Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Vulnerability and Resilience: Assessing Factors that Shape Climate Change Adaptation Outcomes among Dwellers of the Okomu Forest Reserve’s Adjacent Communities Cover

Vulnerability and Resilience: Assessing Factors that Shape Climate Change Adaptation Outcomes among Dwellers of the Okomu Forest Reserve’s Adjacent Communities

Open Access
|Mar 2026

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Map of study area showing the Okomu Forest Reserve (A) and insert maps Nigeria showing Edo state (B) and Edo state showing the Okomu Forest Reserve (C)
Source: Onojeghuo and Onojeghuo, 2015.
Map of study area showing the Okomu Forest Reserve (A) and insert maps Nigeria showing Edo state (B) and Edo state showing the Okomu Forest Reserve (C) Source: Onojeghuo and Onojeghuo, 2015.

Multivariate probit of factors influencing choice of climate change approaches

VariablesUse of irrigationPlanting cover cropsAdjusting planting dateLivelihood diversificationSwitching livestock to cropUse of minimum tillage system

βS.E.βS.E.βS.E.βS.E.βS.E.βS.E.
Sex–0.0640.2210.3690.306–0.0880.2560.2830.1970.2830.1970.2190.651
Age–0.0080.0840.1350.117–0.0170.0980.0760.0750.760.075–0.0380.141
Annual income0.0690.0560.0320.078–0.0550.0650.0380.0500.0380.0500.0410.094
Years of experience0.0070.0940.0160.0100.0030.009–0.0170.007–0.017*0.007–0.0050.012
Occupation0.08*0.032–0.0250.044–0.0980.0370.063*0.0280.063*0.0280.0770.053
Farm size0.0540.041–0.0200.0570.0290.0480.0490.0370.0490.0370.33*0.069
Access to credit0.0850.1510.2610.210–0.658*0.1760.943*0.1350.943*0.135–0.2760.254
Access to extension services0.63*0.2010.940*0.0271.318*0.234–0.2000.180–0.2000.180–0.1990.033

Challenges confronting adoption of climate change adaptation outcomes in Okomu Forest Reserve

ParametersConsiderable extentModerate extentSlight extentNo extentMean scoresRank
Distance to extension agents46(46.5)18(18.2)15(15.2)20(20.2)1.91st
Inadequate government support19(19.2)57(57.6)18(18.2)5(5.0)1.91st
Inadequate access to weather forecasting information35(35.4)33(33.3)24(24.2)7(7.0)1.91st
Inadequate knowledge of coping or building resilience5(5.1)26(26.3)49(49.5)19(19.2)1.18th
High cost of irrigation facilities20(20.2)14(14.1)16(16.2)49(49.5)1.09th
Unpredictable weather condition26(26.3)34(34.3)20(20.2)19(19.2)1.64th
Land tenure issues19(19.1)25(25.3)29(29.3)26(26.3)1.36th
Shifting cultivation31(31.4)34(34.3)34(34.3)0(0.0)1.91st
Unavailable drought resistant varieties43(43.4)14(14.1)27(27.3)15(15.2)1.82nd
Poor agricultural program and service delivery36(36.4)35(35.4)19(19.2)9(9.0)1.91st
High cost of fertilizer and other farm inputs15(15.2)41(41.4)24(24.2)19(19.2)1.36th
Poor financing of adaptation strategies23(23.2)25(25.3)27(27.3)24(24.2)1.27th
High cost of improved varieties30(30.3)36(36.4)23(23.2)10(10.1)1.82nd
Poor households income12(12.1)39(39.4)39(39.4)9(9.1)1.55th
Lack of access to improve crop varieties32(32.3)29(29.3)18(18.2)20(20.2)1.73rd
Inadequate information on climate change29(29.3)45(45.5)15(15.1)10(10.1)1.91st
Limited knowledge on water management method19(19.2)51(51.5)10(10.1)19(19.2)1.73rd
Inadequate knowledge on adaptive measures34(34.3)31(31.3)25(25.3)9(9.1)1.91st
Bush burning20(20.2)51(51.5)5(5.1)23(23.2)1.64th

Chi square test of association between respondents’ socio-economic characteristics and climate change approaches outcomes (CCAO)

Socio economic characteristicsUse of irrigationPlanting cover cropsAdjusting planting dateLivelihood diversificationSwitching livestock to cropUse of minimum tillage system
Sex0.25(0.62)1.52(0.47)0.02(0.89)0.75(0.39)0.75(0.39)1.51(0.47)
Age5.27(0.15)5.37(0.49)0.43(0.94)1.32(0.72)1.32(0.72)3.03(0.81)
Marital status2.98(0.39)23.33(0.001)*0.92(0.82)2.62(0.46)2.61(0.45)1.04(0.98)
Religion8.39(0.02)*10.39(0.03)*3.84(0.15)1.67(0.43)1.67(0.43)5.62(0.23)
Education7.95(0.02)*6.83(0.15)*0.36(0.84)1.80(0.41)1.80(0.41)3.66(0.45)
Annual income12.52(0.01)*11.75(0.07)*1.15(0.77)1.47(0.69)1.47(0.69)4.53(0.61)
Years of experience10.25(0.85)45.82(0.05)*14.44(0.57)14.34(0.57)14.34(0.57)20.41(0.9)
Household size12.50(0.13)*8.44(0.94)7.82(0.45)2.83(0.95)2.83(0–95)25.13(0.0)
Members of social organization0.22(0.64)0.99(0.61)0.91(0.34)0.48(0.49)0.48(0.49)0.40(0.82)
Occupation13.13(.001)*8.34(0.08)23.47(0.00)*11.84(0.003)*11.84(.003)*1.28(.02)*
Farm size22.78(0.00)*27.11(0.00)*9.41(0.02)*14.87(0.002)*14.87(0.02)*81.2(.00)*
Access to credit5.19(0.02)*3.17(0.21)0.96(0.34)47.92(0.00)*47.92(0.00)*8.93(.01)*
Access to extension services26.85(0.00)*20.34(0.00)*16.41(0.00)*21.27(0.00)*21.27(0.00)*3.96(0.14)

Socio-economic characteristics of residents around Okomu Forest Reserve

VariablesFrequenciesPercentages

123
Gender

Male7575.2
Female2424.2

Age (years)

20–302727.3
31–402323.2
41–5077.1
> 504242.4

Marital status

Single4242.4
Married4040.4
Divorced11.0
Widowed1616.2

Religion

Christianity3636.4
Islamic2222.2
Traditional4141.4

Education level

Informal education5050.5
Primary education2121.2
Secondary education2828.3

Annual income (₦)

< 2504545.5
251–3001717.2
301–4503333.3
> 45144.0
> 250,00010.8

Years of experience

2–63434.3
7–113535.2
12–161414.3
> 171616.2

Household size (number of person)

2–42131.3
5–74949.5
> 82929.2

Membership of social organization

Yes9494.9
No55.1

Occupation

Farming7575.8
Trading1515.2
Others99.0

Farm size (acres)

1–34444.4
4–63333.3
7–955.1
10–121717.2

Access to credit

Yes7979.8
No2020.2

Access to extension services

Yes8989.9
No1010.1

Effects of climate change in Okomu Forest Reserve

ParametersHighModerateLowMean scoresRank
Reduction in yield and quantity of crops on farmland71(71.7)9(9.1)19(19.2)1.51st
Shortage of food supply0(0.0)75(75.8)24(24.2)0.68th
Pests and diseases outbreak30(30.3)28(28.3)41(41.4)0.86th
Threatening or reduction in forest products like Fuel-wood38(38.4)34(34.3)27(27.3)1.13rd
Reduction in animal yield19(19.2)61(61.6)19(19.2)14th
Death of animals35(35.4)19(19.2)45(45.5)0.86th
Erosion/flooding14(14.2)41(41.4)44(44.4)0.68th
Sudden rise in heavy rainfall34(34.3)55(55.6)10(10.1)1.22nd
Reduction of feed quality and fodder shortage35(35.4)35(35.4)29(29.2)1.13rd
Excessive moisture during harvesting due to excessive rainfall31(31.3)43(43.4)25(25.3)1.13rd
High intensity of temperature31(31.3)35(35.4)33(33.3)0.95th
Alteration in land suitability for agricultural production.56(56.6)38(38.4)5(5.1)1.51st
Increase competition for resources in terms of food and water34(34.3)51(51.5)14(14.2)1.22nd
Drought due to reduced rainfall increase vulnerability of residents to disease19(19.2)38(38.4)42(42.4)0.77th

Adaptation approaches utilized by rural dwellers of Okomu Forest Reserve

ParametersUtilizedNot utilized

F%F%
Use of irrigation facilities (70.7%)7070.72929.3
Planting of improved and resistant crop varieties3737.46262.6
Use of mulching method and materials5252.64747.4
Planting of cover crops6464.63535.4
Use of indigenous knowledge-based conservation practices5353.54646.5
Planting early maturing crops3737.46262.6
Adjusting planting time and season5959.64040.4
Planting drought resistant varieties5757.64242.4
Renting-out or leasing land6060.63939.4
Livelihood diversification6565.71616.8
Practicing multiple cropping/mixed farming4444.45555.6
Switching from livestock to crop6565.73434.3
Rural-urban migration4646.55353.5
Construction of drainage around homes/farms6969.73030.3
Use of minimum tillage system7373.72626.3
Carryout reforestation/afforestation3939.46060.6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17306/j.jard.2026.1.00040r1 | Journal eISSN: 1899-5772 | Journal ISSN: 1899-5241
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 15
Accepted on: Jan 14, 2026
|
Published on: Mar 30, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Adebayo Samson Adeoye, Olawale Julius Aluko, Oluwole Olalekan Oke, published by The University of Life Sciences in Poznań
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 79 (2026): Issue 1 (February 2026)