Theorizing Engineering Judgment at the Intersection of Decision-Making and Identity
References
- ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. (2018). 2019–2020 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. A. E. A. Commission.
https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/ - Allie, S., Armien, M. N., Burgoyne, N., Case, J. M., Collier-Reed, B. I., Craig, T. S., Deacon, A., Fraser, D. M., Geyer, Z., Jacobs, C., Jawitz, J., Kloot, B., Kotta, L., Langdon, G., le Roux, K., Marshall, D., Mogashana, D., Shaw, C., Sheridan, G., & Wolmarans, N. (2009). Learning as acquiring a discursive identity through participation in a community: improving student learning in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 359–367. DOI: 10.1080/03043790902989457
- Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosberg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007, October). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359–379. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.x
- Barner, M. S., Brown, S. A., & Linton, D. (2021). Structural engineering heuristics in an engineering workplace and academic environments. Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 147(2), 04020014. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000029
- Baybutt, P. (2018). The validity of engineering judgment and expert opinion in hazard and risk analysis: The influence of cognitive biases. Process Safety Progress, 37(2), 205–210. DOI: 10.1002/prs.11906
- Berkenkotter, C. (1984). Student writers and their sense of authority over texts. College Composition and Communication, 35(3), 312–319.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40171130 . DOI: 10.2307/357459 - Bornasal, F., Brown, S., Perova-Mello, N., & Beddoes, K. (2018). Conceptual growth in engineering practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(2), 318–348. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20196
- Bruhl, J. C., Klosky, J. L., Mainwaring, T., & Hanus, J. P. (2017). Accelerating the development of engineering judgment in students through inquiry-based learning activities. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
http://peer.asee.org/27532 . DOI: 10.18260/1-2--27532 - Bucciarelli, L. L. (2001).
Design knowing and learning: A socially mediated activity . In W. C. Newstetter, C. Eastman & M. McCraken (Eds.), Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education (pp. 297–313). Elsevier Science Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/B978-008043868-9/50013-9 - Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 1–24. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2010.545065
- Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee. (2019). Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge: Preparing the Future Civil Engineer (3rd ed.). American Society of Civil Engineers. DOI: 10.1061/9780784415221
- Cristancho, S., Lingard, L., Forbes, T., Ott, M., & Novick, R. (2017). Putting the puzzle together: The role of ‘problem definition’ in complex clinical judgement. Medical Education, 51(2), 207–214. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13210
- Cunningham, P., Matusovich, H. M., Hunter, D.-A., Williams, S. A., & Bhaduri, M. S. (2017). Beginning to understand student indicators of metacognition. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.
https://peer.asee.org/27820 . DOI: 10.18260/1-2--27820 - Cunningham, P. J., Matusovich, H. M., Venters, C., Williams, S. A., & Bhaduri, S. (2018). The impact of metacognitive instruction on students’ conceptions of learning and their self-monitoring behaviors. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.
https://peer.asee.org/29999 . DOI: 10.18260/1-2--29999 - Davis, D. C., Beyerlein, S. W., & Davis, I. T. (2005). Development and use of an engineer profile. 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Portland, OR.
https://peer.asee.org/14201 . DOI: 10.18260/1-2--14201 - Davis, M. (2012). A plea for judgment. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(4), 789–808. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9254-6
- Dombrowski, P. (1992). Challenger and the social contingency of meaning: Two lessons for the technical communication classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1(1), 73–85. DOI: 10.1080/10572259209359507
- Ekoniak, M. R. (2018). Practice and efficacy of peer writing feedback in a large first-year engineering course. [Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Tech]. Blacksburg, VA.
http://hdl.handle.net/10919/95551 . DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2018.8659050 - Ford, J., Paretti, M., Kotys-Schwartz, D., Howe, S., & Ott, R. (2021). New Engineers’ Transfer of Communication Activities From School to Work. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 64(2), 105–120. DOI: 10.1109/TPC.2021.3065854
- Francis, R., Riedner, R., & Paretti, M. C. (2021). A thematic analysis of the intersection of engineering judgment and student writing practices. 2021 Research in Engineering Education Symposium.
https://aaee.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/REES_AAEE_2021_paper_303.pdf - Francis, R. A., Paretti, M. C., & Riedner, R. (2022). The WRI2TES Project: Writing Research Initiating Identity Transformation in Engineering Students. 2022 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.
https://strategy.asee.org/42002 - Francis, R. A., Riedner, R. C., & Paretti, M. C. (2021). A dramaturgical exploration of engineering judgment processes in undergraduate student writing. 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. DOI: 10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637349
- Gainsburg, J. (2006). The mathematical modeling of structural engineers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(1), 3–36. DOI: 10.1207/s15327833mtl0801_2
- Gainsburg, J. (2013). Learning to model in engineering. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(4), 259–290. DOI: 10.1080/10986065.2013.830947
- Gainsburg, J., & Gainsburg, J. (2007). The mathematical disposition of structural engineers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 477–506.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/30034962 - Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99–125. DOI: 10.2307/1167322
- Gewirtz, C. (2021). Twelve Tales of Engineering in the “Real World:” Narratives of Newcomers’ Agency in Transitions to Engineering Work [Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Tech]. Blacksburg, VA.
http://hdl.handle.net/10919/104897 - Gewirtz, C., & Paretti, M. C. (2021). Becoming after College: Agency and Structure in Transitions to Engineering Work. Engineering Studies, 13(2), 111–131. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2021.1959597
- Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., & Lock, R. (2016). Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 312–340. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20118
- Goncher, A., & Johri, A. (2015). Contextual constraining of student design practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 104, 252–278. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20079
- Gonzalez, C. (2017).
Decision-making: A cognitive science perspective . In E. F. C. Susan (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199842193.013.6 - Herndl, C. G., Fennell, B., & Miller, C. (1991).
Understanding failures in organizational discourse: The accident at three mile island and the shuttle Challenger disaster . In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual Dynamics of the Professions (pp. 279–305). University of Wisconsin Press. - Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48–94. DOI: 10.1080/07370000701798495
- Holland, D., Lachicotte, W. J., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Harvard University Press.
- House, R. A., Layton, R., Livingston, J., & Moseley, S. (2014). Engineering ethos in environmental public policy deliberation. 2014 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference. DOI: 10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020384
- Jesiek, B. K., Buswell, N. T., & Nittala, S. (2021). Performing at the boundaries: Narratives of early career engineering practice. Engineering Studies, 13(2), 86–110. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2021.1959596
- Jesiek, B. K., Woo, S. E., Parrigon, S., & Porter, C. M. (2020). Development of a situational judgment test for global engineering competency. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 470–490. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20325
- Johnson-Glauch, N., Choi, D. S., & Herman, G. (2020). How engineering students use domain knowledge when problem-solving using different visual representations. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 443–469. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20348
- Johri, A., Olds, B. M., & O’Connor, K. (2014).
Situative frameworks for engineering learning research . In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 47–66). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.006 - Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139–151. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x
- Jonassen, D. H. (2014).
Engineers as problem solvers . In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.009 - Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1914185 . DOI: 10.2307/1914185 - Klein, G. (2008). Naturalistic decision-making. Human Factors, 50(3), 456–460. DOI: 10.1518/001872008X288385
- Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The “academic literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 368–377. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11
- Litzinger, T. A., Lattuca, L. R., Hadgraft, R. G., Newstetter, W. C., Alley, M., Atman, C., DiBiasio, D., Finelli, C., Diefes-Dux, H., Kolmos, A., Riley, D., Sheppard, S., Weimer, M., & Yasuhara, K. (2011). Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123–150. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00006.x
- Lord, S. M., & Chen, J. C. (2014).
Curriculum Design in the Middle Years . In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 181–200). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.014 - Lynch, W. T., & Kline, R. (2000). Engineering practice and engineering ethics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(2), 195–225. DOI: 10.1177/016224390002500203
- MacRobert, C. J. (2018). Introducing engineering judgment through active learning. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 144(4), 05018009-05018001-05018009-05018010. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000382
- Magana, A. J., Fennell, H. W., Vieira, C., & Falk, M. L. (2019). Characterizing the interplay of cognitive and metacognitive knowledge in computational modeling and simulation practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(2), 276–303. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20264
- McCall, C., Shew, A., Simmons, D. R., Paretti, M. C., & McNair, L. D. (2020). Exploring student disability and professional identity: navigating sociocultural expectations in U.S. undergraduate civil engineering programs. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 79–89. DOI: 10.1080/22054952.2020.1720434
- McCord, R. E., & Matusovich, H. M. (2019). Naturalistic observations of metacognition in engineering: Using observational methods to study metacognitive engagement in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(4), 481–502. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20291
- McGee, E. O., & Martin, D. B. (2011). ‘You would not believe what I have to go through to prove my intellectual value!’ Stereotype management among academically successful black mathematics and engineering students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 1347–1389. DOI: 10.3102/0002831211423972
- McKenna, A. F. (2014).
Chapter 12 – Adaptive expertise and knowledge fluency in design and innovation . In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 227–242). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.016 - McLaughlin, D. (2021).
Engineering, judgment and engineering judgment: A proposed definition . In Z. Pirtle, D. Tomblin & G. Madhavan (Eds.), Engineering and Philosophy: Reimagining Technology and Social Progress (pp. 199–217). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70099-7_10 - Montfort, D., Brown, S., & Pollock, D. (2009). An investigation of students’ conceptual understanding in related sophomore to graduate-level engineering and mechanics courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(2), 111–129. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01011.x
- Mosier, K., Fischer, U., Hoffman, R. R., & Klein, G. (2018).
Expert professional judgments and “naturalistic decision-making” . In A. M. Williams, A. Kozbelt, K. A. Ericsson & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (2 ed., pp. 453–475). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316480748.025 - National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/10999
- Paretti, M., Kotys-Schwartz, D., Ford, J., Howe, S., & Ott, R. (2020). Leveraging the capstone design experience to build self-directed learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(2), 664–674.
https://www.ijee.ie/1atestissues/Vol36-2/14_ijee3903.pdf - Paretti, M. C. (2006). Audience awareness: Leveraging problem-based learning to teach workplace communication practices. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49(2), 189–198. DOI: 10.1109/TPC.2006.875083
- Paretti, M. C., & McNair, L. D. (2012). Analyzing the intersections of institutional and discourse identities in engineering work at the local level. Engineering Studies, 4(1), 55–78. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2011.652120
- Pembridge, J. J., & Paretti, M. C. (2019). Characterizing capstone design teaching: A functional taxonomy. Journal of Engineering Education, 108, 197–219. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20259
- Riley, D. (2008). Engineering and social justice: Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, and Society. Morgan & Claypool. DOI: 10.2200/S00117ED1V01Y200805ETS007
- Riley, D., Slaton, A., & Pawley, A. L. (2014).
Social justice and inclusion: Women and minorities in engineering . In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 335–356). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.022 - Ross, M. S., Huff, J. L., & Godwin, A. (2021). Resilient engineering identity development critical to prolonged engagement of Black women in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 110, 92–113. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20374
- Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Stevens, R., Johri, A., & O’Connor, K. (2014).
Professional engineering work . In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 119–137). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451 - Streveler, R. A., Brown, S., Herman, G. L., & Montfort, D. (2014).
Conceptual change and misconceptions in engineering education: Curriculum, measurement, and theory-focused approaches . In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 83–102). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.008 - Streveler, R. A., Litzinger, T. A., Miller, R. L., & Steif, P. S. (2008). Learning conceptual knowledge in the engineering sciences: Overview and future research directions. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 279–294. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00979.x
- Strimel, G. J., Bartholomew, S. R., Purzer, S., Zhang, L., & Ruesch, E. Y. (2021). Informing engineering design through adaptive comparative judgment. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(2), 227–246. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2020.1718614
- Svihla, V., Peele-Eady, T., & Gallup, A. (2021). Exploring agency in capstone design problem framing. Studies in Engineering Education, 2(2), 96–119. DOI: 10.21061/see.69
- Swenson, J. E., Johnson, A. W., Chambers, T. G., & Hirshfield, L. (2019). Exhibiting productive beginnings of engineering judgment during open-ended modeling problems in an introductory mechanics of materials course. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida.
https://strategy.asee.org/32786 . DOI: 10.18260/1-2--32786 - Ternes, M. E. (2019). Legal liability, good engineering judgment and adaptation. Process Safety Progress, 38(3), e12083. DOI: 10.1002/prs.12083
- Tonso, K. L. (2006a). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 273–307. DOI: 10.1007/s11422-005-9009-2
- Tonso, K. L. (2006b). Teams that work: Campus culture, engineer identity, and social interactions. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 25–37. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00875.x
- Tonso, K. L. (2007). On the outskirts of engineering: Learning identity, gender, and power via engineering practice. Sense Publishers. DOI: 10.1163/9789087903534
- Trevelyan, J. (2010). Reconstructing engineering from practice. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 175–195. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2010.520135
- Trevelyan, J. (2014a). The making of an expert engineer. CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/b17434
- Trevelyan, J. (2014b).
Towards a theoretical framework for engineering practice . In B. Williams, J. Figueiredo & J. Trevelyan (Eds.), Engineering practice in a global context: Understanding the technical and the social (pp. 33–60). CRC Press/Balkema. DOI: 10.1201/b15792 - Trevelyan, J., & Williams, B. (2018). Value creation in the engineering enterprise: An educational perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–23. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1421905
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. DOI: 10.1126/science.7455683
- Vick, S. G. (2002). Degrees of belief: subjective probability and engineering judgment. ASCE Press, Reston, VA.
- Weedon, J. S. (2016). Judging for themselves: How students practice engineering judgment. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. DOI: 10.18260/p.25509
- Weedon, J. S. (2017). Putting engineering judgment in conversation with engineering communication. 2017 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference. DOI: 10.1109/IPCC.2017.8013977
- Weedon, S. (2019). The role of rhetoric in engineering judgment. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 62(2), 165–177. DOI: 10.1109/TPC.2019.2900824
- Wilde, R. J., & Guile, D. (2021). Client-facing interprofessional project teams: The role of engineers’ “situated judgment”. Engineering Studies, 13(3), 185–204. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2021.2005073
- Williams, B., & Figueiredo, J. (2014).
Finding workable solutions: Portuguese engineering experience . In B. Williams, J. Figueiredo & J. Trevelyan (Eds.), Engineering Practice in a Global Context: Understanding the Technical and the Social (pp. 159–184). CRC Press/Balkema. DOI: 10.1201/b15792 - Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. Columbia University Press.
- Winsor, D. A. (1988). Communication failures contributing to the Challenger accident: An example for technical communicators. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 31(3), 101–108. DOI: 10.1109/47.7814
- Winsor, D. A. (1990). The construction of knowledge in organizations: Asking the right questions about the Challenger. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 4(2), 7–20. DOI: 10.1177/105065199000400201
- Yang, D., Streveler, R., Miller, R. L., Senocak, I., & Slotta, J. (2020). Using schema training to facilitate students’ understanding of challenging engineering concepts in heat transfer and thermodynamics. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(4), 743–759. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20360
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.90 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 79 - 98
Submitted on: Mar 15, 2022
Accepted on: Sep 28, 2022
Published on: Nov 14, 2022
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2022 Royce A. Francis, Marie C. Paretti, Rachel Riedner, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.