Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
On the Nature and Use of Questions in Engineering Student Teams: Status and Power in Student Interactions Cover

On the Nature and Use of Questions in Engineering Student Teams: Status and Power in Student Interactions

Open Access
|Nov 2025

References

  1. Aronsson, K. (2018). Negative interrogatives and adversarial uptake: Building hostility in child custody examinations. Journal of Pragmatics, 136, 3953. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.008
  2. Atkinson, D., Okada, H., & Talmy, S. (2011). Ethnography and discourse analysis. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.) The continuum companion to discourse analysis (pp. 85100). Bloomsbury Publishing.
  3. Baird, F., Moore, C. J., & Jagodzinski, A. P. (2000). An ethnographic study of engineering design teams at Rolls-Royce Aerospace. Design Studies, 21(4), 333355. 10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00006-5
  4. Barr, N. B., & De Clerck, J. P. (2018). ‘Helpful,’ ‘Irritating,’ and ‘Smart’: Student perspectives on teams in a mechanical engineering program. In 2018 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (pp. 196202). 10.1109/ProComm.2018.00046
  5. Bear, J. B., & Woolley, A. W. (2011). The role of gender in team collaboration and performance. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 36(2), 146153. 10.1179/030801811X13013181961473
  6. Beddoes, K. (2020). Interdisciplinary teamwork artefacts and practices: A typology for promoting successful teamwork in engineering education. Australasion Journal of Engineering Education, 25(2), 133141. 10.1080/22054952.2020.1836753
  7. Beddoes, K., & Panther, G. (2018). Gender and teamwork: An analysis of professors’ perspectives and practices. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(3), 330343. 10.1080/03043797.2017.1367759
  8. Bennis, W. G., Berkowitz, N., Affinito, M., & Malone, M. (1958). Authority, power, and the ability to influence. Human Relations, 11(2), 143155. 10.1177/001872675801100204
  9. Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, Jr., M. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37(3), 241255. 10.2307/2093465
  10. Berger, J., & Fisek, M. H. (2006). Diffuse status characteristics and the spread of status value: A formal theory. American Journal of Sociology, 111(4), 10381079. 10.1086/498633
  11. Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., & Zelditch, Jr., M. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6(1), 479508. 10.1146/annurev.so.06.080180.002403
  12. Bianchi, A. J. (2010). Status characteristics/expectation states theory. In J. M. Levine & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Sage Encyclopedia of Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (pp. 845848). Sage Publications, Inc.
  13. Blum-Kulka, S. (1985). Modifiers as indicating devices: The case of requests. Theoretical Linguists, 12(2–3), 213230. 10.1515/thli.1985.12.2-3.213
  14. Bocci, G., Bianchi, V., & Crushchina, S. (2021). Focus in wh-questions: Evidence from Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 39(2), 405455. 10.1007/s11049-020-09483-x
  15. Bowman, J. E. (2013). Status processes and organizational inequality: The social psychology of inclusion [Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  16. Casakin, H., Ball, L. J., Christensen, B. T., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2015). How do analogizing and mental simulation influence team dynamics in innovative product design? Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing, 29(2), 173183. 10.1017/S0890060415000050
  17. Cash, P., Dekoninck, E. A., & Ahmed-Kristensen, S. (2017). Supporting the development of shared understanding in distributed design teams. Journal of Engineering Design, 28(3), 147170. 10.1080/09544828.2016.1274719
  18. Chindanon, K., & Koretsky, M. D. (2023). Group practice in engineering: Productive interactions during a realistic, open-ended task. Studies in Engineering Education, 4(2), 144175. 10.21061/see.112
  19. Chowdhury, T., & Murzi, H. (2019, July). Literature review: Exploring teamwork in engineering education. Proceedings of the Conference: Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Cape Town, South Africa (pp. 1012).
  20. Correll, S. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2003). Chapter 2: Expectation states theory. In J. Delamater (ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 2951). Springer, Boston, MA. 10.1007/0-387-36921-X_2
  21. Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. SAGE Publications, Inc. 10.4135/9781452243672
  22. Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (5th ed.). Routledge.
  23. Dickerson, D. A., Masta, S., Ohland, M. W., & Pawley, A. L. (2021). How can we identify teams at risk of marginalizing minoritized students at scale. Research paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/37250
  24. Dickerson, D. A., Masta, S., Ohland, M. W., & Pawley, A. L. (2024). Is Carla grumpy? Analysis of peer evaluations to explore microaggressions and other marginalizing behaviors in engineering student teams. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(3), 603634. 10.1002/jee.20606
  25. Dinar, M., Shah, J. J., Cagan, J., Leifer, L., Linsey, J., Smith, S. M., & Hernandez, N. V. (2015). Empirical studies of designer thinking: Past, present, and future. Journal of Mechanical Design, 137(2), 012201-1-021101-13. 10.1115/1.4029025
  26. Downey, G., & Lucena, J. (2003). When students resist: Ethnography of a senior design experience in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1), 168176.
  27. Dringenberg, E., Kramer, A., & Betz, A. R. (2022). Smartness in engineering: Beliefs of undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(3), 575594. 10.1002/jee.20463
  28. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1). 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
  29. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226206868.001.0001
  30. Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J. M., McKinney de Royston, M. (2014). Toward a model of influence in persuasive discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245261. 10.1080/10508406.2014.883979
  31. Ercan, M. F., & Khan, R. (2017). Teamwork as a fundamental skill for engineering graduates. In 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education (FIE). 10.1109/TALE.2017.8252298
  32. Eshach, H., Dor-Ziderman, Y., & Yefroimsky, Y. (2013). Question asking in the science classroom: Teacher attitudes and practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 6781. 10.1007/s10956-013-9451-y
  33. Farahian, M., & Rezaee, M. (2012). A case study of an EFL teacher’s type of questions: An investigation into classroom interaction. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 161167. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.631
  34. Fowler, R. R. (2014). Improving engineering student tram collaborative discussions by moving them online: An investigation of synchronous chat and face-to-face team conversations. [Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  35. Fowler, R. R., & Su, M. P. (2018). Gendered risks of team-based learning: A model of inequitable task allocation in project-based learning. IEEE Transactions on Education, 61(4), 312318. 10.1109/TE.2018.2816010
  36. Fox, J., & Moore, Jr., J. C. (1979). Status characteristics and expectation states: Fitting and testing a recent model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 126134. 10.2307/3033693
  37. Francis, R. A., Paretti, M. C., & Riedner, R. (2022). Theorizing engineering judgment at the intersection of decision-making and identity. Studies in Engineering Education, 3(1). 10.21061/see.90
  38. Grant, J., Masta, S., Pawley, A., & Ohland, M. W. (2022). “I don’t like thinking about this stuff”: Black and brown student experiences in engineering education. Research paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/41397
  39. Harré, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (1991). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21(4), 393407. 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1991.tb00203.x
  40. Harrington, B. (2003). The social psychology of access in ethnographic research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 32(5), 592625. 10.1177/0891241603255677
  41. Heinemann, T. (2008). Questions of accountability: Yes-No interrogatives that are unanswerable. Discourse Studies, 10(1), 5571. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24049340
  42. Henderson, T. S. (2023). Understanding access to learning opportunities in collaborative projects: Gendered social hierarchies in student teams. Studies in Engineering Education, 4(1), 90114. 10.21061/see.101
  43. Henderson, T. S. (2024a). Eurocentric epistemologies in engineering: Manifestations in first-year student design teams and consequences for student learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(2), 360382. 10.1002/jee.20589
  44. Henderson, T. S. (2024b). Understanding the relationship between idea contributions and idea enactments in student design teams: A social network analysis approach. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(2), 225250. 10.1002/jee.20582
  45. Heritage, J. (2002). The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10–11), 14271446. 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00072-3
  46. Hirshfield, L., & Chachra, D. (2015, October). Task choice, group dynamics and learning goals: Understanding student activities in teams. In 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 15). IEEE. 10.1109/FIE.2015.7344043
  47. Hirshfield, L., & Koretsky, M. D. (2018). Gender and participation in an engineering problem-based learning environment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(1). 10.7771/1541-5015.1651
  48. Hirvonen, P. (2016). Positioning theory and small-group interaction: Social and task positioning in the context of joint decision-making. SAGE Open, 6(3), 115. 10.1177/2158244016655584
  49. Huddleston, R. (1994). The contrast between interrogatives and questions. Journal of Linguistics, 30(2), 411439. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4176277
  50. Hyland, K. (2000). Hedges, boosters and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in academic texts. Language Awareness, 9(4), 179197. 10.1080/09658410008667145
  51. Isaac, S., Kotluk, N., & Tormey, R. (2023). Educating engineering students to address bias and discrimination within their project teams. Science and Engineering Ethics, 29(6), 121. 10.1007/s11948-022-00426-w
  52. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 484), 6385. 10.1007/BF02300500
  53. Jonassen, D. H. (2015). Chapter 6 – Engineers as problem solvers. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 103118). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.009
  54. Joshi, A. (2014). By whom and when is women’s expertise recognized? The interactive effects of gender and education in science and engineering teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(2), 202239. 10.1177/0001839214528331
  55. Kant, V., & Kerr, E. (2018). Taking stock of engineering epistemology: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Philosophy & Technology, 32, 142. 10.1007/s13347-018-0331-5
  56. Karpowitz, C. F., & Mendelberg, T. (2014). Introduction. In C. F. Karpowitz & Mendelgberg (Eds.), The silent sex: Gender, deliberation, and institutions (pp. 17). Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400852697
  57. Koufetta-Menicou, C., & Scaife, J., (2000). Teachers’ questions – types and significance in science education. School Science Review, 81, 7984.
  58. Li, X., Fowler, R., & Mills, M. (2024). Examining engineering students’ gender and racial effects in college course team peer assessments: A quantitative intersectional approach. Research paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Portland, OR. 10.18260/1-2--46671
  59. Mabogunje, A. (2003). Towards a conceptual framework for predicting engineering design team performance based on question asking activity simulation. In U. Lindemann (Ed.), Human Behaviour in Design: Individuals, teams, tools (pp. 154163). 10.1007/978-3-662-07811-2_16
  60. Macke, C., Canfield, J., Tapp, K., & Hunn, V. (2019). Outcomes for Black students in team-based learning courses. Journal of Black Studies, 50(1), 6686. 10.1177/0021934718810124
  61. Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008, November). The self-reinforcing nature of social hierarchy: Origins and consequences of power and status. IACM 21st annual conference paper. 10.2139/ssrn.1298493
  62. Matz, R. L., Lee, A. M., Fowler, R. R., & Hayward, C. (2022, March). Teammates stabilize over time in how they evaluate their team experiences. In LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (pp. 485491). ACM. 10.1145/3506860.3506891
  63. Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  64. McGee, E. O. (2021). Black, brown, and bruised: How racialized STEM education stifles innovation. Harvard Education Press.
  65. Meadows, L. A., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2013). The influence of gender stereotypes on role adoption in student teams. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA. 10.18260/1-2--22602
  66. Miles, E. W., & Clenney, E. F. (2010). Gender differences in negotiation: A status characteristics theory view. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 3(2), 130144. 10.1111/j.1750-4716.2010.00054.x
  67. Moffat, A. D., Fowler, R., Matz, R. L., & Jeffrey, M. (2022). Is an effective team an equitable team? Protocol for a scoping review. 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education (FIE), 16. 10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962452
  68. Moffat, A. D., Matz, R. L., Fowler, R. R., & Jeffrey, M., (2024). Facets of team equity: A scoping review. Small Group Research. 10.1177/10464964241281057
  69. Moffat, A. D., Matz, R. L., Fowler, R. R., & Henderson, T. S. (2025). Interpreting student nonparticipation in teams. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 29562958. Helsinki, Finland.
  70. Mostafapour, M., & Hurst, A. (2020). An exploratory study of teamwork processes and perceived team effectiveness in engineering capstone design teams. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(1), 436449.
  71. Neumann, I. B. (2008). Discourse analysis. In A. Klotz and D. Prakash (Eds.), Qualitative methods in international relations: A pluralist guide (pp. 85100). Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230584129
  72. Novoselich, B. J., & Knight, D. B. (2018). Shared leadership in capstone design teams: Social network analysis. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 144(4), 04018017. 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000376
  73. Pieterse, V., & Thompson, L. (2010). Academic alignment to reduce the presence of ‘social loafers’ and ‘diligent isolates’ in student teams. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(4), 355367. 10.1080/13562517.2010.493346
  74. Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 939967. 10.2307/1519752.
  75. Rodriguez-Simmonds, H. E., Godwin, A., Langus, T., Pearson, N., & Kirn, A. (2023). Building inclusion in engineering teaming practices. Studies in Engineering Education, 3(2), 3159. 10.21061/see.84
  76. Seron, C., Silbey, S. S., Cech, E., & Rubineau, B. (2016). Persistence is cultural: Professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segregation. Work and Occupations, 43(2), 178214. 10.1177/0730888415618728
  77. Simpson, B., Willer, R., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2012). Status hierarchies and the organization of collective action. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 149166. 10.1177/0735275112457912
  78. Smith-Doerr, L., Alegria, S., & Sacco, T. (2017). How diversity matters in the US science and engineering workforce: A critical review considering integration in teams, fields, and organizational contexts. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 3, 139153. 10.17351/ests2017.142
  79. Tonso, K. L. (2007). On the outskirts of engineering: Learning identity, gender, and power via engineering practice (Vol. 6). Brill. 10.1163/9789087903534
  80. van Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 311330. 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00002-5
  81. Weedon, S. (2019). The role of rhetoric in engineering judgment. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 62(2), 165177. 10.1109/TPC.2019.2900824
  82. Wixom, J. H., Dahlin, E., Child, C., & Mattson, C. A. (2022). Logics of collaboration: An ethnography of engineering co-design in the Brazilian Amazon. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship, 17(2), 113. 10.24908/ijsle.v17i2.15709
  83. Wolfe, J., Powell, E. A., Schlisserman, S., & Kirshon, A. (2016). Teamwork in engineering undergraduate classes: What problems do students experience? Research paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. New Orleans, LA.
  84. Yap, F. H., Kashyap, A. K., & Tao, H. (2023). Interrogatives and speaker stance: From information-seeking to interpersonal (dis)affiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, 205, 111121. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.12.012
  85. Zajda, J. (2020). Discourse analysis as qualitative methodology. Educational Practice and Theory, 42(2), 521. 10.7459/ept/42.2.02
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.166 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 94 - 121
Submitted on: Jan 23, 2024
Accepted on: Feb 27, 2025
Published on: Nov 21, 2025
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Trevion Shamir Henderson, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.