Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Negative Sensitivity of Southern Ocean Circumpolar Transport to Increased Wind Stress Controlled by Residual Overturning Cover

Negative Sensitivity of Southern Ocean Circumpolar Transport to Increased Wind Stress Controlled by Residual Overturning

Open Access
|Sep 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

(a) A schematic outlining the geometry of the model, with the layer interface depicted in light blue. The blue arrow represents a streamline of the flow, and the red arrow represents a prescribed outflow as defined in (18). (b) The model pycnocline depth h of a sample equilibrium state for GEOM for a calculation with wind over both the channel and basin region (W02, with ys=0km, yn=2,000km), for τ0=1.0Nm2, TRMOC=0. The orange contour represents a streamline originating from the northern end of the model Drake passage located at (x,y) = (0,1,000) km, roughly denoting the northern boundary of the modelled ACC. The region enclosed in red denotes the location where the boundary condition of TRMOC is applied, and the region enclosed in yellow denotes the section of the domain shown in (c). (c) The section of the domain denoted by the yellow region in (b), shown with the numerical unstructured mesh overlaid (light yellow).

Figure 2

FEniCS code for solving the steady-state equation in its weak form as outlined in Eq. (14).

Table 1

A list of the relevant constants and parameters for the calculations reported in this work.

PARAMETERSVALUEUNITSDESCRIPTION
Lx20,000kmZonal width of the domain
Ly4,000kmMeridional width of the domain
gr0.01m s-2Reduced gravity
ρ01,027kg m-3Density of the upper layer
f01.2×104s-1Coriolis parameter at the southern end of the domain
β2×1011ms11df/dy
r1×107s-1Linear drag coefficient
D5,000mTotal depth of the ocean
α0.03Eddy efficiency (GEOM)
λ1.4×107s-1Eddy energy dissipation coefficient
ν1,000m2s1Eddy energy diffusion coefficient
κ01,000m2s1Gent–McWilliams eddy coefficient (CONST)
αML0.063Eddy efficiency (ML)
E010.0m2s2Minimum eddy energy
τ00.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0,N m-2Maximum surface wind stress
1.2, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0
ys,yn (W01)0, 1,000kmSouthern & northern boundaries of wind stress (W01)
ys,yn (W02)0, 2,000kmSouthern & northern boundaries of wind stress (W02)
ys,yn (W23)2,000, 3,000kmSouthern & northern boundaries of wind stress (W23)
Figure 3

Diagnosed ACC transport for a case where the wind is completely over the re-entrant channel (W01), for different values of TRMOC and τ0 on a logarithmic scale on both axes, for (a) GEOM, (b) ML and (c) CONST. When TRMOC>0, at low winds the transport goes to zero, and there is no equilibrium solution (since no mass balance is possible in those cases). The data scalings shown as black dashed line and blue dashed line are diagnosed via a regression over the indicated data range corresponding to the length of the dashed lines using data from the TRMOC=0Sv and TRMOC=20Sv calculations, respectively.

Figure 4

Diagnostic relating to momentum balance for a case where the wind is completely over the re-entrant channel (W01), showing net northward volume transports for a representative case with peak wind stress τ0=1.0Nm2 for (top row) TRMOC=0Sv and (bottom row) TRMOC=20Sv, for (a,d) GEOM, (b,e) ML and (c,f) CONST. The quantities Teddy, Tfric and Tgeos are shown with the opposite sign (dashed lines) to enable easier comparison of magnitudes and distributions. The vertical dashed-dot grey line denotes the model Drake passage separating the channel region and the basin region.

Figure 5

The zonally averaged h/y profiles of the W01 case (wind forcing only over the channel) for (a) GEOM, (b) ML and (c) CONST. The data plotted here are the profiles where there is no wind but fixed negative RMOC (τ0=0Nm2 and TRMOC=20Sv; grey dotted), only wind but no RMOC (τ0=1.0Ns2 and TRMOC=0Sv; black dashed), and intermediate profiles varying τ0 at fixed negative RMOC (TRMOC=20Sv; darker blue with increasing τ0). The vertical dashed-dot grey line denotes the model Drake passage separating the channel region and the basin region.

Figure 6

The implied ACC transports from Eq. (32) from the optimisation calculation stated in Eq. (31) for the wind solely over the re-entrant channel (W01). (Top row) T^wind. (Middle row) T^RMOC. (Bottom row) T^total=T^wind+T^RMOC, to be compared with results in Figure 3. See Figures A.1 and 5 for samples of the respective definitions of the basis patterns (h/y)wind and (h/y)RMOC.

Figure 7

Diagnostics for GEOM, for a case where the wind is partially over the re-entrant channel (W02). (a) Diagnosed transport for different values of TRMOC and τ0. (b, c) Momentum balances for a zero and negative TRMOC case, respectively; details are as in Figure 4. The vertical dashed-dot grey line denotes the model Drake passage separating the channel region and the basin region. The data scalings shown as black dashed line and blue dashed line are diagnosed via a regression over the indicated data range corresponding to the length of the dashed lines using data from the TRMOC=0Sv and TRMOC=20Sv calculation respectively.

Figure 8

Diagnostics for GEOM, for a case where the wind is completely over the basin (W23). (a) Diagnosed transport for different values of TRMOC and τ0. (b, c) Momentum balances for a zero and negative TRMOC case, respectively, for τ0=1Nm2; details are as in Figure 4. The vertical dashed-dot grey line denotes the model Drake passage separating the channel region and the basin region. The data scalings shown as black dashed line and blue dashed line are diagnosed via a regression over the indicated data range corresponding to the length of the dashed lines using data from the TRMOC=0Sv and TRMOC=20Sv calculations, respectively.

Figure A.1

The zonally averaged h/y profiles of the W01 case (wind forcing only over the channel) at zero TRMOC, normalised by the maximum of the zonally averaged profile. (a) GEOM, (b) ML and (c) CONST. The vertical dashed-dot grey line denotes the model Drake passage separating the channel region and the basin region.

Figure A.2

The profile returned by the optimisation calculation (black dashed) and the actual diagnosed profile (grey), for the case τ0=1.0Nm2 ad TRMOC=20Sv, for (a) GEOM, (b) ML and (c) CONST.

Language: English
Page range: 199 - 220
Submitted on: Aug 13, 2024
Accepted on: Sep 4, 2025
Published on: Sep 22, 2025
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Han Seul Lee, James R. Maddison, Julian Mak, David P. Marshall, Yan Wang, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.