Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Additive Model Perturbations Scaled by Physical Tendencies for Use in Ensemble Prediction Cover

Additive Model Perturbations Scaled by Physical Tendencies for Use in Ensemble Prediction

Open Access
|Nov 2023

References

  1. Astakhova, E, Montani, A and Alferov, DY. 2015. Ensemble forecasts for the Sochi-2014 Olympic Games. Russian Meteorology and Hydrology, 40(8): 531539. DOI: 10.3103/S1068373915080051
  2. Baldauf, M, Seifert, A, Förstner, J, Majewski, D, Raschendorfer, M and Reinhardt, T. 2011. Operational convective-scale numerical weather prediction with the COSMO model: description and sensitivities. Monthly Weather Review, 139(12): 38873905. DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-10-05013.1
  3. Berner, J, Fossell, K, Ha, S-Y, Hacker, J and Snyder, C. 2015. Increasing the skill of probabilistic forecasts: Understanding performance improvements from model-error representations. Monthly Weather Review, 143(4): 12951320. DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-14-00091.1
  4. Bouttier, F, Fleury, A, Bergot, T and Riette, S. 2022. A single-column comparison of model-error representations for ensemble prediction. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 183(2): 167197. DOI: 10.1007/s10546-021-00682-6
  5. Bouttier, F, Vié, B, Nuissier, O and Raynaud, L. 2012. Impact of stochastic physics in a convection-permitting ensemble. Monthly Weather Review, 140(11): 37063721. DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-12-00031.1
  6. Buizza, R, Miller, M and Palmer, T. 1999. Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 125(560): 28872908. DOI: 10.1002/qj.49712556006
  7. Candille, G and Talagrand, O. 2005. Evaluation of probabilistic prediction systems for a scalar variable. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 131(609): 21312150. DOI: 10.1256/qj.04.71
  8. Christensen, H, Lock, S-J, Moroz, I and Palmer, T. 2017. Introducing independent patterns into the stochastically perturbed parametrization tendencies (SPPT) scheme. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 143(706): 21682181. DOI: 10.1002/qj.3075
  9. Clark, P, Halliwell, C and Flack, D. 2021. A physically based stochastic boundary layer perturbation scheme. Part I: Formulation and evaluation in a convection-permitting model. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 78(3): 727746. DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-19-0291.1
  10. Dorrestijn, J, Crommelin, DT, Siebesma, AP and Jonker, HJ. 2013. Stochastic parameterization of shallow cumulus convection estimated from high-resolution model data. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 27(1): 133148. DOI: 10.1007/s00162-012-0281-y
  11. Eckel, FA and Mass, CF. 2005. Aspects of effective mesoscale, short-range ensemble forecasting. Weather and Forecasting, 20(3): 328350. DOI: 10.1175/WAF843.1
  12. Efron, B and Tibshirani, RJ. 1994. An introduction to the bootstrap. CRC press. DOI: 10.1201/9780429246593
  13. Fortin, V, Abaza, M, Anctil, F and Turcotte, R. 2014. Why should ensemble spread match the RMSE of the ensemble mean? Journal of Hydrometeorology, 15(4): 17081713. DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0008.1
  14. Frogner, I-L, Andrae, U, Ollinaho, P, Hally, A, Hämäläinen, K, Kauhanen, J, Ivarsson, K-I and Yazgi, D. 2022. Model uncertainty representation in a convection-permitting ensemble — SPP and SPPT in HarmonEPS. Monthly Weather Review, 150(4): 775795. DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-21-0099.1
  15. Fuchs, A. 2014. Nonlinear dynamics in complex systems. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33552-5
  16. Gal-Chen, T and Somerville, RC. 1975. On the use of a coordinate transformation for the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 17(2): 209228. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(75)90037-6
  17. Gofa, F, Raspanti, A and Charantonis, T. 2010. Assessment of the performance of the operational forecast model COSMOGR using a conditional verification tool. In: Proc. 10th COMECAP Conference of Meteorology, Patras, Greece, Hellenic Meteorological Society.
  18. Hersbach, H. 2000. Decomposition of the continuous ranked probability score for ensemble prediction systems. Weather and Forecasting, 15(5): 559570. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<;0559:DOTCRP>2.0.CO;2
  19. Hirt, M, Rasp, S, Blahak, U and Craig, GC. 2019. Stochastic parameterization of processes leading to convective initiation in kilometer-scale models. Monthly Weather Review, 147(11): 39173934. DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-19-0060.1
  20. Kiktev, D, Joe, P, Isaac, GA, Montani, A, Frogner, I-L, Nurmi, P, Bica, B, Milbrandt, J, Tsyrulnikov, M, Astakhova, E, Bundel, A, Belair, S, Pyle, M, Muravyev, A, Rivin, G, Rozinkina, I, Paccagnella, T, Wang, Y, Reid, J, Nipen, T and Ahn, K-D. 2017. FROST-2014: The Sochi winter Olympics international project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 98(9): 19081929. DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00307.1
  21. Kober, K and Craig, GC. 2016. Physically based stochastic perturbations (PSP) in the boundary layer to represent uncertainty in convective initiation. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 73(7): 28932911. DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-15-0144.1
  22. Kwasniok, F. 2012. Data-based stochastic subgrid-scale parametrization: an approach using cluster-weighted modelling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 370(1962): 10611086. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0384
  23. Lang, ST, Lock, S-J, Leutbecher, M, Bechtold, P and Forbes, RM. 2021. Revision of the stochastically perturbed parametrisations model uncertainty scheme in the integrated forecasting system. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 147(735): 13641381. DOI: 10.1002/qj.3978
  24. Leutbecher, M, Lock, S-J, Ollinaho, P, Lang, ST, Balsamo, G, Bechtold, P, Bonavita, M, Christensen, HM, Diamantakis, M, Dutra, E, et al. 2017. Stochastic representations of model uncertainties at ECMWF: State of the art and future vision. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 143(707): 23152339. DOI: 10.1002/qj.3094
  25. Leutbecher, M and Palmer, TN. 2008. Ensemble forecasting. Journal of Computational Physics, 227(7): 35153539. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.014
  26. Machulskaya, E and Seifert, A. 2019. Stochastic differential equations for the variability of atmospheric convection fluctuating around the equilibrium. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11(8): 27082727. DOI: 10.1029/2019MS001638
  27. Maurer, D, Walser, A and Arpagaus, M. 2014. First COSMO-E experiments with the stochastically perturbed parametrization tendencies (SPPT) scheme. COSMO Newsletter, 14: 1927. DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-21-0316.1
  28. McTaggart-Cowan, R, Separovic, L, Charron, M, Deng, X, Gagnon, N, Houtekamer, PL and Patoine, A. 2022. Using stochastically perturbed parameterizations to represent model uncertainty. Part II: Comparison with existing techniques in an operational ensemble. Monthly Weather Review, 150(11): 28592882.
  29. Monin, AS and Yaglom, AM. 2013. Statistical fluid mechanics, volume II: Mechanics of turbulence, Vol. 2. Courier Corporation.
  30. Montani, A, Alferov, D, Astakhova, E, Marsigli, C and Paccagnella, T. 2014. Ensemble forecasting for Sochi-2014 Olympics: The COSMO-based ensemble prediction systems. COSMO Newsletter, 14: 8894.
  31. Montani, A, Cesari, D, Marsigli, C and Paccagnella, T. 2011. Seven years of activity in the field of mesoscale ensemble forecasting by the COSMO-LEPS system: main achievements and open challenges. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 63(3): 605624. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0870.2010.00499.x
  32. Ollinaho, P, Lock, S-J, Leutbecher, M, Bechtold, P, Beljaars, A, Bozzo, A, Forbes, RM, Haiden, T, Hogan, RJ and Sandu, I. 2017. Towards process-level representation of model uncertainties: Stochastically perturbed parametrisations in the ECMWF ensemble. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 143(702): 408422. DOI: 10.1002/qj.2931
  33. Orrell, D, Smith, L, Barkmeijer, J and Palmer, TN. 2001. Model error in weather forecasting. Nonlinear processes in geophysics, 8(6): 357371. DOI: 10.5194/npg-8-357-2001
  34. Palmer, T. 2012. Towards the probabilistic earth-system simulator: A vision for the future of climate and weather prediction. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 138(665): 841861. DOI: 10.1002/qj.1923
  35. Palmer, T, Shutts, G, Hagedorn, R, Doblas-Reyes, F, Jung, T and Leutbecher, M. 2005. Representing model uncertainty in weather and climate prediction. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 33: 163193. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122552
  36. Plant, R and Craig, GC. 2008. A stochastic parameterization for deep convection based on equilibrium statistics. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 65(1): 87105. DOI: 10.1175/2007JAS2263.1
  37. Rieger, D, Milelli, M, Boucouvala, D, Gofa, F, Iriza-Burca, A, Khain, P, Kirsanov, A, Linkowska, J and Marcucci, F. 2021. Verification of ICON in limited area mode at COSMO national meteorological services. Reports on ICON, 6. DOI: 10.5676/DWD_pub/nwv/icon_006
  38. Rivin, G, Rozinkina, I, Astakhova, E and Coauthors. 2018. The COSMO Priority Project CORSO (Consolidation of Operational and Research Results for the Sochi Olympic Games). Final Report. COSMO Technical report, (35): 249262. DOI: 10.5676/DWD_pub/nwv/cosmo-tr_35
  39. Romine, GS, Schwartz, CS, Berner, J, Fossell, KR, Snyder, C, Anderson, JL and Weisman, ML. 2014. Representing forecast error in a convection-permitting ensemble system. Monthly Weather Review, 142(12): 45194541. DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-14-00100.1
  40. Sakradzija, M, Seifert, A and Heus, T. 2015. Fluctuations in a quasi-stationary shallow cumulus cloud ensemble. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 22(1): 6585. DOI: 10.5194/npg-22-65-2015
  41. Schraff, C, Reich, H, Rhodin, A, Schomburg, A, Stephan, K, Perianez, A and Potthast, R. 2016. Kilometre-scale ensemble data assimilation for the COSMO model (KENDA). Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 142(696): 14531472. DOI: 10.1002/qj.2748
  42. Shutts, G and Pallarès, AC. 2014. Assessing parametrization uncertainty associated with horizontal resolution in numerical weather prediction models. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 372(2018): 20130284. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2013.0284
  43. Toth, Z, Talagrand, O, Candille, G and Zhu, Y. 2003. Probability and ensemble forecasts. In: Jolliffe, IT and Stephenson, DB (eds.), Forecast verification: A practitioner’s guide in atmospheric science. John Wiley and Sons. pp. 137163.
  44. Touil, H, Hussaini, M, Gotoh, T, Rubinstein, R and Woodruff, S. 2007. Development of stochastic models for turbulence. New Journal of Physics, 9(7): 215. DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/9/7/215
  45. Tsyroulnikov, MD. 2001. Proportionality of scales: An isotropy-like property of geophysical fields. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 127(578): 27412760. DOI: 10.1002/qj.49712757812
  46. Tsyrulnikov, M and Gayfulin, D. 2017. A limited-area spatio-temporal stochastic pattern generator for simulation of uncertainties in ensemble applications. Meteorol. Zeitschrift, 26(5): 549566. DOI: 10.1127/metz/2017/0815
  47. Tsyrulnikov, M and Rakitko, A. 2019. Impact of non-stationarity on hybrid ensemble filters: A study with a doubly stochastic advection-diffusion-decay model. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 145(722): 22552271. DOI: 10.1002/qj.3556
  48. Van Ginderachter, M, Degrauwe, D, Vannitsem, S and Termonia, P. 2020. Simulating model uncertainty of subgrid-scale processes by sampling model errors at convective scales. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 27(2): 187207. DOI: 10.5194/npg-27-187-2020
  49. Wastl, C, Wang, Y, Atencia, A and Wittmann, C. 2019. A hybrid stochastically perturbed parametrization scheme in a convection-permitting ensemble. Monthly Weather Review, 147(6): 22172230. DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-18-0415.1
  50. Wilks, DS. 2011. Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. Academic press.
Language: English
Page range: 334 - 357
Submitted on: Nov 22, 2022
Accepted on: Oct 21, 2023
Published on: Nov 13, 2023
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Michael Tsyrulnikov, Elena Astakhova, Dmitry Gayfulin, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.