Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Six-stage Instructional Design Model for Collaborative Implementation of Integrated STEM Education Cover

A Six-stage Instructional Design Model for Collaborative Implementation of Integrated STEM Education

Open Access
|May 2025

References

  1. Al Salami, M. K., Makela, C. J., & de Miranda, M. A. (2017). Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 6388. 10.1007/s10798-015-9341-0
  2. Al-araibi, A. A. M., Naz’ri bin Mahrin, M., & Yusoff, R. C. M. (2019). Technological aspect factors of E-learning readiness in higher education institutions: Delphi technique. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 567590. 10.1007/s10639-018-9780-9
  3. Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(6), 6872.
  4. Anderson, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 3(4), 216. 10.1007/BF02904348
  5. Belland, B. R. (2017). Instructional scaffolding in STEM education: Strategies and efficacy evidence. Springer Nature.
  6. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.
  7. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369387. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x
  8. Budoya, C., Kissaka, M., & Mtebe, J. (2019). Instructional design enabled Agile method using ADDIE model and Feature Driven Development method. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 15(1), 3554.
  9. Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 3035.
  10. Chamberlin, S. A., & Pereira, N. (2017). Differentiating engineering activities for use in a mathematics setting. In D. Dailey & A. Cotabish (Eds.), Engineering Instruction for High-Ability Learners in K-8 Classrooms (pp. 4555). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  11. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 321. 10.1007/BF00988593
  12. Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications. for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 7485.
  13. Cunningham, C. M. (2017). Engineering in elementary STEM education: Curriculum design, instruction, learning, and assessment. Teachers College Press.
  14. Dow, W. (2006). The need to change pedagogies in science and technology subjects: A European perspective. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16(3), 307321. 10.1007/s10798-006-0009-7
  15. Eckman, E. W., Williams, M. A., & Silver-Thorn, M. B. (2016). An integrated model for STEM teacher preparation: The value of a teaching cooperative educational experience. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 51(1), 7182. 10.30707/JSTE51.1Eckman
  16. Edmonds, G. S., Branch, R. C., & Mukherjee, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for comparing instructional design models. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(4), 5572. 10.1007/BF02298055
  17. English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 18. 10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
  18. Eubank, B. H., Mohtadi, N. G., Lafave, M. R., Wiley, J. P., Bois, A. J., Boorman, R. S., & Sheps, D. M. (2016). Using the modified Delphi method to establish clinical consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(1), 115. 10.1186/s12874-016-0165-8
  19. Fan, S., & Yu, K. (2016). Core value and implementation of the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics curriculum in technology education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(2), 153183. 10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).06
  20. Gao, X., Li, P., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 114. 10.1186/s40594-020-00225-4
  21. Glancy, A.W & Moore, T.J. (2013). Theoretical Foundations for Effective STEM Learning Environments. Retrieved from https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=enewp
  22. Goodman, C. M. (1987). The Delphi technique: a critique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 12(6), 729734. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1987.tb01376.x
  23. Gordon, J., & Zemke, R. (2000). The attack on ISD. Training, 37(4), 4245.
  24. Grafinger, D. J. (1988). Basics of instructional systems development. Alexandria: American Society for Training and Development.
  25. Habibi, A., Sarafrazi, A., & Izadyar, S. (2014). Delphi technique theoretical framework in qualitative research. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 3(4), 813.
  26. Han, J., Kelley, T., & Knowles, J. G. (2021). Factors influencing student STEM learning: Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy, 21st century skills, and career awareness. Journal for STEM Education Research, 4(2), 117137. 10.1007/s41979-021-00053-3
  27. Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 10081015. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
  28. Herro, D. & Quigley, C. (2017). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: implications for teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 43, 416438. 10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507
  29. Honey, M., Pearson, G., and Schweingruber, H. A. (eds) (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press. 10.17226/18612
  30. Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 12(1). 10.7275/pdz9-th90
  31. Hughes, A., & Denson, C. (2021). Scaffolding middle and high school students’ engineering design experiences: quality problem-SCOPEing promoting successful solutions. Journal of Technology Education, 32(2), 420. https://jte-journal.org/articles/10.21061/jte.v32i2.a.1
  32. Ismail, M. E., Utami, P., Ismail, I. M., Hamzah, N., & Harun, H. (2018). Development of massive open online course (MOOC) based on addie model for catering courses. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 8(2), 184192.
  33. Keeney, S., McKenna, H., & Hasson, F. (2010). The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, Somerset.
  34. Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM education, 3(1), 111. 10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
  35. Kelley, T. R., Knowles, J. G., Han, J., & Trice, A. N. (2021). Integrated STEM models of implementation. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 22(1), 3445.
  36. Kelley, T. R., Knowles, J. G., Holland, J. D., & Han, J. (2020). Increasing high school teachers’ self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 113. 10.1186/s40594-020-00211-w
  37. Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. M. (2018). Teaching science in elementary and middle school: A project-based learning approach. Routledge.
  38. Lai, C. S. (2018). Using inquiry-based strategies for enhancing students’ STEM education learning. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 4(1), 110117.
  39. Lin, K. Y., & Williams, P. J. (2016). Taiwanese preservice teachers’ science, technology, engineering, and mathematics teaching intention. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(6), 10211036. 10.1007/s10763-015-9645-2
  40. Linstone, H., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
  41. Love, T. S., & Wells, J. G. (2018). Examining correlations between preparation experiences of US technology and engineering educators and their teaching of science content and practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28, 395416.10.1007/s10798-017-9395-2
  42. Love, T. S., & Love, Z. J. (2023). The teacher recruitment crisis: Examining influential recruitment factors from a United States technology and engineering teacher preparation program. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(1), 105121.
  43. Magliaro, S. G., & Shambaugh, N. (2006). Student models of instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(1), 83106. 10.1007/s11423-006-6498-y
  44. Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 116. 10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
  45. McMillan, S. S., King, M., & Tully, M. P. (2016). How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 38(3), 655662. 10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x
  46. Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 3437.
  47. Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In Engineering in pre-college settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices (pp. 3560). Purdue University Press.
  48. Mukaka, M. M. (2012). A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Medical Journal, 24(3), 6971.
  49. Nichols Hess, A., & Greer, K. (2016). Designing for engagement: Using the ADDIE model to integrate high-impact practices into an online information literacy course. Communications in Information Literacy, 10(2), 264282. 10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.2.27
  50. Nolan, A., & Molla, T. (2017). Teacher confidence and professional capital. Teaching and Teacher Education, 62, 1018. 10.1016/j.tate.2016.11.004
  51. Raskin, M. S. (1994). The Delphi study in field instruction revisited: Expert consensus on issues and research priorities. Journal of Social Work Education, 30(1), 7589. 10.1080/10437797.1994.10672215
  52. Rayens, M. K., & Hahn, E. J. (2000). Building consensus using the policy Delphi method. Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice, 1(4), 308315. 10.1177%2F152715440000100409
  53. Schmidt, R. C. (1997). Managing Delphi surveys using non-parametric statistical techniques. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 763774. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01330.x
  54. Schmidt, R., Lyytinen, K., Keil, M., & Cule, P. (2001). Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), 536. 10.1080/07421222.2001.11045662
  55. Schwier, R. A., Campbell, K., & Kenny, R. (2004). Instructional designers’ observations about identity, communities of practice and change agency. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1), 69100. 10.14742/ajet.1368
  56. Siegel, S. (1956). Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill.
  57. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2004). Instructional design. John Wiley & Sons.
  58. Tang, K. S. (2017). Analyzing teachers’ use of metadiscourse: The missing element in classroom discourse analysis. Science Education, 101(4), 548583. 10.1002/sce.21275
  59. Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., … & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 02. 10.20897/ejsteme/85525
  60. Trust, T., & Pektas, E. (2018). Using the ADDIE model and universal design for learning principles to develop an open online course for teacher professional development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 219233. 10.1080/21532974.2018.1494521
  61. Walker, A. M., & Selfe, J. (1996). The Delphi method: a useful tool for the allied health researcher. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 3(12), 677681. 10.12968/bjtr.1996.3.12.14731
  62. Wang, H. H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 113. 10.5703/1288284314636
  63. Wells, J. G. (2013). Integrative STEM Education at Virginia Tech: Graduate preparation for tomorrow’s leaders. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 72(5), 2835. Reston, VA
  64. Wells, J. G. (2016). PIRPOSAL model of integrative STEM education: Conceptual and pedagogical framework for classroom implementation. The Technology and Engineering Teacher, 75(6), 1219. https://0-www.proquest.com.opac.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/scholarly-journals/pirposal-model-integrative-stem-education/docview/1781332370/se-2?accountid=14228
  65. Williams, P. J., Jones, A., & Buntting, C. (Eds.). (2015). The future of technology education. Springer Singapore.
  66. Williams, P. L., & Webb, C. (1994). The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(1), 180186. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01066.x
  67. Yeh, Y. F., Lin, T. C., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., & Hwang, F. K. (2015). Science teachers’ proficiency levels and patterns of TPACK in a practical context. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 7890. 10.1007/s10956-014-9523-7
  68. Yu, K. C., Wu, P. H., Lin, K. Y., Fan, S. C., Tzeng, S. Y., & Ku, C. J. (2021). Behavioral intentions of technology teachers to implement an engineering-focused curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 120. 10.1007/s10956-014-9523-7
  69. Zhong, B., Kang, S., & Zhan, Z. (2021). Investigating the effect of reverse engineering pedagogy in K-12 robotics education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(5), 10971111. 10.1002/cae.22363
  70. Ziglio, E. (1996). The Delphi method and its contribution to decision-making. In Adler, M. & Ziglio, E. (Eds.). Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 60
Submitted on: Aug 26, 2024
Accepted on: Apr 15, 2025
Published on: May 16, 2025
Published by: Virginia Tech
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Chih-Jung Ku, Kuen-Yi Lin, Hyuksoo Kwon, Todd R. Kelley, published by Virginia Tech
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.