Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quantitative and Qualitative Job Insecurity and Idea Generation: The Mediating Role of Psychological Contract Breach Cover

Quantitative and Qualitative Job Insecurity and Idea Generation: The Mediating Role of Psychological Contract Breach

Open Access
|Mar 2018

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Means, standard deviations and correlations among the variables.

MSD123456789101112131415
1. Women0.38nax
2. Age under 350.14na0.07**x
3. Age between 45–540.34na–0.01–0.29**x
4. Age over 550.20na–0.14**–0.20**–0.36**x
5. No high school degree0.20na–0.14**–0.14**0.050.23**x
6. Degree of higher ed.0.17na0.06*0.040.04–0.08**–0.23**x
7. Org. Tenure < 5 years0.18na0.06*0.51**–0.20**–0.20**–0.14**0.17**x
8. Org. Tenure > 10 years0.55na–0.13**–0.44**0.34**0.39**0.19**–0.10**–0.51**x
9. Job tenure < 1 year0.13na0.040.13**–0.04–0.10**0.03–0.040.16**–0.14**x
10. Job tenure > 5 years0.38na–0.09**–0.20**0.09**0.21**0.01–0.02–0.25**0.28**–0.30**x
11. Part-time empl.0.14na0.07*–0.02–0.020.12**0.000.02–0.050.05–0.020.09**x
12. French0.40na–0.02–0.020.00–0.05*0.040.04–0.01–0.06*0.03–0.03–0.02x
13. Qualitative JI4.491.270.00–0.08**0.04–0.07**–0.04–0.04–0.07*0.02–0.07*0.05*0.010.10**x
14. Quantitative JI3.341.420.00–0.06*0.03–0.02–0.07**0.02–0.020.010.000.06*0.04–0.11**0.57**x
15. PC breach3.191.26–0.02–0.020.06*–0.02–0.050.030.030.00–0.010.06*0.07*–0.020.36**0.43**x
16. Idea Generation5.431.15–0.01–0.07**–0.01–0.08*0.02–0.050.05–0.08**0.05–0.09**–0.030.05*–0.14**–0.15**–0.24**

[i] Note: na = not applicable, ed. = education, empl. = employment, JI = job insecurity, PC = psychological contract. Dummies: the reference groups were male, Dutch speaking, fulltime workers, with an age between 35 and 44 years, who obtained only a high school degree and have a tenure of 5 to 10 years in the company and 1 to 5 years in their job. **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.

Table 2

Fit indices of competing nested factor models, standardized maximum likelihood estimates.

Modelχ2dfRMSEASRMRCFITLIModel comparisonΔ χ2
Model 15228,313760,2180160,5140,418
Model 2802,426730,0840,0520,9310,914|Model 2–Model 1|4425,887*
Model 3700,983700,0800,0490,9400,923|Model 3–Model 2|101,443*

[i] Note: *p < .001; Model 1 = 1-factor model; Model 2 = 3-factor model (quantitative and qualitative job insecurity load on same factor); Model 3 = 4-factor model.

Table 3

Hierarchical regression analysis.

Control variablesIdea Generation
Step 2Step 3
Women–0.028–0.034
Age: Under 350.0340.037
Age: 45–54–0.0120.003
Age: Over 55–0.060–0.055
Education: no high school degree0.0150.009
Education: degree of higher Education–0.060*–0.057
Organizational tenure < 5 year–0.0040.004
Organizational tenure > 10 year–0.014–0.019
Job tenure < 1 year0.0170.017
Job tenure > 5 year–0.063–0.054
Full-time employment0.0030.017
French0.059*0.061*
Step 2
Qualitative job insecurity–0.090*–0.056
Quantitative job insecurity–0.079*–0.015
Step 3
PC breach–.198**
R2 change0.01**0.01**

[i] Notes: Standardized regression coefficients. Reference categories are: male, Dutch speaking, full-time workers, with an age between 35 and 44 years, who obtained only a high school degree and have a tenure of 5 to 10 years in the company and 1 to 5 years in their job. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.36 | Journal eISSN: 2002-2867
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 3
Submitted on: May 4, 2017
Accepted on: Feb 22, 2018
Published on: Mar 26, 2018
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2018 Wendy Niesen, Anahí Van Hootegem, Yasmin Handaja, Adalgisa Battistelli, Hans De Witte, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.