Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer Subsidies (1994–2024) Cover

A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer Subsidies (1994–2024)

Open Access
|Mar 2026

References

  1. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., Lim, W.M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res., 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  2. Dorward, A.R., Chirwa, E.W. (2015). Crowding out, diversion, and benefit/cost assessments in fertilizer subsidy programs in sub-Saharan Africa: a comment on Jayne, T.S., Mather, D., Mason, N., Ricker-Gilbert, J., 2013. How do fertilizer subsidy programs affect total fertilizer use in sub-Sa. Agric. Econ. (UK), 46(6), 739–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12189
  3. Fahmid, I.M., Jamil, A., Wahyudi, Agustian, A., Hatta, M., Aldillah, R., Yofa, R.D., Sumaryanto, Susilowati, S.H. (2022). Study of the impact of increasing the highest retail price of subsidized fertilizer on rice production in Indonesia. Open Agric., 7(1), 348–359. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0087
  4. Frempong, R.B. (2023). Do subsidies on seed and fertilizer lead to child labour? Evidence from Malawi. Dev. Pol. Rev., 41(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12646
  5. Harou, A., Liu, Y., Barrett, C., You, L. (2017). Variable Returns to Fertiliser Use and the Geography of Poverty: Experimental and Simulation Evidence From Malawi. J. Afr. Econ., 26(3), 342–371. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejx002
  6. Hidayat, Y., Nur, R., Nurdiyana, T. (2024). Urgency of Social Capital to Improve The Resilience of Independent Oil Palm Farmers in Managing Oil Palm Plantations in Peat Areas: Lessons from Indonesia. Rev. Gest. Soc. Amb., 18(9). https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-031
  7. Holden, S., Lunduka, R. (2012). Do fertilizer subsidies crowd out organic manures? The case of Malawi. Agric. Econ., 43(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00584.x
  8. Jayne, T.S., Rashid, S. (2013). Input subsidy programs in sub-Saharan Africa: a synthesis of recent evidence. Agric. Econ., 44(6), 547–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12073
  9. Ju, X., Gu, B., Wu, Y., Galloway, J.N. (2016). Reducing China’s fertilizer use by increasing farm size. Glob. Env. Chang., 41, 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.08.005
  10. Katon, Y.C., Artana, K.B., Pujawan, I.N., Putra, B.W. (2023). Performance Assessment of Fertilizer Industry Supply Chain Using a System Dynamics Approach. Int. Rev. Mech. Eng., 17(11), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.15866/ireme.v17i11.24104
  11. Khonje, M.G., Nyondo, C., Chilora, L., Mangisoni, J., Ricker-Gilbert, J., Burke, W. (2022a). Exploring Adoption Effects of Subsidies and Soil Fertility Management in Malawi. J. Agric. Econ., 73(3), 874–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12486
  12. Khonje, M.G., Nyondo, C., Mangisoni, J., Ricker-Gilbert, J., Burke, W., Chadza, W., Muyanga, M. (2022b). Does Subsidizing Legume Seeds Improve Farm Productivity and Nutrition in Malawi? Food Pol., 113, 102308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102308
  13. Kim, J.-W., Mason, N.M., Mather, D., Wu, F. (2021). The Effects of the National Agricultural Input Voucher Scheme (NAIVS) on Sustainable Intensification of Maize Production in Tanzania. J. Agric. Econ., 72(3), 857–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12431
  14. Koppmair, S., Kassie, M., Qaim, M. (2017). The Influence of Farm Input Subsidies on the Adoption of Natural Resource Management Technologies. Austral. J. Agric. Res. Econ., 61(4), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12220
  15. Kusmiyati, K., Wijaya, D.K., Hartono, B.J.R., Shidik, G.F., Fudholi, A. (2023). Harnessing the power of cow dung: Exploring the environmental, energy, and economic potential of biogas production in Indonesia. Res. Eng., 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101431
  16. Li, B., Shen, L. (2024). Effects of Soluble Organic Fertilizer Combined with Inorganic Fertilizer on Greenhouse Tomatoes with Different Irrigation Techniques. Agric. (Switz.), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14020313
  17. Nurbudiati, K., Wulandari, E. (2020). The Risk and Strategies of Potato Production in Garut, Indonesia. Caraka Tani: J. Sust. Agric., 35(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.20961/carakatani.v35i2.34072
  18. Putri, M.A., Karimi, S., Ridwan, E., Muharja, F. (2025). Fertilizer use, deforestation, and energy consumption: key drivers of nitrous oxide emissions in Indonesia. Disc. Sustain., 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01290-x
  19. Ricker-Gilbert, J., Jayne, T. (2016). Estimating the Enduring Effects of Fertiliser Subsidies on Commercial Fertiliser Demand and Maize Production: Panel Data Evidence from Malawi. J. Agric. Econ., 68, 70–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12161
  20. Ricker-Gilbert, J., Jayne, T.S., Chirwa, E. (2011). Subsidies and crowding out: A double-hurdle model of fertilizer demand in Malawi. Am. J. Agric. Econ., 93(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaq122
  21. Ricker-Gilbert, J., Mason, N.M., Darko, F.A., Tembo, S. (2013). What Are the Effects of Input Subsidy Programs on Maize Prices? Evidence From Malawi and Zambia. Agric. Econ., 44(6), 671–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12081
  22. Sane, M., Hájek, M., Nwaogu, C., Purwestri, R.C. (2021). Subsidy as an Economic Instrument for Environmental Protection: A Case of Global Fertilizer Use. Sustainability, 13(16), 9408. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169408
  23. Scheiterle, L., Birner, R. (2018). Assessment of Ghana’s Comparative Advantage in Maize Production and the Role of Fertilizers. Sustainability, 10(11), 4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114181
  24. Sibande, L., Bailey, A., Davidova, S. (2017). The Impact of Farm Input Subsidies on Maize Marketing in Malawi. Food Pol., 69(October), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.04.001
  25. Silberg, T.R., Richardson, R.B., Borges, C.P., Olabisi, L.K.S., Lopez, M.C., Grisotti, M., Chimonyo, V.G.P., Basso, B., Renner, K.A. (2024). Technology adoption and weed emergence dynamics: social ecological modeling for maize-legume systems across Africa. Ecol. Soc., 29(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-14667-290102
  26. Tadesse, A.S., Molla, D.A. (2021). Determinants of Inorganic Fertilizer Use by Smallholder Farmers in South Wollo and Oromia Special Administrative Zones, Ethiopia. J. Agric. Exten., 25(4), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.4314/jae.v25i4.11
  27. Tafakresnanto, C., Kasno, A., Susanti, Z., Karmawati, E., Adi, S.H., Hidayanto, M., Suratman, S., Rivaie, A.A. (2024). Utilising GIS-based spatial land resource analysis for subsidised fertiliser allocation in Jombang Regency, Indonesia. J. Water Land Dev., 63, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2024.151788
  28. Vondolia, G.K., Stage, J. (2021). The Effect of Fertilizer Subsidies on Investment in Soil and Water Conservation and Productivity Among Ghanaian Farmers Using Mechanized Irrigation. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158242
  29. Wang, S., Yang, P., Tan, Q., Yao, L., Li, C. (2025). Identifying spatially targeted organic fertilizer subsidies for water pollution control: An interactive hydro-economic model. Water Research, 281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.123662
  30. Yu, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, B., Yang, L., Xue, L., Han, X., Huang, L. (2025). Effects of organic fertilizer substitution strategies on nitrogen loss from crop production in Taihu Lake Basin: A case study of Jinting Town, Suzhou, China. Sust. Horiz., 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.horiz.2025.100132
  31. Zafar, S., Tarique, M. (2024). Is Input Subsidy Regime in Indian Agriculture Environmentally Sustainable? An Econometric Investigation. Ind. Econ. J., 74(1), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662241238490
  32. Zakaria, A., Alhassan, S.I., Kuwornu, J.K.M.M., Azumah, S.B. (2021). Beyond Participation: The Effect of Fertilizer Subsidy on the Adoption of Certified Seeds Among Rice Farmers in Northern Ghana. Eur. J. Dev. Res., 33(3), 684–709. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00293-w
  33. Zupic, I., Čater, T. (2014). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Org. Res. Method., 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17306/j.jard.2026.1.00041r1 | Journal eISSN: 1899-5772 | Journal ISSN: 1899-5241
Language: English
Page range: 26 - 39
Accepted on: Feb 17, 2026
Published on: Mar 30, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Mega Amelia Putri, Syafruddin Karimi, Endrizal Ridwan, Fajri Muharja, published by The University of Life Sciences in Poznań
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.