Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Methodological Roadmap for Phenomenologically Based Interviewing in Engineering Education: Identifying Types of Learning in Makerspaces Cover

A Methodological Roadmap for Phenomenologically Based Interviewing in Engineering Education: Identifying Types of Learning in Makerspaces

Open Access
|Feb 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Example artifacts brought to the second interview.

Figure 2

Recreated timeline developed during a third interview.

Table 1

Example from Codebook.

CODEDESCRIPTIONCODING RULESEXAMPLES
FailingDiscussion of failing, making mistakes, falling short in succeeding to achieve a goal, or to error in one’s actionor judgement.Code when participant points to specific mistakes or failures they made that required them to rethink how they were making. Mistakes might be related to the choice of machine, the speed, the steps, or the materials.And so, I went in and I’m like, “Okay, so let me just take this wood and cut it down.” And I cracked a piece of wood. And I’m like, “Shoot, okay, I can’t do it this fast.”
Table 2

Subset of the Typology at a glance – the primary and secondary categorization.

1LEARNING BY DOING
1.1Failing
1.2Struggling
1.3Practicing
1.4Iterating
1.5Exploring
2CULTURAL KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS
2.1Access conventions and protocols
2.2Roles and structure of participation
2.3Rules of the community
2.4Gender associations
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.32 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 100 - 118
Submitted on: Jan 16, 2020
Accepted on: Nov 29, 2021
Published on: Feb 25, 2022
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Megan Tomko, Melissa Aleman, Wendy Newstetter, Julie Linsey, Robert Nagel, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.