Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Coagulant Cost Optimization for Surface Water Coagulation Process Cover

Coagulant Cost Optimization for Surface Water Coagulation Process

Open Access
|Apr 2019

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Ranges and average turbidity reduction efficiency
Ranges and average turbidity reduction efficiency

Figure 2.

Ranges and average DOC removal efficiency
Ranges and average DOC removal efficiency

Figure 3.

Relationship between UV254 removal effectiveness and DOC removal
Relationship between UV254 removal effectiveness and DOC removal

Figure 4.

Unit organic substance removal efficiency in the second stage of the study (doses test I: 1.8; 2.3; 2.7; 3.0; 3.5; 4.5 g Al/m3; test II: 2.5; 3.0; 3.3; 3.6; 3.9; 4.5 g Al/m3)
Unit organic substance removal efficiency in the second stage of the study (doses test I: 1.8; 2.3; 2.7; 3.0; 3.5; 4.5 g Al/m3; test II: 2.5; 3.0; 3.3; 3.6; 3.9; 4.5 g Al/m3)

Water parameter ranges before and after coagulation

Temp. °C*** pHAlkalinity, val/m3 Tr, NTUC, g Pt/m3 UV 254, m-1 DOC, g C/m3 SUVA254, m2/g C
 T ITIIT ITIIT ITIIT ITIIT ITIIT ITIIT ITIIT ITII
RW* 9128.097.833.1435.148.98.98.29.498.93.94.72.431.89
I Stage
C117.5-18.813.8-14.77.74-8.067.24-7.502.69-3.042.63-2.940.79-3.451.4-7.55.1-7.94.4-6.65.58-8.065.84-7.862.74-3.584.28-4.482.04-2.271.36-1.76
C215.2-16.014.1-14.87.98-8.107.68-7.753.00-3.022.92-2.952.09-4.483.0-8.55.8-7.83.8-6.15.82-7.954.71-7.202.53-3.283.53-4.581.97-2.541.33-1.57
C315.9-16.514.3-14.77.45-8.097.33-7.552.91-3.002.67-2.951.30-4.551.4-7.75.0-7.73.3-6.16.25-8.405.31-7.512.70-3.443.81-4.622.17-2.581.39-1.62
C413.6-16.113.3-14.07.38-7.917.15-7.522.87-3.062.47-2.931.07-6.102.3-9.84.6-6.33.7-6.15.62-7.955.47-7.662.70-3.444.34-4.612.08-2.311.26-1.63
C514.8-15.513.0-13.47.86-8.167.48-7.642.87-3.061.79-2.960.92-3.862.9-8.74.6-8.44.3-6.35.67-8.755.74-7.652.96-4.064.21-4.861.91-2.311.36-1.61
C614.4-15.312.2-13.48.12-8.217.61-7.782.93-3.052.88-2.970.81-2.523.1-6.94.9-8.44.1-6.76.01-8.645.17-7.632.74-5.883.75-4.561.03-2.591.38-1.67
C715.2-16.212.4-12.88.11-8.258.00-8.093.08-3.022.88-2.950.88-3.501.3-6.65.0-8.14.6-7.45.49-8.165.50-8.073.10-3.993.29-4.202.03-2.511.67-1.92
C811.3-13.213.8-14.87.84-8.257.93-8.002.94-3.032.92-2.981.96-3.314.4-9.06.4-8.75.0-7.76.23-8.495.83-8.353.10-3.993.71-4.351.93-2.171.56-1.92
C914.0-15.512.3-12.48.12-8.228.04-8.172.91-3.092.86-3.000.63-4.040.6-7.65.2-8.14.0-8.05.68-7.965.23-8.022.75-3.603.56-4.281.91-2.221.42-1.87
C1010.1-11.511.3-11.68.11-8.228.06-8.172.93-3.142.88-2.942.24-3.443.8-7.95.4-7.24.7-7.15.68-7.635.50-7.862.97-3.613.59-4.421.91-2.111.53-1.82
II Stage
C1**11.6-12.8-7.71-7.76-2.81-3.00-0.67-1.99-6.0-7.9-6.64-7.95-3.08-3.72-2.14-2.35-
C211.2-14.414.0-15.78.00-8.147.67-7.783.02-3.102.74-2.850.87-2.571.1-3.85.5-6.95.6-6.46.10-6.926.65-7.402.96-3.274.00-4.332.06-2.281.63-1.73
C310.6-12.615.9-16.17.87-7.977.47-7.622.81-2.982.53-2.680.52-1.960.9-4.05.0-7.75.2-6.46.19-7.936.22-7.432.91-3.403.81-4.332.13-2.411.54-1.72
C412.5-13.516.6-17.47.45-7.787.94-8.022.58-2.912.90-2.930.90-2.081.9-5.04.8-5.45.8-6.56.12-6.756.29-7.012.96-3.183.86-4.162.07-2.221.61-1.71
C9-13.5-14.7-7.89-8.03-2.92-2.99-2.0-5.1-4.9-6.4-5.83-7.00-3.74-4.13-1.56-1.70

Comparison of effectiveness and coagulation process cost for chosen coagulants (at optimal dosages; red color marks greatest values)

coagulantC, %/g Al/m3 DOC, %/g Al/m3 UV254, %/gAl,m3 M, %/g Al/m3 Cost, PLN/ 1000m3
 T IT IIT IT IIT IT IIT IT IIT IT II
C19.0-3.2-7.3-29.2-21.00-
C217.38.28.74.714.18.135.729.139.9850.01
C38.08.14.43.06.56.323.529.239.9940.10
C414.28.87.43.59.76.823.524.629.89* 40.07
C9-7.5-4.0-7.6-26.5-121.00

Characteristics of used coagulants

CoagulantAluminum(Al+3) %Chlorides (Cl-)Alkalinity* pHDensity, 20°CPriceAdditives
 %%%-g/dm3 PLN/kgAl-
C1; PAX168.2 ±0.219 ±2.037 ±51.013308.65
C2; PAX XL19H12.5 ±0.38.5 ±185 ±53.5134015.20
C3; PAX XL35.3 ±0.313.0 ±270 ±52.5121014.28Na+ ions
C4; ALS4.2 ±0.2--2.4131010.86
C5; PAX XL105.0 ±0.211.5 ±170 ±102.51220 Na+, SO42-
C6; PAX 19F8.5 ±0.35.5 ±0.585 ±54.01220 Al./Cl min. 1.6
C7; PAX 191010.5 ±0.56.0 ±0.585 ±54.01280  
C8; FLOKOR 1,2A12.0 ±0.56.5 ±0.585 ±54.21290 
C9;FLOKOR 1ASW9.0 ±0.55.0 ±0.585 ±53.8122037.80SO42-:0.8 0.5%
C10; FLOKOR 1.5A9.0 ±0.55.5 ±0.575 ±54.21200  

Ranges of unit effectivenesses

ParameterUnitFirst testSecond test
  C1C2C3C4C2C3C4C9
C%/gAl/m3 6.6-10.810.1-17.87.0-11.811.0-17.87.2-8.87.0-8.88.2-9.26.6-8.7
Tr%/gAl/m3 25.4-31.914.6-43.922.4-25.813.3-30.520.0-35.819.7-36.919.9-34.819.6-34.7
DOC%/gAl/m3 2.4-6.16.7-8.74.4-6.65.3-8.23.7-4.92.4-4.12.8-4.24.0-4.6
UV254 %/gAl/m3 5.4-8.89.8-15.36.1-8.77.9-11.97.2-8.65.7-6.86.5-7.16.6-8.6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2018-048 | Journal eISSN: 2720-6947 | Journal ISSN: 1899-0142
Language: English
Page range: 153 - 161
Submitted on: Jul 15, 2017
|
Accepted on: Jun 27, 2018
|
Published on: Apr 4, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Małgorzata WOLSKA, Marek MOŁCZAN, Anna SOLIPIWKO-PIEŚCIK, Halina URBAŃSKA-KOZŁOWSKA, published by Silesian University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.