Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
“Does that mean it’s a success?”: Beginning Designers’ Forethought and Self-Reflection in Engineering Design Thinking Cover

“Does that mean it’s a success?”: Beginning Designers’ Forethought and Self-Reflection in Engineering Design Thinking

By:   
Open Access
|May 2025

References

  1. Adams, R. S., Daly, S. R., Mann, L. M., & Dall’Alba, G. (2011). Being a professional: Three lenses into design thinking, acting, and being. Design Studies, 32(6), 588607. 10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.004
  2. Adams, R. S., & Fralick, B. (2010, October). Work in progress — a conceptions of design instrument as an assessment tool. 2010 Frontiers in Education Conference. 10.1109/FIE.2010.5673125
  3. Alexander, P. A., Dinsmore, D. L., Parkinson, M. M., & Winters, F. I. (2011). Self-regulated learning in academic domains. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 393407). Routledge.
  4. Ates Akdeniz, A. (2023). Exploring the impact of self-regulated learning intervention on students’ strategy use and performance in a design studio course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(5), 19231957. 10.1007/s10798-022-09798-3
  5. Atman, C. J., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., & Adams, R. (2005). Comparing freshman and senior engineering design processes: An in-depth follow-up study. Design Studies, 26(4), 325357. 10.1016/j.destud.2004.09.005
  6. Atman, C. J., Chimka, J. R., Bursic, K. M., & Nachtmann, H. L. (1999). A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes. Design Studies, 20(2), 131152. 10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00031-3
  7. Baker, L., & Cerro, L. C. (2000). Assessing metacognition in children and adults. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition. Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/burosmetacognition
  8. Bao, G., Fang, H., Chen, L., Wan, Y., Xu, F., Yang, Q., & Zhang, L. (2018). Soft robotics: Academic insights and perspectives through bibliometric analysis. Soft Robotics, 5(3), 229241. 10.1089/soro.2017.0135
  9. Barak, M. (2010). Motivating self-regulated learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(4), 381401. 10.1007/s10798-009-9092-x
  10. Cayetano-Jiménez, I. U., Martinez-Ríos, E. A., Bustamante-Bello, R., Ramírez-Mendoza, R. A., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2024). Experimenting with soft robotics in education: A systematic literature review from 2006 to 2022. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 12611278. 10.1109/tlt.2024.3372894
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
  12. Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738797. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x
  13. Cross, N., & Clayburn Cross, A. (1998). Expertise in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design - Theory, Applications, and Concurrent Engineering, 10(3), 141149.
  14. Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(1), 3445.
  15. Daly, S. R., Adams, R. S., & Bodner, G. M. (2012). What does it mean to design? A qualitative investigation of design professionals’ experiences. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 187219. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00048.x
  16. Daly, S. R., Yilmaz, S., Christian, J. L., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2012, Oct). Design heuristics in engineering concept generation. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 601629.
  17. Dixon, R. A., & Johnson, S. D. (2012). The use of executive control processes in engineering design by engineering students and professional engineers. Journal of Technology Education, 24(1), 7389. 10.21061/jte.v24i1.a.5
  18. Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425437. 10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6
  19. Dubberly, H. (2004). How do you design? A compendium of models. http://www.dubberly.com/
  20. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 103119.
  21. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219245. 10.1177/1077800405284363
  22. Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16(3), 395429. 10.1207/s15516709cog1603_3
  23. Goldschmidt, G. (1995). The designer as a team of one. Design Studies, 16(2), 189209. 10.1016/0142-694X(94)00009-3
  24. Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. State University of New York Press.
  25. Holland, D. P., Berndt, S., Herman, M., & Walsh, C. J. (2018). Growing the soft robotics community through knowledge-sharing initiatives. Soft Robotics, 5(2), 119121. 10.1089/soro.2018.29013.dph
  26. International Technology & Engineering Educators Association. (2017). Foundations of techonology at-a-glance. http://www.iteea.org
  27. Jackson, A., Godwin, A., Bartholomew, S., & Mentzer, N. (2021). Learning from failure: A systematized review. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(3), 18531873. 10.1007/s10798-021-09661-x
  28. Jackson, A., Mentzer, N., & Kramer-Bottiglio, R. (2021). Increasing gender diversity in engineering using soft robotics. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 143160. 10.1002/jee.20378
  29. Jackson, A., & Strimel, G. J. (2018). Toward a matrix of situated design cognition. CTETE Research Monograph Series, 1(Summer), 4965. 10.21061/ctete-rms.v1.c.3
  30. Jackson, A., Zhang, J., Kramer, R., & Mentzer, N. (2017). Design-based research and soft robotics to broaden the STEM pipeline (work in progress). Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education. https://peer.asee.org/27963
  31. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(4), 6385. 10.1007/BF02300500
  32. Jones, J. C. (1963). A method of systematic design. In J. C. Jones & D. G. Thornley (Eds.), Conference on design methods: Papers presented at the conference on systematic and intuitive methods in engineering, industrial design, architecture and communications, London, September 1962. Pergamon Press.
  33. Kapur, M. (2014). Comparing learning from productive failure and vicarious failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 651677. 10.1080/10508406.2013.819000
  34. Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 4583. 10.1080/10508406.2011.591717
  35. Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Architectural Press.
  36. Li, S., Chen, G., Xing, W., Zheng, J., & Xie, C. (2020). Longitudinal clustering of students’ self-regulated learning behaviors in engineering design. Computers & Education, 153. 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103899
  37. Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 4362. 10.1007/BF02299633
  38. Lottero-Perdue, P. S., & Parry, E. A. (2017). Perspectives on failure in the classroom by elementary teachers new to teaching engineering. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 7(1), Article 4. 10.7771/2157-9288.1158
  39. Matlen, B. J., & Klahr, D. (2013). Sequential effects of high and low instructional guidance on children’s acquisition of experimentation skills: Is it all in the timing? Instructional Science, 41(3), 621634. 10.1007/s11251-012-9248-z
  40. McDonnell, J. (2015). Gifts to the future: Design reasoning, design research, and critical design practitioners. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 1(2), 107117. 10.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.007
  41. Mentzer, N., Becker, K., & Sutton, M. (2015). Engineering design thinking: High school students’ performance and knowledge. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(4), 417432. 10.1002/jee.20105
  42. Mentzer, N., Lee, W., Jackson, A., & Bartholomew, S. (2023). Learning by evaluating (LbE): Promoting meaningful reasoning in the context of engineering design thinking using adaptive comparative judgment (ACJ). International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(3), 11451169. 10.1007/s10798-023-09853-7
  43. Merriam, S. B. (1995). What can you tell from an n of 1?: Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 4, 5160.
  44. Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
  45. Pathak, S. A., Kim, B., Jacobson, M. J., & Zhang, B. (2011). Learning the physics of electricity: A qualitative analysis of collaborative processes involved in productive failure. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 5773. 10.1007/s11412-010-9099-z
  46. Peters-Burton, E. E. (2018). Strategies for learning nature of science knowledge: A perspective from educational psychology. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), History, Philosophy and Science Teaching: New Perspectives. Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-62616-1
  47. Purzer, Ş., Goldstein, M. H., Adams, R. S., Xie, C., & Nourian, S. (2015). An exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors associated with scientific explanations. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), Article 9. 10.1186/s40594-015-0019-7
  48. Rus, D., & Tolley, M. T. (2015, May 28). Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature, 521, 467475. 10.1038/nature14543
  49. Sawyer, R. K. (2019). The role of failure in learning how to create in art and design. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, Article 100527. 10.1016/j.tsc.2018.08.002
  50. Sleezer, R., Swanson, J. J., & Bates, R. A. (2016). Using failure to teach design. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 10.18260/p.27145
  51. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
  52. Strimel, G. (2014). Authentic education. Technology & Engineering Teacher, 73(7), 818.
  53. Strong, K. M., Lawanto, O., & Wilson-Lopez, A. (2020). Peer-prompted engineering design: How do adolescents interact and strategize? Journal of Technology Education, 31(2), 1939. 10.21061/jte.v31i2.a.2
  54. Tauber, F., Desmulliez, M., Piccin, O., & Stokes, A. A. (2023). Perspective for soft robotics: The field’s past and future. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 18(3), Article 035001. 10.1088/1748-3190/acbb48
  55. Thomas, G. (2011). How to do your case study: A guide for students and researchers. Sage Publications.
  56. Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837851. 10.1177/1077800410383121
  57. Trenshaw, K. F., Herman, G. L., Green, K. A., & Goldberg, D. E. (2014). Fostering motivation as a class objective in a large engineering class for second-year students: A narrative approach. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(4), 837847.
  58. Trimmer, B. (2013). A journal of soft robotics: Why now? Soft Robotics, 1(1), 14. 10.1089/soro.2013.0003
  59. Trueman, R. J. (2014). Productive failure in STEM education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 42(3), 199214. 10.2190/ET.42.3.b
  60. Upadyaya, K., Viljaranta, J., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Poikkeus, A.-M., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2012). Cross-lagged relations between kindergarten teachers’ causal attributions, and children’s interest value and performance in mathematics. Social Psychology of Education, 15(2), 181206. 10.1007/s11218-011-9171-1
  61. van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. Academic Press.
  62. Wang, Z., Chen, M. Z. Q., & Yi, J. (2015). Soft robotics for engineers. HKIE Transactions, 22(2), 8897. 10.1080/1023697X.2015.1038321
  63. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531566). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
  64. Wynn, D. C., & Eckert, C. M. (2016). Perspectives on iteration in design and development. Research in Engineering Design, 28(2), 153184. 10.1007/s00163-016-0226-3
  65. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  66. Zhang, J., Jackson, A., Mentzer, N., & Kramer, R. (2017). A modular, reconfigurable mold for a K-12 soft robotic gripper design activity. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 4, Article 46. 10.3389/frobt.2017.00046
  67. Zheng, J., Xing, W., Zhu, G., Chen, G., Zhao, H., & Xie, C. (2020). Profiling self-regulation behaviors in STEM learning of engineering design. Computers & Education, 143. 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103669
  68. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 1339). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
  69. Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. J. (2006). Adolescents’ development of personal agency: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulatory skill. In F. Pajares & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 143). Information Age Publishing.
Language: English
Page range: 61 - 88
Submitted on: Aug 9, 2024
Accepted on: Feb 27, 2025
Published on: May 16, 2025
Published by: Virginia Tech
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Andrew Jackson, published by Virginia Tech
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.