Student and Faculty Beliefs about Diverse Approaches to Engineering Design Decisions
References
- ABET. (2020). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2019–2020. Retrieved February 18 from
https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/#GC3 - Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. Taylor & Francis Group.
- Addis, W. (1990). Structural engineering: The nature of theory and design. Ellis Horwood Ltd.
- Agogino, A. M., Sheppard, S., & Oladipupo, A. (1992). Making connections to engineering during the first two years. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Nashville, TN.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/683462 - Ahmed, S., Wallace, K. M., & Blessing, L. T. (2003). Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1), 1–11. DOI: 10.1007/s00163-002-0023-z
- Akin, Ö., & Lin, C. (1995). Design protocol data and novel design decisions. Design Studies, 16(2), 211–236. DOI: 10.1016/0142-694X(94)00010-B
- Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359–379. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.x
- Atman, C. J., Chimka, J. R., Bursic, K. M., & Nachtmann, H. L. (1999). A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes. Design Studies, 20(2), 131–152. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00031-3
- Baird, F., Moore, C., & Jagodzinski, A. (2000). An ethnographic study of engineering design teams at Rolls-Royce Aerospace. Design Studies, 21(4), 333–355. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00006-5
- Bejerano, A. R., & Bartosh, T. M. (2015). Learning masculinity: Unmasking the hidden curriculum in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics courses. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 21(2). DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2015011359
- Bodnar, C., Dringenberg, E., Butler, B., Burkey, D., Anastasio, D., & Cooper, M. (2020). Revealing the Decision-Making Processes of Chemical Engineering Students in Process Safety Contexts. Chemical Engineering Education, 54(1), 22–30.
https://journals.flvc.org/cee/article/view/107720 - Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and quantity, 36(4), 391–409. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020909529486
- Brewer, M., Sochacka, N., & Walther, J. (2015). Into the Pipeline: A freshman student’s experiences of stories told about engineering. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. DOI: 10.18260/p.24355
- Bunniss, S., & Kelly, D. R. (2010). Research paradigms in medical education research. Medical education, 44(4), 358–366. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03611.x
- Camacho, M. M., & Lord, S. M. (2013). Latinos and the exclusionary space of engineering education. Latino Studies, 11(1), 103–112. DOI: 10.1057/lst.2012.57
- Canney, N., & Bielefeldt, A. (2015). A framework for the development of social responsibility in engineers. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1B), 414–424.
https://www.ijee.ie/contents/c310115B.html - Cech, E. A. (2013).
The (mis) framing of social justice: Why ideologies of depoliticization and meritocracy hinder engineers’ ability to think about social injustices . In J. Lucena (Ed.), Engineering Education for Social Justice (pp. 67–84). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6350-0_4 - Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(1), 42–72. DOI: 10.1177/0162243913504305
- Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
- Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998).
Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance . In The handbook of social psychology, Vols. 1–2, 4th ed. (pp. 151–192). McGraw-Hill. - Connors, M. H., & Halligan, P. W. (2015). A cognitive account of belief: A tentative road map. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1588. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01588
- Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
- Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x
- Cross, N. (1999). Natural intelligence in design. Design Studies, 20(1), 25–39. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00026-X
- Cross, N. (2001).
Design cognition: Results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity . In C. Eastman, W. McCracken, & W. Newstetter (Eds.), Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education (pp. 79–103). Elsevier Science. DOI: 10.1016/B978-008043868-9/50005-X - Cross, N., Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K. (1994). Design Expertise Amongst Student Designers. Journal of Art & Design Education, 13(1), 39–56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-8070.1994.tb00356.x
- Cross, N., & Cross, A. C. (1998). Expertise in engineering design. Research in engineering design, 10(3), 141–149. DOI: 10.1007/BF01607156
- de Pillis, E., & de Pillis, L. (2008). Are engineering schools masculine and authoritarian? The mission statements say yes. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1(1), 33–44. DOI: 10.1037/1938-8926.1.1.33
- Douglas, E. P., Koro-Ljungberg, M., McNeill, N. J., Malcolm, Z. T., & Therriault, D. J. (2012). Moving beyond formulas and fixations: Solving open-ended engineering problems. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(6), 627–651. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2012.738358
- Downey, G., & Lucena, J. (2003). When students resist: Ethnography of a senior design experience in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1), 168–176.
https://www.ijee.ie/articles/Vol19-1/IJEE1343.pdf - Dringenberg, E., Abell, A., & Guanes, G. (2019). Decision making in engineering capstone design: Participants’ reactions to a workshop about diverse types of reasoning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6B), 1907–1917.
https://www.ijee.ie/contents/c350619B.html - Dringenberg, E., Wertz, R. E. H., Atman, C., Cross, K., Miskioğlu, E. E., & Guanes, G. (2019). Surfacing the Hidden Brain (System 1) in Engineering Education Teaching, Learning, and Research. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Cincinnati, Ohio. DOI: 10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028673
- Dutson, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., & Sorensen, C. D. (1997). A review of literature on teaching engineering design through project-oriented capstone courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(1), 17–28. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00260.x
- Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
- Erickson, S. K. (2007). Engineering the hidden curriculum: How women doctoral students in engineering navigate belonging. Arizona State University.
- Faulkner, W. (2007). Nuts and bolts and people’sgender-troubled engineering identities. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 331–356. DOI: 10.1177/0306312706072175
- Fila, N. D., & Hess, J. L. (2016, 2016/06/26). In their shoes: Student perspectives on the connection between empathy and engineering. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana.
https://peer.asee.org/25640 - Finelli, C. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2019). Improving student learning in undergraduate engineering education by improving teaching and assessment. Advances in Engineering Education.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1220294.pdf . - Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press. DOI: 10.4324/9780203838020
- Gainsburg, J. (2006). The mathematical modeling of structural engineers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(1), 3–36. DOI: 10.1207/s15327833mtl0801_2
- Gainsburg, J., Fox, J., & Solan, L. M. (2016). Argumentation and Decision Making in Professional Practice. Theory Into Practice, 55(4), 332–341. DOI: 10.1243/095440503322420142
- Girod, M., Elliott, A. C., Burns, N. D., & Wright, I. C. (2003). Decision making in conceptual engineering design: An empirical investigation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 217(9), 1215–1228. DOI: 10.1243/095440503322420142
- Guanes, G., Thanh, G., & Dringenberg, E. (2019, 2019/06/15). Engineering Students’ Beliefs about Decision Making in Capstone Design: A Revised Framework for Types of Informal Reasoning. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida.
https://peer.asee.org/32736 - Guanes, G., Wang, L., Delaine, D., & Dringenberg, E. (2021). Empathic Approaches in Engineering Capstone Design: Student Beliefs and Reported Behavior. European Journal of Engineering Education. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2021.1927989
- Gunckel, K. L., & Tolbert, S. (2018). The imperative to move toward a dimension of care in engineering education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 938–961. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21458
- Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Random House, Inc.
- Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–984. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20439
- Hess, J. L., Beever, J., Zoltowski, C. B., Kisselburgh, L., & Brightman, A. O. (2019). Enhancing engineering students’ ethical reasoning: Situating reflexive principlism within the SIRA framework. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(1), 82–102. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20249
- Hess, J., L., & Fila, N., D. (2016). The development and growth of empathy among engineering students. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. DOI: 10.18260/p.26120
- Holland, D., Lachicotte, W. J., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Harvard University Press.
- Holth, L. (2014). Passionate men and rational women: gender contradictions in engineering. NORMA, 9(2), 97–110. DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2014.908629
- International Engineering Alliance Secretariat. (2014). 25 Years of the Washington Accord.
www.ieagreements.org - Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
- Jocuns, A., Stevens, R., Garrison, L., & Amos, D. (2008). Students’ changing images of engineering and engineers. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--4320
- Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. DOI: 10.1007/BF02300500
- Jonassen, D. H. (2008). Instructional design as design problem solving: An iterative process. Educational Technology, 48(3), 21–26.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/44429574 - Jonassen, D. H. (2012). Designing for decision making. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(2), 341–359. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-011-9230-5
- Jonassen, D. H., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139–151. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- Klein, G. A. (2017). Sources of power: How people make decisions. MIT press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1v2xt08
- Kouprie, M., & Visser, F. S. (2009). A framework for empathy in design: Stepping into and out of the user’s life. Journal of Engineering Design, 20(5), 437–448. DOI: 10.1080/09544820902875033
- Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511571350
- Lather, P. (2007). Validity, Qualitative. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. DOI: 10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosv001
- Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., Volkwein, J. F., & Peterson, G. D. (2006). The changing face of engineering education. The Bridge, 36(2), 5.
https://www.nae.edu/File.aspx?id=7396&v=e563d01 - Mackie, G., Moneti, F., Shakya, H., & Denny, E. (2015). What are social norms? How are they measured? University of California at San Diego-UNICEF Working Paper.
https://www.dmeforpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/42009203020Whole20What20are20Social20Norms.pdf - Magoon, A. J. (1977). Constructivist approaches in educational research. Review of Educational Research, 47(4), 651–693. DOI: 10.3102/00346543047004651
- Martin, K. M., Esse, S. R., & Miskioglu, E. (2020). Failure is not an option: A simulation tool to develop engineering intuition and boost success in orbital mechanics. AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum. DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-0071
- McNeill, N. J., Douglas, E. P., Koro-Ljungberg, M., Therriault, D. J., & Krause, I. (2016). Undergraduate students’ beliefs about engineering problem solving. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(4), 560–584. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20150
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Millard, D., Berry, F., & Chouikha, M. (2007). Improving student intuition via Rensselaer’s new mobile studio pedagogy. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Honolulu, Hawaii. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--2538
- Miskioglu, E., & Martin, K. M. (2019). Is it rocket science or brain science? Developing an instrument to measure “engineering intuition”. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--33027
- Miskioglu, E., Martin, K. M., & Carberry, A. R. (2020). Work in progress: Experts’ perceptions of engineering intuition. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--35633
- National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering. National Academy Press.
- Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328. DOI: 10.1080/0022027870190403
- Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. DOI: 10.3102/00346543062003307
- Paluck, E. L., & Shepherd, H. (2012). The salience of social referents: A field experiment on collective norms and harassment behavior in a school social network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(6), 899. DOI: 10.1037/a0030015
- Pawley, A. L. (2009). Universalized narratives: Patterns in how faculty members define”engineering”. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 309. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01029.x
- Pawley, A. L. (2017). Shifting the “default”: The case for making diversity the expected condition for engineering education and making whiteness and maleness visible. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 531–533. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20181
- Pehlivanli-Kadayifci, E. (2019). Exploring the hidden curriculum of gender in engineering education: A case of an engineering faculty in Turkey. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 1194–1205.
https://www.ijee.ie/contents/c350419.html . - Phillips, J. K., Klein, G., & Sieck, W. R. (2004). Expertise in judgment and decision making: A case for training intuitive decision skills. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, 297–315. DOI: 10.1002/9780470752937.ch15
- Picon, A. (2004). Engineers and engineering history: Problems and perspectives. History and Technology, 20(4), 421–436. DOI: 10.1080/0734151042000304367
- Polly, D., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Examining how learner-centered professional development influences teachers’ espoused and enacted practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(2), 120–130. DOI: 10.1080/00220671003636737
- Poni, M. (2014). Research paradigms in education. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(1), 407. DOI: 10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n1p407
- Prentice, D., & Paluck, E. L. (2020). Engineering social change using social norms: Lessons from the study of collective action. Current Opinion in Psychology. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.06.012
- Pritchard, J., & Baillie, C. (2006). How can engineering education contribute to a sustainable future? European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(5), 555–565. DOI: 10.1080/03043790600797350
- Raudsepp, E. (1980). Intuition: A neglected decision-making tool. Machine Design, 52, 91–94.
- Reimlinger, B., Lohmeyer, Q., Moryson, R., & Meboldt, M. (2019). A comparison of how novice and experienced design engineers benefit from design guidelines. Design Studies, 63, 204–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2019.04.004
- Robinson, M. D. (2014).
Retrospective reports . In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2515 - Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. The Urban Review, 3(1), 16–20. DOI: 10.1007/BF02322211
- Rugarcia, A., Felder, R. M., Woods, D. R., & Stice, J. E. (2000). The future of engineering education I. A vision for a new century. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1), 16–25.
https://journals.flvc.org/cee/article/view/123095/122140 - Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20042
- Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3 ed.). Sage.
- Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4 ed.). Wiley.
- Schon, D. A. (1984). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic books.
- Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., & Colby, A. (2008). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field (Vol. 3). Jossey-Bass Inc Pub.
- Sloman, S., & Fernbach, P. (2018). The knowledge illusion: Why we never think alone. Penguin.
- Smith, A. C. (2016). Cognitive mechanisms of belief change. Springer Nature. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-57895-2
- Steele, C. M. (2011). Whistling Vivaldi: And other clues to how stereotypes affect us (issues of our time). WW Norton & Company.
- Stevens, R., Amos, D., Jocuns, A., & Garrison, L. (2007). Engineering as lifestyle and a meritocracy of difficulty: Two pervasive beliefs among engineering students and their possible effects. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--2791
- Stevens, R., O’Connor, K., & Garrison, L. (2005). Engineering student identities and the navigation of the undergraduate curriculum. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--14754
- Strobel, J., Hess, J., Pan, R., & Wachter Morris, C. A. (2013). Empathy and care within engineering: Qualitative perspectives from engineering faculty and practicing engineers. Engineering Studies, 5(2), 137–159. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2013.814136
- Strobel, J., & Pan, R. (2011). Compound problem solving: Insights from the workplace for engineering education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 137(4), 215–222. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000047
- Suchner, R. W., & More, D. M. (1975). Stereotypes of males and females in two occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 6(1), 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/0001-8791(75)90015-9
- Taylor, P. C., & Medina, M. (2011). Educational research paradigms: From positivism to pluralism. College Research Journal, 1(1), 1–16.
https://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/36978/ - Toh, C., & Miller, S. R. (2019). Does the preferences for creativity scale predict engineering students’ ability to generate and select creative design alternatives? Journal of Mechanical Design, 141(6). DOI: 10.1115/1.4042154
- Ullman, D. G. (2001). Robust decision-making for engineering design. Journal of Engineering Design, 12(1), 3–13. DOI: 10.1080/09544820010031580
- Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Witte, P. (2005). Uncovering the problem-solving process: Cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 237. DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.237
- Villanueva, I., Gelles, L. A., DiStefano, M., Smith, B., Tull, R. G., Lord, S., … Ryan, G. W. (2018). What does hidden curriculum in engineering look like and how can it be explored? ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--31234
- Walther, J., Brewer, M. A., Sochacka, N. W., & Miller, S. E. (2020). Empathy and engineering formation. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(1), 11–33. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20301
- Walther, J., Miller, S., Sochacka, N., & Brewer, M. (2016). Fostering empathy in an undergraduate mechanical engineering course. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA. DOI: 10.18260/p.26944
- Walther, J., Miller, S. E., & Sochacka, N. W. (2017). A model of empathy in engineering as a core skill, practice orientation, and professional way of being. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 123–148. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20159
- Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., Benson, L. C., Bumbaco, A. E., Kellam, N., Pawley, A. L., & Phillips, C. M. (2017). Qualitative research quality: A collaborative inquiry across multiple methodological perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 398–430. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20170
- Young, M. T. (2018). Heuristics and human judgment: What we can learn about scientific discovery from the study of engineering design. Topoi, 1–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11245-018-9550-8
- Zsambok, C. E., & Klein, G. (Eds.). (2014). Naturalistic decision making. Psychology Press. DOI: 10.4324/9781315806129
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.70 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 78 - 95
Submitted on: Jan 11, 2021
Accepted on: Sep 1, 2021
Published on: Oct 28, 2021
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2021 Emily Dringenberg, Giselle Guanes, Alexia Leonard, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.