. Minor (Eds.), Sage Publications Ltd.
- Li, L., Tian, G., & Yan, W. (2013). The network of interlocking directorates and firm performance in transition economies: Evidence from China. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 29(2), 607. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v29i2.7661
- Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), W-65. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136
- Meeusen, & Cuyvers. (1985). The interaction between interlocking directorships and economic behaviour of companies. In Networks of Corporate Power—A Comparison of Ten Countries. F. N. Stokman, R. Ziegler, & J. Scott (Eds.), Polity Press.
- Mills, C. W. (1965). The Power Elite. Oxford University Press.
- Mizruchi, M. S. (1989). Similarity of political behavior among large american corporations. American Journal of Sociology, 95(2), 401–424.
- Mizruchi, M. S. (1990). Similarity of ideology and party preference among large american corporations: A study of political action committee contributions. Sociological Forum, 5(2), 213–240.
- Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271
- Mizruchi, M. S. (2013). The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite. Harvard University Press.
- Mizruchi, M. S., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1993). Networks of interorganizational relations. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(1), 46–70.
- Mizruchi, M. S., & Koenig, T. (1986). Economic sources of corporate political consensus: An examination of interindustry relations. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 482. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095582
- Mizruchi, M. S., & Koenig, T. (1988). Economic concentration and corporate political behavior: A cross-industry comparison. Social Science Research, 17(4), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(88)90005-1
- Mizruchi, M. S., & Koenig, T. (1991). Size, concentration, and corporate networks: Determinants of business collective action. Social Science Quarterly, 72(2), 299–313.
- Murray, J. (2017). Interlock Globally, Act Domestically: Corporate Political Unity in the 21st Century. American Journal of Sociology, 122(6), 1617–1663. https://doi.org/10.1086/691603
- Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
- Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040713
- Pennings, J. M. (1980). Interlocking Directorates. Jossey-Bas.
- Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1987). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row.
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2016). Recommendations for creating better concept definitions in the organizational, behavioral, and social sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 19(2), 159–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115624965
- Post, C., Sarala, R., Gatrell, C., & Prescott, J. E. (2020). Advancing theory with review articles. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 351–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12549
- Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988
- Raddant, M., & Takahashi, H. (2022). Corporate boards, interorganizational ties and profitability: The case of Japan. Empirical Economics, 62(3), 1365–1406.
- Ramsawak, R., Buertey, S., Maheshwari, G., Dang, D., & Thanh Phan, C. (2024). Interlocking boards and firm outcomes: A review. Management Decision, 62(4), 1291–1322. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2023-0501
- Rhoades, D. L., Rechner, P. L., & Sundaramurthy, C. (2000). Board composition and financial performance: A meta-analysis of the influence of outside directors. Journal of Managerial Issues, 12(1), 76–91.
- Richardson, R. J. (1987). Directorship interlocks and corporate profitability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(3), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392910
- Rivas, J. L., Salvaj, E., & Cordova, M. (2023). Family vs non family networks: Chile, Mexico and Peru. Management Research: The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 21(3), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-12-2022-1369
- Sapinski, J. P., & Carroll, W. K. (2018). Interlocking directorates and corporate networks. In Handbook of the International Political Economy of the Corporation (pp. 45–60). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/edcoll/9781785362521/9781785362521.00009.xml
- Scott, J. (1991). Networks of corporate power: A comparative assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 181–203.
- Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the Grass Roots; A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. University of California Press.
- Shaw, T. S., Cordeiro, J. J., & Saravanan, P. (2016). Director network resources and firm performance: Evidence from Indian corporate governance reforms. Asian Business & Management, 15(3), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-016-0003-1
- Simsek, Z., Fox, B., & Heavey, C. (2023). Systematicity in organizational research literature reviews: A framework and assessment. Organizational Research Methods, 26(2), 292–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211008652
- Singh, J. (1991). Redundancy in constructs: Problem, assessment, and an illustrative example. Journal of Business Research, 22(3), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90006-J
- Smith, M., & Sarabi, Y. (2021). “What do interlocks do” revisited – a bibliometric analysis. Management Research Review, 44(4), 642–659. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2020-0258
- Stokman, F. N., Van Der Knoop, J., & Wasseur, F. W. (1988). Interlocks in the Netherlands: Stability and careers in the period 1960–1980. Social Networks, 10(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(88)90021-4
- Suddaby, R. (2010). Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.3.zok346
- Urry, J. (2004). Small worlds and the new ‘Social Physics. Global Networks, 4(2), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2004.00083.x
- Useem, M. (1984). The Inner Circle. Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the US and UK. Oxford University Press.
- Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35–67.
- Valeeva, D., Heemskerk, E. M., & Takes, F. W. (2020). The duality of firms and directors in board interlock networks: A relational event modeling approach. Social Networks, 62, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2020.02.009
- Watkins-Fassler, K., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., Fernández-Pérez, V., & Briano-Turrent, G. D. C. (2023). Interlocking directorates and family firm performance: An emerging market’s perspective. Journal of Family Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-02-2023-0018
- Yang, C., Chen, X., & Chen, X. (2021). Vertical interlock and stock price crash risk. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 68, 101387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101387
- Yoshikawa, T., Zhu, H., & Wang, P. (2014). National governance system, corporate ownership, and roles of outside directors: A corporate governance bundle perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(3), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12050
- Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. (2008). Corporate governance in emerging economies: a review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 196–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00752.x
- Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–334.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/connections-2026-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2816-4245 (formerly 0226-1766) | Journal ISSN: 0226-1766
Language: English
Page range: 39 - 68
Submitted on: Jan 18, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 7, 2026
Published on: Oct 5, 2026
Published by: International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Related subjects:
© 2026 Majsa Stina Grosen, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.