Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Learning by Evaluating: An Exploration of Optimizing Design-Based Instruction Cover

Learning by Evaluating: An Exploration of Optimizing Design-Based Instruction

Open Access
|Jun 2024

References

  1. Aitken, A., & Thompson, D. G. (2018). Using software to engage design students in academic writing. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(3), 885898. 10.1007/s10798-017-9413-4
  2. Baniya, S., Mentzer, N., Bartholomew, S., Chesley, A., Moon, C., & Sherman, D. (2019). Using Adaptive Comparative Judgment in writing assessment: An investigation of reliability among interdisciplinary evaluators. The Journal of Technology Studies, 45(1), 2435.
  3. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 114. 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
  4. Bartholomew, S. (2017). Assessing open-ended design problems. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 76(6), 1317.
  5. Bartholomew, S., & Connolly, P. E. (2017, June 24). Adaptive Comparative Judgment in Graphics Applications and Education. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://strategy.asee.org/adaptive-comparative-judgment-in-graphics-applications-and-education
  6. Bartholomew, S., & Jones, M. D. (2022). A systematized review of research with adaptive comparative judgment (ACJ) in higher education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(2), 11591190. 10.1007/s10798-020-09642-6
  7. Bartholomew, S., Mentzer, N., & Jackson, A. (2022). Lessons from Dilbert: Clarifying design expectations. Technology & Engineering Teacher.
  8. Bartholomew, S., Mentzer, N., Jones, M., Sherman, D., & Baniya, S. (2022). Learning by evaluating (LbE) through adaptive comparative judgment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(2), 11911205. 10.1007/s10798-020-09639-1
  9. Bartholomew, S., Yauney, J., Mentzer, N., & Thorne, S. (2021). Investigating the impacts of differentiated stimulus materials in a Learning by Evaluating activity. Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher Education Conference (MVTTEC), Nashville, TN, USA.
  10. Bell, P. (2004). On the theoretical breadth of design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 243253. 10.1207/s15326985ep3904_6
  11. Bouwer, R., Lesterhuis, M., Bonne, P., & De Maeyer, S. (2018). Applying criteria to examples or learning by comparison: Effects on students’ evaluative judgment and performance in writing. Frontiers in Education, 3. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2018.00086
  12. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 3242. 10.3102/0013189X018001032
  13. Canty, D., Seery, N., Hartell, E., & Doyle, A. (2017). Integrating peer assessment in technology education through adaptive comparative judgment.
  14. Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 13151325. 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
  15. Carless, D., & Chan, K. K. H. (2017). Managing dialogic use of exemplars. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 930941. 10.1080/02602938.2016.1211246
  16. Chong, S. W. (2019). The use of exemplars in English writing classrooms: From theory to practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 748763. 10.1080/02602938.2018.1535051
  17. Collins, A., Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. AMERICAN EDUCATOR, 6, 3846.
  18. Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design (4th ed.). SAGE Publications Inc. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design/book246896
  19. Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738797. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x
  20. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 58. 10.3102/0013189X032001005
  21. Dixon, H., Hawe, E., & Hamilton, R. (2020). The case for using exemplars to develop academic self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(3), 460471. 10.1080/02602938.2019.1666084
  22. Douglas, E. P., Koro-Ljungberg, M., McNeill, N. J., Malcolm, Z. T., & Therriault, D. J. (2012). Moving beyond formulas and fixations: Solving open-ended engineering problems. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(6), 627651. 10.1080/03043797.2012.738358
  23. Ge, X., Chen, C.-H., & Davis, K. A. (2005). Scaffolding novice instructional designers’ problem-solving processes using question prompts in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33, 219248. 10.2190/5F6J-HHVF-2U2B-8T3G
  24. Ghefaili, A. (2003). Cognitive apprenticeship, technology, and the contextualization of learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing, Design & Online Learning, 4.
  25. Grainger, P. R., Heck, D., & Carey, M. D. (2018). Are Assessment Exemplars Perceived to Support Self-Regulated Learning in Teacher Education? Frontiers in Education, 3. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2018.00060
  26. Hawe, E., & Dixon, H. (2017). Assessment for learning: A catalyst for student self-regulation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 11811192. 10.1080/02602938.2016.1236360
  27. Headley, J., & Pittson, H. (2020). Bottom Up! Establishing a University Wide Community of Practice for Exemplars and Exploration of Its Affect in Enhancing the Quality of Student Assessment. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 13(1), 1826. eric.
  28. Hendry, G. D., & Tomitsch, M. (2014). Implementing an exemplar-based approach in an interaction design subject: Enhancing students’ awareness of the need to be creative. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(3), 337348. 10.1007/s10798-013-9256-6
  29. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 12771288. 10.1177/1049732305276687
  30. Huber, S., Bosman, L., & Bartholomew, S. (2021). Library instruction and adaptive comparative judgment to foster visual literacy skills. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 21(1), 149169. 10.1353/pla.2021.0001
  31. ITEEA. (2011). Engineering Design Process (EDP) grades 6-12. Retrieved August 10, 2023, from https://www.iteea.org/engineering-bydesign
  32. Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12(1), 311. 10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-F
  33. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 6594. 10.1007/BF02299613
  34. Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (2009). The status and nature of K-12 engineering education in the United States. The Bridge on K-12 Engineering Education, 3, 510.
  35. Kimbell, R. (2007). E-assessment in project e-scape. Design & Technology Education: An International Journal, 12(2).
  36. Kimbell, R. (2012). The origins and underpinning principles of e-scape. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(2), 123134. 10.1007/s10798-011-9197-x
  37. Kimbell, R. (2018). Constructs of quality and the power of holism. Perspectives on Human Capacity and Development, 181186.
  38. Knight, S., Leigh, A., Davila, Y. C., Martin, L. J., & Krix, D. W. (2019). Calibrating assessment literacy through benchmarking tasks. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 11211132. 10.1080/02602938.2019.1570483
  39. Mentzer, N., Lee, W., & Bartholomew, S. (2021). Examining the validity of adaptive comparative judgment for peer evaluation in a design thinking course. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.772832
  40. Newlyn, D. (2013). Providing Exemplars in the Learning Environment: The Case For and Against. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 2632.
  41. Poitras, G., & Poitras, E. (2011). A cognitive apprenticeship approach to engineering education: The role of learning styles. Engineering Education, 6(1), 6272. 10.11120/ened.2011.06010062
  42. Pollitt, A. (2012). The method of Adaptive Comparative Judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(3), 281300. 10.1080/0969594X.2012.665354
  43. Potter, T., Englund, L., Charbonneau, J., MacLean, M. T., Newell, J., & Roll, I. (2017). ComPAIR: A new online tool using adaptive comparative judgement to support learning with peer feedback. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 5(2), Article 2. 10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.2.8
  44. Rust, C., Price, M., & O’Donovan, B. (2003). Improving Students’ Learning by Developing their Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 147164. 10.1080/02602930301671
  45. Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and Promulgating Achievement Standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13(2), 191209. 10.1080/0305498870130207
  46. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119144. 10.1007/BF00117714
  47. Sadler, D. R. (2002). Ah!… so that’s ‘quality’. In Assessment. Routledge.
  48. Saldaña, J. (2013). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (Second). SAGE Publications Inc. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-coding-manual-for-qualitative-researchers/book243616
  49. Seery, N., Buckley, J., Delahunty, T., & Canty, D. (2019). Integrating learners into the assessment process using adaptive comparative judgement with an ipsative approach to identifying competence based gains relative to student ability levels. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(4), 701715. 10.1007/s10798-018-9468-x
  50. Strimel, G. J., Bartholomew, S., Purzer, S., Zhang, L., & Ruesch, E. Y. (2021). Informing engineering design through adaptive comparative judgment. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(2), 227246. 10.1080/03043797.2020.1718614
  51. Tam, A. C. F. (2021). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of and responses to exemplar-based dialogic feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 269285. 10.1080/02602938.2020.1772957
  52. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky: The Fundamentals of Defectology. Springer Science & Business Media.
  53. Yucel, R., Bird, F. L., Young, J., & Blanksby, T. (2014). The road to self-assessment: Exemplar marking before peer review develops first-year students’ capacity to judge the quality of a scientific report. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(8), 971986. 10.1080/02602938.2014.880400
Language: English
Page range: 53 - 80
Submitted on: Sep 9, 2023
Accepted on: Mar 29, 2024
Published on: Jun 25, 2024
Published by: Virginia Tech
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Scott Thorne, Nathan Mentzer, Greg J. Strimel, Scott Bartholomew, Jason Ware, published by Virginia Tech
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.