Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Mixed Method Approach to Understanding Researcher Identity Cover

A Mixed Method Approach to Understanding Researcher Identity

Open Access
|Mar 2021

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Participants are Ranked High to Low Based on Researcher Identity Scores Reported.

Identity GroupingParticipants Ranked High to Low Researcher IdentityParticipant’s ReasoningChange from Survey to Interview
I am a researcher and/or I want a research careerPatConfident in abilities as a researcher, mentor, and mentee0
DanaAnyone who is asking and/or answering questions is a researcher–1.5
RileyFeels confident as a researcher, but feels that she cannot fully be a researcher without a Ph.D.0
Logan and TaylorCannot rate self higher because there is always more to learn in research–1
0.5
AubreyNot enough experience to rate self higher0.25
ClayHad not finished writing a paper for publication–1.5
FrancesHas not done enough independent research to rate self higher–1
PeytonDid not see that the research he was doing was helping people–1
I am not a researcher and/or do not want a career in researchAriLikes research, but lacks research experience0
Kelly and SageConfident in their research abilities, but feel they cannot lead their own research–0.5
–1.5
RiverInterested in research, but not all fields of research–2
BayFeels like she is performing the practices of research but does not identify as a researcher0
KennedyLacks experience, only did research for a short time0.5
Hayden, Max, and ReedCurrently not participating in research experience–4
–4
–5
EliResults were not verified by a university professor, so cannot be considered research–3.5
SamNo passion for research; the more research she does, the less she feels like a researcher–1
Table 2

Participant, Identity Score Reported from Survey, Interview, and Selected Demographic Data.

ParticipantSurvey Identity ScoreInterview Identity ScoreaInstitution & TypeYears in CollegeGenderRace/Ethnicity
Ari5.05.03, R14FHispanic
Aubrey5.05.25a6, ES3FWhite
Bay4.04.06, ES2FWhite
Clay6.04.5a4, M14FSouth Asian
Dana6.04.5a1, R13MWhite
Eli5.01.5a6, ES2FWhite
Frances7.06.02, R14MWhite
Hayden7.03.06, ES4FWhite
Kelly6.05.52, R13FWhite
Kennedy3.03.5a2, R14FWhite
Logan6.05.05, R15MWhite
Max6.02.01, R12FWhite
Pat6.06.01, R15MWhite
Peyton6.05.02, R12MEast Asian
Reed6.01.03, R16FHispanic
Riley6.06.01, R13FWhite
River6.04.04, M14FWhite
Sage7.05.5a1, R13FWhite
Sam4.03.02, R14FWhite
Taylor5.05.5a4, M14FSouth Asian

[i] Note: Carnegie classification reported at time of publication: R1 – Very High Research Activity, M1 – Lager Program Master’s University, and ES – Special Focus Four-Year: Engineering Schools. Scores marked with an (a) were an average based on the range reported by the participant. For example, Aubrey reported she was between a 5 and 5.5. Participant scores highlighted had an increase in scores from their survey to interview. On the identity scale, a one corresponds to not at all feeling like a researcher and a seven corresponds to feeling very much like a researcher.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.24 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 15
Submitted on: Jan 15, 2020
Accepted on: Feb 23, 2021
Published on: Mar 29, 2021
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Rachel Kajfez, Dennis Lee, Katherine Ehlert, Courtney Faber, Lisa Benson, Marian Kennedy, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.