Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Coupling Methodological Commitments to Make Sense of Socio-Psychological Experience Cover

Coupling Methodological Commitments to Make Sense of Socio-Psychological Experience

Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. Agar, M., & MacDonald, J. (1995). Focus groups and ethnography. Human Organization, 54(1), 7886. DOI: 10.17730/humo.54.1.x102372362631282
  2. Borrego, M., Douglas, E. P., & Amelink, C. T. (2009). Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 5366. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x
  3. Brown, B. (2006). Shame resilience theory: A grounded theory study on women and shame. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 87(1), 4352. DOI: 10.1606/1044-3894.3483
  4. Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(1), 4272. DOI: 10.1177/0162243913504305
  5. Dringenberg, E., Secules, S., Kramer, A. (2019, June). Smartness in engineering culture: An interdisciplinary dialogue. Paper presented at the 2019 ASEE Conference, Tampa, FL. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--33272
  6. Ferguson, T. J., Eyre, H. L., & Ashbaker, M. (2000). Unwanted identities: A key variable in shame–anger links and gender differences in shame. Sex Roles, 42(3–4), 133157. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007061505251
  7. Gadamer, H. (2013). Truth and method. (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  8. Gilbert, P. (2003). Evolution, social roles, and the differences in shame and guilt. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 70(4), 12051230.
  9. Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., & Lock, R. (2016). Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 312340. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20118
  10. Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and time. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  11. Huff, J. L. (2019). Identity in practice: Examining personal identities of engineering graduates in the transition to the workplace. Proceedings of the 2019 Research in Engineering Education Symposium (REES), Cape Town, South Africa, 359368.
  12. Huff, J. L., Okai, B., Shanachilubwa, K., Sochacka, N. W., & Walther, J. (in press). Unpacking professional shame: Patterns of White male engineering students living in and out of threats to their identities. Journal of Engineering Education.
  13. Huff, J. L., Smith, J. A., Jesiek, B. K., Zoltowski, C. B., Graziano, W. B., & Oakes, W. C. (2014, October). From methods to methodology: Reflection on keeping the philosophical commitments of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Paper presented at the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Madrid. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044253
  14. Kamanda, H., Walther, J., Wilson, D., Brewer, M. A., Sochacka, N. W., & Huff, J. L. (in press). The role of expectations in the educational experience and professional socialization of engineering students. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice.
  15. Kirn, A., & Benson, L. (2018). Engineering students’ perceptions of problem solving and their future. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(1), 87112. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20190
  16. Kirn, A., Huff, J. L., Godwin, A., Ross, M., & Cass, C. (2019). Exploring tensions of using interpretative phenomenological analysis in a domain with conflicting cultural practices. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(2), 305324. DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2018.1563270
  17. Kramer, A., Dringenberg, E., Kajfez, R. L. (2020, June). Development and refinement of interview protocol to study engineering students’ beliefs and identities. Paper presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--34443
  18. Lewis, H. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
  19. Lewis, M. (1995). Shame: The exposed self. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  20. Matusovich, H. M., Streveler, R. A., & Miller, R. L. (2010). Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative, longitudinal investigation of students’ motivational values. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 289303. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01064.x
  21. Morse, J. M. (2010). Simultaneous and sequential qualitative mixed method designs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 483491. DOI: 10.1177/1077800410364741
  22. Patrick, A. D., Borrego, M., & Prybutok, A. N. (2018). Predicting persistence in engineering through an engineering identity scale. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34 (2-A), 351363.
  23. Pawley, A. L. (2009). Universalized narratives: Patterns in how faculty members define “engineering”. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 309319. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01029.x
  24. Pawley, A. L. (2019). “Asking questions, we walk”: How should engineering education address equity, the climate crisis, and its own moral infrastructure? Journal of Engineering Education, 108(4), 447452. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20295
  25. Ross, M. S., Huff, J. L., & Godwin, A. (in press). Resilient engineering identity development critical to prolonged engagement of Black women in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education.
  26. Secules, S., Sochacka, N. W., Huff, J. L., & Walther, J. (2020). An ethnographic exploration of the social construction of professional shame for undergraduate engineering students. Unpublished manuscript.
  27. Scheff, T. J. (2003). Shame in self and society. Symbolic Interaction, 26(2), 239262. DOI: 10.1525/si.2003.26.2.239
  28. Smith, J. A. (2011a). Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5(1), 927. DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2010.510659
  29. Smith, J. A. (2011b). “We could be diving for pearls”: The value of the gem in experiential qualitative psychology. Qualitative Methods in Psychology Bulletin, 12, 615.
  30. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method, and research. Sage Publications, Ltd.
  31. Sochacka, N., Walther, J., Wilson, J., & Brewer, M. (2014, October). Stories “told” about engineering in the media: Implications for attracting diverse groups to the profession. Paper presented at the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Madrid. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044009
  32. Stefl, S. K. (2020). Women engineering faculty well-being: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Available from All Dissertations @ Clemson (2608). https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/2608
  33. Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  34. Tonso, K. L. (2006). Teams that work: Campus culture, engineer identity, and social interactions. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 2537. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00875.x
  35. Van Vliet, K. J. (2008). Shame and resilience in adulthood: A grounded theory study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(2), 233245. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.55.2.233
  36. Walther, J., Kellam, N., Sochacka, N., & Radcliffe, D. (2011). Engineering competence? An interpretive investigation of engineering students’ professional formation. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 703740. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00033.x
  37. Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., Benson, L. C., Bumbaco, A. E., Kellam, N., Pawley, A. L., & Phillips, C. M. (2017). Qualitative research quality: A collaborative inquiry across multiple methodological perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 398430. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20170
  38. Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., & Kellam, N. N. (2013). Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 626659. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20029
  39. Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus group methodology: A review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1(3), 181203. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.29 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 13
Submitted on: Jan 15, 2020
Accepted on: Oct 28, 2020
Published on: Dec 23, 2020
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 James L. Huff, Joachim Walther, Nicola W. Sochacka, Mackenzie B. Sharbine, Hindolo Kamanda, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.