Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Understanding the Impact of Product Characteristics on Groups’ Collaboration During a Dissection Task Cover

Understanding the Impact of Product Characteristics on Groups’ Collaboration During a Dissection Task

Open Access
|Aug 2023

References

  1. Agogino, A. M., Sheppard, S., & Oladipupo, A. (1992). Making connections to engineering during the first two years. In Frontiers in Education, Twenty-Second Annual Conference, Nashville, TN. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.1992.683462
  2. Anderson, A., Kollmann, E.K., Beyer, M., Weitzman, O., Bequette, M., Haupt, G., & Velazquez, H. (2021). Design strategies for hands-on activities to increase interest, relevance, and self-efficacy in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(6), 18411851. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00193
  3. Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 403436. DOI: 10.1207/S15327809JLS0904_2
  4. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307359. DOI: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
  5. Barron, B., Martin, C. K., Mercier, E., Pea, R., Steinbock, D., Walter, S., Herrenkohl, L., Mertl, V., & Tyson, K. (2009). Repertoires of collaborative practice. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning – CSCL’09, 2527. DOI: 10.3115/1599503.1599513
  6. Borge, M., & White, B. (2016). Toward the development of socio-metacognitive expertise: An approach to developing collaborative competence. Cognition and Instruction, 34(4), 323360. DOI: 10.1080/07370008.2016.1215722
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Brereton, M. F., Cannon, D. M., Mabogunje, A., & Leifer, L. J. (1996). Collaboration in design teams: How social interaction shapes the product. Analyzing Design Activity, 319341. https://dokumen.tips/documents/brereton-1996-collaboration-in-design-teams-how-social-interact-crop.html?page=1
  9. Calderon, M. (2010). The design research methodology as a framework for the development of a tool for engineering design education. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education. https://www.designsociety.org/publication/30186/The+Design+Research+Methodology+as+a+Framework+for+the+Development+of+a+Tool+for+Engineering+Design+Education
  10. CATME Smarter Teamwork. (2021). https://www.catme.org/login/index
  11. Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L.S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(39), 1925119257. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1821936116
  12. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (189211). London: Pergamon. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32231168_The_evolution_of_research_on_collaborative_learning
  13. Douglas, E. P., Koro-Ljungberg, M., McNeill, N. J., Malcolm, Z. T., & Therriault, D. J. (2012). Moving beyond formulas and fixations: Solving open-ended engineering problems. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(6), 627651. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2012.738358
  14. Dringenberg, E., & Purzer, S. (2018). Experiences of first-year engineering students working on ill-structured problems in teams. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(3), 442467. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20220
  15. Dym, C. (1994). Teaching design to freshmen: Style and content. Journal of Engineering Education, 83(4), 303310. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1994.tb00123.x
  16. Dym, C., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103120. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
  17. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 84108415. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111
  18. Ge, X. (2001). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes on an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions (Doctoral Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University). https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/5867
  19. Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding Students’ Problem-Solving Processes in an Ill-Structured Task Using Question Prompts and Peer Interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 2138. DOI: 10.1007/BF02504515
  20. Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004). A Conceptual Framework for Scaffolding Ill-Structured Problem-Solving Processes Using Question Prompts and Peer Interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 522. DOI: 10.1007/bf02504836
  21. Hmelo-Silver, C., Chinn, C., Chan, C., & O’Donnell, A. (2013). The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203837290
  22. Hoey, B. A. (2014). A simple introduction to the practice of ethnography and guide to ethnographic fieldnotes. Marshall Digital Scholar. https://www.cedarnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Wasserfall-Intro-to-ethnography.pdf
  23. Huerta-Wong, J. E., & Schoech, R. (2010). Experiential learning and learning environments: The case of active listening skills. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(1), 85102. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/70377/. DOI: 10.5175/JSWE.2010.200800105
  24. Hung, W. (2013). Team-based complex problem solving: A collective cognition perspective. Educational Technology Research & Development, 61(3), 365384. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-013-9296-3
  25. Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 2539. DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2012.748006
  26. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 6594. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30220169. DOI: 10.1007/BF02299613
  27. Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2008). All problems are not equal: implications for problem- based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(2), 628. DOI: 10.7771/1541-5015.1080
  28. Jonassen, D. H., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139151. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x
  29. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365379. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X09339057
  30. Kamp, A. (2016). Engineering education in the rapidly changing world: rethinking the vision for higher engineering education. TU Delft: The Netherlands, 61. https://pure.tudelft.nl/ws/files/10113369/Vision_engineering_education_2nd_Rev_Ed.pdf
  31. Kaendler, C., Wiedmann, M., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2015). Teacher competencies for the implementation of collaborative learning in the classroom: A framework and research review. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 505536. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-014-9288-9
  32. Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. (2007). Examining the effect of problem type in a synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(5), 439459. DOI: 10.1007/S11423-007-9045-6
  33. Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. K. (2009). Productive failure in CSCL groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 2146. DOI: 10.1007/s11412-008-9059-z
  34. Lamancusa, J., Torres, M., & Kumar, V. (1996). Learning engineering by product dissection. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. The American Society for Engineering Education. https://peer.asee.org/learning-engineering-by-product-dissection
  35. Leake, J., & Borgerson, J. (2008). Engineering design graphics: Sketching, modeling, and visualization. 2nd ed., Wiley.
  36. Ma, J., Tucker, C. S., Okudan Kremer, G. E., & Jackson, K. L. (2017). Exposure to digital and hands-on delivery modes in engineering design education and their impact on task completion efficiency. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 21(2), 6178. DOI: 10.3233/jid-2016-0021
  37. Meneske, M., Purzer, S., & Heo, D. (2019). An investigation of verbal episodes that relate to individual and team performance in engineering student teams. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 7. DOI: 10.1186/s40594-019-0160-9
  38. Mercier, E. M., & Higgins, S. E. (2013). Collaborative learning with multi-touch technology: Developing adaptive expertise. Learning and Instruction, 25, 1323. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1003564. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.004
  39. Mercier, E. M., & Higgins, S. E. (2014). Creating joint representations of collaborative problem solving with multi-touch technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(6), 497510. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12052
  40. Michael, J., Booth, J., & Doyle, T. E. (2012). Importance of first-year engineering design projects to self-efficacy: Do first-year students feel like engineers? Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference. DOI: 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.4650
  41. Nokes-Malach, T. J., Richey, J. E., & Gadgil, S. (2015). When is it better to learn together? Insights from research on collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 645656. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-015-9312-8
  42. Ragonese, A. M., & Starkey, E. M. (2020). Implementing product dissections in virtual classrooms. At home with Engineering Education: The 127th ASEE Annual Conference. Virtual: The American Society for Engineering Education. https://strategy.asee.org/implementing-product-dissection-in-virtual-classrooms
  43. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 235276. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls0203_1
  44. Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201241. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25473478. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1402_2
  45. Schön, D. A. (1990). The design process. In V.A. Howard (Ed.), Varieties of thinking: Essays from Harvard’s philosophy of education center (110141). New York: Routledge.
  46. Schwartz, D. L. (1998). The Productive Agency that Drives Collaborative Learning. New York: Elsevier Science/Permagon.
  47. Sheppard, S. D. (1992). Mechanical dissection: An experience in how things work. Proceedings of the Engineering Education Conference: Curriculum Innovation & Integration, 18. http://www-cdr.stanford.edu/images/Dissection/dissphil.pdf
  48. Simon, H. A., & Newell, A. (1971). Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970. American Psychologist, 26(2), 145. DOI: 10.1037/h0030806
  49. Slavin, R. E. (2009). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
  50. Smith, K. A. (1995). Cooperative learning: effective teamwork for engineering classrooms. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, 1, 208213. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.1995.483059
  51. Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 3.161.13.161.2. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--6987
  52. Tucker, T. (2021). Work in progress: Exploring the nature of students’ collaborative interactions in a hands-on, ill-structured engineering design task. [Technical Session]. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://strategy.asee.org/work-in-progress-exploring-the-nature-of-students-collaborative-interactions-in-a-hands-on-ill-structured-engineering-design-task
  53. Tucker, T., Shehab, S., & Mercier, E. (2020). The impact of scaffolding prompts on the collaborative problem solving of ill-structured tasks by undergraduate engineering student groups [Technical Session]. 2020 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (Virtual Conference). https://peer.asee.org/the-impact-of-scaffolding-prompts-on-the-collaborative-problem-solving-of-ill-structured-tasks-by-undergraduate-engineering-student-groups
  54. Tucker, T., Shehab, S., & Mercier, E. (2021). The impact of scaffolding prompts on students’ cognitive interactions during collaborative problem solving of ill-structured tasks. [Technical Session]. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://peer.asee.org/the-impact-of-scaffolding-prompts-on-students-cognitive-interactions-during-collaborative-problem-solving-of-ill-structured-engineering-tasks
  55. Tucker, T., Shehab, S., Mercier, E., & Silva, M. (2019). WIP: Evidence-based analysis of the design of collaborative problem-solving engineering tasks. [Poster Session]. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://monolith.asee.org/public/conferences/140/papers/25919/view. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--32366
  56. Wankat, P. C., & Oreovicz, F. S. (Eds.). (2015). Teaching engineering. Purdue University Press.
  57. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.98 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 21
Submitted on: May 20, 2022
Accepted on: Jul 4, 2023
Published on: Aug 4, 2023
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Taylor Tucker, Molly Hathaway Goldstein, Emma Mercier, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.