Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparative Study of Trace Metrics between Bibliometrics and Patentometrics Cover

Comparative Study of Trace Metrics between Bibliometrics and Patentometrics

Open Access
|Sep 2017

References

  1. Anderson, T.R., Hankin, R.K.S., & Killworth, P.D. (2008). Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output. Scientometrics, 76(3), 577–588.
  2. Bornheim, A., Bunn, J., Chen, J., Denis, G., Galvez, P., Gataullin, M., … & Yuldashev, B.S. (2008). The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC. Journal of Instrumentation, 3(8), S08004.
  3. Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H.D. (2010). The h index research output measurement: Two approaches to enhance its accuracy. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 407–414.
  4. Egghe, L. (2006). An improvement of the h-index: The g-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(1), 8–9.
  5. García-Pérez, M.A. (2009). A multidimensional extension to Hirsch’s h-index. Scientometrics, 81(3), 779–785.
  6. Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation — Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science, 178, 471–479.
  7. Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.
  8. Huang, M.H., Chen, D.Z., Shen, D., Wang, M.S., & Ye, F.Y. (2015). Measuring technological performance of assignees using trace metrics in three fields. Scientometrics, 104(1), 61–86.
  9. Kuan, C.H., Huang, M.H., & Chen, D.Z. (2011). Positioning research and innovation performance using shape centroids of h-core and h-tail. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 515–528.
  10. Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2011). Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2133–2146.
  11. Narin, F., Noma, E., & Perry, R. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16(2–4), 143–155.
  12. Schubert, A. (2009). Using the h-index for assessing single publications. Scientometrics, 78(3), 559–565.
  13. Waltman, L., & van Eck, N.J. (2012). The inconsistency of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 406–415.
  14. Ye, F.Y., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). The “academic trace” of the performance matrix: A mathematical synthesis of the h-index and the integrated impact indicator (I3). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 742–750.
  15. Zheng, J., Zhao, Z., Zhang, X., Huang, M., & Chen, D. (2013). Influences of counting methods on country rankings: A perspective from patent analysis. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2087–2102.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20309/jdis.201611 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 13 - 31
Submitted on: Feb 20, 2016
Accepted on: May 12, 2016
Published on: Sep 1, 2017
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Fred Y. Ye, Mu-Hsuan Huang, Dar-Zen Chen, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.