Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
“Not an Engineer Yet”: Manifestations of Liminal Engineering Identities Cover

“Not an Engineer Yet”: Manifestations of Liminal Engineering Identities

Open Access
|Nov 2023

References

  1. Baillie, C., & Male, S. A. (2019). Assisting engineering students along a liminal pathway and assessing their progress. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 24(1), 2534. DOI: 10.1080/22054952.2018.1562320
  2. Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 5073. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20269
  3. Beech, N. (2011). Liminality and the practices of identity reconstruction. Human Relations, 64(2), 285302. DOI: 10.1177/0018726710371235
  4. Bennett, D., & Male, S. A. (2017). An Australian study of possible selves perceived by undergraduate engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 603617. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2016.1208149
  5. Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: 10.4135/9781848607941
  6. Burke, P. J. (2003). Relationships among multiple identities. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, & P. A. Thoits (Eds.) Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 195214). Springer, Boston, MA. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9188-1_14
  7. Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 11871218. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20237
  8. Case, J., & Light, G. (2014). Framing qualitative methods in engineering education research: Established and emerging methodologies. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 535549). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.034
  9. Cech, E., Rubineau, B., Silbey, S., & Seron, C. (2011). Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering. American Sociological Review, 76(5), 641666. DOI: 10.1177/0003122411420815
  10. Chachra, D., Kilgore, D., Loshbaugh, H., McCain, J., & Chen, H. (2008). Being and becoming: Gender and identity formation of engineering students. 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Pittsburgh, PA. https://peer.asee.org/being-and-becoming-gender-and-identity-formation-of-engineering-students
  11. Choe, N. H., Martins, L. L., Borrego, M., & Kendall, M. R. (2019). Professional aspects of engineering: Improving prediction of undergraduates’ engineering identity. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 145(3), 04019006. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000413
  12. Claussen, S., Blacklock, J., Boll, A., Tsai, J. Y., & Johnson, K. (2019). Pain and gain: Barriers and opportunities for integrating sociotechnical thinking into diverse engineering courses. 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Tampa, FL. https://peer.asee.org/33151. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--33151
  13. Claussen, S., Tsai, J. Y., Johnson, K., Blacklock, J., & Leydens, J. A. (2021). Exploring the nexus between student’s perceptions of sociotechnical thinking and construction of their engineering identities. 2021 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, July 26–29. Long Beach, CA. [virtual conference]. https://peer.asee.org/37155
  14. Cottom, T. M. (2019). Thick: And other essays. The New Press. https://thenewpress.com/books/thick
  15. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241. DOI: 10.2307/1229039
  16. Dutta, D. (2015). Sustaining the pipeline: Experiences of international female engineers in U.S. graduate programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(3), 326344. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20077
  17. Dutta, D. (2016). Negotiations of cultural identities by Indian women engineering students in US engineering programmes. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 45(3), 177195. DOI: 10.1080/17475759.2016.1165727
  18. Erickson, J. D., Claussen, S., Leydens, J. A., Johnson, K., and Tsai, J. Y. (2020). Real-world examples and sociotechnical integration: What’s the connection? 2020 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Montreal, Quebec, Canada [virtual conference]. https://peer.asee.org/35120
  19. Felder, R. (2014). Why are you teaching that? Chemical Engineering Education, 48(3), 131132. https://cee.che.ufl.edu/
  20. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2016). Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide (1st edition). Jossey-Bass. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Teaching+and+Learning+STEM:+A+Practical+Guide-p-9781118925812
  21. Field, J., & Morgan-Klein, N. (2010, July). Studenthood and identification: Higher education as a liminal transitional space. 2010 40th Annual SCUTREA Conference. http://dspace.stir.ac.uk/handle/1893/3221
  22. Foor, C. E., Walden, S. E., & Trytten, D. A. (2007). “I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group:” Achieving individual diversity. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(2), 103115. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00921.x
  23. Friedensen, R. E., Rodriguez, S., & Doran, E. (2020). The making of ‘ideal’ electrical and computer engineers: A departmental document analysis. Engineering Studies, 12(2), 104126. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2020.1795182
  24. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter. DOI: 10.4324/9780203793206
  25. Godwin, A. (2016). The development of a measure of engineering identity. 2016 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. https://peer.asee.org/26122. DOI: 10.18260/p.26122
  26. Godwin, A., & Kirn, A. (2020). Identity-based motivation: Connections between first-year students’ engineering role identities and future-time perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 362383. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20324
  27. Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., & Lock, R. (2013). Understanding engineering identity through structural equation modeling. 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 5056. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2013.6684787
  28. Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. State University of New York Press. https://sunypress.edu/Books/D/Doing-Qualitative-Research-in-Education-Settings2
  29. Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 9781003. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20363
  30. Hughes, B. E., Schell, W. J., Annand, E., Beigel, R., Kwapisz, M. B., & Tallman, B. (2019). Do I think I’m an engineer? Understanding the impact of engineering identity on retention. 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition. Tampa, FL. https://peer.asee.org/32674. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--32674
  31. Johnson, K., Leydens, J. A., Walter, J. D., Boll, A. M., Claussen, S., & Moskal, B. M. (2019). Sociotechnical habits of mind: Initial survey results and their formative impact on sociotechnical teaching and learning. 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Tampa, FL. https://peer.asee.org/33275. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--33275
  32. Johnston, M. P. (2014). Secondary data analysis: A method of which the time has come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 3, 619626. http://www.qqml.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/169
  33. Jonassen, D. H. (2014). Engineers as problem solvers. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 103118). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.009
  34. Kabo, J., & Baillie, C. (2010). Engineering and social justice: Negotiating the spectrum of liminality. In Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning (pp. 303315). Brill. DOI: 10.1163/9789460912078_019
  35. Kendall, M., Procter, L., & Patrick, A. (2019a). Assessing methods for developing an engineering identity in the classroom. 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 32114. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--32114
  36. Kendall, M. R., Denton, M., Choe, N. H., Procter, L. M., & Borrego, M. (2019b). Factors influencing engineering identity development of Latinx students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(3), 173180. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2019.2909857
  37. Kendall, M. R., & Joslyn, C. (2021). Navigating and reconciling identity interference and values conflicts associated with our engineering identities: A conceptual framework. 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 15. DOI: 10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637472
  38. Kirn, A., & Benson, L. (2018). Engineering students’ perceptions of problem solving and their future. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(1), 87112. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20190
  39. Kirn, A., Faber, C. J., & Benson, L. (2014). Engineering students’ perceptions of the future: Implications for student performance. 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Indianapolis, Indiana. https://peer.asee.org/20398. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--20398
  40. Leydens, J. A., Johnson, K., Claussen, S., Blacklock, J., Moskal, B. M., & Cordova, O. (2018). Measuring change over time in sociotechnical thinking: A survey/validation model for sociotechnical habits of mind. 2018 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Salt Lake City, UT. https://peer.asee.org/30794. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--30794
  41. Leydens, J. A., Johnson, K. E., & Moskal, B. M. (2021). Engineering student perceptions of social justice in a feedback control systems course. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(3), 718749. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20412
  42. Leydens, J. A., & Lucena, J. C. (2018). Social justice is often invisible in engineering education and practice. In Engineering justice: Transforming engineering education and practice (pp. 4566). IEEE Press. DOI: 10.1002/9781118757369
  43. Loui, M. C. (2005). Ethics and the development of professional identities of engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 383390. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00866.x
  44. Lucena, J. C. (2005). Defending the nation: U.S. policymaking to create scientists and engineers from Sputnik to the “war against terrorism.” University of America Press. https://rowman.com/ISBN/9780761831563/Defending-the-Nation-U.S.-Policymaking-to-Create-Scientists-and-Engineers-from-Sputnik-to-the-War-Against-Terrorism
  45. McCartney, R., Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., Moström, J. E., Sanders, K., Thomas, L., & Zander, C. (2009). Liminal spaces and learning computing. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 383391. DOI: 10.1080/03043790902989580
  46. Morelock, J. R. (2017). A systematic literature review of engineering identity: definitions, factors, and interventions affecting development, and means of measurement. European journal of engineering education, 42(6), 12401262. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1287664
  47. Niles, S., Contreras, S., Roudbari, S., Kaminsky, J., & Harrison, J. L. (2020). Resisting and assisting engagement with public welfare in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 491507. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20323
  48. Patrick, A., Riegle-Crumb, C., & Borrego, M. (2021). Examining the gender gap in engineering professional identification. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 27(1), 3155. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2020030909
  49. Pierrakos, O., Beam, T. K., Constantz, J., Johri, A., & Anderson, R. (2009). On the development of a professional identity: Engineering persisters vs. engineering switchers. 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 16. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2009.5350571
  50. Rodriguez, S. L., Doran, E. E., Sissel, M., & Estes, N. (2022). Becoming la ingeniera: Examining the engineering identity development of undergraduate Latina students. Journal of Latinos and Education, 21(2), 181200. DOI: 10.1080/15348431.2019.1648269
  51. Rohde, J., Satterfield, D. J., Rodriguez, M., Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Benson, L., & Kirn, A. (2020). Anyone, but not everyone: Undergraduate engineering students’ claims of who can do engineering. Engineering Studies, 12(2), 82103. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2020.1795181
  52. Rossmann, D. J. S., & Armstrong, M. A. (2021). “A new way of seeing”: Engagement with women’s and gender studies fosters engineering identity formation. 2021 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. July 26–29, Long Beach, CA. [virtual conference]. https://peer.asee.org/36526. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--36526
  53. Settles, I. H. (2004). When multiple identities interfere: The role of identity centrality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 487500. DOI: 10.1177/0146167203261885
  54. Settles, I. H., O’Connor, R. C., & Yap, S. C. (2016). Climate perceptions and identity interference among undergraduate women in STEM: The protective role of gender identity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(4), 488503. DOI: 10.1177/0361684316655806
  55. Sherif, V. (2018). Evaluating preexisting qualitative research data for secondary analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(2). DOI: 10.17169/fqs-19.2.2821
  56. Spence, C. M., & Benson, L. (2020). It’s the end of the world as we know it, and I need a job: A qualitative exploration of mid-year engineering students’ future possible careers. 2020 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Montreal, Quebec, Canada [virtual conference]. https://peer.asee.org/34887
  57. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-art-of-case-study-research/book4954
  58. Stevens, R., O’Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D. M. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three-dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355368. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00984.x
  59. Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1994). Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent, overlapping, or complementary concepts? Social Psychology Quarterly, 1635. DOI: 10.2307/2786972
  60. Swartz, M., Leydens, J.A., Walter J. D. & Johnson, K. (2019). Is sociotechnical thinking important in engineering education? Survey perceptions of male and female undergraduates. 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Tampa, FL. https://peer.asee.org/33030. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--33030
  61. Tonso, K. L. (2006). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 273307. DOI: 10.1007/s11422-005-9009-2
  62. Tonso, K. L. (2014). Engineering identity. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 267282). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.019
  63. Trevelyan, J. P. (2014). The making of an expert engineer: How to have a wonderful career creating a better world and spending lots of money belonging to other people. Leiden, The Netherlands: CRC Press/Balkema. DOI: 10.1201/b17434
  64. Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Aldine Publishing Company. https://www.routledge.com/The-Ritual-Process-Structure-and-Anti-Structure/Turner-Abrahams-Harris/p/book/9780202011905
  65. Vignoles, V. L., Manzi, C., Regalia, C., Jemmolo, S., & Scabini, E. (2008). Identity motives underlying desired and feared possible future selves. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 11651200. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00518.x
  66. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity (1st edition). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.89 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 95 - 121
Submitted on: Jan 5, 2022
Accepted on: Jul 24, 2023
Published on: Nov 13, 2023
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Stephanie A. Claussen, Janet Y. Tsai, Kathryn Johnson, Jenifer Blacklock, Jon A. Leydens, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.