Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Robustness of Observing System Simulation Experiments Cover

Robustness of Observing System Simulation Experiments

Open Access
|Oct 2023

References

  1. Arnold, CJ and Dey, C. 1986. Observing-system simulation experiments: past, present, and future. Bull. of the Amer. Met. Soc., 67: 687695. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0477(1986)067<;0687:OSSEPP>2.0.CO;2
  2. Atlas, R. 1997. Atmospheric observations and experiments to assess their usefulness in data assimilation. J. Met. Soc. Japan, 75: 687695. DOI: 10.2151/jmsj1965.75.1B_111
  3. Bloom, S, Takacs, L, Silva, AD and Ledvina, D. 1996. Data assimilation using incremental analysis updates. Monthly Weather Review, 124: 12561271. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<;1256:DAUIAU>2.0.CO;2
  4. Boukabara, S-A, Ide, K, Shahroudi, N, Zhou, Y, Zhu, T, Li, R, Cucurull, L, Atlas, R, Casey, S and Hoffman, R. 2018. Community Global Observing System Simulation Experiment (OSSE) Package (CGOP): perfect observations simulation validation. J. Atmos. Ocean Tech., 35: 207226. DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-17-0077.1
  5. Cardinali, C, Pailleux, J and Thépaut, J-N. 1998. Use of simulated Doppler wind lidar data in NWP: an impact study. Note de travail du Groupe de Modelisation pour L’assimilation et le Prevision 6, Cent. Natl. de la Rech. Sci., Météo, France.
  6. Cucurull, L and Casey, SPF. 2021. Improved impacts in observing system simulation experiments of radio occultation observations as a result of model and data assimilation changes. Monthly Weather Review, 149(1): 207220. DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-20-0174.1
  7. Culverwell, I, Lewis, H, Offiler, D, Marquardt, C and Burrows, C. 2015. The radio occultation processing package, ROPP. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8: 18871899. DOI: 10.5194/amt-8-1887-2015
  8. Ding, S, Yang, P, Weng, F, Liu, Q, van Delst, P, Li, J and Baum, B. 2011. Validation of the community radiative transfer model. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer., 112: 10501064. DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.11.009
  9. El Akkraoui, A, Privé, N, Errico, R and Todling, R. 2023. The GMAO Hybrid 4D-EnVar Observing System Simulation Experiment Framework. Monthly Weather Review, 151(7): 17171734. DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-22-0254.1
  10. Errico, RM, Carvalho, D, Privé, NC and Sienkiewicz, M. 2020. Simulation of atmospheric motion vectors for an observing system simulation experiment. J. Atmos. Ocean Tech., 37: 489505. DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-19-0079.1
  11. Errico, RM and Privé, NC. 2018. Some general and fundamental requirements for designing observing system simulation experiments (osses). WMO Rep. WWRP 2018–8 p. 33 pp.
  12. Errico, R, Privé, N, Carvalho, D, Sienkiewicz, M, Akkraoui, AE, Guo, J, Todling, R, McCarty, W, Putman, W, da Silva, A, Gelaro, R and Moradi, I. 2017. Description of the GMAO OSSE for Weather Analysis software package: Version 3. Technical Report 48, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA/TM-2017-104606.
  13. Errico, RM, Yang, R, Privé, N, Tai, K-S, Todling, R, Sienkiewicz, M and Guo, J. 2013. Validation of version one of the Observing System Simulation Experiments at the Global Modeling and Assimilation Office. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139: 11621178. DOI: 10.1002/qj.2027
  14. Freitas, SR, Grell, G, Molod, A, Thompson, M, Putman, W, e Silva, CS and Souza, E. 2018. Assessing the Grell-Freitas convection parameterization in the NASA GEOS modeling system. J. Adv. Model. Earth Sys., 10: 12661289. DOI: 10.1029/2017MS001251
  15. Gelaro, R, Putman, WM, Pawson, S, Draper, C, Molod, A, Norris, PM, Ott, L, Privé, N, Reale, O, Achuthavarier, D, Bosilovich, M, Buchard, V, Chao, W, Coy, L, Cullather, R, da Silva, A, Darmenov, A, Errico, RM, Fuentes, M, Kim, M-J, Koster, R, McCarty, W, Nattala, J, Partyka, G, Schubert, S, Vernieres, G, Vikhliaev, Y and Wargan, K. 2014. Evaluation of the 7-km GEOS-5 nature run. NASA/TM–2014-104606, 36, NASA.
  16. Halliwell, G, Srinicasan, A, Kourafalou, V, Yang, H, Willey, D, Hénaff, ML and Atlas, R. 2014. Rigorous evaluation of a fraternal twin ocean OSSE system for the open Gulf of Mexico. J. Atmos. Ocean Tech., 31: 105130. DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00011.1
  17. Han, Y, van Delst, P, Liu, Q, Weng, F, Yan, B, Treadon, R and Derber, J. 2006. JCSDA Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM) – version 1. NOAA Tech. Report 122.
  18. Hoffman, R and Atlas, R. 2016. Future observing system simulation experiments. Bull. of the Amer. Met. Soc., 97: 16011616. DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00200.1
  19. Masutani, M, Woollen, J, Lord, S, Emmitt, G, Kleespies, T, Wood, S, Greco, S, Sun, H, Terry, J, Kapoor, V, Treadon, R and Campana, K. 2010. Observing system simulation experiments at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction. J. Geophys. Res., 115: D07101. DOI: 10.1029/2009JD012528
  20. McCarty, W, Carvalho, D, Moradi, I and Prive, NC. 2021. Observing system simulation experiments investigating atmospheric motion vectors and radiances from a constellation of 4-5 micro-m infrared sounders. J. Atmos. Ocean Tech., 38: 331347. DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-20-0109.1
  21. McGrath-Spangler, E, McCarty, W, Privé, N, Moradi, I, Karpowicz, B and McCorkel, J. 2022. Using OSSEs to evaluate the impacts of geostationary infrared sounders. J. Atmos. Ocean Tech., 39: 19031918. DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-22-0033.1
  22. Molod, A, Takacs, L, Suarez, M and Bacmeister, J. 2015. Development of the GEOS-5 atmospheric general circulation model: evolution from MERRA to MERRA2. Geosci. Model Dev., 8: 13391356. DOI: 10.5194/gmd-8-1339-2015
  23. Park, S and Bretherton, C. 2009. The University of Washington shallow convection and moist turbulence schemes and their impact on climate simulations with the community atmosphere model. J. Clim., 22: 34493469. DOI: 10.1175/2008JCLI2557.1
  24. Peubey, C and McNally, AP. 2009. Characterization of the impact of geostationary clear-sky radiances on wind analyses in a 4D-Var context. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 135(644): 18631876. DOI: 10.1002/qj.500
  25. Privé, N and Errico, R. 2013b. The role of model and initial condition error in numerical weather forecasting investigated with an observing system simulation experiment. Tellus-A, 65. DOI: 10.3402/tellusa.v65i0.21740
  26. Privé, N and Errico, R. 2019. Uncertainty of observation impact estimation in an adjoint model investigated with an observing system simulation experiment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 147: 31913204. DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-19-0097.1
  27. Privé, N, Errico, R and Tai, K-S. 2013a. The influence of observation errors on analysis error and forecast skill investigated with an observing system simulation experiment. J. Geophys. Res., 118: 53325346. DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50452
  28. Privé, N, Errico, R and Tai, K-S. 2013b. Validation of forecast skill of the Global Modeling and Assimilation Office observing system simulation experiment. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139: 13541363. DOI: 10.1002/qj.2029
  29. Privé, NC. 2021. Comment on “use of observing system simulation experiments in the united state.” Bull. Amer. Met. Soc., 102: E80E83. DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0240.1
  30. Privé, NC and Errico, RM. 2013a. The role of model and initial condition error in numerical weather forecasting investigated with an observing system simulation experiment. Tellus, 65A: 21740. DOI: 10.3402/tellusa.v65i0.21740
  31. Privé, NC, Errico, RM and Akkraoui, AE. 2022. Investigation of the potential saturation of information from global navigation satellite system radio occultation observations with an observing system simulation experiment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 150: 12931316. DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-20-0256.1
  32. Privé, NC, Errico, RM and McCarty, W. 2021. The importance of simulated errors in observing system simulation experiments. Tellus A, 73: 1117. DOI: 10.1080/16000870.2021.1886795
  33. Privé, NC, Errico, RM, Todling, R and Akkraoui, AE. 2020. Evaluation of adjoint-based observation impacts as a function of forecast length using an observing system simulation experiment. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147: 121138. DOI: 10.1002/qj.3909
  34. Privé, NC, McLinden, M, Bing, L, Moradi, I, Sienkiewicz, M, Heymsfield, GM and McCarty, W. 2023. Impacts of marine surface pressure observations from a spaceborne differential absorption radar investigated with an observing system simulation experiment. JTECH, 40(8): 897918. DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-22-0088.1
  35. Rienecker, M, Suarez, M, Todling, R, Bacmeister, J, Takacs, L, Liu, H-C, Gu, W, Sienkiewicz, M, Koster, R, Gelaro, R, Stajner, I and Nielsen, J. 2008. The GEOS-5 data assimilation system – documentation of versions 5.0.1, 5.1.0 and 5.2.0. Technical Report 27. NASA.
  36. Stoffelen, A, Marseille, G, Bouttier, F, Vasiljevic, D, de Haan, S and Cardinali, C. 2006. ADM-Aeolus Doppler wind lidar Observing System Simulation Experiment. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132: 19271947. DOI: 10.1256/qj.05.83
  37. Yu, L, Fennel, K, Wang, B, Laurent, A, Thompson, K and Shay, L. 2019. Evaluation of nonidentical versus identical twin approaches for observation impact assessments: an ensemble-Kalman-filter-based ocean assimilation application for the Gulf of Mexico. Ocean Sci., 15: 18011814. DOI: 10.5194/os-15-1801-2019
Language: English
Page range: 309 - 333
Submitted on: Aug 30, 2023
Accepted on: Oct 2, 2023
Published on: Oct 13, 2023
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Nikki C. Privé, Erica L. McGrath-Spangler, David Carvalho, Bryan M. Karpowicz, Isaac Moradi, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.