Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
New Engineers for a Bright Future: Deconstructing the Promises of Challenge-Based Learning Cover

New Engineers for a Bright Future: Deconstructing the Promises of Challenge-Based Learning

Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2006). The nonperformativity of antiracism. Meridians, 7(1), 104126. 10.2979/MER.2006.7.1.104
  2. Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Duke University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv125jkj2
  3. Akera, A., Appelhans, S., Cheville, A., De Pree, T., Fatehiboroujeni, S., Karlin, J., & Riley, D. (2019, June). ABET & Engineering accreditation – History, theory, practice: Initial findings from a national study on the governance of engineering education. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 10.18260/1-2--32020
  4. Andrée, M., & Hansson, L. (2014). Recruitment campaigns as a tool for social and cultural reproduction of scientific communities: A case study on how scientists invite young people to science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 19852008. 10.1080/09500693.2014.888598
  5. Andrée, M., & Hansson, L. (2020). Industrial actors and their rationales for engaging in STEM education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(4), 551576. 10.1080/00220272.2019.1682055
  6. Askehave, I. (2007). The impact of marketization on higher education genres—The international student prospectus as a case in point. Discourse Studies, 9(6), 723742. 10.1177/1461445607082576
  7. Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 4557. 10.1080/01596300050005493
  8. Beder, S. (1998). The new engineer: Management and professional responsibility in a changing world. Macmillan Education AU.
  9. Berge, M., Silfver, E., & Danielsson, A. (2019). In search of the new engineer: Gender, age, and social class in information about engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(5), 650665. 10.1080/03043797.2018.1523133
  10. Birol, G., McKenna, A. F., Smith, H. D., Giorgio, T. D., & Brophy, S. P. (2002). Integration of the “How people learn” framework into educational module development and implementation in biotechnology. Proceedings of the Second Joint 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society, Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 3, 26402641. 10.1109/IEMBS.2002.1053468
  11. Boden, R., & Nedeva, M. (2010). Employing discourse: Universities and graduate ‘employability.’ Journal of Education Policy, 25(1), 3754. 10.1080/02680930903349489
  12. Bourn, D. (2018). The global engineer. In D. Bourn (Ed.), Understanding global skills for 21st century professions (pp. 201219). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-97655-6_9
  13. Cech, E. A. (2012). Great problems of grand challenges: Problematizing engineering’s understandings of its role in society. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, 1(2). 10.24908/ijesjp.v1i2.4304
  14. Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(1), 4272. 10.1177/0162243913504305
  15. Conlon, E. (2008). The new engineer: Between employability and social responsibility. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(2), 151159. 10.1080/03043790801996371
  16. Cruger, K. M. (2018). Applying challenge-based learning in the (feminist) communication classroom: Positioning students as knowledgeable change agents. Communication Teacher, 32(2), 87101. 10.1080/17404622.2017.1372602
  17. Danaher, J. (2022). Techno-optimism: An analysis, an evaluation and a modest defence. Philosophy & Technology, 35(2), 54. 10.1007/s13347-022-00550-2
  18. Díaz Lantada, A. D. (2020). Engineering education 5.0: Continuously evolving engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(6), 18141832. https://www.ijee.ie/1atestissues/Vol36-6/10_ijee3990.pdf
  19. Dishon, G. (2021). The new natural? Authenticity and the naturalization of educational technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(2), 156173. 10.1080/17439884.2020.1845727
  20. Dishon, G., & Gilead, T. (2021). Adaptability and its discontents: 21st-century skills and the preparation for an unpredictable future. British Journal of Educational Studies, 69(4), 393413. 10.1080/00071005.2020.1829545
  21. Doulougeri, K., Vermunt, J. D., Bombaerts, G., & Bots, M. (2024). Challenge-based learning implementation in engineering education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(4), 10761106. 10.1002/jee.20588
  22. Edström, K. (2018). Academic and professional values in engineering education: Engaging with history to explore a persistent tension. Engineering Studies, 10(1), 3865. 10.1080/19378629.2018.1424860
  23. Eidenskog, M., Leifler, O., Sefyrin, J., Johnson, E., & Asplund, M. (2023). Changing the world one engineer at a time – unmaking the traditional engineering education when introducing sustainability subjects. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(9), 7084. 10.1108/IJSHE-03-2022-0071
  24. Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  25. Faulkner, W. (2007). ‘Nuts and bolts and people’: Gender-troubled engineering identities. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 331356. 10.1177/0306312706072175
  26. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2003). Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 725. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00734.x
  27. Feng, D. (2019). Interdiscursivity, social media and marketized university discourse: A genre analysis of universities’ recruitment posts on WeChat. Journal of Pragmatics, 143, 121134. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.007
  28. Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage.
  29. Froyd, J. E., Wankat, P. C., & Smith, K. A. (2012). Five major shifts in 100 years of engineering education. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(Special Centennial Issue), 13441360. 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2190167
  30. Gallagher, S. E., & Savage, T. (2023). Challenge-based learning in higher education: An exploratory literature review. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(6), 11351157. 10.1080/13562517.2020.1863354
  31. Gaskins, W. B., Johnson, J., Maltbie, C., & Kukreti, A. (2015). Changing the learning environment in the college of engineering and applied science using challenge based learning. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 5(1), 3341. 10.3991/ijep.v5i1.4138
  32. Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Routledge.
  33. Graham, R. H. (2018). The global state of the art in engineering education. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  34. Guerra, A. (2017). Integration of sustainability in engineering education: Why is PBL an answer? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(3), 436454. 10.1108/IJSHE-02-2016-0022
  35. Hagvall Svensson, O. (2021). What’s wrong with engineering education? Comparing and combining a teaching-problematization and a culture-problematization [Doctoral dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology]. https://research.chalmers.se/en/publication/527132
  36. Herkert, J. R., & Banks, D. A. (2012). I have seen the future! Ethics, progress, and the grand challenges for engineering. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, 1(2), 109122. 10.24908/ijesjp.v1i2.4306
  37. Högfeldt, A. K., Rosén, A., Mwase, C., Lantz, A., Gumaelius, L., Shayo, E., Lujara, S., & Mvungi, N. (2019). Mutual capacity building through North-South collaboration using challenge-driven education. Sustainability, 11(24), 7236. 10.3390/su11247236
  38. Johansson, A. (2020). Negotiating intelligence, nerdiness, and status in physics master’s studies. Research in Science Education, 50(6), 24192440. 10.1007/s11165-018-9786-8
  39. Kaldewey, D. (2018). The grand challenges discourse: Transforming identity work in science and science policy. Minerva, 56(2), 161182. 10.1007/s11024-017-9332-2
  40. Klein, J. T. (2017). Typologies of interdisciplinarity: The boundary work of definition. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & R. C. dos Santos Pacheco (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (Vol. 2, pp. 2134). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.3
  41. Kohn Rådberg, K., Lundqvist, U., Malmqvist, J., & Hagvall Svensson, O. (2020). From CDIO to challenge-based learning experiences – expanding student learning as well as societal impact? European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(1), 2237. 10.1080/03043797.2018.1441265
  42. Lagesen, V. A., & Sørensen, K. H. (2009). Walking the line? The enactment of the social/technical binary in software engineering. Engineering Studies, 1(2), 129149. 10.1080/19378620902911584
  43. Larsson, J., Airey, J., Danielsson, A., & Lundqvist, E. (2020). A fragmented training environment: Discourse models in the talk of physics teacher educators. Research in Science Education, 50, 25592585. 10.1007/s11165-018-9793-9
  44. Leijon, M., Gudmundsson, P., Staaf, P., & Christersson, C. (2022). Challenge based learning in higher education – A systematic literature review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(5), 609618. 10.1080/14703297.2021.1892503
  45. Lönngren, J., Direito, I., Tormey, R., & Huff, J. L. (2023). Emotions in engineering education. In A. Johri (Ed.), International handbook of Engineering Education Research. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003287483-10
  46. Lönngren, J., Ingerman, Å., & Svanström, M. (2017). Avoid, control, succumb, or balance: Engineering students’ approaches to a wicked sustainability problem. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 805831. 10.1007/s11165-016-9529-7
  47. Lönngren, J., & van Poeck, K. (2021). Wicked problems: A mapping review of the literature. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(6), 481502. 10.1080/13504509.2020.1859415
  48. Lucena, J., Downey, G., Jesiek, B., & Elber, S. (2008). Competencies beyond countries: The re-organization of engineering education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 433447. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00991.x
  49. Ludwig, D., Blok, V., Garnier, M., Macnaghten, P., & Pols, A. (2022). What’s wrong with global challenges? Journal of Responsible Innovation, 9(1), 627. 10.1080/23299460.2021.2000130
  50. Malmqvist, J., Kohn Rådberg, K., & Lundqvist, U. (2015, June). Comparative analysis of challenge-based learning experiences. Proceedings of the 11th international CDIO conference, Chengdu, China. http://www.cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/problem-based-challenge-based-learning-%E2%80%93-motives-examples-outcomes-and
  51. Martin, D. A., Herzog, C., Papageorgiou, K., & Bombaerts, G. (2022). Three European experiences of cocreating ethical solutions to real-world problems through challenge based learning. In E. Vilalta-Perdomo, J. Membrillo-Hernández, R. Michel-Villarreal, G. Lakshmi, & M. Martínez-Acosta (Eds.), The Emerald handbook of challenge based learning (pp. 251279). Emerald Publishing. 10.1108/978-1-80117-490-920221011
  52. Martínez-Acosta, M., Membrillo-Hernández, J., & Cabañas-Izquierdo, M. R. (2022). Sustainable development goals through challenge-based learning implementation in higher education – education for sustainable development (ESD). In E. Vilalta-Perdomo, J. Membrillo-Hernández, R. Michel-Villarreal, G. Lakshmi, & M. Martínez-Acosta (Eds.), The Emerald handbook of challenge based learning (pp. 281299). Emerald Publishing. 10.1108/978-1-80117-490-920221012
  53. Mitcham, C. (2014). The true grand challenge for engineering: Self-knowledge. Issues in Science and Technology, 31(1), 1923. https://issues.org/perspectives-the-true-grand-challenge-for-engineering-self-knowledge/
  54. Moreau, M., & Leathwood, C. (2006). Graduates’ employment and the discourse of employability: A critical analysis. Journal of Education and Work, 19(4), 305324. 10.1080/13639080600867083
  55. Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Routledge.
  56. National Academy of Engineering. (2008). NAE grand challenges for engineering.
  57. Nichols, M. H., & Cator, K. (2008). Challenge based learning white paper. Apple, Inc. https://www.challengebasedlearning.org/learn/cbl-publications-and-research/
  58. Nieusma, D., & Tang, X. (2012). The unbalanced equation: Technical opportunities and social Barriers in the NAE Grand Challenges and beyond. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, 1(2). 10.24908/ijesjp.v1i2.4314
  59. Nordvall, M. (2023). Shaping engineers, making gender politics: Swedish universities of technology and the creation of a policy field, 19761998 [Doctoral dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology]. https://research.chalmers.se/en/publication/534655
  60. Nudelman, G. (2020). The hidden curriculum in two employability skills development courses in a South African electrical engineering degree programme. Journal of Education and Work, 33(5–6), 360374. 10.1080/13639080.2020.1820962
  61. O’Flaherty, J., & Liddy, M. (2018). The impact of development education and education for sustainable development interventions: A synthesis of the research. Environmental Education Research, 24(7), 10311049. 10.1080/13504622.2017.1392484
  62. Ottemo, A., Berge, M., Mendick, H., & Silfver, E. (2023). Gender, passion, and ‘sticky’ technology in a voluntaristically-organized technology makerspace. Engineering Studies, 15(2), 101121. 10.1080/19378629.2023.2203396
  63. Paul, R. M., Zacharias, K., Nolan, E. M., Monkman, K., & Thomsen, V. (2023). Stubborn boundaries: The iron ring ritual as a case of mapping, resisting, and transforming Canadian engineering ethics. Frontiers in Education, 8. 10.3389/feduc.2023.1177035
  64. Philip, T. M., Gupta, A., Elby, A., & Turpen, C. (2018). Why ideology matters for learning: A case of ideological convergence in an engineering ethics classroom discussion on drone warfare. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(2), 183223. 10.1080/10508406.2017.1381964
  65. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage.
  66. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1994). Analyzing discourse. In A. Bryman & B. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 4766). Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9780203413081_chapter_3
  67. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155169. 10.1007/BF01405730
  68. Saka, Y., Southerland, S. A., Kittleson, J., & Hutner, T. (2013). Understanding the induction of a science teacher: The interaction of identity and context. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 12211244. 10.1007/s11165-012-9310-5
  69. Sen, A. (2022). Articulations of Islamic nationalism in the educational reform discourse of ‘New Turkey.’ Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 43(2), 205216. 10.1080/01596306.2020.1817859
  70. Slaton, A. E. (2012). Engineering improvement: Social and historical perspectives on the NAE’s “Grand Challenges.” International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, 1(2), 95108. 10.24908/ijesjp.v1i2.4305
  71. Southwood, I. (2017). Against precarity, against employability. In E. Armano, A. Bove, & A. Murgia (Eds.), Mapping precariousness, labour insecurity and uncertain livelihoods: Subjectivities and resistance (pp 7081). Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9781315593838-7
  72. Staton, A. Q., & Peeples, J. A. (2000). Educational reform discourse: President George Bush on “America 2000”. Communication Education, 49(4), 303319. 10.1080/03634520009379220
  73. Stonyer, H. (2002). Making engineering students—Making women: The discursive context of engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(4), 392399.
  74. UNESCO. (2021). Engineering for sustainable development: Delivering on the Sustainable Development Goals. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375644.locale=en
  75. van den Beemt, A., van de Watering, G., & Bots, M. (2023). Conceptualising variety in challenge-based learning in higher education: The CBL-compass. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(1), 2441. 10.1080/03043797.2022.2078181
  76. Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1988). Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretative repertoires. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analysing Everyday Explanation: A casebook of methods (pp. 168183). Sage.
  77. Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121136. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652
  78. Xiong, T. (2012). Discourse and marketization of higher education in China: The genre of advertisements for academic posts. Discourse & Society, 23(3), 318337. 10.1177/0957926511433786
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.172 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 129 - 151
Submitted on: Mar 16, 2024
Accepted on: May 8, 2025
Published on: Jul 15, 2025
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Johanna Larsson, Anders Johansson, Oskar Hagvall Svensson, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.