Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Measuring Trust in Public Sector Organizations – Research Note Cover

Measuring Trust in Public Sector Organizations – Research Note

Open Access
|Apr 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Description and analyses made on the study samples.

SAMPLE ASAMPLE B
ParticipantsManagersEmployees
N2401871
AnalysisDescriptive statistics, correlations, factor analysisDescriptive statistics, correlations, Multilevel CFA
SAMPLE A1SAMPLE A2
N11912115711586
AnalysisEFACFAMCFACorrelations
Table 2

Factor loadings from CFA and MCFA.

MANAGERS (SAMPLE A2) FACTOR LOADINGS WITHINEMPLOYEES (SAMPLE B) FACTOR LOADINGS WITHINEMPLOYEES (SAMPLE B) FACTOR LOADINGS BETWEENEMPLOYEES (SAMPLE B) ICC(1)
F1F2F1F2F1F2
Organizational Trust
1I have confidence in the top management and in their way of leading the organization..96.91.99.22
2I trust that the top management provides correct and honest information about conditions that affect the work being done..91.93.99.20
3I trust that the administrative staff (HR, finance, etc.) has sufficient knowledge about the operations at our workplace..48.51.86.13
4I trust that the political leadership is sufficiently familiar with the operations at my workplace..45.62.91.13
5The top management trusts that we know how to do our jobs and that we do our best for the organization..78.72.95.15
Supervisory trust
6I have confidence in my immediate manager and in their way of leading the work..93.89.99.26
7I can discuss difficulties and problems with my immediate manager without the risk of having this being used against me..86.83.96.18
8If I have problems at work that I or my work group cannot solve, I trust that the immediate manager can help take care of the situation..83.89.99.23
Table 3

Correlations between trust factors and theoretically related variables in the employee sample. Within level correlations below diagonal. Between level correlations above diagonal.

1234567
1. Organizational trust  1  .493  .669–.665  .400  .773  .630
2. Supervisory trust  .467  1  .771–.798  .611  .749  .617
3. Distributive justice  .359  .480  1–.886  .597  .762  .546
4. Turnover intention–.360–.478–.362  1–.668–.835–.686
5. Work engagement  .326  .309  .292–.412  1  .658  .517
6. Pleased with work outcome  .362  .376  .346–.461  .427  1  .917
7. Users’ needs met  .226  .212  .195–.250  .295  .464  1

[i] Note: Covariates were grand mean centered, Nwithin = 1586, Nbetween = 171. With sample size as presented in the note, all correlations are significant at p < 0.01.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.234 | Journal eISSN: 2002-2867
Language: English
Page range: 4 - 4
Submitted on: May 30, 2023
Accepted on: Mar 5, 2024
Published on: Apr 8, 2024
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Annika Härenstam, Erik Berntson, Lisa Björk, Linda Corin, Rebecca Fältén, Aleksandra Bujacz, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.