Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Machine Learning Approach to Investigating the Relative Importance of Meteorological and Aerosol-Related Parameters in Determining Cloud Microphysical Properties Cover

Machine Learning Approach to Investigating the Relative Importance of Meteorological and Aerosol-Related Parameters in Determining Cloud Microphysical Properties

Open Access
|Jan 2024

References

  1. Aas, W, Mortier, A, Bowersox, V, et al. 2019. Global and regional trends of atmospheric sulfur. Sci Rep., 9: 953. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37304-0
  2. Altaratz, O, Rotem, BO, Wollner, U and Koren, I. 2013. Relative humidity and its effect on aerosol optical depth in the vicinity of convective clouds. Environ. Res. Lett., 8(3): 034025. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034025
  3. Andersen, H, Cermark, J, Douglas, A, Myers, TA, Nowack, P, Stier, P, Wall, CJ and Kemsley, SW. 2023. Sensitivities of cloud radiative effects to large-scale meteorology and aerosols from global observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23: 1077510794. DOI: 10.5194/acp-23-10775-2023
  4. Andersen, H, Cermark, J, Fuchs, J, Knutti, R and Lohmann, U. 2017. Understanding the drivers of marine liquid-water cloud occurrence and properties with global observations using neural networks. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17: 95359546. DOI: 10.5194/acp-2017-282
  5. Bellouin, N, Quaas, J, Gryspeerdt, E, et al. 2020. Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change. Rev. Geophys., 58(1). DOI: 10.1029/2019RG000660
  6. Bender, FA-M. 2020. Aerosol forcing: Still uncertain, still relevant. AGU Advances, 1(3): e2019AV000128. DOI: 10.1029/2019AV000128
  7. Bender, FA-M, Engström, A and Karlsson, J. 2016. Factors controlling cloud albedo in marine subtropical stratocumulus regions in climate models and satellite observations. J. Clim., 29(10): 35593587. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0095.1
  8. Bender, FA-M, Frey, L, McCoy, DT, Grosvenor, DP and Mohrmann, JK. 2019. Assessment of aerosol–cloud–radiation correlations in satellite observations, climate models and reanalysis. Clim. Dyn. 52: 43714392. DOI: 10.1007/s00382-018-4384-z
  9. Blanco, JE, Caballero, R, Datseris, G, Stevens, B, Bony, S, Hadas, O and Kaspi, Y. 2023. A Cloud-Controlling Factor Perspective on the Hemispheric Asymmetry of Extratropical Cloud Albedo. J. Clim., 36: 17931804. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-22-0410.1
  10. Bond, TC, et al. 2013. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118: 53805552. DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50171
  11. Carslaw, KS, Lee, LA, Reddington, CL, Pringle, KJ, Rap, A, Forster, PM, Mann, GW, Spracklen, DV, Woodhouse, MT, Regayre, LA and Pierce, JR. 2013. Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing. Nature, 503: 6771. DOI: 10.1038/nature12674
  12. Ceppi, P, and Nowack P. 2021. Observational evidence that cloud feedback amplifies global warming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118(30): e2026290118. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2026290118
  13. Chand, D, Wood, R, Ghan, SJ, Wang, M, Ovchinnikov, M, Rasch, PJ, Miller, S, Schichtel, B and Moore, T. 2012. Aerosol optical depth increase in partly cloudy conditions. J. Geophys. Res., 117: D17207. DOI: 10.1029/2012JD017894
  14. Chen, Y, Haywood, J, Wang, Y, et al. 2022. Machine learning reveals climate forcing from aerosols is dominated by increased cloud cover. Nat. Geosci., 15: 609614. DOI: 10.1038/s41561-022-00991-6
  15. Chen, YC, Christensen, M, Stephens, G and Seinfeld, JH. 2014. Satellite-based estimate of global aerosol–cloud radiative forcing by marine warm clouds. Nat. Geosci., 7: 643646. DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2214
  16. Christensen, MW, Gettelman, A, Cermak, J, Dagan, G, Diamond, M, Douglas, A, Feingold, G, Glassmeier, F, Goren, T, Grosvenor, DP, Gryspeerdt, E, Kahn, R, Li, Z, Ma, P-L, Malavelle, F, McCoy, IL, McCoy, DT, McFarquhar, G, Mülmenstädt, J, Pal, S, Possner, A, Povey, A, Quaas, J, Rosenfeld, D, Schmidt, A, Schrödner, R, Sorooshian, A, Stier, P, Toll, V, Watson-Parris, D, Wood, R, Yang, M and Yuan, T. 2022. Opportunistic experiments to constrain aerosol effective radiative forcing. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22: 641674. DOI: 10.5194/acp-22-641-2022
  17. Diamond, MS, Director, HM, Eastman, R, Possner, A and Wood, R. 2020. Substantial Cloud Brightening from Shipping in Subtropical Low Clouds. AGU Advances, 1: e2019AV000111. DOI: 10.1029/2019AV000111
  18. Douglas, A and L’Ecuyer, T. 2019. Quantifying variations in shortwave aerosol–cloud–radiation interactions using local meteorology and cloud state constraints. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19: 6251626. DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-6251-2019
  19. Engström, A and Ekman, AM. 2010. Impact of meteorological factors on the correlation between aerosol optical depth and cloud fraction. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37: L18814. DOI: 10.1029/2010GL044361
  20. Feingold, G, Remer, LA, Ramaprasad, J and Kaufman, YJ. 2001. Analysis of smoke impact on clouds in Brazilian biomass burning regions: An extension of Twomey’s approach. J. Geophys. Res., 106(D19): 2290722922. DOI: 10.1029/2001JD000732
  21. Forster, PT, Storelvmo, K, Armour, W, Collins, J-L, Dufresne, D, Frame, DJ, Lunt, T, Mauritsen, MD, Palmer, M, Watanabe, M, Wild and Zhang, H. 2021. The Earth’s Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity. In Masson-Delmotte, V, Zhai, P, Pirani, A, Connors, SL, Péan, C, Berger, S, Caud, N, Chen, Y, Goldfarb, L, Gomis, MI, Huang, M, Leitzell, K, Lonnoy, E, Matthews, JBR, Maycock, TKT, Waterfield, O, Yelekçi, R, Yu and Zhou, B (eds.), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9231054. DOI: 10.1017/9781009157896.009
  22. Friedman, JH. 2001. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat., 29: 11891232. DOI: 10.1214/aos/1013203451
  23. Fuchs, J, Cermark, J and Andersen, H. 2018. Building a cloud in the southeast Atlantic: understanding low-cloud controls based on satellite observations with machine learning. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18: 1653716552. DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-16537-2018
  24. Géron, A. 2019. Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow, 2nd Edition. O’Reilly Media, Inc., ISBN: 9781492032649
  25. Glassmeier, F, Hofffmann, F, Johnson, JS, Yamaguchi, T, Carslaw, KS and Feingold, G. 2021. Aerosol-cloud-climate cooling overestimated by ship-track data. Science, 371(6528): 485489. DOI: 10.1126/science.abd3980
  26. Grandey, BS and Stier, P. 2010. A critical look at spatial scale choices in satellite-based aerosol indirect effect studies. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10: 1145911470. DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-11459-2010
  27. Gryspeerdt, E and Stier, P. 2012. Regime-based analysis of aerosol-cloud interactions. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39: 21. DOI: 10.1029/2012GL053221
  28. Gryspeerdt, E, Stier, P and Partridge, DG. 2014. Satellite observations of cloud regime development: the role of aerosol processes. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14: 11411158. DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-1141-2014
  29. Hastie, T, Tibshirani, R and Friedman, J. 2017. The elements of statistical learning – Data mining, inference, and prediction, Second edition. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
  30. Hersbach, H, Bell, B, Berrisford, P, Hirahara, S, Horányi, A, Muñoz-Sabater, J, Nicolas, J, Peubey, C, Radu, R, Schepers, D, Simmons, A, Soci, C, Abdalla, S, Abellan, X, Balsamo, G, Bechtold, P, Biavati, G, Bidlot, J, Bonavita, M, De Chiara, G, Dahlgren, P, Dee, D, Diamantakis, M, Dragani, R, Flemming, J, Forbes, R, Fuentes, M, Geer, A, Haimberger, L, Healy, S, Hogan, RJ, Hólm, E, Janisková, M, Keeley, S, Laloyaux, P, Lopez, P, Lupu, C, Radnoti, G, de Rosnay, P, Rozum, I, Vamborg, F, Villaume, S and Thépaut, JN. 2020. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 146: 730. DOI: 10.1002/qj.3803
  31. Jesson, A, Manshausen, P, Douglas, A, Watson-Parris, D, Gal, Y and Stier, P. 2021. Using Non-Linear Causal Models to Study Aerosol-Cloud Interactions in the Southeast Pacific. Nov 3 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.15084v3
  32. Jia, H, Ma, X, Quaas, J, Yin, Y and Qiu, T. 2019. Is positive correlation between cloud droplet effective radius and aerosol optical depth over land due to retrieval artifacts or real physical processes? Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19: 88798896. DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-8879-2019
  33. Kaplan, J, McCandlish, S, Henighan, T, Brown, TB, Chess, B, Child, R, Gray, S, Radford, A, Wu, J and Amodei, D. 2020. Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models. arXiv:2001.08361
  34. Klein, SA, Hall, A, Norris, JR and Pincus, R. 2017. Low-Cloud Feedbacks from Cloud-Controlling Factors: A Review. Surv. Geophys, 38(6): 13071329. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77273-8_7
  35. Klein, S and Hartmann, DL. 1993. The seasonal cycle of low stratiform clouds. J. Clim., 6: 15871606. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<;1587:TSCOLS>2.0.CO;2
  36. Koren, I, Feingold, G and Remer, LA. 2010. The invigoration of deep convective clouds over the Atlantic: aerosol effect, meteorology or retrieval artifact? Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10: 88558872. DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-8855-2010
  37. Krotkov, NA, McLinden, CA, Li, C, Lamsal, LN, Celarier, EA, Marchenko, SV, Swartz, WH, Bucsela, EJ, Joiner, J, Duncan, BN, Boersma, KF, Veefkind, JP, Levelt, PF, Fioletov, VE, Dickerson, RR, He, H, Lu, Z and Streets, DG. 2016. Aura OMI observations of regional SO2 and NO2 pollution changes from 2005 to 2015. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16: 46054629. DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-4605-2016
  38. Levy, RC, Mattoo, S, Munchak, LA, Remer, LA, Sayer, AM, Patadia, F and Hsu, NC. 2013. The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6: 29893034. DOI: 10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013
  39. Liu, J and Li, Z. 2014. Estimation of cloud condensation nuclei concentration from aerosol optical quantities: influential factors and uncertainties. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14: 471483. DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-471-2014
  40. Liu, Y, de Leeuw, G, Kerminen, V-M, Zhang, J, Zhou, P, Nie, W, Qi, X, Hong, J, Wang, Y, Ding, A, Guo, H, Krüger, O, Kulmala, M and Petäjä, T. 2017. Analysis of aerosol effects on warm clouds over the Yangtze River Delta from multi-sensor satellite observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17: 56235641. DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-5623-2017
  41. Loeb, NG, Manalo-Smith, N, Su, W, Shankar, M and Thomas, S. 2016. CERES Top-of-Atmosphere Earth Radiation Budget Climate Data Record: Accounting for in-Orbit Changes in Instrument Calibration. Remote Sens., 8: 182. DOI: 10.3390/rs8030182
  42. Ma, X, Jia, H, Yu, F and Quaas, J. 2018. Opposite aerosol index-cloud droplet effective radius correlations over major industrial regions and their adjacent oceans. Geophys. Res. Lett., 45: 57715778. DOI: 10.1029/2018GL077562
  43. Malavelle, F, Haywood, J, Jones, A, et al. 2017. Strong constraints on aerosol–cloud interactions from volcanic eruptions. Nature, 546: 485491. DOI: 10.1038/nature22974
  44. Mauger, GS and Norris, JR. 2007. Meteorological bias in satellite estimates of aerosol-cloud relationships Geophys. Res. Lett., 34: 16. DOI: 10.1029/2007GL029952
  45. McCoy, DT, Bender, FA-M, Grosvenor, DP, Mohrmann, JK, Hartmann, DL, Wood, R and Field, PR. 2018. Predicting decadal trends in cloud droplet number concentration using reanalysis and satellite data. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18: 20352047. DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-2035-2018
  46. McCoy, DT, Bender, FA-M, Mohrmann, JKC, Hartmann, DL, Wood, R and Grosvenor, DP. 2017. The global aerosol-cloud first indirect effect estimated using MODIS, MERRA, and AeroCom. J. Geophys. Res., 122: 17791796. DOI: 10.1002/2016JD026141
  47. McCoy, DT and Hartmann, DL. 2015. Observations of a substantial cloud-aerosol indirect effect during the 2014–2015 Bárðarbunga-Veiðivötn fissure eruption in Iceland. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42(10): 40910, 414. DOI: 10.1002/2015GL067070
  48. McCoy, IL, McCoy, DT, Wood, R, Zuidema, P and Bender, FA-M. 2023. The role of mesoscale cloud morphology in the shortwave cloud feedback. Geophys. Res. Lett., 50: e2022GL101042. DOI: 10.1029/2022GL101042
  49. Myers, TA, Scott, RC, Zelinka, MD, Klein, SA, Norris, JR and Caldwell, PM. 2021. Observational constraints on low cloud feedback reduce uncertainty of climate sensitivity. Nat. Clim. Change, 11: 501507. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-021-01039-0
  50. Myhre, G, Stordal, F, Johnsrud, M, Kaufman, YJ, Rosenfeld, D, Storelvmo, T, Kristjansson, JE, Berntsen, TK, Myhre, A and Isaksen, ISA. 2007. Aerosol-cloud interaction inferred from MODIS satellite data and global aerosol models. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7: 30813101. DOI: 10.5194/acp-7-3081-2007
  51. NASA. n.d. OMSO2 Release Specific Information. Available at https://so2.gsfc.nasa.gov/Documentation/OMSO2ReleaseDetails_v111_0303.pdf.
  52. OMI Team. 2012. Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Data User’s Guide. Technical Report OMIDUG-3.0, NASA, January 5 2012. Available at https://docserver.gesdisc.eosdis.nasa.gov/repository/Mission/OMI/3.3_ScienceDataProductDocumentation/3.3.2_ProductRequirements_Designs/README.OMI_DUG.pdf.
  53. Oreopoulos, L, Cho, N and Lee, D. 2017. Using MODIS cloud regimes to sort diagnostic signals of aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions. J. Geophys. Res., 122: 54165440. DOI: 10.1002/2016JD026120
  54. Oreopoulos, L, Cho, N and Lee, D. 2019. A Global Survey of Apparent Aerosol-Cloud Interaction Signals J. Geophys. Res., 125(1): e2019JD031287. DOI: 10.1029/2019JD031287
  55. Pedregosa, F, Varoquaux, G, Gramfort, A, Michel, V, Thirion, B, Grisel, O, Blondel, M, Prettenhofer, P, Weiss, R, Dubourg, V, Vanderplas, J, Passos, A, Cournapeau, D, Brucher, M, Perrot, M and Duchesnay, E. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. JMLR, 12: 28252830.
  56. Platnick, S, Meyer KG, King, MD, Wind, G, Amarasinghe, N, Marchant, B, Arnold, GT, Zhang, Z, Hubanks, PA, Holz, RE, Yang, P, Ridgway, WL and Riedi, J. 2017. The MODIS cloud optical and microphysical products: Collection 6 updates and examples from Terra and Aqua. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 55(1): 502525. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2610522
  57. Quaas, J, Arola, A, Cairns, B, Christensen, M, Deneke, H, Ekman, AML, Feingold, G, Fridlind, A, Gryspeerdt, E, Hasekamp, O, Li, Z, Lipponen, A, Ma, P-L, Mülmenstädt, J, Nenes, A, Penner, JE, Rosenfeld, D, Schrödner, R, Sinclair, K, Sourdeval, O, Stier, P, Tesche, M, van Diedenhoven, B and Wendisch, M. 2020. Constraining the Twomey effect from satellite observations: issues and perspectives. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20: 1507915099. DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-15079-2020
  58. Randles, CA, da Silva, AM, Buchard, V, Colarco, PR, Darmenov, A, Govindaraju, R, et al. 2017. The MERRA-2 aerosol reanalysis, 1980 onward. Part I: System description and data assimilation evaluation. J. Clim., 30(17): 68236850. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0609.1
  59. Randles, CA, da Silva, AM, Buchard, V, Darmenov, A, Colarco, PR, Aquila, V, Bian, H, Nowottnick, EP, Pan, X, Smirnov, A, Yu, H and Govindaraju, R. 2016. The MERRA-2 Aerosol Assimilation. Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, 45: 1140.
  60. Roberts, DR, Bahn, V, Ciuti, S, Boyce, MS, Elith, J, Guillera-Arroita, G, Hauenstein, S, Lahoz-Monfort, JJ, Schröder, B, Thuiller, W, Warton, DI, Wintle, BA, Hartig, F and Dormann, CF. 2017. Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure. Ecography. 40: 913929. DOI: 10.1111/ecog.02881
  61. Rumelhart, D, Hinton, G and Williams, R. 1986. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323: 533536. DOI: 10.1038/323533a0
  62. Scott, RC, Myers, TA, Norris, JR, Zelinka, MD, Klein, SA, Sun, M, Doelling, DR. 2020. Observed Sensitivity of Low-Cloud Radiative Effects to Meteorological Perturbations over the Global Oceans. J. Clim., 33: 77177734. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-1028.1
  63. Shinozuka, Y, Clarke, AD, Nenes, A, Jefferson, A, Wood, R, McNaughton, CS, Ström, J, Tunved, P, Redemann, J, Thornhill, KL, Moore, RH, Lathem, TL, Lin, JJ and Yoon, YJ. 2015. The relationship between cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration and light extinction of dried particles: indications of underlying aerosol processes and implications for satellite-based CCN estimates. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15: 75857604. DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-7585-2015
  64. Song, Q, Zhang, Z, Yu, H, Ginoux, P and Shen, J. 2021. Global dust optical depth climatology derived from CALIOP and MODIS aerosol retrievals on decadal timescales: regional and interannual variability. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21: 1336913395. DOI: 10.5194/acp-21-13369-2021
  65. Stein, AF, Draxler, RR, Rolph, GD, Stunder, BJB, Cohen, MD and Ngan, F. 2015. NOAA’s HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 96: 20592077. DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1
  66. Stevens, B and Brenguier, J-L. 2009. Cloud-controlling factors: Low clouds. In Heintzenberg, J and Charlson, RJ (eds.), Clouds in the perturbed climate system (Chap. 8). Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/8300.003.0010
  67. Stevens, B and Feingold, G. 2009. Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and precipitation in a buffered system. Nature, 461: 607613. DOI: 10.1038/nature08281
  68. Stier, P. 2016. Limitations of passive remote sensing to constrain global cloud condensation nuclei. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16: 65956607. DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-6595-2016
  69. Tang, JP, Wang, PC, Mickley, LJ, Xia, XG, Liao, H, Yue, X, Sun, L and Xia, JR. 2014. Positive relationship between liquid cloud droplet effective radius and aerosol optical depth over Eastern China from satellite data. Atmos. Environ., 84: 244253. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.024
  70. Tian, X, Tang, C, Wu, X, Yang, J, Zhao, F and Liu, D. 2023. The global spatial-temporal distribution and EOF analysis of AOD based on MODIS data during 2003–2021. Atmos. Environ., 302: 119722. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119722
  71. Toll, V, Christensen, M, Gassó, S and Bellouin, N. 2017. Volcano and Ship Tracks Indicate Excessive Aerosol-Induced Cloud Water Increases in a Climate Model Geophys. Res. Lett., 44(24): 1249212500. DOI: 10.1002/2017GL075280
  72. Toll, V, Christensen, M, Quaas, J and Bellouin, N. 2019. Weak average liquid-cloud-water response to anthropogenic aerosols. Nature, 572: 5155. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1423-9
  73. Twomey, S. 1974. Pollution and the planetary albedo, Atmos. Environ., 8: 12511256. DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(74)90004-3
  74. Wall, CJ, Norris, JR, Possner, A, McCoy, DT, McCoy, IL and Lutsko, NJ. 2022. Assessing effective radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions over the global ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 119(46). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2210481119
  75. Wang, F, Guo, J, Wu, Y, Zhang, X, Deng, M, Li, X, Zhang, J and Zhao, J. 2014. Satellite observed aerosol-induced variability in warm cloud properties under different meteorological conditions over eastern China. Atmos. Environ., 84: 122132. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.018
  76. Wielicki, B, Barkstom, BR, Harrison, EF, Lee, RBIII, Smith, GL, and Cooper, J. 1996. Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES): An earth observing system experiment. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77: 853868. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<;0853:CATERE>2.0.CO;2
  77. Yuan, T, Li, Z, Zhang, R and Fan, J. 2008. Increase of cloud droplet size with aerosol optical depth: An observation and modeling study. J. Geophys. Res., 113: D04201. DOI: 10.1029/2007JD008632
  78. Zhang, J, Zhou, X, Goren, T and Feingold, G. 2022. Albedo susceptibility of northeastern Pacific stratocumulus: the role of covarying meteorological conditions. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22: 861880. DOI: 10.5194/acp-22-861-2022
  79. Zipfel, L, Andersen, H and Cermark, J. 2022. Machine-learning based analysis of liquid water path adjustments to aerosol perturbations in marine boundary layer clouds using satellite observations. Atmosphere, 13: 586. DOI: 10.3390/atmos13040586
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 18
Submitted on: Jan 9, 2023
Accepted on: Dec 13, 2023
Published on: Jan 10, 2024
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Frida A.-M. Bender, Tobias Lord, Anna Staffansdotter, Verena Jung, Sabine Undorf, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.